Research Article

Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis

Volume: 6 Number: 1 January 12, 2020
TR EN

Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis

Abstract

Objective: Wound infections constitute the most prevalent postoperative complication encountered by orthopedists. Lack of timely and correct treatment may lead to chronic wound infections. Therefore, this study aims to guide empirical treatment, investigate the isolated bacteria and associated antibiotic resistance states in wound cultures obtained after orthopedic surgery.

Methods: In the three-year period between January 2016 and end of December 2018, 3100 patients were operated in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic of the Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Training and Research Hospital. Wound cultures obtained from patients operated due to wound infections were retrospectively evaluated. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in accordance with EUCAST guidelines using disc diffusion methods and the VITEK 2 Compact® (Biomerieux, France) automated system.

Results: A total of 284 wound culture specimens were evaluated, and 85 (22.9%) of these demonstrated significant bacterial growth. Monomicrobial growth was detected in 92% and polymicrobial growth was found in 8% of the cultures. The most commonly isolated microorganism was Escherichia coli (22.3%), followed by coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) (20%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9.4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.4%) and Streptococcus spp. (5.8%) respectively. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) positivity was determined as 100% and 25% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. Carbapenems were found to be the most effective antibiotics to Enterobacteriales family. Gram positive bacteria were not resistant against vancomycin and teicoplanin, but 7.6% of S. aureus strains and 57.1% of CoNS were methicillin-resistant.

Conclusion: Identification and monitoring of causative microorganisms in postoperative wound infections and antibiotic resistance rates at every hospital is quite important. Taking these findings into consideration will result in better prevention of infections, increased treatment success, and decreased antibiotic resistance rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbul A. Wound healing. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 8th edition, Brunicardi FC (Ed), New York. McGraw-Hill, 2005; p. 223–249.
  2. Gündem NS, Çıkman A. Yara kültürlerinden izole edilen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. ANKEM Derg. 2012;26(4):165-170.
  3. Görmeli G, Duman Y, Karakaplan M, et al. Orthopedic Surgical Wound Infection: Microorganisms and Resistance Figures. J Turgut Ozal Med Cent. 2015;22(1):13-17.
  4. Cirit OS, Müderris T, Mızraklı AU, Vurupalmaz Y, Barış A. Yara kültürlerinden izole edilen aerop bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg. 2014;44(4):149-157.
  5. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 8, 2018. http://www.eucast.org.
  6. Savcı Ü, Alıç T, Güreser AS, Özkan AT. Ortopedik cerrahi sonrası yara enfeksiyonları: mikroorganizmaların dağılımları ve direnç durumları. Ortadogu Tıp Derg. 2018;10(4):492-497.
  7. Derbentli Ş. Cerrahi infeksiyonlarda dirençli Gram pozitif bakteri sorunu. ANKEM Derg 2004;8(Ek 2): E215-221.
  8. Dikici N, Sümer Ş, Ural O. Cerrahi Alan Enfeksiyonları ve Profilaksisi. Selçuk Tıp Antimikrobik Bülteni. 2011;1(2):1-15.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 12, 2020

Submission Date

July 14, 2019

Acceptance Date

October 19, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Sezgin, H., & Milletli Sezgin, F. (2020). Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.591869
AMA
1.Sezgin H, Milletli Sezgin F. Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis. KOU Sag Bil Derg. 2020;6(1):12-16. doi:10.30934/kusbed.591869
Chicago
Sezgin, Hicabi, and Fikriye Milletli Sezgin. 2020. “Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-Year Analysis”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (1): 12-16. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.591869.
EndNote
Sezgin H, Milletli Sezgin F (January 1, 2020) Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6 1 12–16.
IEEE
[1]H. Sezgin and F. Milletli Sezgin, “Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis”, KOU Sag Bil Derg, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–16, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.30934/kusbed.591869.
ISNAD
Sezgin, Hicabi - Milletli Sezgin, Fikriye. “Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-Year Analysis”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 6/1 (January 1, 2020): 12-16. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.591869.
JAMA
1.Sezgin H, Milletli Sezgin F. Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis. KOU Sag Bil Derg. 2020;6:12–16.
MLA
Sezgin, Hicabi, and Fikriye Milletli Sezgin. “Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-Year Analysis”. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 12-16, doi:10.30934/kusbed.591869.
Vancouver
1.Hicabi Sezgin, Fikriye Milletli Sezgin. Evaluation of Postoperative Wound Culture Results at an Orthopedic Clinic: A Three-year Analysis. KOU Sag Bil Derg. 2020 Jan. 1;6(1):12-6. doi:10.30934/kusbed.591869

Cited By