STEM ÖĞRENME MODÜLÜ GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: TASARIM TABANLI ARAŞTIRMA UYGULAMASI

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 390 - 424, 09.02.2022

Hilmi Doğan , Ayşe Savran Gencer , Kadir Bilen

Abstract

Tasarım tabanlı araştırma yöntemiyle modellenen bu çalışma, ortaokul beşinci sınıf fen bilimleri dersi ünitelerinin bütünleşik STEM eğitimi yaklaşımıyla tasarlanması, uygulanması ve değerlendirilmesine ilişkin tasarım ilkelerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bununla birlikte çalışma tasarım tabanlı araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak bütünleşik STEM eğitimi öğrenme modüllerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir tasarım çerçevesi de sunmaktadır. Çalışmada bütünleşik STEM eğitimi tasarım ilkeleri alan yazın taraması ve uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda belirlenmiş, bu ilkeler doğrultusunda tersine tasarım yaklaşımı temel alınarak öğrenme modülleri geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen öğrenme modüllerinin uygulanması sürecinde öğrencilerin öğrenme deneyimlerine ilişkin veriler yansıtıcı açık uçlu sorular ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular bütünleşik STEM eğitimi tasarım ilkeleri doğrultusunda geliştirilen öğrenme modüllerinin öğrenci deneyimlerini olumlu yönde etkilediği, belirlenen tasarım ilkelerinin ve tasarım çerçevesinin mevcut fen bilimleri dersi ünitelerinin bütünleşik STEM ünitelerine dönüştürmede kullanışlı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Bütünleşik STEM eğitimi, tasarım tabanlı araştırma, tersine tasarım

