Sosyal Sağlık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amaç sağlığın sosyal belirleyicileri ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini yapmaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 434 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak sosyal sağlık ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada açıklayıcı faktör analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve korelasyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenirliliği için CR, AVE ve Cronbach Alpha değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Sosyal sağlık ölçeğinin açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda genel sosyal sağlık, riskli sosyal davranışlar, ekonomik boyut ve soyutlanma olmak üzere dört farklı boyutta dağılım gösterdiği görülmüştür. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği ve model uyum değerlerinin iyi düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: Sosyal sağlık ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun, geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Sosyal sağlık ölçeği Türkçe versiyonu 14 madde ve dört boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal sağlık düzeylerini değerlendirmek amacıyla bu ölçek kullanılabilir.

Keywords

• Sağlık
• üniversite öğrencileri
• sosyal belirleyiciler
• öğrencilerin sosyal sağlığı

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

YOK

Thanks

YOK

TURKISH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE SOCIAL HEALTH SCALE

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to establish the validity and reliability of the Social Determinants of Health Scale in Turkish. Material and Methods: The study sample consisted of 434 university students, with data collection accomplished using the Social Health Scale. The research employed exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analyses. The validity and reliability of the scale, values for CR, AVE, and Cronbach Alpha were calculated. Results: Exploratory factor analysis results indicated that the Social Health Scale consists of four distinct dimensions: general social health, risky social behaviors, economic dimension, and isolation. The structure validity and model fit values of the scale were determined to be satisfactory. Conclusion: The results of the study confirmed the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Social Health Scale, which comprises 14 items and four dimensions. This tool may be used to evaluate the social health levels of university students.

Keywords

• Health
• university students
• social determinants
• social health of students

Project Number

YOK

References

1. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization: Basic Documents. Forty-fifth Edition, Supplement, October 1984. World Health Organization. 1984.
2. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):458-67.
3. Teo AR, Choi H, Valenstein M. Social relationships and depression: Ten-year follow-up from a nationally representative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193522.
4. Lipson SK, Gaddis SM, Heinze J, Beck K, Eisenberg D. Variations in student mental health and treatment utilization across US colleges and universities. J Am Coll Health. 2018;66(5):389-96.
5. Stallman HM, Ohan JL. A systematic review of treatments for university students with anxiety. Aust Psychol. 2018;53(2):173-82.
6. Chen X, Li M, Wang M, Wang X. Social support, depression, and suicidal ideation among Chinese college students: A structural equation model. J Affect Disord. 2018;229:327-32.
7. Gao W, Ping S, Liu X, Li J. Mental health problems among Chinese college students: The role of meaning in life and social support. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2102.
8. Huang L, Wang Z. Longitudinal effects of social support on life satisfaction among Chinese university students: Mitigating the impact of perceived stress. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(1):39- 54.

9. Yu S, Chen Y, Williams DR. Social participation and self-rated health among college students in China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1-9.
10. Sivertsen B, Harvey AG, Pallesen S, Hysing M, Eid J. Trajectories of sleep problems from adolescence to adulthood: A population-based longitudinal study from Norway. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(4):e12944.
11. Sivertsen B, Råkil H, Munkvik E, Lønning KJ. Sleep, exercise, and diet in university students: Associations with mental health, subjective well- being, and academic performance. J Adolesc. 2020;80:204-12.
12. Chen Y, Feeley TH, Chen M. Social support, social strain, sleep quality, and health: A longitudinal mediation analysis. J Health Psychol. 2018;23(11):1392-402.
13. Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well- being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359(1449):1435-46.
14. Keyes CL. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(3):539-48.
15. Gumora G, Arsenio WF. Emotionality, emotion regulation, and school performance in middle school children. J Sch Psychol. 2002;40(5):395-413.
16. DeBerard MS, Spielmans GI, Julka DL. Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. Coll Student J. 2004;38(1):66-80.
17. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB. Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge University Press. 2008.
18. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. 2018. Accessed [Date]. https://www.bls.gov/cps/.
19. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469-480.
20. Maloney EA, Grawitch MJ, Barber LK. The multi- factor structure of the Brief Self-Control Scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. J Res Pers. 2006;40(5):898-903.
21. Anderson CA, Anderson KB, Dorr N, DeNeve KM, Flanagan M. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2016;142(5):526-45.
22. Johnson KF, Brookover DL, Bradbrook K. Social health needs and promotive health factors scale for college students: Scale development and initial validation. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(1):74-83.
23. Gürbüz S, Şahin F. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2014.
24. Karagöz Y. SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler. Nobel Yayıncılık; 2018.
25. Hair JF, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ. Investigación de mercados: En un ambiente de información digital (4a ed.). México D.F.: McGraw Hill; 2010.
26. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Allen & Unwin; 2005.
27. Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J.Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. J Educ Res. 2006;99(6):323-38.
28. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications; 2015.
29. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage Publications; 2016.