Çevre Kirliliği ve Turizm Sektörü Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Seçilmiş Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri Örneği

Abstract

Çevre kirliliği ve turizm sektörü ilişkisi turizmin sürdürülebilirliği açısından önemlidir. Bu amaçla çalışmada, popüler turistik destinasyonları içine alan seçilmiş 15 Avrupa Birliği üyesi ülkenin 1990-2019 yılları arasındaki partikül madde 2.5 (PM2.5) değeri analize dahil edilerek çevre ve turizm sektörü arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. PM2.5, gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla, enerji tüketimi, turist varışları ve dış ticaret açığı verileri araştırmada kullanılan değişkenlerdir. Nedensellik analizi sonucuna göre, turist varışlarından ve enerji kullanımından çevre kirliliğini temsil eden PM2.5’e doğru bir nedensellik vardır. Dış ticaret ve gayrisafi yurt içi hasıla değişkenleri için ise PM2.5 ile herhangi bir nedensellik bulgusuna ulaşılamamıştır. Ayrıca analiz sonucunda, enerji kullanımı değişkeninden hem gayrisafi yurt içi hasılaya hem de turist varışlarına doğru istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve tek yönlü bir nedensellik saptanmışken enerji kullanımı ile dış ticaret açığı arasında nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilememiştir. Bununla birlikte dış ticaret açığı değişkeninden de turist varışlarına doğru istatistiksel olarak anlamlı tek yönlü bir nedensellik bulunmuştur. Son olarak gayrisafi yurt içi hasıla ve turist varışları arasında ise istatistiksel olarak güçlü bir anlamlılıkla çift yönlü nedenselliğin varlığı ispat edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Çevre Kirliliği
• Turizm
• PM2.5

The Causality Relationship between Environmental Pollution and Tourism Sector: The Case of Selected European Union Countries

Abstract

The relationship between environmental pollution and tourism sector is important for the tourism’s sustainability. For this purpose, the study investigates the relationship between particulate matter 2.5 (PM2,5) and the environment and tourism sector between 1990-2019 for 15 selected European Union member countries, including popular tourist destinations, by causality analysis. PM2.5, gross domestic product, energy consumption, tourist arrivals, and foreign trade deficit data are the variables used in the study. The results of the casuality analysis show that there is a one-way link between the number of tourists and the amount of energy used and PM2,5, which is a measure of enviromental pollution. For foreign trade and gross domestic product variables, no causality was found with PM2.5. In addition, as a result of the analysis, a statistically significant and unidirectional causality was found from energy use variable to both gross domestic product and tourist arrivals, while no causality relationship was found between energy use and foreign trade deficit. However, a statistically significant unidirectional causality was found from the foreign trade deficit variable to tourist arrivals. Finally, it was statically proven that there is a two-way casual relationship between gross domestic product and tourist arrivals.

Keywords

• Environmental Pollution
• Tourism
• PM2.5

References

1. AL-MULALI, Usama ve ÖZTURK, İlhan (2015), “The Effect of Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Trade Openness, Industrial Output, and the Political Stability on the Environmental Degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) Region”, Energy, S.84, ss.382-389.
2. AL-MULALI, Usama, HASSAN, Gholipour Fereidouni, JANICE, Lee ve CHE, Normee Binti Che Sab (2013), “Exploring the Relationship Between Urbanization, Energy Consumption, and CO2 Emission in MENA Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, S.23, ss.107-112.
3. ALTINÖZ, Buket ve ASLAN, Alper (2022), “New Insight to Tourism-Environment Nexus in Mediterranean Countries: Evidence from Panel Vector Autoregression Approach”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, S.24(10), ss.12263-12275.
4. APERGIS, Nicholas ve PAYNE, James (2010), “Renewable Energy Consumption and Growth in Eurasia”, Energy Economics, S.32(6), ss.1392-1397.
5. APERGIS, Nicholas ve PAYNE, James (2010), “Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries”, Energy Policy, S.38(1), ss.656-660.
6. AVCI, Pınar, SÜMERLİ SARIGÜL, Sevgi, KARATAŞER, Büşra, ÇETİN, Murat ve ASLAN, Alper (2024), “Analysis of the Relationship Between Tourism, Green Technological Innovation and Environmental Quality in the Top 15 Most Visited Countries: Evidence From Method of Moments Quantile Regression”, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, S.26, ss.2337-2355.
7. AZAM, Muhammad, KHAN, Abdul Qayyum, BAKHTYAR, Bardia ve EMIRULLAH, Chandra (2015), “The Causal Relationship Between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in the ASEAN-5 Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, S.47, ss.732-745.
8. BEKUN, Festus Victor, ALOLA, Andrew Adewale, GYAMFI, Bright Akwasi ve YAW, Sarpong Steve (2021), “The Relevance of EKC Hypothesis in Energy Intensity Real-Output Trade-Off for Sustainable Environment in EU-27”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, S.28(37), ss.51137-51148.

