Erratum
BibTex RIS Cite

Erratum: Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrolü Sürecinde Bina Projesine Ait Verilerin Gösterimleri

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 672 - 672, 28.07.2025
The original article was published on April 30, 2022. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mbud/issue/69408/988508

Erratum Note

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi'nde 2022 yılında yayınlanmış “Aydın, M. (2022). The building project’s data representations in the automated code compliance checking process. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7 (Special Issue), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.988508” başlıklı makalede "Teşekkür ve Bilgi Notu" içeriğinde yazar tarafından sehven unutulan düzeltme talebi doğrultusunda "Teşekkür ve Bilgi Notu" aşağıdaki şekilde düzeltilmiştir. “Teşekkür ve Bilgi Notu” Bu makale, 27-29 Ekim 2021 tarihinde gerçekleştirilen '1. Uluslararası Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Sempozyumu (1st International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium – IArcSAS-2021)'nda sözlü olarak sunulmuş ve sadece özeti, sempozyum kitabında yayınlanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu makale 2021 yılında Murat Aydın’ın Prof. Dr. Hakan Yaman danışmanlığında hazırlanan, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı bünyesinde tamamlanan “Türkiye’deki Konut Projeleri için BIM Tabanlı Otomatik Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrol Modeli: BIMTRAC3” adlı doktora tez çalışmasının ekler bölümü ile ilişkilidir. Makalede ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur. Çalışmada etik kurul izni gerekmemiştir.”

Abstract

BIM, inşaat endüstrisinde bina projelerin bilgi alışverişinde en etkili platform olarak kabul edilmektedir ve çeşitli yazılımların geliştirilmesini desteklemektedir. BIM tasarımcı, mimar, mühendis, yüklenici, mal sahibi vb. gibi projede yer alan katılımcılar için bina projelerinin bina yönetmeliklerine ve standartlarına göre uygunluğunun otomatik veya yarı otomatik olarak kontrol edilmesini kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrolü (Automated Code Compliance Checking, ACCC) sürecinde bina projesine ait veriler iki şekilde temsil edilmektedir. Bunlar BIM modeli ve IFC veya IFCXML veri standardıdır. Bu çalışmada, ACCC sürecinde bina projesine ait verilerin BIM, IFC ve IFCXML gösterimi örnek konut projesi üzerinden anlatılmıştır. Örnek konut projesi bir katı bodrum olmak üzere toplamda 9 kattan, 8 daireden ve 2 asansörden oluşmaktadır.

Thanks

Bu makale, 27-29 Ekim 2021 tarihinde gerçekleştirilen '1. Uluslararası Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Sempozyumu (1st International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium – IArcSAS-2021)'nda sözlü olarak sunulmuş ve sadece özeti, sempozyum kitabında yayınlanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu makale 2021 yılında Murat Aydın’ın Prof. Dr. Hakan Yaman danışmanlığında hazırlanan, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı bünyesinde tamamlanan “Türkiye’deki Konut Projeleri için BIM Tabanlı Otomatik Bina Yönetmelik Uygunluk Kontrol Modeli: BIMTRAC3” adlı doktora tez çalışmasının ekler bölümü ile ilişkilidir. Makalede ulusal ve uluslararası araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur. Çalışmada etik kurul izni gerekmemiştir.”

