Yeşil Sosyal Politika Literatürünün Haritalandırılması: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Abstract

Bu çalışma, 1924–2024 yılları arasında yeşil sosyal politika literatürünün gelişimini bibliyometrik analizle incelemiştir. Yayın sayıları 1990’lardan itibaren artış göstermiş ve 2024’te 1.193 ile zirveye ulaşmıştır. Analize, 629.686 yazardan 24.399’u dahil edilmiştir. İş birliği analizinde 3.363 yazarın 12.894 bağlantısı ve en güçlü 86 yazarın 13.653 bağlantı gücü belirlenmiştir; Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Hong Chen ve Isabelle Anguelovski en etkili iş birlikçileri olmuştur. Anahtar kelimelerde “sustainability”, “sustainable development” ve “climate change” öne çıkmıştır. Atıf analizinde Sjerp de Vries, Howard Frumkin ve Terry Hartig en çok atıf alan yazarlar; Ruyin Long, Hong Chen ve Isabelle Anguelovski ise en üretken yazarlar olmuştur. “Journal of Cleaner Production”, “Sustainability” ve “Science of the Total Environment” en çok atıf alan dergilerdir. Ülkeler arasında Çin, ABD ve Birleşik Krallık liderdir. Kurum bazında en çok atıf Pompeu Fabra Üniversitesi’ne, en fazla yayın Çin’deki Pekin Teknoloji Enstitüsü ve Kuzey Çin Elektrik Enerjisi Üniversitesi’ne aittir. Eserler çevre, insan sağlığı ve toplumsal refah ilişkisini disiplinlerarası yaklaşımla ele alarak sosyal politika için stratejik bilgiler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, alandaki gelişim ve iş birliği dinamiklerine bütüncül bir bakış sağlayarak geleceğe rehberlik etme potansiyeline sahiptir.

Keywords

• Sosyal Politika
• Yeşil Sosyal Politika
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• İklim Değişikliği

Ethical Statement

“Yeşil Sosyal Politika Literatürünün Haritalandırılması: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz” başlıklı çalışmanın yazım sürecinde bilimsel kurallara, etik ve alıntı kurallarına uyulmuş; toplanan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış ve bu çalışma herhangi başka bir akademik yayın ortamına değerlendirme için gönderilmemiştir.

Mapping Literature of Green Social Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the development of literature on green social policy from 1924 to 2024. The number of publications increased from the 1990s onwards, peaking at 1,193 in 2024. Of the 629,686 authors, 24,399 were included in the analysis. A collaboration analysis identified 12,894 connections among 3,363 authors. The top 86 authors had a connection strength of 13,653, and Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Hong Chen and Isabelle Anguelovski were found to be the most influential collaborators. The most frequent keywords were 'sustainability', 'sustainable development', and 'climate change'. Citation analysis revealed that the most cited authors were Sjerp de Vries, Howard Frumkin and Terry Hartig, while the most productive authors were Ruyin Long, Hong Chen and Isabelle Anguelovski. Leading journals included the Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability, and the Science of the Total Environment. China, the USA, and the UK led in both citations and publications. Pompeu Fabra University received the most citations, while Beijing Institute of Technology and North China Electric Power University published the most. These works address the interrelations between the environment, human health, and social welfare using interdisciplinary approaches and provide strategic insights for social policy. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the development of the field and its collaborative dynamics, guiding future research and policymaking.

Keywords

• Social Policy
• Green Social Policy
• Sustainability
• Climate Change

Ethical Statement

During the writing process of the study “Mapping Literature of Green Social Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis” scientific rules, ethical and citation rules were followed. No falsification was made on the collected data and this study was not sent to any other academic publication medium for evaluation.

References

1. About Sustainability. Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/X97KT3
2. Anguelovski, I., et al. (2019). Expanding the environmental justice frame: The challenges and opportunities of urban green equity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.004
3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
4. Aysan, M. F., & Kaya, A. (2008). Türkiye'de sosyal politika disiplininin ve uygulamalarının gelişimi. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, (11), 223–250.
5. Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of environmental politics. Routledge.
6. Barrientos, A. (2011). Social protection and poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(3), 240–249.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00783.x
7. Barry, J. (2016). The politics of actually existing unsustainability: Human flourishing in a climate-changed, carbon-constrained world. Oxford University Press.
8. Barry, J., & Doherty, B. (2001). The greens and social policy: Movements, politics and practice? Social Policy & Administration, 35(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00252

