Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH NEXUS: ASYMMETRIC PANEL CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR THE FRAGILE FIVE COUNTRIES

Year 2022, , 542 - 560, 23.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.913434

Abstract

Economic growth is one of the main macroeconomic variables with which financial development interacts. The main aim of developing countries is to become a developed country with stable and sustainable growth. In this study, the causality relationship between financial development and economic growth is investigated in five developing countries, called the fragile five countries. In the study in which the 1980-2019 period data of the mentioned countries are used, asymmetric panel causality analysis is performed after the traditional and new unit root tests. According to the results of the causality analysis, it is revealed that “supply-leading hypothesis” and “demand-following hypothesis” are valid for Indonesia whereas “ feedback hypothesis” is valid for Turkey. This situation can be interpreted as the variables used in the causality relationship and the sample group are effective, and these factors should be taken into consideration for new studies to be conducted on the subject.

References

  • Arestis, P. (2002). The impact of financial liberalization policies on financial development: Evidence from developing economies. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 7(2), 109-121.
  • Breusch, T.S., A.R. Pagan (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and ıts applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., & Wu, T. (2014). Revisiting purchasing power parity in African countries: Panel stationary test with sharp and smooth breaks. Applied Financial Economics, 24(22), 1429-1438.
  • Calderón, C., & Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.
  • Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, R. & Sova, A. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from ten new EU members, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 940, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin.
  • Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., Del Barrio-Castro, T. & Lopez-Bazo, E. (2005). Breaking the panels: An application to the GDP percapita, The Econometrics Journal, 8(3), 159-175. Chakraborty, I. (2008). Does financial development cause economic growth? The case of India. South Asia Economic Journal, 9(1), 109-139.
  • Cheng, S. (2012). Substitution or complementary effects between banking and stock markets: Evidence from financial openness in Taiwan. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(3), 508-520.
  • Colombage, S. (2009). Financial markets and economic performances: Empirical evidence from five industrialized economies. Research International Business and Finance, 23(3), 339-348.
  • Ductor, L. & Grechyna, D. (2015). Financial development, real sector, and economic growth, International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 393-405.
  • Enders, W. & Holt, M. T. (2012). Sharp breaks or smooth shifts? An investigation of the evolution of primary commodity prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 659-673.
  • Graff, M. (1999). Financial Development and Economic Growth: A New Empirical Analysis, Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 5/99.
  • Guptha, K. S. K., & Rao, R. P. (2018). The causal relationship between financial development and economic growth: An experience with BRICS economies. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 20(2), 308-326.
  • Güneş, S. (2013). Finansal gelişmişlik ve büyüme arasındaki nedensellik testi: Türkiye örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 73-85.
  • Guru, B. K., & Yadav, I. S. (2019). Financial development and economic growth: Panel evidence from BRICS. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(47), 113-126.
  • Hardi, K. (2001). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3, 148–161.
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2011). Asymmetric panel causality tests with an application to the impact of fiscal policy on economic performance in Scandinavia. Munich Personal Repec Archive, Erişim adresi https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55527/1/MPRA_paper_55527.pdf.
  • Helhel, Y. (2017). E7 ülkelerinde finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasında nedensellik analizi, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(628), 9-18.
  • Hsueh, S.-J., Hu, Y.-H. & Tu, C.-H., (2013). Economic growth and financial development in Asian countries: A bootstrap panel granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 32, 294-301.
  • Hussain, F., & Chakraborty, D. K. (2012). Causality between financial development and economic growth: Evidence from an Indian state. Romanian Economic Journal, 15(35), 27-48.
  • Jung, S. M. (2017). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from South Korea between 1961 and 2013. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), 6(2), 89-106.
  • Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992.
  • Mutlugün, B. (2014). The relationship between financial development and economic growth for Turkey. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 85-115.
  • Nyasha, S., Gwenhure, Y., & Odhiambo, N. (2017). The dynamic causal linkage between financial development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 70(1), 73-102.
  • Odhiambo N. M., (2009). “Finance-growth Nexus and Inflation dynamics in Kenya: An empirical investigation. Journal of Savings and Development, 33(1), 7-25.
  • Ogunyiola, A. (2013). Financial development and economic growth: The case of Cape Verde. MPRA Paper No. 49783, Erişim adresi https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49783/3/MPRA_paper_49783.pdf.
  • Ololade, O. F. (2014). Financial development and economic growth nexus in Nigeria, Global Journal of Commerce Management Perspective, 3(5), 231-241.
  • Patrick H. T. (1966). Financial development and economic growth in underdeveloped countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 14(2), 174-189.
  • Perera, N., & Paudel, R. C. (2009). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Sri Lanka. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 9(1), 157-164.
  • Pradhan, R. P. (2009). The nexus between financial development and economic growth in India: Evidence from multivariate VAR model, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 1(2), 141-151.
  • Sehrawat, M. & Giri A. K. (2015). The role of financial development in economic growth: Empirical evidence from Indian states, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 765-780.
  • Shan, J. Z. & Morris, A. (2002). Does financial development ‘lead’ economic growth?, International Review of Applied Economics, 16(2), 153–168.
  • Tadesse, T., & Abafia, J. (2019). The causality between financial development and economic growth in Ethiopia: Supply leading vs demand following hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 3(1), 87-115.
  • Worldbank (2021). World Development Indicators, Erişim adresi https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
  • Yılancı, V. & Aydın. M. (2017). Oil prices and stock prices: An asymmetric panel causality approach. Journal of Applied Research in Finance and Economics, 2(4), 9-19.
  • Zortuk, M. ve Yıldız, A. (2018). E-7 ülkelerinde turizm ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Asimetrik panel nedensellik analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 58, 130-142.

FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÜLKELERİ İÇİN PANEL ASİMETRİK NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Year 2022, , 542 - 560, 23.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.913434

Abstract

Finansal gelişmenin etkileşim içerisinde olduğu temel makroekonomik değişkenlerin başında ekonomik büyüme gelmektedir. Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin başlıca amacı da, istikrarlı ve sürdürülebilir büyümeyle gelişmiş bir ülke haline gelebilmektir. Bu çalışmada, kırılgan beşli ülkeleri olarak adlandırılan beş gelişmekte olan ülke örneğinde, finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. Adı geçen ülkelerin 1980-2019 dönemi verilerinin kullanıldığı çalışmada, geleneksel ve yeni birim kök testlerinden sonra asimetrik panel nedensellik analizi yapılmıştır. Nedensellik analizi sonuçlarına göre, Endonezya için “arz öncüllü hipotez” ve “talep takipli hipotez”in, Türkiye için ise “geri bildirim hipotezi”nin geçerli olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu durum, nedensellik ilişkisinde kullanılan değişkenler ve örneklem grubunun etkili olduğu, konuyla ilgili yapılacak yeni çalışmalarda bu unsurların dikkate alınması gerektiği şeklinde yorumlanabilir.

References

  • Arestis, P. (2002). The impact of financial liberalization policies on financial development: Evidence from developing economies. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 7(2), 109-121.
  • Breusch, T.S., A.R. Pagan (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and ıts applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T., & Wu, T. (2014). Revisiting purchasing power parity in African countries: Panel stationary test with sharp and smooth breaks. Applied Financial Economics, 24(22), 1429-1438.
  • Calderón, C., & Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.
  • Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., Sova, R. & Sova, A. (2009). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from ten new EU members, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 940, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin.
  • Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., Del Barrio-Castro, T. & Lopez-Bazo, E. (2005). Breaking the panels: An application to the GDP percapita, The Econometrics Journal, 8(3), 159-175. Chakraborty, I. (2008). Does financial development cause economic growth? The case of India. South Asia Economic Journal, 9(1), 109-139.
  • Cheng, S. (2012). Substitution or complementary effects between banking and stock markets: Evidence from financial openness in Taiwan. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22(3), 508-520.
  • Colombage, S. (2009). Financial markets and economic performances: Empirical evidence from five industrialized economies. Research International Business and Finance, 23(3), 339-348.
  • Ductor, L. & Grechyna, D. (2015). Financial development, real sector, and economic growth, International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 393-405.
  • Enders, W. & Holt, M. T. (2012). Sharp breaks or smooth shifts? An investigation of the evolution of primary commodity prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 659-673.
  • Graff, M. (1999). Financial Development and Economic Growth: A New Empirical Analysis, Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 5/99.
  • Guptha, K. S. K., & Rao, R. P. (2018). The causal relationship between financial development and economic growth: An experience with BRICS economies. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 20(2), 308-326.
  • Güneş, S. (2013). Finansal gelişmişlik ve büyüme arasındaki nedensellik testi: Türkiye örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 73-85.
  • Guru, B. K., & Yadav, I. S. (2019). Financial development and economic growth: Panel evidence from BRICS. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(47), 113-126.
  • Hardi, K. (2001). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3, 148–161.