References

  • Aydın, M., ve Yaman, H. (2018). Bina enformasyonu modellemesi (bim) tabanlı bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü literatürüne genel bir bakış. Tasarım + Kuram, 14(25), s. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2018.25744
  • Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020a). Bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü kavramına yönelik bir literatür taraması. Tasarım + Kuram, 16(29), s. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.86158
  • Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020b). Domain knowledge representation languages and methods for building regulations. In: Ofluoglu S., Ozener O., Isikdag U. (eds) Advances in Building Information Modeling. EBF 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1188 CCIS, pp. 101–121, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42852-5_9
  • buildingSMART. (2020). buildingSMART International. https://www.buildingsmart.org
  • buildingSMART Türkiye. (2019). buildingSmart Türkiye. http://www.buildingsmartturkiye.org/index.php/hakkinda/buildingsmart-turkiye
  • Dimyadi, J., ve Amor, R. (2013). Automated Building Code Compliance Checking – Where is it at? Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 172–185.
  • Dimyadi, J., Clifton, C., Spearpoint, M., ve Amor, R. (2014). Regulatory Knowledge encoding guidelines for automated compliance audit of building engineering design. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), pp. 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.067
  • Ding, L., Drogemuller, R., Rosenman, M., Marchant, D., ve Gero, J. (2006). Automating code checking for building designs - DesignCheck. Clients Driving Innovation: Moving Ideas into Practice, pp. 1–16. https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/4842
  • Fenves, S. J., Garrett, J. H., Kiliccote, H., Law, K. H., ve Reed, K. A. (1995). Computer representations of design standards and building codes: US perspective. The International Journal of Construction Information Technology, 3(1), pp. 13–34.
  • Graphisoft. (2018). ArchiCAD 21. https://www.graphisoft.com/archicad/
  • Greenwood, D., Lockley, S., Malsane, S., ve Matthews, J. (2010). Automated Compliance Checking Using Building İnformation Models. Proceedings of the Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference, 2-3 September, Paris, France, pp. 363–371.
  • IAI. (1997). Release 1.0 IFC Model Architecture. International Alliance for Interoperability. http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/
  • ISO_10303-11. (1997). Product Data Representation and Exchange Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/38047.html
  • Lee, H., Lee, J.-K., Park, S., ve Kim, I. (2016). Translating building legislation into a computer-executable format for evaluating building permit requirements. Automation in Construction, 71, pp. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.008
  • Martins, J. P., ve Monteiro, A. (2013). LicA: a bim based automated code-checking application for water distribution systems. Automation in Construction, 29(23), pp. 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.08.008
  • Nawari, N. O. (2012). Automating codes conformance. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18(4), pp. 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000049
  • Nawari, N. O., ve Alsaffar, A. (2015). Understanding computable building codes. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(6), pp. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2015.030601
  • NBIMS-US. (2015). National BIM Standard–United States Version 3. National Inst. of Building Sciences Washington, DC. https://www.nibs.org/news/242663/buildingSMART-alliance-Releases-NBIMS-US-Version-3.html
  • Shih, S.-Y., Sher, W. ve Giggins, H. (2013). Assessment of the building code of Australia to inform the development of BIM-enabled code checking system. Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1–12.

Erratum: The Building Project’s Data Representations in the Automated Code Compliance Checking Process

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 672 - 672, 28.07.2025
The original article was published on April 30, 2022. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mbud/issue/69408/988508

Erratum Note

In the article published in Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications in 2022 (Aydın, M. (2022). The building project’s data representations in the automated code compliance checking process. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7 (Special Issue), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.988508), "Acknowledgements and Information Note" has been corrected as follows in line with the correction request in the "Acknowledgements and Information Note" content, which was inadvertently forgotten by the author. "Acknowledgments and Information Note” This article was presented orally at the 1st International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium (IArcSAS-2021) held on October 27-29, 2021 and only the abstract was published in the symposium book. In addition, this article is associated with the appendix section of Murat Aydın's PhD dissertation entitled “BIM Based Automatic Building Code Compliance Control Model for Residential Projects in Turkey: BIMTRAC3”, which was prepared in 2021 under the supervision of Prof. Hakan Yaman and completed at Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Architecture, Department of Architecture. The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee permission was not required for the study."

Abstract

BIM is widely acknowledged as the most effective platform for building project information sharing in the construction sector. It aids in the creation of numerous software applications. It enables automated or semi-automated ACCC of the building projects for compliance with building regulations and standards for parties (architect, contractor, engineer, owner, designer, etc.) participating in the building production process. The data from the building project is represented in two ways in the ACCC process. These are BIM Model, and IFC or IFCXML Data Standard. In this study, the BIM, IFC, and IFCXML representations of the building project data were described using a sample housing project in the ACCC process. The sample housing project has 9 floors, 8 units, and 2 elevators.

