TR33 ve TR81 Bölgelerinde Yeşil Dönüşüm ve Yeşil İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin TR33 (Afyonkarahisar, Kütahya, Manisa, Uşak) ve TR81 (Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın) bölgelerinde yeşil dönüşüm tedbirlerini ve potansiyel yeşil insan kaynakları yönetimi (YİKY) uygulamalarını incelemektir. Çalışma, yeşil dönüşüm süreçlerinin bölgesel düzeyde nasıl şekillendiğini ve YİKY uygulamalarının bu dönüşüme nasıl katkı sağlayabileceğini anlamayı hedeflemektedir. Bu kapsamda, TR33 ve TR81 bölgelerindeki kalkınma ajansları tarafından hazırlanan güncel bölge planları, doküman analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, yeşil dönüşüm tedbirlerinin bölgesel dinamiklere göre farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. TR33 bölgesi, hayvancılık ve tarıma dayalı sanayide sürdürülebilirlik ve doğal kaynakların etkin kullanımıyla öne çıkarken, TR81 bölgesi enerji yoğun sektörlerde kaynak verimliliği ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerine odaklanmaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma, yeşil dönüşüm süreçlerinin etkinliğini artırmak amacıyla, yeşil işe alım, yeşil eğitim ve geliştirme, yeşil performans değerlendirme, yeşil ücret ve ödül yönetimi ve yeşil iş sağlığı ve güvenliği uygulamaları önermektedir.

Keywords

• Bölgesel Kalkınma
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Yeşil Dönüşüm
• İnsan Kaynakları

A Comparative Analysis of Green Transformation and Green Human Resources Management Practices in TR33 and TR81 Regions

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine green transformation measures and potential green human resources management (GHRM) practices in Turkey’s TR33 (Afyonkarahisar, Kütahya, Manisa, Uşak) and TR81 (Zonguldak, Karabük, Bartın) regions. The study seeks to understand how green transformation processes are shaped at the regional level and how GHRM practices can contribute to this transformation. In this context, the current regional plans prepared by the development agencies in the TR33 and TR81 regions have been analyzed using the document analysis method. The findings reveal that green transformation measures vary based on regional dynamics. The TR33 region stands out for its focus on sustainability and the efficient use of natural resources in livestock and agriculture-based industries, while the TR81 region focuses on resource efficiency and environmental sustainability goals in energy-intensive sectors. Furthermore, the study recommends green recruitment, green training and development, green performance appraisal, green compensation and reward management, and green occupational health and safety to enhance the effectiveness of green transformation processes.

Keywords

• Regional Development
• Sustainability
• Green Transformation
• Human Resources

References

1. Adekoya, O. D., Mordi, C. ve Ajonbadi, H. A. (2023). Green human resource management: An introduction. İçinde O. D. Adekoya, C. Mordi, ve H. A. Ajonbadi (Edt.), Global perspectives on green HRM: Highlighting practices across the world (ss. 1-22). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
2. Agan, B. (2024). Sustainable development through green transition in EU countries: New evidence from panel quantile regression. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121545
3. Ahmad, S. (2015). Green human resource management: Policies and practices. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1), 1-13.
4. Ahmad, S. (2024). GHRM process: Step towards sustainability. İçinde M. Y. Yusliza ve D. W. S. Renwick (Edt.), Green human resource management: A view from global south countries (ss. 43-56). Singapore: Springer.
5. Ahmad, J., Al Mamun, A., Reza, M. N. H., Makhbul, Z. K. M. ve Ali, K. A. M. (2023). Green human resource management, competitive advantages, and green ambidexterity: Using partial least squares structural equation modeling and necessary condition analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(37), 87938-87957.
6. Altassan, M. (2024). The nexus between green HR practices and firm sustainable performance in Saudi Arabia manufacturing industry: The role of green innovation and green transformation leadership. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 2207-2220.
7. Ansori, S. ve Yusuf, R. (2023). Addressing the global environmental crisis: Strategies for sustainable development. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(2), 63-75.
8. Arora, M. ve Kaul, A. (2020). Green human resource management: An empirical study of India. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 61-66.

