Review
BibTex RIS Cite

“DERS ARAŞTIRMASINA DAYALI DİSİPLİNLER ARASI ETKİNLİK PLANI GELİŞTİRME”: TASARIM BECERİ ATÖLYELERİ ÖĞRETMEN EĞİTİMİ MODEL ÖNERİSİ

Year 2022, Volume: 51 Issue: 234, 1781 - 1804, 09.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.870214

Abstract

Disiplinler arası yaklaşımlar, çağımız eğitim anlayışının gereklerinden biri olarak görülmektedir. Ders araştırması (ders imecesi) modeli dünyanın birçok ülkesinde uygulanan ve verimli sonuçlar elde edilen bir mesleki gelişim yaklaşımı olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Öte yandan ülkemizdeki eğitim sahamızı değerlendirdiğimizde disiplinler arası, iş birlikli, uygulamalı çalışmaların geliştirilmesine yönelik ihtiyaçlar olduğu görülmektedir. Özellikle MEB 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu belgesindeki “Tasarım Beceri Atölyeleri” bu ihtiyacın hem tespit hem de çözüm yerleri olarak görülmekle beraber, geliştirilen modelin atölyeler odaklı kullanılmasıyla öğretim niteliğinin arttırılması ve öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimlerinin sürdürülebilirliği açısından önem arz ettiği düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırmada disiplinler arası yaklaşımlar ile ders araştırması modelinin bir araya getirilmesiyle “Ders Araştırmasına Dayalı Disiplinler Arası Etkinlik Planı Geliştirme Modeli” önerisinin ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Modelin özellikle Tasarım Beceri Atölyelerinde kullanılmasına yönelik düşüncelerden ve sahada oluşabilecek muhtemel yansımalardan yola çıkılarak öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