Thanks

This article was presented orally at the 1st International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium (IArcSAS-2021) held on October 27-29, 2021 and only the abstract was published in the symposium book. In addition, this article is associated with the appendix section of Murat Aydın's PhD dissertation entitled “BIM Based Automatic Building Code Compliance Control Model for Residential Projects in Turkey: BIMTRAC3”, which was prepared in 2021 under the supervision of Prof. Hakan Yaman and completed at Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Architecture, Department of Architecture. The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics committee permission was not required for the study."

References

  • Aydın, M., ve Yaman, H. (2018). Bina enformasyonu modellemesi (bim) tabanlı bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü literatürüne genel bir bakış. Tasarım + Kuram, 14(25), s. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2018.25744
  • Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020a). Bina yönetmelik uygunluk kontrolü kavramına yönelik bir literatür taraması. Tasarım + Kuram, 16(29), s. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.86158
  • Aydın, M. ve Yaman, H. (2020b). Domain knowledge representation languages and methods for building regulations. In: Ofluoglu S., Ozener O., Isikdag U. (eds) Advances in Building Information Modeling. EBF 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1188 CCIS, pp. 101–121, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42852-5_9
  • buildingSMART. (2020). buildingSMART International. https://www.buildingsmart.org
  • buildingSMART Türkiye. (2019). buildingSmart Türkiye. http://www.buildingsmartturkiye.org/index.php/hakkinda/buildingsmart-turkiye
  • Dimyadi, J., ve Amor, R. (2013). Automated Building Code Compliance Checking – Where is it at? Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 172–185.
  • Dimyadi, J., Clifton, C., Spearpoint, M., ve Amor, R. (2014). Regulatory Knowledge encoding guidelines for automated compliance audit of building engineering design. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), pp. 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.067
  • Ding, L., Drogemuller, R., Rosenman, M., Marchant, D., ve Gero, J. (2006). Automating code checking for building designs - DesignCheck. Clients Driving Innovation: Moving Ideas into Practice, pp. 1–16. https://ro.uow.edu.au/engpapers/4842
  • Fenves, S. J., Garrett, J. H., Kiliccote, H., Law, K. H., ve Reed, K. A. (1995). Computer representations of design standards and building codes: US perspective. The International Journal of Construction Information Technology, 3(1), pp. 13–34.
  • Graphisoft. (2018). ArchiCAD 21. https://www.graphisoft.com/archicad/
  • Greenwood, D., Lockley, S., Malsane, S., ve Matthews, J. (2010). Automated Compliance Checking Using Building İnformation Models. Proceedings of the Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference, 2-3 September, Paris, France, pp. 363–371.
  • IAI. (1997). Release 1.0 IFC Model Architecture. International Alliance for Interoperability. http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/
  • ISO_10303-11. (1997). Product Data Representation and Exchange Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/38047.html
  • Lee, H., Lee, J.-K., Park, S., ve Kim, I. (2016). Translating building legislation into a computer-executable format for evaluating building permit requirements. Automation in Construction, 71, pp. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.008
  • Martins, J. P., ve Monteiro, A. (2013). LicA: a bim based automated code-checking application for water distribution systems. Automation in Construction, 29(23), pp. 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.08.008
  • Nawari, N. O. (2012). Automating codes conformance. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 18(4), pp. 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000049
  • Nawari, N. O., ve Alsaffar, A. (2015). Understanding computable building codes. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3(6), pp. 163–171. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2015.030601
  • NBIMS-US. (2015). National BIM Standard–United States Version 3. National Inst. of Building Sciences Washington, DC. https://www.nibs.org/news/242663/buildingSMART-alliance-Releases-NBIMS-US-Version-3.html
  • Shih, S.-Y., Sher, W. ve Giggins, H. (2013). Assessment of the building code of Australia to inform the development of BIM-enabled code checking system. Proceedings of the 19th World Building Congress: Construction and Society, 5-9 May, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1–12.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Architecture
Journal Section ERRATUM
Authors

Murat Aydın 0000-0002-3928-2936

Publication Date July 28, 2025
Submission Date July 28, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Aydın, M. (2025). The Building Project’s Data Representations in the Automated Code Compliance Checking Process. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 10(1), 672-672.