KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON

Tuncer Yılmaz

doi:10.12981/mahder.584130

TR EN

KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON

Abstract

Edebiyat ve kültürel çalışmalar ele alındığında, edebi türlerin arasındaki sınırların bulanıklaştığı ve bunların giderek birbirine yaklaştığı, dahası kimi durumlarda birbirine geçtiği görülür. Bu durumun izlerini Antik döneme kadar sürmek olasıdır. Geride bıraktığımız yüzyılın en önemli edebiyat kuramcılarından biri olarak kabul edilen Mikhail Bakhtin, roman türünün köklerini de antikiteye dayandırarak türün ortaya çıkmasında ve gelişmesinde karnavalın, Sokratik diyalogların ve en önemlisi de Menippusçu hicvin önemine değinir. Bu çalışmada, İngiliz yazar Samuel Butler’ın Erewhon adlı hiciv romanında Menippusçu hicvin izleri aranacaktır.

Keywords

Karnaval, Menippusçu Hiciv, Samuel Butler, Erewhon

References

ABRAMS, M. H. (1993). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Toronto: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
ALLEN, G. (2000). Intertextuality: The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge.
BAKHTIN, M. (2004a). Carnival and the Carnivalesque. John Storey, (Ed.). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader (s. 246-255). Georgia: University of Georgia Press. BAKHTIN, M. (2004b). Discourse in the Novel. The Dialogic Imagination. Michael Holquist (Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
BAKHTIN, M. (2006). Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. Caryl Emerson (Çev.) Minneapolis ve Londra: University of Minnesota Press.
BLANCHARD, W. S. (1995). Scholars’ Beldham: Menippean Satire in the Renaissance. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
BOOKER, M. K. (1995). Flann O’Brien, Bakhtin, and Menippean Satire. New York: Syracuse University Press.
BRODIE, T. L. (2004). The Birthing of the New Testament: The Intertextual Development of the New Testament Writings. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
BURNYEAT, M. (1990). The Theaetetus of Plato. M. J. Levett (Çev.). Indiana: Hackett Publishing.
BUTLER, S. (1920) Erewhon Revisited, New York: E. P. Dutton&Company.
BUTLER, S. (1970) Erewhon, or Over the Range, Londra: Penguin.

DA MATTA, R. (1991). Carnivals, Rogues and Heroes: An interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
EMERSON, C. (2004). On the Generation that Squandered its Philosophers (Losev, Bakhtin, and Classical Thought as Equipment for Living). Studies in Eastern European Thought, 56 (2/3) 95-117.
FREUDENBURG, K. (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FRYE, N. (1971). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
HOLLAND, P. (1979). Robert Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy and Menippean Satire, Humanist and English. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). University of London: Londra.
HUMPHREY, C. (2001). The Politics of Carnival: Festive Misrule in Medieval England. Manchester: Manchaster University Press.
JONES, H. F. (1919). Samuel Butler, Author of Erewhon (1835-1902): A Memoir. II. Cilt. Londra: McMillan and Co..
JONES, M. V. (2005). Dostoyevsky After Bakhtin: Readings in Dostoyevsky’s Fantastic Realism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KENNEDY, G. A. (2003). Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden: Society of Biblical Literature.
KIERKEGAARD, S. (1989). The Concept of Irony. Howard V. Hong ve Edna H. Hong (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
KRISTEVA, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Leon S. Roudiez (Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
LUCIAN. (2007). Trips to the Moon, Thomas Francklin (Çev.) Middlesex: Echo Library Publishing.
MCCARTHY, B. P. (1936). The Form of Varro’s Menippean satires. The University of Missouri Studies: Philological Studies in Honour of Walter Miller.
NIELSEN, G. M. (2002). The Norms of Answerability: Social Theory Between Bakhtin and Habermas. Albany: State University of New York Press.
PAYNE, F. A. (1981). Chaucer and Menippean Satire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
RAPPAPORT, R. A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SCHECHNER, R. (2004). Carnival (theory) after Bakhtin. Milla Cozart Riggio, (Ed.). Carnival: Culture in Action, Trinidad Experience (s. 3-12). New York: Routledge.
SHEPHERD, D. G. (1993). Introduction: (Mis)Representing Bakhtin, Critical Studies. 3(2).
SHERBERT, G. (1996). Menippean Satire and the Poetics of Wit: Ideologies of Self-Consciousness in Dunton, D’Urfey, and Sterne. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
SUÁREZ, J. I. (1993). The Carnival Stage: Vincentine Comedy in Serio-Comic Mode. Cranbury: Associated University Press.
WEINBROT, H. D. (2005). Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to Eighteenth Century. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Creative Arts and Writing

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tuncer Yılmaz ^*
0000-0001-6585-8284
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 20, 2019

Submission Date

June 28, 2019

Acceptance Date

July 26, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 12 Number: 27

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.584130

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93PP82MR

APA

Yılmaz, T. (2019). KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 12(27), 849-870. https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.584130

AMA

1.Yılmaz T. KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON. Motif Academy. 2019;12(27):849-870. doi:10.12981/mahder.584130

Chicago

Yılmaz, Tuncer. 2019. “KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON”. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi 12 (27): 849-70. https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.584130.

EndNote

Yılmaz T (September 1, 2019) KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi 12 27 849–870.

IEEE

[1]T. Yılmaz, “KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON”, Motif Academy, vol. 12, no. 27, pp. 849–870, Sept. 2019, doi: 10.12981/mahder.584130.

ISNAD

Yılmaz, Tuncer. “KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON”. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi 12/27 (September 1, 2019): 849-870. https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.584130.

JAMA

1.Yılmaz T. KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON. Motif Academy. 2019;12:849–870.

MLA

Yılmaz, Tuncer. “KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON”. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 27, Sept. 2019, pp. 849-70, doi:10.12981/mahder.584130.

Vancouver

1.Tuncer Yılmaz. KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON. Motif Academy. 2019 Sep. 1;12(27):849-70. doi:10.12981/mahder.584130

Cited By

Karnavalizmin Çocuk Edebiyatına Yansıması ve Pedagojik İşlevi

Akademik Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.34083/akaded.796048

KARNAVALİZM, SOKRATİK DİYALOG, MENİPPUSÇU HİCİV VE EREWHON

Abstract

Keywords

CARNIVALISM, SOCRATIC DIALOGUE, MENIPPEAN SATIRE AND EREWHON

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Karnavalizmin Çocuk Edebiyatına Yansıması ve Pedagojik İşlevi