Mekânsal Algı: Eleştirel Bir Bibliyometrik Sorgulama

Year 2024, , 548 - 567, 30.07.2024

Gülsüm Akatlı Pinar Dınc Kalaycı

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1402794

Abstract

Bu çalışmada ‘‘algı çalışmaları içinde mimarlık araştırmalarının yeri ve durumu nedir?’’ araştırma sorusuna yanıt verilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Aynı zamanda bibliyometrik analizlerin sistematik olarak gerçekleştirilmesi noktasında yaygın kullanıma sahip olan VOSviewer programının çalışma kapsamındaki geçerliliğinin saptanması da araştırmanın dolaylı yoldan ikincil hedefini oluşturmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda mekânsal algı araştırmalarının yelpazesini görmek ve alt açılımlarını keşfetmek üzere her biri farklı derinlikte olan ardışık iki bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın ilk iki aşaması için iki anahtar kelime grubu oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma çerçevesini belirlemek üzere doküman türü ve kategori sınırlaması getirilmiştir. Bu çerçevede ilk aşamada (n=2727) ve ikinci aşamada (n=243) tespit edilen çalışmalar bibliyometrik analizlerini yapabilmek üzere VOSviewer programına aktarılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın son aşamasında, Sankey diyagramı oluşturucusu kullanılarak ikinci aşamada belirlenmiş makale çalışmaları özelinde bir akış-miktar diyagramı oluşturulmuştur (n=92). Web of Science'ta taranmış olan çalışmalar incelendiğinde, araştırma çerçevesindeki kavramları içeren çalışmaların en çok konfor kavramı ile, en az ise mutluluk kavramı ile ilgili olduğu saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Mekânsal algı, bibliyometrik analiz, içerik analizi, mimarlık, çok disiplinli psikoloji.

Spatial Perception: A Critical Bibliometric Inquiry

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to answer the research question "what is the place and status of architectural research in perception studies?". At the same time, determining the validity of the VOSviewer program, which is widely used for systematic bibliometric analysis, within the scope of the study constitutes an indirect secondary objective of the research. In this direction, two consecutive bibliometric analyses, each with a different depth, were conducted to see the range of spatial perception studies and to explore its sub-expansions. In this context, two keyword groups were created for the first two phases of the study. Document type and category were restricted to determine the research framework. In this framework, the studies identified in the first phase (n=2727) and the second phase (n=243) were transferred to the VOSviewer program for bibliometric analysis and analyzed. In the last phase of the study, a flow-quantity diagram was created for the article studies identified in the second phase using the Sankey diagram generator (n=92). When the studies scanned in Web of Science were analyzed, it was found that the studies involving the concepts in the research framework were mostly related to the concept of comfort and the least related to the concept of happiness.

Keywords

Spatial perception, bibliometric analysis, content analysis, architecture, multidisciplinary psychology.

Ethical Statement

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee approval was not required for this study.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank Gazi University Academic Writing Application and Research Center for proofreading the article.