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2011). Asymmetric panel causality tests with an application to the impact of fiscal policy on economic performance in Scandinavia. Munich Personal Repec Archive, Erişim adresi https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55527/1/MPRA_paper_55527.pdf.
  • Helhel, Y. (2017). E7 ülkelerinde finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme arasında nedensellik analizi, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(628), 9-18.
  • Hsueh, S.-J., Hu, Y.-H. & Tu, C.-H., (2013). Economic growth and financial development in Asian countries: A bootstrap panel granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 32, 294-301.
  • Hussain, F., & Chakraborty, D. K. (2012). Causality between financial development and economic growth: Evidence from an Indian state. Romanian Economic Journal, 15(35), 27-48.
  • Jung, S. M. (2017). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from South Korea between 1961 and 2013. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), 6(2), 89-106.
  • Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992.
  • Mutlugün, B. (2014). The relationship between financial development and economic growth for Turkey. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 85-115.
  • Nyasha, S., Gwenhure, Y., & Odhiambo, N. (2017). The dynamic causal linkage between financial development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 70(1), 73-102.
  • Odhiambo N. M., (2009). “Finance-growth Nexus and Inflation dynamics in Kenya: An empirical investigation. Journal of Savings and Development, 33(1), 7-25.
  • Ogunyiola, A. (2013). Financial development and economic growth: The case of Cape Verde. MPRA Paper No. 49783, Erişim adresi https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49783/3/MPRA_paper_49783.pdf.
  • Ololade, O. F. (2014). Financial development and economic growth nexus in Nigeria, Global Journal of Commerce Management Perspective, 3(5), 231-241.
  • Patrick H. T. (1966). Financial development and economic growth in underdeveloped countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 14(2), 174-189.
  • Perera, N., & Paudel, R. C. (2009). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Sri Lanka. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 9(1), 157-164.
  • Pradhan, R. P. (2009). The nexus between financial development and economic growth in India: Evidence from multivariate VAR model, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 1(2), 141-151.
  • Sehrawat, M. & Giri A. K. (2015). The role of financial development in economic growth: Empirical evidence from Indian states, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(4), 765-780.
  • Shan, J. Z. & Morris, A. (2002). Does financial development ‘lead’ economic growth?, International Review of Applied Economics, 16(2), 153–168.
  • Tadesse, T., & Abafia, J. (2019). The causality between financial development and economic growth in Ethiopia: Supply leading vs demand following hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, 3(1), 87-115.
  • Worldbank (2021). World Development Indicators, Erişim adresi https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
  • Yılancı, V. & Aydın. M. (2017). Oil prices and stock prices: An asymmetric panel causality approach. Journal of Applied Research in Finance and Economics, 2(4), 9-19.
  • Zortuk, M. ve Yıldız, A. (2018). E-7 ülkelerinde turizm ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Asimetrik panel nedensellik analizi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 58, 130-142.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hamza Çeştepe 0000-0003-1541-5703

Havanur Ergün Tatar 0000-0002-4284-9083

Publication Date March 23, 2022
Submission Date April 11, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Çeştepe, H., & Ergün Tatar, H. (2022). FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: KIRILGAN BEŞLİ ÜLKELERİ İÇİN PANEL ASİMETRİK NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 9(1), 542-560. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.913434

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.