BibTex RIS Cite

Bir Kritik: Bellek, Şiddet ve Kimlik Aksında Nickel Boys (2024)

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 427 - 441, 25.07.2025

Abstract

Bu yazı, Nickel Boys (2024) filmini, geçmişin bastırılmış travmalarıyla hesaplaşan ve sessiz tanıklık üzerinden ilerleyen sinemasal bir anlatı olarak ele almaktadır. Film, 1960’ların Amerika’sında bir ıslahevinde geçen gerçek olaylara dayanırken, yalnızca tarihsel bir dram sunmakla kalmaz; aynı zamanda adaletin yokluğunu, görsel ve işitsel eksiltmelerle temsil eden özgün bir anlatım kurar. Karakterlerin bakış açılarıyla sınırlanan kamera kullanımı, izleyiciyi pasif bir seyirci olmaktan çıkararak, tanıklığın sorumluluğuna dahil etmektedir. İki karakterin kimlikleri üzerinden gelişen hikâye, bireysel belleğin kolektif hafızayla nasıl iç içe geçtiğini göstermektedir. Filmde mahkeme, yargılama ya da adaleti temsil eden hiçbir kurumun sahneye çıkmaması, adaletin bazıları için zaten en baştan imkânsız olduğunu ortaya koyarken sessizlik, film boyunca hem estetik hem de etik bir araç olarak kullanılır. Bu yazı, Nickel Boys’un görünmeyen üzerinden kurduğu anlatının, siyah geçmişin bastırılmış sesini bugünün izleyicisine taşıyan güçlü bir sinemasal tanıklık sunduğunu savunmaktadır. Popülerlikten uzak olmasına rağmen, film sanatsal sadeliği ve politik derinliğiyle önemli bir etki yaratmaktadır.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
  • Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural memory and Western civilization: Functions, media, archives. Cambridge University Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (2003). On the concept of history. In Walter Benjamin: Selected writings 1938-1940 (Vol. 4). Harvard University Press.
  • Campt, T. M. (2017). Listening to images. Duke University Press.
  • Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (2007). The souls of Black folk. Oxford University Press.
  • Hartman, S. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press.
  • Hirsch, M. (2008). The generation of postmemory. Poetics Today, 29(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-019
  • Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.
  • Kimmerle, E., Wells, E., & Jackson, A. (2011). Investigation of the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys and the Jackson Juvenile Offender Center, Marianna, Florida. United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2011/12/02/dozier_findltr_12-1-11.pdf
  • Lhamon, W. T. (2000). Raising cain: Blackface performance from Jim Crow to Hip Hop. Harvard University Press.
  • Litwack, L. F. (1998). Trouble in mind: Black southerners in the age of Jim Crow. Vintage Books.
  • Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
  • Sharpe, C. (2016). In the wake: On Blackness and being. Duke University Press.
  • Stokes, M. (2007). D. W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation: A history of "The most controversial motion picture of all time. Oxford University Press.
  • West, C. (2006). Hope on a tightrope: Words and wisdom. Hay House.
  • Woodward, C. V. (2002). The strange career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press.

A Review: Nickel Boys (2024) on the Axis of Memory, Violence and Identity

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 427 - 441, 25.07.2025

Abstract

This review analyzes Nickel Boys (2024) as a cinematic narrative shaped by suppressed historical traumas and structured through silent forms of witnessing. Based on true events that took place in a reform school in 1960s America, the film does more than present a historical drama; it constructs a unique narrative language that represents the absence of justice through visual and auditory reductions. The use of the camera, often confined to the characters’ perspectives, prevents the viewer from remaining a passive observer and instead invites them into the ethical burden of witnessing. Through the two characters’ identity, the story reveals how individual memory becomes inseparable from collective history. The lack of courtroom scenes, legal processes, or institutional representations of justice signals that, for some, justice is rendered impossible from the outset. Silence functions as both an aesthetic and ethical strategy throughout the film. This article argues that Nickel Boys delivers a powerful cinematic testimony by portraying what remains unseen and unheard, giving voice to a silenced Black past. Although it may not have gained mainstream popularity, the film leaves a lasting impression through its artistic restraint and political depth.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
  • Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural memory and Western civilization: Functions, media, archives. Cambridge University Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (2003). On the concept of history. In Walter Benjamin: Selected writings 1938-1940 (Vol. 4). Harvard University Press.
  • Campt, T. M. (2017). Listening to images. Duke University Press.
  • Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (2007). The souls of Black folk. Oxford University Press.
  • Hartman, S. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press.
  • Hirsch, M. (2008). The generation of postmemory. Poetics Today, 29(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-019
  • Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.
  • Kimmerle, E., Wells, E., & Jackson, A. (2011). Investigation of the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys and the Jackson Juvenile Offender Center, Marianna, Florida. United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2011/12/02/dozier_findltr_12-1-11.pdf
  • Lhamon, W. T. (2000). Raising cain: Blackface performance from Jim Crow to Hip Hop. Harvard University Press.
  • Litwack, L. F. (1998). Trouble in mind: Black southerners in the age of Jim Crow. Vintage Books.
  • Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.
  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
  • Sharpe, C. (2016). In the wake: On Blackness and being. Duke University Press.
  • Stokes, M. (2007). D. W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation: A history of "The most controversial motion picture of all time. Oxford University Press.
  • West, C. (2006). Hope on a tightrope: Words and wisdom. Hay House.
  • Woodward, C. V. (2002). The strange career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Communication and Media Studies (Other)
Journal Section Film Reviews
Authors

Deniz Kurtyılmaz 0000-0001-8123-8034

Publication Date July 25, 2025
Submission Date April 16, 2025
Acceptance Date May 26, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kurtyılmaz, D. (2025). A Review: Nickel Boys (2024) on the Axis of Memory, Violence and Identity. Kronotop İletişim Dergisi, 2(2), 427-441.