Research Article

FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES

Volume: 22 Number: 1 March 30, 2020
TR EN

FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES

Abstract

Despite has many critical as much as defenders, Benford’s Law has been used many different ways in accounting. The purpose of the study is to create an alternative standard and critical values that can be used to assess financial data compliance with Benford's law for using as an audit procedure. To this end, the allowable deviation limits were determined on an average basis by analysing the quarterly (20 periods total) balance sheet and income statements of the companies traded in BIST for the years 2013-2017. Analysis done in Excel software by performing 1. Digit, 2. Digit and First 2 Digit tests of Benford Analysis. As a result, a new measuring standard BDS (Benford Digit Score) and conformity limits have been created that evaluated is more effective for audit aims.

Keywords

References

  1. Akkaş, M.E., 2007. “Denetimde Benford Kanunu'nun Uygulanması”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1): 191 – 206.
  2. Amiram D., Bozanic Z. and Rouen E., 2015. “Financial Statement Errors: Evidence From The Distributional Properties Of Financial Statement Numbers”, Rev Account Stud, 20:1540–1593.
  3. Archambault J.J. and Archambault M.E., 2011. “Earnings Management Among Firms During The Pre-Sec Era: A Benford's Law, Analysis.” Accounting Historians Joumal, 38 (2), 145-170.
  4. Benford, F., 1938. “The law of anomalous numbers.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78 (4), 551-572.
  5. Boztepe, E., 2013. “Benford Kanunu ve Muhasebe Denetiminde Kullanılabilirliği.” LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (1): 73.
  6. Carslaw, C., 1988. “Anomalies in Income Numbers: Evidence of Goal Oriented Behavior.” The Accounting Review 63 (2): 321-327.
  7. Christian, C., and Gupta, S., 1993.” New Evidence on "Secondary Evasion".” The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 15: 72-93.
  8. Das, S., and Zhang, H., 2003. “Rounding-up in Reported EPS, Behavioral Thresholds and Earnings Management.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(1): 31-50.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 30, 2020

Submission Date

August 23, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 15, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 22 Number: 1

APA
Özevin, O., Yücel, R., & Öncü, M. A. (2020). FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 22(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.609957
AMA
1.Özevin O, Yücel R, Öncü MA. FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020;22(1):107-126. doi:10.31460/mbdd.609957
Chicago
Özevin, Onur, Rahmi Yücel, and Mehmet Akif Öncü. 2020. “FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22 (1): 107-26. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.609957.
EndNote
Özevin O, Yücel R, Öncü MA (March 1, 2020) FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22 1 107–126.
IEEE
[1]O. Özevin, R. Yücel, and M. A. Öncü, “FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 107–126, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.609957.
ISNAD
Özevin, Onur - Yücel, Rahmi - Öncü, Mehmet Akif. “FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22/1 (March 1, 2020): 107-126. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.609957.
JAMA
1.Özevin O, Yücel R, Öncü MA. FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020;22:107–126.
MLA
Özevin, Onur, et al. “FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 107-26, doi:10.31460/mbdd.609957.
Vancouver
1.Onur Özevin, Rahmi Yücel, Mehmet Akif Öncü. FRAUD DETECTING WITH BENFORD’S LAW: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH WITH BDS AND CRITIC VALUES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020 Mar. 1;22(1):107-26. doi:10.31460/mbdd.609957

Cited By

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.