9. Beg, N., Morlot, J. C., Davidson, O., Afrane-Okesse, Y., Tyani, L., Denton, F., ... & Rahman, A. A. (2002). Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy, 2(2–3), 129–144.
10. Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO₂ emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
11. Béné, C. (2011). Social protection and climate change. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00269.x
12. Bina, O. (2013). The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(6), 1023–1047.
13. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
14. Bryan, B. A., Nolan, M., McKellar, L., Connor, J. D., Newth, D., Harwood, T., ... & Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2016). Land-use and sustainability under intersecting global change and domestic policy scenarios: Trajectories for Australia to 2050. Global Environmental Change, 38, 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007
15. Cahill, M. (2002). The environment and social policy (1st ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315060941
16. Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. S. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(4), 2277–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01449-4
17. China’s transition to a low-carbon economy and climate resilience needs shifts in resources and technologies [Press release No: 2023/022/EAP]. (2025, May 27). Retrieved fromhttps://l24.im/J32Y
18. Chomsky, N., Pollin, R., & Polychroniou, C. J. (2020). Climate crisis and the global green new deal: The political economy of saving the planet. Verso Books.
19. Costella, C., McCord, A., van Aalst, M., Holmes, R., Ammoun, J., & Barca, V. (2021). Social protection and climate change: Scaling up ambition. Social Protection Approaches to COVID-19 Expert Advice Service (SPACE), DAI Global UK Ltd, United Kingdom.
20. Çelik, A. (2013). Avrupa Birliği sosyal politikası ve Türkiye (3. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
21. D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
22. de Vries, A., Werner, G., Wijlhuizen, E., Toom, V., Bovens, M., & Hulscher, S. (2024). Justice in climate policy: Distributing climate costs fairly (p. 164). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- XXXX-X (doğru DOI girilirse buraya yazılabilir)
23. de Vries, G. (2020). Public communication as a tool to implement environmental policies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 244–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12063
24. de Vries, M. S. (1999). Developments in Europe: The idea of policy generations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65(4), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085239906500405
25. de Vries, M. S. (2005). Generations of interactive policy-making in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305059593
26. de Vries, S. (2010). Nearby nature and human health: Looking at mechanisms and their implications in designing health-promoting environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), 1037–1056.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031037
27. de Vries, S. A., & Neergaard, U. (2025). Recalibration of EU internal market law paradigms in light of the EU Green Deal. SSRN.https://ssrn.com/abstract=5176659
28. de Vries, S., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Environmental justice in urban green space provision: The case of The Netherlands. Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(15), 5889-5907. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v12n15p5889
29. de Vries, S., Baliatsas, C., Verheij, R., & Dückers, M. (2025). Domestic gardens and morbidity: Associations between private green space and diagnosed health conditions in the Netherlands. Environment International, 199, 109450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109450
30. de Vries, S., et al. (2012). Is green space in the living environment associated with people's feelings of social safety? Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(2-4), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.08.001
31. de Vries, S., Van Dillen, S. M., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 26–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
32. de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
33. de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments — Healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731.https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
34. Dobson, A. (1990). Green political thought: An introduction. Routledge.
35. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
36. Erasmus University Rotterdam. (2024). Sustainability and SDG research agenda. https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/vision/sustainability
37. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
38. Felli, R., & Castree, N. (2012). Neoliberalising nature? The logics of the green economy. Environmental Politics, 21(2), 217–234.https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.664017
39. Ferris, J. (1993). Ecological versus social rationality: Can there be green social policies? In The politics of nature (1st ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge.
40. Fetting, C. (2020). The European Green Deal. ESDN Report, December, 2(9), 53. https://www.esdn.eu/fileadmin/ESDN_Reports/2020/ESDN_Report_2_2020.pdf
41. Fitzpatrick, T. (2011). Understanding the environment and social policy. Policy Press.
42. Fitzpatrick, T. (2023). Social policy in a climate emergency context: Towards an ecosocial research agenda. Journal of Social Policy, 52(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000721
43. Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2005). Understanding the environment and social policy (1st ed.). Policy Press. (Understanding Welfare: Social Issues, Policy and Practice Series)
44. Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2011). Understanding the environment and social policy. Policy Press.
45. Fitzpatrick, T., & Cahill, M. (Eds.). (2002). Environment and welfare: Towards a green social policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
46. Friel, S. (2010). Climate change, food insecurity and chronic diseases: Sustainable and healthy policy opportunities for Australia. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 21(6), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB10013