9. BREUSCH, Trevor ve PAGAN, Adrian (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, The Review of Economic Studies, S.47(1), ss.239-253.
10. BROOK, Robert D., RAJAGOPALAN, Sanjay, POPE, Arden, BROOK, Jeffrey, BHATNAGAR, Aruni, DIEZ-ROUX, Ana ve
11. HOLGUIN Fernando (2010), “Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update to the Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association”, Circulation, S.121(21), ss.2331-2378.
12. CHANDRAN, Vgr ve TANG, Chor Foon (2013), “The Impacts of Transport Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment and Income on CO2 Emissions in ASEAN-5 Economies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, S.24 ss.445-453.
13. CHEN, Jing Zhou, WANG, Chunshan Shaojian ve LI, Shijie (2018), “Impacts of Energy Consumption Structure, Energy Intensity, Economic Growth, Urbanization on PM2.5 Concentrations in Countries Globally”, Applied Energy, S.230, ss.94-105.
14. CIARLANTINI, Sara, MADALENO, Mara, ROBAINA, Margarita, MONTEIRO, Alexandra, EUSÉBIO, Celeste, JOÃO
15. CARNEIRO, Maria ve GAMA, Carla (2023), “Air Pollution and Tourism Growth Relationship: Exploring Regional Dynamics in Five European Countries through an EKC Model”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, S.30(15), ss.42904-42922.
16. COWAN, Wendy N., CHANG, Tsangyao, INGLESI-LOTZ, Roula ve GUPTA, Rangan (2014), “The Nexus of Electricity Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in the BRICS Countries”, Energy Policy, S.66, ss.359-368.
17. DUMITRESCU, Elena-Ivona ve HURLIN, Christophe (2012), “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, S.29(4), ss.1450-1460.
18. DOGAN, Eyup ve ASLAN, Alper (2017), “Exploring the Relationship Among CO2 Emissions, Real GDP, Energy Consumption and Tourism in the EU and Candidate Countries: Evidence from Panel Models Robust to Heterogeneity and Cross-Sectional Dependence”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, S.77, ss.239-245.
19. EPA – UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (2024), “Particulate”,United States Environmental Protection Agency (E-Döküman), 20 Haziran 2024, https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/particulate-matter-pm-basics (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2024).
20. GAO, Jing ve ZHANG, Lei (2021), “Exploring the Dynamic Linkages Between Tourism Growth and Environmental Pollution: New Evidence from the Mediterranean Countries”, Current Issues in Tourism, S.24(1), ss.49-65.
21. HOSSAIN, Md Sharif (2011), “Panel Estimation for CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade Openness and Urbanization of Newly Industrialized Countries”, Energy Policy, S.39(11), ss.6991-6999.
22. İŞLEYEN, Şakir (2019), “Sağlık Harcamaları, Çevre Kirliliği ve Ekonomik Kalkınma İlişkisi: 1998-2016 OECD Ülkeleri Örneği”, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, S.4(7), ss.63-79.
23. KASMAN, Adnan ve DUMAN, Yavuz Selman (2015), “CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade and Urbanization in New EU Member and Candidate Countries: A Panel Data Analysis”, Economic Modelling, S.44, ss.97-103.
24. MENEGAKI, Angeliki (2011), “Growth and Renewable Energy in Europe: A Random Effect Model with Evidence for Neutrality Hypothesis”, Energy Economics, S.33(2), ss.257-263.
25. OMRI, Anis (2013), “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in MENA Countries: Evidence from Simultaneous Equations Models”, Energy Economics, S.40, ss.657-664.
26. PESERAN, Hashem (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge.
27. PESARAN, Hashem (2007), “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross‐Section Dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, S.22(2), ss.265-312.
28. POPE, C. Arden ve DOCKERY, Douglas (2006), “Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect”, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, S.56(6), ss.709-742.
29. RAZA, Syed Ali ve SHAH, Nida (2018), “Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in G7 Countries: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, S.25, ss.26965-26977.
30. WANG, Yuan, CHEN, Lili ve KUBOTA, Jumpei (2016), “The Relationship Between Urbanization, Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from a Panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Countries”, Journal of Cleaner Production, S.112, ss.1368-1374.