GENDER ISSUES IN LEADERSHIP STYLE OF PRINCIPALS

Year 2009, , 23 - 33, 10.01.2009

E. Serra Yurtkoru Nurdan Özarallı , Beril Durmuş

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.677269

Abstract

The question of how issues of gender affect the way school principals’ leadership style is perceived by teachers has attracted little attention. In order to measure the leadership style of school principals we used the Multi-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). This paper aims to determine if there exist gender differences in the leadership behavior of school principals. This paper also investigates how the interaction between principal and teacher gender affects teachers’ evaluations of the principal’s leadership. Findings revealed that female principals were more transformational than male principals were and engaged in more of the contingent reward behaviors (active-constructive leaders). Male principals were more likely to manifest the other aspects of transactional leadership (passive-avoidant leadership and management by exception-passive). The implications of these findings are encouraging for female school leadership in Turkey.

Keywords

Leadership, Gender, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confırmatory Factor Analysis, MANOVA

References

• Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.
• Bass, B.M. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria; VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
• Seltzer, J. & Bass, B.M. (1990). Transformational leadership: beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693-703.
• Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Workand Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33-48.
• Bass, B.M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9- 32.
• Yammarino, F.J.; Dubinsky, A.J.; Comer, L.B. & Jolson, M.A. (1997). Women and transformational and contingent reward leadership: A multiple levels-of-analysis perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 205- 222.
• Korabik, K.; Ayman, R. & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2001). Gender-role orientation and transformational leadership. Gender, Work, and Organization Conference, Keele, June.
• Carbonell, J.L. (1984). Sex roles and leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), pp.44-49
• Eagly, A.H. & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685-710.
• Kent, R.L. & Moss, S.E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1335-1346.
• Hackman, M.Z.; Fumiss, A.H.; Hills, M.J. & Paterson, T.J. (1992). Perceptions of gender-role characteristics and transformational and transactional leadership behaviors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(11), 311-319.
• McShane, S.L. (2001). Canadian Organizational Behavior. (Fourth Edition). Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
• Littrell, R.F. & Nkomo, M.S. (2005). Gender and race differences in leader behavior preferences in South Africa Women in Management Review, 20(7/8), 562-581.
• Moss, S. E. & Kent, R. L. (1996). Gender and gender role categorization of emergent leaders: A critical review and comprehensive analysis. Sex Roles, 35(1/2), 79-96.
• Vinnicombe, S. & Singh, V. (2002). Sex role strereotyping and requisites of successful top managers. Women in Management Review, 17(3/4), 120-130.
• Shakeshaft, C. & Nowell, I. (1984). Research on theories, concepts, and models of organizational behavior.The influence of gender. Issues in Education, 11(3), 186-203.
• Bass, B.M.; Avolio, B.J. & Atwater, L. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and vvomen. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5-34.
• Bass, B.M. (1997). Does the transactional/transformational leadership transcend organizational and national boundaries. American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.
• Den Flartog, N.; House, R.J.; Hanges, P.J.; Ruiz- Quintanilla & Dorfman, P.W. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: are the attitudes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorced? Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219- 256.
• Shamir, B. & Howell, J.M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 257-283.
• Leithwood, K.A. (1992). The move tovvards transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.
• Mitchell, D.E. & Tucker, S. (1992). Leadership as a way of thinking. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 30-35.
• Çelik, V. (1998). Eğitimde dönüşümcü liderlik. Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(16), 423-442.
• Eagly, A.H. & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
• Rosener, J.B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
• Clisbee, M.A. (2005). Gender differences in leadership style: A literatüre analysis. Journal of Women in Education Leadership, 3(1), 38-54
• Eagly, A.H.; Karau, S.J. & Johnson, B.T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta- analysis. Educational Administration Çhıarterly, 28(1), 76- 102.
• Fauth, G.C. (1984). Women in educational administration: A research profile. Educational Forum, 49(1), 65-79.