9. Bajpai, D. ve Tripathi, S. N. (2023). Role of human resource in promoting sustainability, in the organizations of future. Madhya Pradesh Journal of Social Sciences, 28(2), 36-54.
10. BAKKA (2013). 2014-2023 Batı Karadeniz Bölge Planı-Mevcut durum analizi. Erişim adresi: http://bakkakutuphane.org/upload/dokumandosya/cilt_1_icsayfalar_spreads.pdf
11. BAKKA (2023a). Batı Karadeniz 2024-2028 bölge planı-Mevcut durum analizi. Erişim adresi: https://www.bakka.gov.tr/assets/upload/dosyalar/bati-karadeniz-bp-mda.pdf
12. BAKKA (2023b). Batı Karadeniz 2024-2028 bölge planı-Plan (Vizyon, stratejik öncelikler hedefler, tedbirler). Erişim adresi: https://www.bakka.gov.tr/assets/upload/dosyalar/bati-karadeniz-bp-plan.pdf
13. Cahyadi, A., Natalisa, D., Poor, J., Perizade, B. ve Szabo, K. (2023). Predicting the relationship between green transformational leadership, green human resource management practices, and employees’ green behavior. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 1-15.
14. Cheba, K., Bąk, I., Szopik-Depczynska, K. ve Ioppolo, G. (2022). Directions of green transformation of the European Union countries. Ecological Indicators, 136, 1-15.
15. Çelebioğlu, F. ve Dall’erba, S. (2021). Using various types of location quotients to disaggregate Turkey’s input-output table: An application to the production structure of region TR33. Ege Academic Review, 21(3), 273-284.
16. Devi, S., Yadav, B., Goel, D., Kaur, S. ve Bhoyar, S. (2024). Embracing green HRM: Propelling organizational sustainability forward. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(4), 1-10.
17. Dolge, K. ve Blumberga, D. (2021). Economic growth in contrast to GHG emission reduction measures in green deal context. Ecological Indicators, 130, 1-11.
18. European Union (2022). Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality (2022/C 243/04). Official Journal of the European Union, 243, 35-51.
19. Fapohunda, T. M., Genty, K. I. ve Olanipekun, L. O. (2021). Green training and development practices on environmental sustainability: Evidence from Wamco Plc. Journal of Educational Management & Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-19.
20. Fukui, H., Man, D. C. ve Phan, A. (2021). Digital earth: A platform for the SDGs and green transformation at the global and local level, employing essential SDGs variables. Big Earth Data, 5(4), 476-496.
21. Global Green Growth Institute (2019). Achieving global green transformation: Report summary. Erişim adresi: https://gggi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Achieving-Green-Growth-Transformation- Report.pdf
22. Gu, S., Xie, M. ve Zhang, X. (2019). Green transformation and development. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Henzelmann, T. ve Hofinger, A. (2011). Qualifications-Investing in education. İçinde Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (Edt.), Green growth, green profit: How green transformation boosts business (ss. 236-245). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Iacobuta, G. I., Brandi, C., Dzebo, A. ve Duron, S. D. E. (2022). Aligning climate and sustainable development finance through an SDG lens. The role of development assistance in implementing the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Change, 74, 1-12.
25. Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H.-M. ve Phetvaroon, K. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83-93.
26. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Mukherjee, S. ve Sanyal, S. (2024). The ethics of green transformation: A business resilience-focused approach. İçinde J. Walsh (Edt.), Business ethics-The competitive advantage of trust and reputation, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.115028
28. Neves, A., Godina, R., Azevedo, S. G., Pimentel, C. ve Matias, J. C. O. (2019). The potential of industrial symbiosis: Case analysis and main drivers and barriers to its implementation. Sustainability, 11(24), 1-68.
29. OECD (2015). Towards green growth? Tracking progress. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2015/07/towards-green- growth_g1g53897/9789264234437-en.pdf
30. O’Rielly, K. ve Jeswiet, J. (2015). Improving industrial energy efficiency through the implementation of waste heat recovery systems. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 39(1), 125-136.
31. Paille, P. (2022). Green human resource management: Introduction and overview. İçinde P. Paille (Edt.), Green human resource management research: Issues, trends, and challenges (ss. 1-6). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Renwick, D. W. S. (2018). Towards an understanding of green human resource management. İçinde D. W. S. Renwick (Edt.), Contemporary developments in green human resource management research: Towards sustainability in action? Abingdon, Oxon & New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Republic of Rwanda (2022). Revised green growth and climate resilience: National strategy for climate change and low carbon development. Kigali, Rwanda: Ministry of Environment.
34. Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M. ve Afridi, M. A. (2019). Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424-438.
35. Shah, M. (2019). Green human resource management: Development of a valid measurement scale. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 771-785.
36. Siyambalapitiya, J., Zhang, X. ve Liu, X. (2018). Green human resource management: A proposed model in the context of Sri Lanka’s tourism industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 542-555.
37. Ulusoy, A., Atılgan, A., Rolbiecki, R., Jagosz, B. ve Rolbiecki, S. (2024). Innovative approaches for sustainable wastewater resource management. Agriculture, 14(12), 1-17.
38. Zafer Kalkınma Ajansı (2024a). TR33 bölgesinde sanayi ve tarımda yeşil fırsatlar. Erişim adresi: https://zafer.gov.tr/magazines?seotitle=/News/raporlar-strateji-belgeleri/raporlar/diger-rapor-ve- analizler
39. Zafer Kalkınma Ajansı (2024b). TR33 bölgesi 2024-2028 bölge planı- Mevcut durum analizi. Erişim adresi: https://zafer.gov.tr/magazines?seotitle=/News/raporlar-strateji-belgeleri/raporlar/diger-rapor-ve- analizler
40. Zafer Kalkınma Ajansı (2024c). TR33 bölgesi 2024-2028 bölge planı-Ana plan metni. Erişim adresi: https://dokuman.zafer.gov.tr/uiassets/filemanagement/FAAL%C4%B0YETLER/Planlama/TR33%20B%C3%B6l gesi%20B%C3%B6lge%20Plan%C4%B1/TR33BolgePlani2024-2028.pdf