47. Frumkin, H. (2002). Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Reports, 117(3), 201–217.https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/117.3.201
48. Frumkin, H. (2005). Guest editorial: Health, equity, and the built environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(5), A290–A291. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.113-a290
49. Frumkin, H. (2018). Healthy communities, green communities. In T. Beatley (Ed.), Green community (pp. 118–125). Routledge.
50. Frumkin, H. (2022a). Hope, health, and the climate crisis. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 5, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100115
51. Frumkin, H. (Ed.). (2010). Environmental health: From global to local (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
52. Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., & Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 075001.https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
53. Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities (1st ed.). Island Press.
54. Frumkin, H., Fried, L., & Moody, R. (2012). Aging, climate change, and legacy thinking. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300617
55. Frumkin, H., Haines, A., & Rao, M. (2025). The US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement: Could it trump progress on climate change and health? BMJ, 388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025- 388
56. Frumkin, H., Shane, B., & Schottland, T. (2024). Box 17-2 How many trees can the world support? In Climate change and public health (p. 371).
57. Ganda, F., & Ngwakwe, C. C. (2014). The role of social policy in transition towards a green economy: The case of South Africa. Environmental Economics, 5(3), 32.
58. Gibson, A. G., & Hazelkorn, E. (2025). Reframing, reacting, or responding? The climate emergency and higher education in Ireland. In J. Kekäle & R. Pinheiro (Eds.), Higher education policy for tackling climate change (pp. 57–76). Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78479-8_3
59. Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 31–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306- 4573(98)00028-4
60. Goldstein, B. (2006). Environmental health: From global to local. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(11). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9111
61. Haghani, M., Ghaderi, H., & Hensher, D. (2024). Hidden effects and externalities of electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 194, 114335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114335
62. Hânlein, A. (2008). Gerhard Kessler'in hayatı ve Türkiye’de sosyal politikanın gelişmesindeki katkıları. In Journal of Social Policy Conferences (No. 54, ss. 203–213). İstanbul Üniversitesi.
63. Hartig, T. (2007). Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In C. W. Thompson & P. Travlou (Eds.), Open space: People space (pp. 215–234). Taylor & Francis.
64. Hartig, T. (2008). Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1614–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4
65. Hartig, T. (2021). Restoration in nature: Beyond the conventional narrative. In Nature and psychology: Biological, cognitive, developmental, and social pathways to well-being (pp. 89–151).
66. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
67. Hirvilammi, T., Häikiö, L., Johansson, H., Koch, M., & Perkiö, J. (2023). Social policy in a climate emergency context: Towards an ecosocial research agenda – Erratum. Journal of Social Policy, 52(2), 1.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000053
68. Huang, H., Long, R., Chen, H., Sun, K., Sun, Q., & Li, Q. (2023). Examining public attitudes and perceptions of waste sorting in China through an urban heterogeneity lens: A social media analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 199, 107233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107233
69. Hutajulu, H., Tahir, U., Utami, E. Y., Harsono, I., & Yuniarti, T. (2024). Green growth strategy and environmental policy integration in sustainable economic development: A review of bibliometric analysis. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(03), 474–482.
70. Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2018). Green inside activism for sustainable development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170072
71. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/green- jobs/publications/WCMS_432859/lang--en/index.htm
72. Journal of Cleaner Production. ( Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/78GR
73. Journal of Environmental Management. Retrieved April 26, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/vzcBT
74. Just the Transition Center. (2020). Just transition: A report for the OECD.https://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/Just-Transition-Center-Report.pdf
75. Kakkar, R., & Sachdeva, G. (2025). Bibliometric exploration of workplace happiness: Identifying patterns, research themes and opening up the research agenda. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 1–35.
76. Khurshid, A., Khan, K., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). 2030 agenda of sustainable transport: Can current progress lead towards carbon neutrality? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 122, 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103869
77. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
78. King, R., & Tingas, E. A. (2021). Potential for carbon-neutral advanced biofuels in UK road transport. Journal of Energy Engineering, 147(4), 04021025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943- 7897.0000799
79. Koray, M. (2007). Sosyal politikanın anlamı ve işlevini tartışmak. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2007(4), 15.
80. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
81. Liu, J., Long, R., Chen, H., Qin, L., Huang, H., Li, Q., & Ye, X. (2025). Assessing the effectiveness of green consumption policy in China: Evidence from social media data. Journal of Environmental Management, 376, 124500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.124500
82. Lozano, R. (2022). Sustainable development and sustainability. In Toward sustainable organisations: Strategies for sustainability (pp. 17–41). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99676-5_2
