Reflective Tools in an English Language Teaching Context: Contributions, Challenges and Recommendations

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 181 - 204, 29.04.2021

Hülya Tuncer , Yonca Özkan

https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.671482

Cited By: 2

Öz

Learning and teaching are the essential inseparable components of any educational contexts, both of which can be facilitated by the utilization of reflective tools. Such tools enhance learners' reflective thinking skills which constitutes a solid base for constructivist learning settings. Constructivist language learning environments require teachers and learners to reflect on classroom dynamics utilizing appropriate tools. There are numerous reflective teaching tools to encourage the learners to learn more, research more, and be more open and curious about learning elements. Once these tools are utilized at an optimum level, the educational settings would yield fruitful and constructive outputs. From a constructivist stance, this study reviews four reflective tools -diaries, videos, portfolios/e-portfolios, and blogs- concerning ELT and language teacher education. This study involves a descriptive and comprehensive look by highlighting each reflective tool's impact on the partakers of the targeted educational settings. The study also presents some guidelines on how to utilize and integrate those reflective tools in ELT contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Reflective learning, Reflective tools, Diary, Video, Portfolio, Blog

İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Bağlamında Kullanılan Yansıtıcı Öğretim Araçları: Katkıları, Sınırlılıkları ve Öneriler

Öz

Öğrenme ve öğretim birbiriyle iç içe geçmiş kavramlar olup her ikisi de yansıtıcı öğretim araçları ile pekiştirebilmektedir. Bu türdeki öğretim araçları yabancı dil öğrencilerinin yansıtıcı düşünce becerilerini geliştirerek onların daha sağlam temellerle düşünce gücünü artırmada ivme kazandırmaktadır. Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Kuramı bağlamında gerek öğretmen gerek öğrenciler yansıtıcı araçlarla sınıf içi yansıtıcı düşünce ortamına katkıda bulunabilmektedir. Alanda, farklı özelliklerde yansıtıcı öğretim araçları mevcuttur. Yansıtıcı öğretim araçları, eğitim ortamında en uygun şekilde kullanıldığında eğitim öğretim ortamına verimli çıktılar sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Yapılandırmacı Kuram Bağlamında dört ana yansıtıcı öğretim aracını (günlük, video, portfolyo/e-portfolyo, blog) İngiliz Dili Eğitimi ve İngilizce öğretmeni yetiştirme bağlamında ele almaktadır. Bu çalışma, anılan bu yansıtıcı öğretim araçlarının dil öğrenimi ve öğretmen yetiştirme üzerine etkisini betimleyici bir bakış açışıyla eğitim düzleminde çok yönlü ele almaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma yansıtıcı öğretim araçlarının sınıf ve sınıf dışı düzlemlerde nasıl kullanılabileceğini içeren tavsiyelere de yer vermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yansıtıcı öğretim, Yansıtıcı öğretim araçları, Günlük, Video, Portfolyo, Blog

Kaynakça

• Arslan, R. S. (2013). Integrating feedback into prospective English language teachers' writing process via blogs and portfolios. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 131-150.
• Ayan, D., & Seferoğlu, G. (2011).Using electronic portfolios to promote reflective thinking in language teacher education. Educational Studies, 37(5), 513-521.
• Bailey, K. M., & Ochsner, R. (1983). A methodological review of the diary studies: Windmill tilting or social science? In K. M. Bailey, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies, (pp.188-198). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/ Newbury House.
• Bataineh, R. F., Al‐Karasneh, S. M., Al‐Barakat, A. A., & Bataineh, R. F. (2007). Jordanian Pre‐service Teachers' Perceptions of the Portfolio as a Reflective Learning Tool. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 435-454.
• Black, G.L. (2015). Developing teacher candidates’ self-efficacy through reflection and supervising teacher support. In Education, 21(1), 78-98.
• Blackstone B., Spiri, J., & Naganuma, N. (2007). Blogs in English language teaching and learning: Pedagogical uses and student responses. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1–20. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253230215_Blogs_in_English_language_teaching_and_learning_Pedagogical_uses_and_student_responses
• Debreli, E. (2011). Use of diaries to investigate and track pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning English as a foreign language throughout a pre-service training program. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 60-65.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: DC Heath.
• Eröz-Tuğa, B. (2013). Reflective feedback sessions using video recordings. ELT Journal, 67(2), 175-183.
• Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2008).Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 123- 136.http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/farmer.html
• Featro, S. M., & DiGregorio, D. (2016). Blogging as an instructional tool in the ESL classroom. TESL-EJ, 20(1).
• Heartel, E. H. (1990). Performance tests, simulations and other methods, in: J. Millman & L. Darling Hammond (Eds). The new handbook of teacher evaluation (Newbury Park, CA, Sage), 278 – 294.
• Kır, E. (2012). Diary keeping in English lessons. Education Sciences, 7(4), 1082-1094.
• Krishnan, L. A., & Hoon, L. H. (2002). Diaries: Listening to ‘voices’ from the multicultural classroom. ELT Journal, 56(3), 227-239.
• Lee, E. & Lew, L. (2001). Diary studies: The voices of nonnative English speakers in a master of arts program in teaching English to speakers of other languages. CATESOL Journal, 13(1), 135-149.
• Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers' beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher's theories. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175-191.
• Ma, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System, 43, 101-113.
• Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
• Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains ‘untold’. Educational Research, 47(1), 25 – 44.
• Orlova, N. (2009). Video recording as a stimulus for reflection in pre-service EFL teacher training. English Teaching Forum, 47(2), 30-35.
• Özkan, Y. (2011). Blogging in a teaching skills course for pre-service teachers of English as a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 655-670.
• Payant, C. (2014). Incorporating video-mediated reflective tasks in MATESOL programs. TESL Canada Journal, 31(2), 1-21.
• Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. USA: Basic Books.
• Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 42, 193–205.
• Susoy, Z. (2015). Watch your teaching: A reflection strategy for EFL pre-service teachers through video recordings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 163-171.
• Viáfara González, J. J., & Eugenia López, M. (2011). Portfolios across the EFL curriculum: Methodological perspectives of their use in university settings. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 13(2), 114-129. Retrieved November 15, 2018, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-46412011000200009&lng=en&tlng=en.
• Wade, R. C., & Yarbrough, D. B. (1996). Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education?. Teaching and teacher education, 12(1), 63-79. Wiggins, G. (1993) Assessing student performance: Exploring the purposes and limits of testing. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
• Wolf, K., & Dietz, M. (1998). Teaching portfolios: Purposes and possibilities. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 25(1), 9–22.
• Yastıbaş, A. E., & Yastıbaş, G. C. (2015).The use of E-portfolio-based assessment to develop students’ self-regulated learning in English language teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, Pages 3-13.