References

  • Akiba, M., Murata, A., Howard, C. C., ve Wilkinson, B. (2019). Lesson study design features for supporting collaborative teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 352-365.
  • Ansawi, B., ve Pang, V. (2017). The relationship between professional learning community and lesson study: a case study in low performing schools in Sabah, Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(1-3), 63–70.
  • Baba, T. (2007). Japanese education and lesson study: An overview section 1.1: “How is lesson study implemented”. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.). Japanese lesson study in mathematics, 2-7.
  • Bayram, İ., ve Bıkmaz, F. (2018). Exploring the lesson study experience of EFL instructors at higher education: a pilot study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s15m.
  • Bayram, İ., ve Canaran, Ö. (2019). An investigation of Turkish novice EFL teachers’ perceptions of lesson study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 11(1), 172-189.
  • Bayram Jacobs, D. (2012). Japonya’da fen ve fizik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimi ve mesleki gelişimde Japon yaklaşımı: “Ders araştırması”. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 33-54.
  • Boran, E., ve Tarım, K. (2018). Reflections of middle school teachers’ professional competency on teaching with lesson study model. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 23-38.
  • Bozkurt, E., ve Yetkin Özdemir, İ. E. (2018). Mesleki gelişimde iş birliğine dayalı bir yaklaşım: ders araştırması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.375675.
  • Bozkuş, F., Kablan, Z., Pak, K., Özdişçi, S., Özdemir, A., Aydın, M. ve Boğazlıyan, D. (2017). Ders imecesi (lesson study) modeli hakkında uygulayıcı görüşleri. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(28), 141-160.
  • Bütün, M. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ early lesson study experiences in Turkey: challenges and advantages. World Journal of Education, 9(5), 51-62.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision, Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  • Calleja, J., ve Formosa, L. (2020). Teacher change through cognitive conflicts: the case of an art lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(4), 383-395.
  • Campbell, C., ve Henning, M. B. (2010). Planning, teaching, and assessing elementary education interdisciplinary curriculum. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 179-186.
  • Cerbin, W., ve Koop, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250-257.
  • Chen, X. (2017) Theorizing Chinese lesson study from a cultural perspective. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 283-292, https://doi.org/10.1108/
  • Chen, W., Cone, T. P., ve Cone, S. L. (2007). A collaborative approach to developing an interdisciplinary unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 103-124.
  • Chokshi, S., ve Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500710.
  • Çağıran Gülten, D., ve Ceran, E. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine ilişkin disiplinler arası ders tasarımları ve değerlendirmeleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 107-123.
  • Çevik, A., ve Müldür, M. (2021). A model trial for the “teaching practice” course within Turkish teaching programs: lesson study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(Special Issue 1), 403-422.
  • Deneme, S., ve Ada, S. (2012). On applying the interdisciplinary approach in primary school. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 885-889.
  • Doig, B., ve Groves, S. (2011). Japanese lesson study: teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77-93.
  • Drake, S. M., ve Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. ASCD. Dudley, P. (2011) Lesson Study: a Handbook (2011), http://lessonstudy.co.uk/lesson-study-a-handbook/
  • Elliott J. (2019). What is lesson study? European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 54(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12339.
  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
  • Eraslan, A. (2008). Japanese lesson study: can it work in Turkey? Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 62-67.
  • Fernandez, C., ve Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study a Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Gardner, J. E., Wissick, C. A., Schweder, W., ve Canter, L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary instruction in general and special education thematic units and technology. Remedial and Special Education, 24(3), 161-172.
  • Gözel, E., ve Erdem, A., R. (2016). Japon öğretmen eğitiminde bir model: ders İmecesi, OPUS –Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(11), 521-538.
  • Gülhan, F. (2021a). Okul paydaşlarının tasarım beceri atölyelerine yönelik beklentilerine dayalı görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 7(15), 235-260.
  • Gülhan, F. (2021b, 30 Ocak). Tasarım beceri atölyeleri-mekândan çok yönlü öğrenme dönüşümüne, Star Açık Görüş. https://www.star.com.tr/acik-gorus/mekandan-cok-yonlu-ogrenme-donusumune-haber-1606059/.
  • Günay, R. Yücel Toy, B., ve Bahadır, E. (2016). Öğretmen eğitiminde ders araştırması modeli ve Türkiye’de hizmet öncesi öğretmenlik uygulamalarına yönelik bir model önerisi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(42), 1224-1237.
  • Güner, P., ve Akyüz, D. (2017). Ders imecesi mesleki gelişim modeli: öğretmen adaylarının fark etme becerilerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 16(2), 428-452.
  • Heck, S. F. (1980). Planning: the key to successful interdisciplinary teaching, Middle School Journal, 11(4), 10-12. https://doi.org /10.1080/00940771.1980.11495560.
  • Hervas, G., ve Medina, J. L. (2020). Key components of lesson study from the perspective of complexity: a theoretical analysis, Teachers and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1745174
  • Hurd, J., ve Licciardo-Musso, L. (2005). Lesson study: teacher-led professional development in literacy instruction. Language Arts, 82(5), 388-395.
  • İstMEM (İstanbul İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü). (2021). Tasarım beceri atölyeleri-uygulama rehberi ve disiplinler arası etkinlik önerileri kitapçığı, https://istanbul.meb.gov.tr/www/yapabilen-cocuklar-icin/icerik/3727.
  • Kanellopoulou, E. D., ve Darra, M. (2019). Benefits, difficulties and conditions of lesson study implementation in basic teacher education: a review. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 18-35. https://doi.org/ 10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p18