References

• Abdallah, M. M. S. (2011). Web-based new literacies and EFL curriculum design in teacher education: A design study for expanding EFL student teachers’ language-related literacy practices in an Egyptian pre-service teacher education programme. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Exeter Graduate School of Education, Exeter. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523062.pdf
• Abdallah, M. M., & Wegerif, R. B. (2014). Design-based research (DBR) in educational enquiry and technological studies: A version for PhD students targeting the integration of new technologies and literacies into educational contexts. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED546471
• Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M., Öner, T., ve Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: Günümüz modası mı yoksa gereksinim mi?. İstanbul: İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi STEM Merkezi. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281098450
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813
• Balka, D. (2011). Standards of mathematical practice and STEM. Math–Science Connector, pp. 6–8. Retrieved from http://ssma.play-cello.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ MathScienceConnector-summer2011.pdf
• Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1),21-24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021
• Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. doi.10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
• Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. Internet Environments for Science Education, 73-85.
• Berland, L. K. (2013). Designing for STEM integration. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3(1), 3.
• Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2007). Design research: Foundational perspectives, critical tensions, and arenas for action. Children’s learning in and out of school: Essays in honor of Ann Brown, 89-111.
• Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton and T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM roadmap: A framework for integration (pp. 23–37). London: Taylor & Francis.
• Burrows, A., Lockwood, M., Borowczak, M., Janak, E., & Barber, B. (2018). Integrated STEM: Focus on informal education and community collaboration through engineering. Education Sciences, 8(4). http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010004
• Bush, S. B. (2019). National reports on STEM education: What are the implications for K-12? In A. Sahin & M. Mohr-Schroeder (Eds.), STEM education 2.0 myths and truths: What has K-12 STEM education research taught us? (pp. 72–90). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Publishing.
• Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M. & Morgan, J. (Eds.). (2013). Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense.
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
• Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
• Çorlu, M. S. (2017). STEM: Bütünleşik öğretmenlik çerçevesi [STEM: Integrated Teaching Framework]. In M. S. Çorlu & E. Çallı (Eds.), STEM Kuram ve Uygulamaları (pp. 1–10). İstanbul: Pusula.
• Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: an analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942.
• Design-Based Research Collective (DBRC) (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
• Dilekli, Y. (2019). Etkinliklerle düşünme eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Doğan, H., Gencer, A. S., ve Bilen, K. (2017). Fen ve mühendislik uygulaması: Yenilenebilir ve yenebilir araba yarışması etkinliği üzerine bir durum çalışması. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 7(2), 62-85.
• Dolmans, D. H., & Tigelaar, D. (2012). Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60. Medical Teacher, 34(1), 1-10.
• Edelson, D.C. (2006). Balancing innovation and risk: Assessing design research proposals. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney& N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 100-106). London: Routledge.
• Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. Educational Design Research, 17-51.
• Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560.doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
• Herbert, J., & Stipek, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children’s perceptions of their academic competence. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 26(3), 276-295.
• Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 4089-4097). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Johnson C. C., (2013). Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 367-368. doi: 10.1111/ ssm.12043.
• Johnson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M., Moore, T., & English, L. (2020). Handbook of research on STEM education. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381
• Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by Design: Strategies and Activities for Grades 4-8. New York: Routledge.
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 11.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
• Koç, S. R. ve Kayacan, K. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin 2018 fen bilimleri öğretim programında yer alan mühendislik ve tasarım becerilerine ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(19), 865-881.
• Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğrenme ortamlarının tasarımı ve geliştirilmesinde kullanımı. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19-35. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts Science and Technology Engineering Curriculum Framework. ERIC Clearinghouse.
• McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel verilerin analizi. Turan. S. (Ed.), Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber içinde (s.161- 198). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Meyrick, K. M. (2011). How STEM education improves student learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14(1), 1-6.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018a). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018b). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018c). Teknoloji ve tasarım dersi öğretim programı (ortaokul 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
• Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu (1973, 27 Haziran) Resmi Gazete (Sayı 14574) Erişim adresi: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf
• Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel and M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
• Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Guzey, S. S. (2016). The need for a STEM road map. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), In Stem road map: A framework for integrated STEM education, 3-12. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Moore, T. J., Johnston, A. C., & Glancy, A. W. (2020). STEM integration: A synthesis of conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education, 1st ed.; Johnson, CC, Mohr-Schroeder, MJ, Moore, TJ, English, LD, Eds, 3-16. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10.
• Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the classroom. TIES (Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM), 20. http://daytonos.com/pdf/stem.pdf
• Myers, A. (2015). The STEM shift: A guide for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
• Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2017.1289775
• Nathan, M. J., Srisurichan, R., Walkington, C., Wolfgram, M., Williams, C., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Building cohesion across representations: A mechanism for STEM integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 77–116. http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20000
• National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press.
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Özbilen, A. G. (2018). Stem eğitimine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri ve farkindaliklari. Scientific Educational Studies, 2(1), 1-21.
• Özcan, H. ve Düzgünoğlu, H. (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi 2017 taslak öğretim programına ilişkin öğret¬men görüşleri. International Journal of Active Learning (IJAL), 2(2), 28-47.
• Özcan, Ö., Oran Ş. ve Arık S. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi 2013 ve 2017 öğretim programlarının öğret¬men görüşlerine göre karşılaştırmalı incelenmesi. Başkent University Journal of Education, 5(2),156-166.
• Plomp T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 11-37). Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2017). 2023’e doğru Türkiye’de STEM gereksinimi. 10 Aralık 2017 tarihinde https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/gundem/dijital/2023e-dogru-turkiyede-stem-gereksinimi.html adresinden erişildi.
• Regehr, G. (2010). It’s not rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44, 31–39. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x
• Rittmayer, M.A. & Beier, M.E. (2009). Self-Efficacy in STEM. In B. Bogue & E. Cady (Eds.). Applying Research to Practice (ARP) Resources. Retrieved from http://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/ARPresources.aspx
• Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
• Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
• Saraç, E., & Yıldırım, M. S. (2019). 2018 fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 138-151. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 4.
• Stein, M., & Muzzin, M. (2018). Learning from failure. Science and Children, 55(8), 62–65. https://doi.org/10. 2505/4/sc18_055_08_62
• Swartz, R. J., Costa, A. L., Beyer, B. K., Reagan, R., & Kallick, B. (2008). Thinking-Based Learning: Promoting Quality Student Achievement in the 21st Century. Teachers College Press. 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
• Toulmin, C. N., & Meghan, G. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association.
• Ural Keleş, P. (2018). 2017 Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı hakkında beşinci sınıf fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 121-142. doi:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s6m
• van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.
• Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Walker, W., Moore, T., Guzey, S., & Sorge, B. (2018). Frameworks to develop integrated STEM curricula. K-12 STEM Education, 4(2), 331-339.
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
• Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.
• Yıldırım, B. (2018). Teoriden pratiğe STEM eğitimi: Uygulama kitabı. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19.