83. MacFarlane, A., Russell-Rose, T., & Shokraneh, F. (2022). Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 15, 200091.
84. Mandelli, M. (2022). Understanding eco-social policies: A proposed definition and typology. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221125083
85. Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., ... & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
86. McElwee, S. (2019, June 20). It's younger and cooler than a carbon tax. The Atlantic.https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/06/green-new-deal-may-be-more-popular-carbon- tax/592201/
87. Meadowcroft, J. (2005). Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344419
88. Midgley, J. (1996). Social work and economic development: Introduction. International Social Work, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872896039001
89. Miller, C., Iles, A., & Jones, C. F. (2013). The social dimensions of energy transitions. Science as Culture, 22(2), 135–148.https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786989
90. Mohy‐ud‐Din, K., Shahbaz, M., & Du, A. M. (2025). Corporate social responsibility and climate change mitigation: Discovering the interaction role of green audit and sustainability committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1198–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2636
91. Moriarty, P., Honnery, D., & Bebbington, J. (2020). Sustainability and social policy: Toward a green welfare state. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 717–728.
92. Muhmad, S. N., Cheema, S., Mohamad Ariff, A., Nik Him, N. F., & Muhmad, S. N. (2024). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of green finance and renewable energy development. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 7342–7355. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2767
93. Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
94. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Chen, H., & Anguelovski, I. (2017). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities 'just green enough'. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(10), 471–478.https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1588
95. Ortakaya, Ü. İ., Koca, D., & Akbaş, E. (2023). Yeşil sosyal politika: Sosyal adaletin ve ekolojik sürdürülebilirliğin bütünleşmesi. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 34(2), 45– 67.https://doi.org/xx.xxx/xxxxx(DOI eksik, tamamlanmalı)
96. Özden, O. (2022). The climate crisis and the global green new deal: The political economy of saving the planet. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergi, 11(1), 82– 89.https://doi.org/10.47934/tife.11.01.06
97. Paavola, J. (2017). Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK. Environmental Health, 16(Suppl 1), 113.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0328-z
98. Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114–122.
99. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020013
100. Plehwe, D., Moreno, J. A., & Neujeffski, M. (2025). Challenging energy transition and green jobs: Climate policy obstruction across borders. Critical Policy Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2025.2030975
101. Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.319
102. Rana, I. A., Khaled, S., Jamshed, A., & Nawaz, A. (2022). Social protection in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: A bibliometric and thematic review. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2022.2083872
103. Rani, S., & Devi, E. B. (2024). Impact of collective knowledge on individual research competence: Exploring the mediating influence of knowledge management processes. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2023-0401
104. Scopus Analiz Sonuçları, https://www.kisa.link/fHwkG, E.T. 23.05.2025.
105. Scheepers, M., Palacios, S. G., Jegu, E., Nogueira, L. P., Rutten, L., van Stralen, J., ... & Van Der Zwaan, B. (2022). Towards a climate-neutral energy system in the Netherlands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112097
106. Science of The Total Environment. Retrieved April 26, 2025, from https://l24.im/0GIfJc,
107. Smardon, R. (2024). [Review of the book The green city and social injustice: 21 tales from North America and Europe, by I. Anguelovski & J. J. T. Connolly (Eds.)]. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14, 618–619.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00926-0
108. Smitha Rao, & Teixeira, S. (2020). The Green New Deal: Social work’s role in environmental justice policy. Social Work, 65(2), 197–200.
109. Singh, A. K., Zhang, Y., & Anu. (2023). Understanding the evolution of environment, social and governance research: Novel implications from bibliometric and network analysis. Evaluation Review, 47(2), 350–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X221121244
110. Talas, C. (2001). Toplumsal politika (5. Baskı). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
111. Terán-Yépez, E., Jiménez-Castillo, D., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2021). International opportunity recognition: A comprehensive bibliometric review. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 19(1), 18–52.
112. The Journal of Cleaner Production. (n.d.). Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/78GR
113. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
114. Vaquero García, A., Bastida, M., Vazquez Taín, M. Á., & Others. (2024). The broad spectrum of sustainability and the social economy: Perspectives from bibliometric data. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02222-2
115. Wang, J., & Kim, H. S. (2023). Visualizing the landscape of home IoT research: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Sensors, 23(6), 3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063086
116. Wise, F., Gillich, A., & Palmer, P. (2025). Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 119, 103866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103866
117. Zhao, X., Nan, D., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Che, S. P., & Kim, J. H. (2023). Bibliometric study on environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 1087493.https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1087493