  • Kıncal, R. Y., ve Beypınar, D. (2015). Ders araştırması uygulamasının matematik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimlerine ve öğrenme sürecinin geliştirilmesine etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 186-210.
  • Korkmaz, H., ve Konukaldı, I. (2015). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde disiplinler arası tematik öğretim yaklaşımının öğrencilerin öğrenme ürünleri üzerine etkisi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 1-22.
  • Lee, V., ve Madden, M. (2019). We’re in this together: principals and teachers as partners and learners in lesson study. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 51–64.
  • Lewanowski-Breen, E., Ni Shuilleabhain, A., ve Meehan, M. (2019). Investigating the longitudinal impact of participating in school-based lesson study on mathematics teachers’ professional community. In Harbison, L. and Twohill, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Research in Mathematics Education in Ireland (MEI7), (pp. 163–170). Dublin, Ireland.
  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., ve Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
  • Makinae, N. (2010) The origin of lesson study in Japan. The 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education: In Search of Excellence in Mathematics Education, 15, Tokyo: Japan.
  • Mayorga Fernández, M. J., Peña Trapero, N., ve De La Rosa Moreno L. (2021). Lesson study in initial training: an interdisciplinary academic experience. a case study in Spain, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 10(3), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2021-0001.
  • MEB (Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı) (2016). STEM eğitimi raporu, Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü, http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/stem_egitimi_raporu.pdf
  • MEB (2018). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu, http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/
  • MEB (2019). Kazanım merkezli STEM uygulamaları, Özel Öğretim Kurumları Genel Müdürlüğü, https://ookgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_01/29164143_STEM_KitapYk.pdf
  • MEB (2021). Tasarım beceri atölyesi-okul yöneticileri, öğretmenler ve öğrenciler için rehber. https://tba.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TBA-Rehber.pdf.
  • Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. L. C. Hart et al. (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. (pp 1-12), Springer Science Business Media B.V.
  • Næsheim-Bjørkvik, G., Helgevold, N., ve Østrem, S. (2019). Lesson study as a professional tool to strengthen collaborative enquiry in mentoring sessions in initial teacher education, European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02619768.2019.1641487.
  • Nurwidodo, N., Hendayana, S., Hindun, I., ve Sarimanah, E. (2018). Strategies for establishing networking with partner schools for implementing lesson study in Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5489.
  • Orhan, G. (2020). Ders araştırması bağlamında ingilizce öğretmenlerinin öğretim görevlerine yönelik sergilemiş oldukları hazırlık ve yansıtma faaliyetleri. [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Rappleye, J., ve Komatsu, H. (2017). How to make lesson study work in America and worldwide: a Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education. Research in Comparative and International Education, 12(4), 398–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499917740656.
  • Roback, P., Chance, B. Legler, J., ve Moore, T. (2006) Applying Japanese lesson study principles to an upper-level undergraduate statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2006.11910580.
  • Saito, E. (2012) Key issues of lesson study in Japan and the United States: a literature review, Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 777-789. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.668857.
  • Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania, The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
  • Serbest, A. (2014). Ders imecesi yönteminin etki alanları üzerine bir meta-sentez çalışması. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
  • Stigler, J., ve Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. The Free Press, California Technical Assistance Center.
  • Styron, R. A. (2013). Interdisciplinary education: a reflection of the real world. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 11(9), 47-52.
  • Takahashi, A., ve Yoshida, M. (2004). Ideas for establishing lesson-study communities, Teaching Children Mathematics, 436-443.
  • Tamura, T., ve Uesugi, Y. (2019). Involving students in lesson study: a new perspective. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(2), 139-151.
  • Uştuk O., ve De Costa P. I. (2020). Reflection as meta-action: lesson study and EFL teacher professional development. TESOL Journal, 00(e531). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.531.
  • Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., ve Van Halem, N. (2017). Teacher learning in the context of lesson study: a video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211-224.
  • Whisenhut, T. G. (2009). The impact of interdisciplinary lesson study on teachers’ instructional decisions and technology use. [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Oklahoma, Graduate College, Norman, Oklahoma.
  • Wolthuis, F., van Veen, K., de Vries, S., ve Hubers, M. (2020). Between lethal and local adaptation: Lesson study as an organizational routine. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, [101534]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101534
  • Yazıcı, L. (2019, 29 Kasım). Tasarım-beceri atölyeleri ve akademik perspektif, Star Açık Görüş. https://www.star.com.tr/acik-gorus/tasarimbeceri-atolyeleri-ve-akademikperspektif-haber-1497133/
  • Yennizar, Zulqarnain, Elfa Eriyani, Zukhairina, Novi Susanti, ve Dini Kausari (2020). Application of lesson study with a scientific approach: a case study of early childhood education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 104-111. https://doi.org /10.31838/jcr.07.07.17
  • Zhou, G., ve Xu, J. (2017). Microteaching lesson study: an approach to prepare teacher candidates to teach science through inquiry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 5(3), 235-247. https://doi.org /10.18404/ijemst. 296039.
Year 2022, Volume: 51 Issue: 234, 1781 - 1804, 09.05.2022
https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.870214

