1952 Tarihli Roma Konvansiyonu ile 2009 Tarihli Genel Tehlike Konvansiyonu’nun Sorumluluk Hukuku Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Year 2020, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 204 - 218, 25.06.2020

Osman Gökhan Antalya Başak Görgeç

https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.725270

Abstract

Hava aracının yeryüzünde neden olduğu zararların nasıl karşılanması gerektiği hususu, hava araçlarının yaygın olarak kullanılmaya başlanmasından beri gündemde olan bir konudur. Bu konuda her devletin iç hukukunda düzenlenme bulunmakla birlikte uluslararası düzlemde ortak bir düzenleme sağlama isteği de mevcuttur. Günümüze kadar olan gelişmeler dikkate alındığında uluslararası boyutta çoğunluk açısından kabul görmüş uluslararası bir metnin varlığından bahsetmek mümkün değildir. Çalışmamızda, bu alanda ortaya çıkan son Konvansiyon metni ile 1952 tarihli Roma Konvansiyonu hükümleri sorumluluk hukuku açısından karşılaştırılacaktır.

Keywords

1952 tarihli Roma Konvansiyonu, Genel Tehlike Konvansiyonu, Yabancı Hava Araçlarının Yeryüzündeki Üçüncü Kişilere Vermiş Olduğu Zararlar Hakkında Konvansiyon, 2009 Tarihli Hava Aracı Tarafından Üçüncü Kişilere Verilen Zararın Tazmin Edilmesi Hakkında Konvansiyon, Hava Aracı, Hava Aracı İşleteni, Kusursuz Sorumluluk, Sorumluluk Hukuku

References

• ABEYRATNE Ruwantissa, Liability for Third Party Damage Caused by Aircraft – Some Recent Developments and Issues, Journal of Transportation Security, Y. 2009, S. 2:3, s. 91-105 – ABEYRATNE Liability –
• ABEYRATNE, Ruwantissa, Liability for Third Party Damage Caused by Aircraft – Some Recent Developments and Issues, Journal of Transportation Security, Y. 2009, S. 2:3, s. 91-105, – ABEYRATNE Recent Developments –
• ABEYRATNE, Ruwantissa, Theoretical Justification for Modernizing the Rome Convention of 1952, Annals of Air and Space Law, Y. 2006, S. 31, s. 185-211 – ABEYRATNE Theoretical–
• BROWN, Elizabeth Gaspar, The Rome Conventions of 1933 and 1952: Do They Point a Moral, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1962, S. 28:4, s. 418-443
• CAPLAN, Harold, Liability for Third Party Damage on the Ground, Air and Space Law, Y. 2008, S. 33:3, s. 183-213
• CAPLAN, Harold, Modernization of the 1952 Rome Convention and Protocol, Air and Space Law, Y. 2007, S. 32:2, s. 19-30, – CAPLAN Modernization –
• DAVIS Frederick B., Surface Damage by Foreign Aircraft: The United States and the New Rome Convention, Cornell Law Quarterly, Y. 1952-1953, S. 38:4, s. 570-590 – DAVIS F. –
• DAVIS, W. Jefferson, Liability of Aircraft Carriers, Owners and Operators of Aircrafts, Georgetown Law Journal, Y. 1930, S. 18, s. 214-264
• FITZGERALD, Gerald, The Protocol to Amend The Convention on Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to The Third Parties on The Surface (Rome, 1952), Signed at Montreal, September 23, 1978, Annals of Air and Space Law, Y. 1979, S. 4, s. 29-73
• FRANKLIN, Mark, Is a Successful New Convention on Airline Liability for Surface Damage Achievable?, Air and Space Law, Y. 2006, S. 31:2, s. 87-97
• FUJITA, Katsutoshi, Some Considerations for the Modernization of the Rome Convention, in case of Unlawful Interference, Korean Journal of Air and Space Law, Y. 2008, S. 23:1, s. 55-81
• HAVEL, Brian F. / SANCHEZ, Gabriel S., The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law, Cambridge 2014, s. 318
• HESSE, Nicky E., The Aircraft Operator’s Liability (in International Conventions), Montreal 1953, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
• IDE, John Jay, The History and Accomplishments of the International Technical Committee of Aerial Legal Experts (CITEJA), Journal of Air Law, Y. 1932, S. 3:1, s. 27-49
• JENNISON, Michael, Rescuing the Rome Convention of 1952: Six Decades of Effort to Make a Workable Regime for Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to Third Parties, Uniform Law Review, Y. 2005, S. 10:4, s. 785-823
• Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1950, S. 17:2, s. 194-224.
• KAFTAL, Andre, The Problem of Liability for Damages Caused by Aircraft on the Surface, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1934, S. 5:2, s. 179-232
• KINGSLEY, Robert / GATES, Sam E., Liability to Persons and Property on the Ground, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1933, S. 4, s. 515-530
• KJELLIN, Henrik, The New International Regime for Third Party Liability, Air and Space Law, Y. 2008, S. 33:2, s. 63-80
• LAUZON, Gilles, The New ICAO Conventions on Third Party Liability, Uniform Law Review, Y. 2009, S. 14:3, s. 676-699
• MAURITZ, Adriaan Jeroen, Liability of the Operators and Owners of Aircraft for Damage Inflicted to Persons and Property on the Surface, The Hauge 2003
• MILDE, Michael, International Air Law and ICAO, Essential Air and Space Law, Eleven International Publishing, 2016
• MILDE, Michael, Liability for Damage Caused by Aircraft on the Surface – Past and Current Efforts to Unify the Law, Zeitschrift für Luft- und Weltraumrecht – ZLW – Y. 2008, S. 57:4, s. 532-557, – MILDE Liability –
• MULLER, J. Wolterbeek, The CITEJA and Liability Toward Third Persons on the Surface, Journal of Air Law, Y. 1933, S. 4:2, s. 235-239
• NEWMAN, Arthur L. II, Damage Liability in Aircraft Cases, Columbia Law Review, Y. 1929, S. 29:8, s. 1039-1051
• NTSB Araç Kayıtları Bölümü, Hava Trafik Kontrolü Kayıtları, NTSB No: DCA01SA060, 21.12.2001 ve The 9/11 Commission Report, 22.07.2004
• SHELLEY, Leander I., The Draft Rome Convention From Standpoint of Residents and Other Persons in This Country, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1952, S. 19:3, s. 289-304
• WASSENBERG, Henri A., Beveiliging van de Burgerluchtvaart en de Economie van de Luchtdienstexploitatie, Journaal LuchtRecht, Y. 2002, S. 5, s. 110 vd.
• WEEKS, Jeffrey, The Future of the Rome Convention on Damage Caused by Aircraft to Third Parties on the Surface: Will All Roads Lead Away from Rome, International Trade & Business Law, Y. 2002, S. 7, s. 131-151
• WOLFF, William C., Liability of Aircraft Owners and Operators for Ground Injury, Journal of Air Law and Commerce, Y. 1957, S. 24, s. 203-221
• https://timeline.911memorial.org/#Timeline/2, E.T. 09.04.2020
• https://www.icao.int/Meetings/AMC/ArchivedAssembly/en/a02/wple.htm, E.T. 10.04.2020, ICAO Legal Committee, Second Session 1948, Minutes and Documents (1948), s. 130-134