Effect of Use of Potato Chips Waste as a Source of Easily Soluble Carbohydrates in Alfalfa Silage on Silage Quality.

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 26 - 29, 30.04.2023

Besime Doğan Daş , Mehmet Avcı , Aydın Daş , Nurcan Kırar , Mücahit Kahraman , Mehmet Emin Aydemir

https://doi.org/10.24880/maeuvfd.1204050

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study was carried out to examine the effect of adding potato chips waste, which is a by-product of the potato processing industry, on silage quality, as an easily soluble carbohydrate source, to the alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plant, which has a high buffering capacity and is therefore difficult to ensilage. In the study, alfalfa (Medicago sativa) harvested at the 10% flowering point was used as the plant material. Four different groups were formed by adding the silage groups prepared in the study, alfalfa plant control (without additives), and potato chips waste at the rates of 0.5%, 1% and 2% on a wet weight basis to the alfalfa plants. The silages were opened at the end of the 60-day fermentation period and raw nutrient compositions and fermentation products were identified. When the effects of the silages prepared by adding different levels of chip waste to alfalfa plant on the nutrient value were examined, the differences between the groups in terms of dry matter (DM), crude ash (CA), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content of the silages obtained from the study were statistically significant. While it was not significant in terms of CP content, the differences between the silage groups were found to be statistically significant. In the study, when the pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), carbon dioxide (CO2) production and total yeast mold values of the fermentation properties of the silages were examined, decreases were observed due to the addition of chips compared to the control group. When the total lactic acid bacteria (LAB) values of the silages were examined, an increase was observed after the addition of 1% chips. As a result, when all the parameters were examined, it was determined that the silages prepared by adding 1% chips waste had positive effects on silage fermentation.

Keywords

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), potato chips waste, silage

Supporting Institution

Not applicable.

Thanks

Not applicable.

References

• 1.AOAC. (1990). Official methods of analysis, Associationof official analytical chemists, Washington DC.
• 2.Ashbell, G., Weinberg, Z. G., Azrieli, A., Hen, Y., & Horev, B. (1991). A simple system to study the aerobic determination of silages. Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 34, 171-175.
• 3.Basmacıoğlu, H., & Ergül, M. (2002). Silage Microbiology. Journal of Animal Production, 43(1), 12-24.
• 4.Berksan, Ö. F. (2002). Patates tarımı. Kar Tarım, Ankara.
• 5.Bingöl, N. T., Bolat, D., Karslı, M. A., & Akça, İ. (2009).Effects of molasses addition into barley-sainfoin mixture at varying levels on silage quality and digestibility. Atatürk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 4(1), 23-30.
• 6.Broderick, G. A., & Kang, J. H. (1980). Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 63(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
• 7.Canbolat, Ö., Kalkan, H., & Filya, İ. (2013). Yonca silajlarında katkı maddesi olarak gladiçya meyvelerinin (Gleditsia tri-acanthos) kullanılma olanakları. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2012.7710
• 8.Canbolat, O., Kalkan, N., Karaman, Ș., & Filya, I. (2010).The investigation of possibility of grape pomace as carbohyd-rate source in alfalfa silages. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fa-kültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 269-276.
• 9.Çerçi, İ. H., Şahin, K., Güler, T., & Tatlı, P. (1996).Farklı oranlarda silajlık mısır yonca kullanılarak yapılan silajların kalitesinin belirlenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 10(2), 193-200.
• 10.Driehuis, F., & Elferink, S. O. (2000). The impact of thequality of silage on animal health and food safety: a review. Veterinary Quarterly, 22(4), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1080 /01652176.2000.9695061
• 11.Ergün, A., Tuncer, Ş. D., Çolpan, İ., Yalçın, S., Yıldız,G., Küçükersan, M. K., ... & Saçaklı, P. (2013). Yemler Yem Hijye-ni ve Teknolojisi, Genişletilmiş 5. Baskı, Ankara, 448.
• 12.Filya, I. (2000, September 4-6). New developments inincreasing silage quality. International Animal Nutrition Cong-ress, Isparta, Türkiye, 243-250.
• 13.Filya, I. (2001). Aerobic stability of sorghum and maizesilages treated with homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria. In Proceedings of the Turkey-Israeli work-shop on silage and agricultural by-products for high lactating cows (pp. 24-26). Bet Dagan, Israel.
• 14.Filya, İ. (2011). Silaj Fermantasyonu. AtatürkÜniversite-si Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1).
• 15.Filya, I. (2002). The effects of lactic acid bacteria andlactic acid bacteria + enzyme mixture silage inoculants on corn silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 26(3), 679-687.
• 16.Güler, T. (2001). Silaj ve Hayvan Beslemede Kullanımı.Konferanslar. Fırat Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Elazığ. 27-36.
• 17. Güney, F., & Ertürk, Ö. (2020). Determination of the ef-fects of propolis ethanolic extract on some properties of fru-it yoghurt during storage. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.694712
• 18. Hofvendahl, K., & Hahn–Hägerdal, B. (2000). Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from re-newable resources1. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 26(2-4), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00155-6
• 19. McDowell, L. R. (1989). Vitamins in Animal Nutrition (pp. 57-67). Academic Press. INC. Santiago, California.
• 20. Oktay, E., Olgun, H., & Ünal, S. (1990). Çeşitli Koşul-larda Kurutulan Yoncanın Besin Değeri Kaybı Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergi-si, 24(1-4), 3-14.
• 21. Onaran, H., Ünlenen, L., & Doğan, A. (2000). Patates tarımı, sorunları ve çözüm yolları. Patates Araştırma Enstitüsü, Niğde.
• 22. Özdemir, P., & Malayoğlu, H. B. (2017). Patates işleme endüstrisi yan ürünleri ve hayvan beslemede değerlendirilme-si. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 5(1), 93-97.
• 23. Polan, C. E., Stieve, D. E., & Garrett, J. L. (1998). Pro-tein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with heat, formic acid, ammonia, or microbial inocu-lant. Journal of Dairy Science, 81(3), 765-776. https://doi. org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75633-4
• 24. SPSS, (2008). Inc, SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version, Chicago.
• 25. Şahin, K., Çerçi, İ. H., Güler, T., Şahin, N., Kalander, H., & Çelik, S. (1999). The effects of different silage additives on the quality of sugar beet pulp silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 23, 285-292.
• 26. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A., (1991): Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non star-ch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(91)78551-2