Abstract

References

  • Akiba, M., Murata, A., Howard, C. C., ve Wilkinson, B. (2019). Lesson study design features for supporting collaborative teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 352-365.
  • Ansawi, B., ve Pang, V. (2017). The relationship between professional learning community and lesson study: a case study in low performing schools in Sabah, Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(1-3), 63–70.
  • Baba, T. (2007). Japanese education and lesson study: An overview section 1.1: “How is lesson study implemented”. In M. Isoda, M. Stephens, Y. Ohara, & T. Miyakawa (Eds.). Japanese lesson study in mathematics, 2-7.
  • Bayram, İ., ve Bıkmaz, F. (2018). Exploring the lesson study experience of EFL instructors at higher education: a pilot study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c3s15m.
  • Bayram, İ., ve Canaran, Ö. (2019). An investigation of Turkish novice EFL teachers’ perceptions of lesson study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 11(1), 172-189.
  • Bayram Jacobs, D. (2012). Japonya’da fen ve fizik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimi ve mesleki gelişimde Japon yaklaşımı: “Ders araştırması”. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 33-54.
  • Boran, E., ve Tarım, K. (2018). Reflections of middle school teachers’ professional competency on teaching with lesson study model. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(1), 23-38.
  • Bozkurt, E., ve Yetkin Özdemir, İ. E. (2018). Mesleki gelişimde iş birliğine dayalı bir yaklaşım: ders araştırması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.375675.
  • Bozkuş, F., Kablan, Z., Pak, K., Özdişçi, S., Özdemir, A., Aydın, M. ve Boğazlıyan, D. (2017). Ders imecesi (lesson study) modeli hakkında uygulayıcı görüşleri. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(28), 141-160.
  • Bütün, M. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ early lesson study experiences in Turkey: challenges and advantages. World Journal of Education, 9(5), 51-62.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision, Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  • Calleja, J., ve Formosa, L. (2020). Teacher change through cognitive conflicts: the case of an art lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(4), 383-395.
  • Campbell, C., ve Henning, M. B. (2010). Planning, teaching, and assessing elementary education interdisciplinary curriculum. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 179-186.
  • Cerbin, W., ve Koop, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250-257.
  • Chen, X. (2017) Theorizing Chinese lesson study from a cultural perspective. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 283-292, https://doi.org/10.1108/
  • Chen, W., Cone, T. P., ve Cone, S. L. (2007). A collaborative approach to developing an interdisciplinary unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 103-124.
  • Chokshi, S., ve Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408500710.
  • Çağıran Gülten, D., ve Ceran, E. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine ilişkin disiplinler arası ders tasarımları ve değerlendirmeleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 107-123.
  • Çevik, A., ve Müldür, M. (2021). A model trial for the “teaching practice” course within Turkish teaching programs: lesson study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(Special Issue 1), 403-422.
  • Deneme, S., ve Ada, S. (2012). On applying the interdisciplinary approach in primary school. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 885-889.
  • Doig, B., ve Groves, S. (2011). Japanese lesson study: teacher professional development through communities of inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77-93.
  • Drake, S. M., ve Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. ASCD. Dudley, P. (2011) Lesson Study: a Handbook (2011), http://lessonstudy.co.uk/lesson-study-a-handbook/
  • Elliott J. (2019). What is lesson study? European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 54(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12339.
  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
  • Eraslan, A. (2008). Japanese lesson study: can it work in Turkey? Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 62-67.
  • Fernandez, C., ve Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study a Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Gardner, J. E., Wissick, C. A., Schweder, W., ve Canter, L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary instruction in general and special education thematic units and technology. Remedial and Special Education, 24(3), 161-172.
