Bu çalışmada, öncelikle, Kamu Gözetimi Kurumu tarafından 2014 yılında Resmi Gazetede yayınlanarak yürürlüğe giren GDS 3400 “İleriye Yönelik Finansal Bilginin İncelenmesi” standardı ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın uygulama kısmında da; 2010 yılından itibaren Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu’na gönderilen izahnamelere ulaşılarak, bu izahnamelerde yer alan kar tahminleri ve beklentileri başlığı altında yapılması beklenen açıklamaların GDS 3400 kapsamında incelenmesine odaklanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda; izahnamelerine ulaşılan işletmelerin hiçbirinde, açıklanması ihtiyari olan, kar tahmin ve beklentilerine yer verilmediği görülmüştür. Dolayısı ile bağımsız
güvence raporlarına da rastlanmamıştır. Ancak; kar tahmin ve beklentileri yapılmamış olmakla birlikte; işletmelerin bu durumu açıklama şekilleri de farklılık göstermiştir.
This paper, primarily, examines the auditing standard GDS 3400 Examination of Prospective Financial Information" that entered into force after its publication by the Public Oversight Board of Turkey in the Official Gazette in 2014. In addition, the practice section of this paper focuses on the examination of disclosures expected to be made under the heading of "profit forecasts and expectations" of the prospectuses that were submitted to the Capital Markets Board of Turkey in the context of GDS 3400 by having access to those prospectuses starting from 2010. In this regard, research findings show that entities whose prospectuses are available, did not express their profit forecasts and expectations whose reporting is optional. That is why they did not prepare any independent assurance report. Finally, it is observed that entities' ways of explaining their reasoning of not reporting their profit forecasts and expectations differentiate.
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Business Administration |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | February 2, 2016 |
| Publication Date | March 31, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 18 Issue: 1 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.