References

• Botton, A. (2006). The architecture of happiness. Toronto : McClelland & Stewart.
• Bratina, N. (1997). Perception of open urban space–Bevk Square in Nova Gorica. Urbani izziv, (32/33), 147-151.
• Bratina Jurkovič, N. (2014). Perception, experience and the use of public urban spaces by residents of urban neighbourhoods. Urbani izziv, 25(1), 107-125.
• Burkut, E. B. & Koseoglu, E. (2023). Spatial legibility: Bibliometric and visualization analyses using Vosviewer software (1975-2023). SAR Journal 6(3), 137-148.
• Byrne, P., Becker, S. & Burgess, N. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychological Review, 114 (2), 340-375.
• Carpenter, C. R., Cone, D. C. & Sarli, C. C. (2014). Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact. Academic Emergency Medicine, 21(10), 1160–1172.
• Chen, J. & Chang, H. (2022). Sketching the landscape of speech perception research (2000–2020): A bibliometric study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-14.
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y. & Zhou, D. (2021). Knowledge map of urban morphology and thermal comfort: A bibliometric analysis based on citespace. Buildings, 11(10), 1-23.
• Ching, F. D. K. (2015). Architecture form, space, and order (4th Edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
• Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D. & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73-101.
• de Dear, R. & Brager, G.S. (1998). Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Transactions, 104(1), 1-18.
• Encho, H., Uchida, K., Horibe, K., Nakatsuka, K. & Ono, R. (2023). Walking and perception of green space among older adults in Japan: subgroup analysis based self-efficacy. Health Promotion International, 38(1), 1-7.
• Freitas, F., Berreth, T., Chen, Y.-C. & Jhala, A. (2023). Characterizing the perception of urban spaces from visual analytics of street-level imagery. AI & Society, 38, 1361-1371.
• Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P. & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694-724.
• Garfield, E. (1983). World brain or memex? Mechanical and intellectual requirements for universal bibliographical control, Essays of an Information Scientist, 6, 540–547, (Reprinted from The Foundations of Access to Knowledge, 1968, New York: Syracuse University Press, 169-196).
• Hidayetoglu, M. L., Yildirim, K. & Akalin, A. (2012). The effects of color and light on indoor wayfinding and the evaluation of the perceived environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 50-58.
• Hipp, J. A., Gulwadi, G. B., Alves, S. & Sequeira, S. (2016). The relationship between perceived greenness and perceived restorativeness of university campuses and student-reported quality of life. Environment and Behavior, 48 (10), 1292-1308.
• Honold, J., Beyer, R., Lakes, T. & van der Meer, E. (2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood- related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2012, 32 (4), 305-317.
• Hughes, N., Chang, Y., Hu, S., Talak, R., Abdulhai, R., Strader, J. & Carlone, L. (2024). Foundations of spatial perception for robotics: Hierarchical representations and real-time systems. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 0(0) 1–49.
• Hur, M., Nasar, J. L. & Chun, B. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (1), 52-59.
• Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal
• space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154-164.
• Jia, B., Chen, Y. & Wu, J. (2021). Bibliometric analysis and research trend forecast of healthy urban planning for 40 years (1981–2020). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 1-25.
• Kamičaitytė, J., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. & Gadal, S. (2019). Role of multicultural identity in landscape perception and methodological possibilities of its interdisciplinary analysis. Landscape Architecture and Art, 15 (15), 65-74.
• Kearney, A. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction : Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment And Behavior, 38 (1), 112-139.
• Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/ local paradigm : A Critical-Review. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 24-38.
• Lenzholzer, S. & Koh, J. (2010). Immersed in microclimatic space: Microclimate experience and perception of spatial configurations in Dutch squares. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1-2), 1-15.
• Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: 2. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99 (4), 587–604.
• McBurney, M. K. & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care? IEEE Internatinal Professional Communication Conference, 108– 114, Portland.
• Meng, L., Wen, K.-H., Brewin, R. & Wu, Q. (2020). Knowledge atlas on the relationship between urban street space and residents’ health—A bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Sustainability, 12(6), 1-20.
• Mertins, H., Danhier, R. D., Mertins, B., Schulz, A., Schulz, B. (2019). The role of expertise in the perception of architectural space, Research Culture in Architecture: Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration. Basel: Birkhäuser, pp. 279-288.
• Morgan, C. T. & King, R. A. (1975). Introduction to psychology. (Fifth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Mourshed, M. & Zhao, Y. (2012). Healthcare providers' perception of design factors related to physical environments in hospitals. Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 32 (4), 362-370.
• Park, G. & Thayer, J. F. (2014). From the heart to the mind: cardiac vagal tone modulates top-down and bottom- up visual perception and attention to emotional stimuli. Frontiers In Psychology, 5, 278.
• Petrides, K. V., Pita, R. & Kokkinaki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98 (2), 273-289.
• Petrides, K.V., Mikolajczak, M., Mavroveli, S., Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J., Furnham, A., Perez-Gonzalez, J.-C. (2016). Developments in trait emotional intelligence research. Emotion Review, 8 (4), 335–341.
• Phelps, E. A., Ling, S. & Carrasco, M. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17 (4), 292-299.
• Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., Horoshenkov, K. V. (2010). The importance of auditory- visual interaction in the construction of 'tranquil space'. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (4), 501-509.
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25 (4), 348-349.
• Ribeiro, A., Madureira, L. & Carvalho, R. (2023). Evidence on how urban gardens help citizens and cities to enhance sustainable development. Review and bibliometric analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 236.
• Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.
• Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
• Subramanyam, K. (1982). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.
• Tan, Z., Chung, S. C., Roberts, A. C. & Lau, K. K.-L. (2019). Design for climate resilience: influence of environmental conditions on thermal sensation in subtropical high-density cities. Architectural Science Review, 62(1), 3-13.
• Trick, L. M. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently - A limited- capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101 (1), 80–102.
• Tirovolas, A. K. & Levitin, D. J. (2011). Music perception and cognition research from 1983 to 2010: A categorical and bibliometric analysis of empirical articles in music perception. Music Perception, 29 (1), 23-36.
• Tirri, C., Swanson, H. & Meenar, M. (2021). Finding the “heart” in the green: Conducting a bibliometric analysis to emphasize the need for connecting emotions with biophilic urban planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 1-18.
• Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440-463.
• Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538.
• Varshabi , N., Arslan Selçuk, S. & Mutlu Avinç, G. (2022). Biomimicry for energy-efficient building design: A bibliometric analysis. Biomimetics, 7(1), 21, 1-15.
• Wang, K., Sun, Z., Cai, M., Liu, L., Wu, H. & Peng, Z. (2022). Impacts of urban blue-green space on residents’ health: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 1-21.
• Wang, X., Shen, L. & Shi, S. (2023). Evaluation of underground space perception: A user-perspective investigation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 131, 1-15.
• Xu, T., Nordin, N. A. & Aini, A. M. (2022). Urban green space and subjective well-being of older people: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 1-29.
• Ye, Y., Huang, Y. & Li, S. (2023). A multidisciplinary perspective on the relationship between sustainable built environment and user perception: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1-19.
• Zhang, J., Yu, Z., Zhao, B., Sun, R. & Vejre, H. (2020). Links between green space and public health: a bibliometric review of global research trends and future prospects from 1901 to 2019. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 1-17.
• Zhang, D. & Yong, T. (2021). Green building, pro-environmental behavior and well-being: Evidence from Singapore. Cities, 108, 1-13.
• Zhang, S., Tan Y. & Yuan, J. (2023). Psychophysiological effects of a natural forest environment on Chinese university students aged 19-25 years. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 42 (10), 986-1003.
• Zhang, S., Li, X., Chen, Z. & Ouyang, Y. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the study of urban green spaces and health behaviors. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-15.