  • Gözel, E., ve Erdem, A., R. (2016). Japon öğretmen eğitiminde bir model: ders İmecesi, OPUS –Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(11), 521-538.
  • Gülhan, F. (2021a). Okul paydaşlarının tasarım beceri atölyelerine yönelik beklentilerine dayalı görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 7(15), 235-260.
  • Gülhan, F. (2021b, 30 Ocak). Tasarım beceri atölyeleri-mekândan çok yönlü öğrenme dönüşümüne, Star Açık Görüş. https://www.star.com.tr/acik-gorus/mekandan-cok-yonlu-ogrenme-donusumune-haber-1606059/.
  • Günay, R. Yücel Toy, B., ve Bahadır, E. (2016). Öğretmen eğitiminde ders araştırması modeli ve Türkiye’de hizmet öncesi öğretmenlik uygulamalarına yönelik bir model önerisi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(42), 1224-1237.
  • Güner, P., ve Akyüz, D. (2017). Ders imecesi mesleki gelişim modeli: öğretmen adaylarının fark etme becerilerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 16(2), 428-452.
  • Heck, S. F. (1980). Planning: the key to successful interdisciplinary teaching, Middle School Journal, 11(4), 10-12. https://doi.org /10.1080/00940771.1980.11495560.
  • Hervas, G., ve Medina, J. L. (2020). Key components of lesson study from the perspective of complexity: a theoretical analysis, Teachers and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1745174
  • Hurd, J., ve Licciardo-Musso, L. (2005). Lesson study: teacher-led professional development in literacy instruction. Language Arts, 82(5), 388-395.
  • İstMEM (İstanbul İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğü). (2021). Tasarım beceri atölyeleri-uygulama rehberi ve disiplinler arası etkinlik önerileri kitapçığı, https://istanbul.meb.gov.tr/www/yapabilen-cocuklar-icin/icerik/3727.
  • Kanellopoulou, E. D., ve Darra, M. (2019). Benefits, difficulties and conditions of lesson study implementation in basic teacher education: a review. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 18-35. https://doi.org/ 10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p18
  • Kıncal, R. Y., ve Beypınar, D. (2015). Ders araştırması uygulamasının matematik öğretmenlerinin mesleki gelişimlerine ve öğrenme sürecinin geliştirilmesine etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 186-210.
  • Korkmaz, H., ve Konukaldı, I. (2015). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji eğitiminde disiplinler arası tematik öğretim yaklaşımının öğrencilerin öğrenme ürünleri üzerine etkisi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 1-22.
  • Lee, V., ve Madden, M. (2019). We’re in this together: principals and teachers as partners and learners in lesson study. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 51–64.
  • Lewanowski-Breen, E., Ni Shuilleabhain, A., ve Meehan, M. (2019). Investigating the longitudinal impact of participating in school-based lesson study on mathematics teachers’ professional community. In Harbison, L. and Twohill, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Research in Mathematics Education in Ireland (MEI7), (pp. 163–170). Dublin, Ireland.
  • Lewis, C., Perry, R., ve Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
  • Makinae, N. (2010) The origin of lesson study in Japan. The 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education: In Search of Excellence in Mathematics Education, 15, Tokyo: Japan.
  • Mayorga Fernández, M. J., Peña Trapero, N., ve De La Rosa Moreno L. (2021). Lesson study in initial training: an interdisciplinary academic experience. a case study in Spain, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 10(3), 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2021-0001.
  • MEB (Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı) (2016). STEM eğitimi raporu, Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü, http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/stem_egitimi_raporu.pdf
  • MEB (2018). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu, http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/
  • MEB (2019). Kazanım merkezli STEM uygulamaları, Özel Öğretim Kurumları Genel Müdürlüğü, https://ookgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_01/29164143_STEM_KitapYk.pdf
  • MEB (2021). Tasarım beceri atölyesi-okul yöneticileri, öğretmenler ve öğrenciler için rehber. https://tba.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TBA-Rehber.pdf.
  • Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. L. C. Hart et al. (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education. (pp 1-12), Springer Science Business Media B.V.
  • Næsheim-Bjørkvik, G., Helgevold, N., ve Østrem, S. (2019). Lesson study as a professional tool to strengthen collaborative enquiry in mentoring sessions in initial teacher education, European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02619768.2019.1641487.
  • Nurwidodo, N., Hendayana, S., Hindun, I., ve Sarimanah, E. (2018). Strategies for establishing networking with partner schools for implementing lesson study in Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5489.
  • Orhan, G. (2020). Ders araştırması bağlamında ingilizce öğretmenlerinin öğretim görevlerine yönelik sergilemiş oldukları hazırlık ve yansıtma faaliyetleri. [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Rappleye, J., ve Komatsu, H. (2017). How to make lesson study work in America and worldwide: a Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education. Research in Comparative and International Education, 12(4), 398–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499917740656.
  • Roback, P., Chance, B. Legler, J., ve Moore, T. (2006) Applying Japanese lesson study principles to an upper-level undergraduate statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2006.11910580.
  • Saito, E. (2012) Key issues of lesson study in Japan and the United States: a literature review, Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 777-789. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.668857.
  • Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania, The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
  • Serbest, A. (2014). Ders imecesi yönteminin etki alanları üzerine bir meta-sentez çalışması. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
  • Stigler, J., ve Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. The Free Press, California Technical Assistance Center.
  • Styron, R. A. (2013). Interdisciplinary education: a reflection of the real world. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 11(9), 47-52.
  • Takahashi, A., ve Yoshida, M. (2004). Ideas for establishing lesson-study communities, Teaching Children Mathematics, 436-443.
  • Tamura, T., ve Uesugi, Y. (2019). Involving students in lesson study: a new perspective. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 9(2), 139-151.
  • Uştuk O., ve De Costa P. I. (2020). Reflection as meta-action: lesson study and EFL teacher professional development. TESOL Journal, 00(e531). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.531.
  • Vrikki, M., Warwick, P., Vermunt, J. D., Mercer, N., ve Van Halem, N. (2017). Teacher learning in the context of lesson study: a video-based analysis of teacher discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211-224.
  • Whisenhut, T. G. (2009). The impact of interdisciplinary lesson study on teachers’ instructional decisions and technology use. [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Oklahoma, Graduate College, Norman, Oklahoma.
  • Wolthuis, F., van Veen, K., de Vries, S., ve Hubers, M. (2020). Between lethal and local adaptation: Lesson study as an organizational routine. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, [101534]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101534
  • Yazıcı, L. (2019, 29 Kasım). Tasarım-beceri atölyeleri ve akademik perspektif, Star Açık Görüş. https://www.star.com.tr/acik-gorus/tasarimbeceri-atolyeleri-ve-akademikperspektif-haber-1497133/
  • Yennizar, Zulqarnain, Elfa Eriyani, Zukhairina, Novi Susanti, ve Dini Kausari (2020). Application of lesson study with a scientific approach: a case study of early childhood education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 104-111. https://doi.org /10.31838/jcr.07.07.17
  • Zhou, G., ve Xu, J. (2017). Microteaching lesson study: an approach to prepare teacher candidates to teach science through inquiry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 5(3), 235-247. https://doi.org /10.18404/ijemst. 296039.
There are 68 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Derleme Makalesi
Authors

Filiz Gülhan 0000-0002-7915-6299

Publication Date May 9, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 51 Issue: 234

Cite

APA Gülhan, F. (2022). “DERS ARAŞTIRMASINA DAYALI DİSİPLİNLER ARASI ETKİNLİK PLANI GELİŞTİRME”: TASARIM BECERİ ATÖLYELERİ ÖĞRETMEN EĞİTİMİ MODEL ÖNERİSİ. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(234), 1781-1804. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.870214