• Charters, W.W., Jr. & Jovick, T.D. The gender of principals and principal/teacher relations in elementary schools. (Ed.: Schmuck, P.A.; Charters, W.W., Jr. & Carlson, R.O.). Educational policy and management: Sex differentials. New York: Academic Press.
• Lee, V.E.; Smith, J.B. & Cioci, M. (1993). Teachers and principals: Gender-related perceptions of leadership and power in secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 153-180.
• Oyster, C.K. (1992). Perceptions of power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(44), 527-533.
• Book, E.W. (2000). Why the best man for the job is a woman: The unigue female gualities of leadership, , New York, NY.: Harperlnformation.
• Eagly, A.H.; Johannessen-Schmidt, M.; van Engen, M.L. & Vinkenburg, C.J. (2003). Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership styles. A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591.
• Burke, S. & Collins, K.M. (2001). Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 244-256.
• McHugh, K.J. (1999). Exploring the relationship between perceptions of principals leadership behaviors and potency f teaching teams at the middle level. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertatioıı, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
• Komives, S. (1991). The relationship of hail directors’ transformational and transactional leadership to select resident assistant outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 32(6), 509-515.
• Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, P.Z. (1999). Leadership Practices Inventory: Psychometric Properties, Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA.
• Dilber, M. (1967). Leadership in Turkish industrial organizations. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Univ. Pub.
• Kanungo, R.N. & Ayçan, Z. (1998). Test of the model of culture fit: A ten country comparison. Paper presented at 24th Congress of Applied Psychology, US. August.
• Paşa, S.F.; Kabasakal, H. & Bodur, M. (2001). Society, organizations and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 559-589.
• Yurtkoru, E.S.; Kepir Sinangil H. & Sipahi, B. (2005). Gender differences in Leadership and Authoritarianism in Organizations. (Ed.: Avallone, F.; Kepir Sinangil, H. & Caetano, A.). Convivence in Organizations and Society. Ch.12., 135-144. Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini Associati SpA.
• Karip, E. (1998). Dönüşümcü liderlik. Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(16), 443-446.
• Akbaba-Altun, S. (2001). Yönetici adaylarının dönüşümcü liderliğe ilişkin görüşleri. X. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 7-9 Haziran 2001, Bolu.
• Bass, B.M. (1981). Stogdill’s Haııdbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
• Maehr, M.L. (1987). Managing organizational culture to enhance motivation. (Ed.: Maehr, M.L. & Kleiber, D.A.). Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.5). Greemvich, CT: JAI Press.
• Heilman, M.E.; Block, C.J., Martell, R.F. & Simon, M.C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characrerizations of men, women and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), pp.935-942.
• Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1995). The Multifactor Leadership Çuestionnaire, Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden
• Lattin J.; Carroll J.D. & Green E.P. (2003). Analyzing Multivariate Data. Pasifle Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Thomson Leaming.
• Hair, Jr. F.J.; Anderson, E.R.; Tatham, L.R. & Black, C.W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hail Inc.
• Bycio, P.; Hackett, R.D. & Ailen, J.S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1995) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468-478.
• Den Hartog, D.N.; Van Muijen, J.J. & Koopman, P.L. (1997). Transactional versus transformational leadership: An anlysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational Organizational Psychology, 70(1), 19-34.
• Yammarino, F.J. & Bass, B.M. (1990). Transformational leadership at multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations. 43(10), 975-995
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-HiIl.
• DeVellis F.R. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
• Bagozzi, R.P. & Youjae, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1),74-94.
• Floyle, R.H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
• Bentler, P.M. (1992). on the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400-404.
• Netemeyer, R.G.; Bearden, W.O. & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
• Fornell, C. & Larcker, F.D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50
• Anderson, C.J. & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
• Hater, J.J. & Bass, B.M. (1988). Supervisors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 695-702.
• Druskat, V.U. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 99- 119.
• Brunner, C.C. (2000). Principles of power: İVomen superintendents and the riddle of the heart. New York: State University of New York Press