TİCARİ FİRMA KREDİ TALEPLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİNDE AHY İLE FARKLI BULANIK SIRALAMA YÖNTEMLERİNİN DENENDİĞİ BAHY’NİN İNCELENMESİ - ANALYZING AHP AND FAHP WITH DIFFERENT FUZZY RANKING METHODS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL COMPANY CREDIT DEMANDS

Year 2011, Volume: 9 Issue: 36, 213 - 235, 16.11.2012

Semra Erpolat

Abstract

Özet:

Ticari faaliyete atılan tüm işletmelerin olduğu gibi
bankaların da hedefi, kaynaklarını en verimli şekilde
kullanarak maksimum kara ulaşmaktır. Bu amaçla rekabetçi
piyasa koşullarında kredi talebinde bulunan firmaları analiz
ederek, kararı mümkün olduğunca en kısa sürede vermeleri
gerekmektedir.
Çalışmanın amacı, kredi almak üzere bankaya başvuran
firmalardan hangilerine kredi verileceği hangilerine
verilmeyeceği kararının alınmasında banka yöneticilerine
destek sağlamaktır. Bu amaçla sektör notu ve firma notu
olmak üzere iki hesaplamadan yararlanılmış, yöntem olarak
ise AHY ve BAHY kullanılmıştır. Farklı şekillerde
oluşturulabilen BAHY, çalışmada Chang’in yöntemi
uygulanarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca BAHY’de bulanık
sıralama yöntemlerinden Liou ve Wang ile Abdel-Kader ve
Dugdale yöntemleri de incelenmiş ve sonuçlar tartışılmıştır.

Abstract:

The goal of the banks is achieving maximum profit
by using their resources the most efficient way as all
businesses that embark on commercial activity. For this
purpose in competitive market condition they must give their
decisions as much as possible the shortest period of time by
analyzing the companies who demands credit.
The aim of the study is providing support to the bank manager
about making decision of giving credit to the companies which
are applied to the bank for receiving the credit or not giving.
For this purpose two different calculation methods such as
sector note and company note is applied, using AHP and
FAHP. In the study FAHP is conducted with Chang’s method
which can be formed in different ways. Additionally, for
FAHP fuzzy ranking methods such as Liou and Wang, Abdel-
Kader and Dugdale were examined and the results were
discussed.

Keywords

AHY, BAHY, Bulanık sıralama, Kredi Talebi. - AHP, FAHP, Fuzzy Ranking, Credit Demand.

References

• Tatlıdil, H. & Özel, M. (2005). Firma Derecelendirme Çalışmaları Konusunda Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analize Dayalı Karar Destek Sistemlerinin Kullanımı. Bankacılar Dergisi, l(54), 46-58.
• Liou, T.S. & Wang, M.]. (1992). Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3), 247- 255.
• Abdel-Kader, M.G. & Dugdale, D. (2001) Evaluating investments in advanced manufacturing technology: A fuzzy set theory approach, British Accounting Review, 33(1), 455-489.
• Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Infomation and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
• Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1983). Ranking of Fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory, Infomation Sciences, 30(1), 183-224.
• Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Chen, Shu-Chen & Hwang, C., in Collaboration with Hwang, F. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods arıd Applications. New York: Springer— Verlag.
• Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
• Erpolat, S. (2006). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi İle İş Sektörü Seçimi. Hakemli Öneri Dergisi. 12(25), 231-241.
• Turban, E. & Meredith, LR. (1994). Fudamentals of Management Science. 6th Ed. New York: The McGraw- Hill Companies.
• Taha, H.A. (1997). Yöneylem Araştırması. (Çev. Baray, Ş.A. & Esnaf, Ş). İstanbul: Literatür.
• Laarhoven, P.M.J. & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(11), 229-241.
• Buckley, J.]. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.
• Buckley, J .J . (1985). Ranking altematives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15(1), 21-31.
• Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
• Kwong, C.K. & Bai, H. (2003). Determining the Importance Weights Fort he Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach. IIE Transactions, 1(35), 619-626. Semra ERPOLAT
• ([e-mail])
• She was educated from Hacettepe University, Faculty of
• Science, Statistics Section in 1999. She was get M.Sc.
• degree in 2002 from Hacettepe University, Faculty of
• Science, Statistics Section, and ph.D. degree from Mimar
• Sinan Fine Art University, Faculty of Science and
• Lecture, Statistics Section. And the second ph.D. degree
• from Marmara University, Faculty of Economics and
• Administrative Sciences, Department of Econometrics,
• Operation Research Section in 2009.