Yeşil Sosyal Politika Literatürünün Haritalandırılması: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 177 - 196, 16.01.2026

Nuray Turan

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1711418

Öz

Bu çalışma, 1924–2024 yılları arasında yeşil sosyal politika literatürünün gelişimini bibliyometrik analizle incelemiştir. Yayın sayıları 1990’lardan itibaren artış göstermiş ve 2024’te 1.193 ile zirveye ulaşmıştır. Analize, 629.686 yazardan 24.399’u dahil edilmiştir. İş birliği analizinde 3.363 yazarın 12.894 bağlantısı ve en güçlü 86 yazarın 13.653 bağlantı gücü belirlenmiştir; Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Hong Chen ve Isabelle Anguelovski en etkili iş birlikçileri olmuştur. Anahtar kelimelerde “sustainability”, “sustainable development” ve “climate change” öne çıkmıştır. Atıf analizinde Sjerp de Vries, Howard Frumkin ve Terry Hartig en çok atıf alan yazarlar; Ruyin Long, Hong Chen ve Isabelle Anguelovski ise en üretken yazarlar olmuştur. “Journal of Cleaner Production”, “Sustainability” ve “Science of the Total Environment” en çok atıf alan dergilerdir. Ülkeler arasında Çin, ABD ve Birleşik Krallık liderdir. Kurum bazında en çok atıf Pompeu Fabra Üniversitesi’ne, en fazla yayın Çin’deki Pekin Teknoloji Enstitüsü ve Kuzey Çin Elektrik Enerjisi Üniversitesi’ne aittir. Eserler çevre, insan sağlığı ve toplumsal refah ilişkisini disiplinlerarası yaklaşımla ele alarak sosyal politika için stratejik bilgiler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, alandaki gelişim ve iş birliği dinamiklerine bütüncül bir bakış sağlayarak geleceğe rehberlik etme potansiyeline sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Politika , Yeşil Sosyal Politika , Sürdürülebilirlik , İklim Değişikliği

Etik Beyan

“Yeşil Sosyal Politika Literatürünün Haritalandırılması: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz” başlıklı çalışmanın yazım sürecinde bilimsel kurallara, etik ve alıntı kurallarına uyulmuş; toplanan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış ve bu çalışma herhangi başka bir akademik yayın ortamına değerlendirme için gönderilmemiştir.

Mapping Literature of Green Social Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the development of literature on green social policy from 1924 to 2024. The number of publications increased from the 1990s onwards, peaking at 1,193 in 2024. Of the 629,686 authors, 24,399 were included in the analysis. A collaboration analysis identified 12,894 connections among 3,363 authors. The top 86 authors had a connection strength of 13,653, and Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Hong Chen and Isabelle Anguelovski were found to be the most influential collaborators. The most frequent keywords were 'sustainability', 'sustainable development', and 'climate change'. Citation analysis revealed that the most cited authors were Sjerp de Vries, Howard Frumkin and Terry Hartig, while the most productive authors were Ruyin Long, Hong Chen and Isabelle Anguelovski. Leading journals included the Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability, and the Science of the Total Environment. China, the USA, and the UK led in both citations and publications. Pompeu Fabra University received the most citations, while Beijing Institute of Technology and North China Electric Power University published the most. These works address the interrelations between the environment, human health, and social welfare using interdisciplinary approaches and provide strategic insights for social policy. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the development of the field and its collaborative dynamics, guiding future research and policymaking.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Policy , Green Social Policy , Sustainability , Climate Change

Etik Beyan

During the writing process of the study “Mapping Literature of Green Social Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis” scientific rules, ethical and citation rules were followed. No falsification was made on the collected data and this study was not sent to any other academic publication medium for evaluation.

Kaynakça

• About Sustainability. Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/X97KT3
• Anguelovski, I., et al. (2019). Expanding the environmental justice frame: The challenges and opportunities of urban green equity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.004
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Aysan, M. F., & Kaya, A. (2008). Türkiye'de sosyal politika disiplininin ve uygulamalarının gelişimi. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, (11), 223–250.
• Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of environmental politics. Routledge.
• Barrientos, A. (2011). Social protection and poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(3), 240–249.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00783.x
• Barry, J. (2016). The politics of actually existing unsustainability: Human flourishing in a climate-changed, carbon-constrained world. Oxford University Press.
• Barry, J., & Doherty, B. (2001). The greens and social policy: Movements, politics and practice? Social Policy & Administration, 35(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00252
• Beg, N., Morlot, J. C., Davidson, O., Afrane-Okesse, Y., Tyani, L., Denton, F., ... & Rahman, A. A. (2002). Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy, 2(2–3), 129–144.
• Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO₂ emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
• Béné, C. (2011). Social protection and climate change. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00269.x
• Bina, O. (2013). The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(6), 1023–1047.
• Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
• Bryan, B. A., Nolan, M., McKellar, L., Connor, J. D., Newth, D., Harwood, T., ... & Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2016). Land-use and sustainability under intersecting global change and domestic policy scenarios: Trajectories for Australia to 2050. Global Environmental Change, 38, 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007
• Cahill, M. (2002). The environment and social policy (1st ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315060941
• Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. S. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(4), 2277–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01449-4
• China’s transition to a low-carbon economy and climate resilience needs shifts in resources and technologies [Press release No: 2023/022/EAP]. (2025, May 27). Retrieved fromhttps://l24.im/J32Y
• Chomsky, N., Pollin, R., & Polychroniou, C. J. (2020). Climate crisis and the global green new deal: The political economy of saving the planet. Verso Books.
• Costella, C., McCord, A., van Aalst, M., Holmes, R., Ammoun, J., & Barca, V. (2021). Social protection and climate change: Scaling up ambition. Social Protection Approaches to COVID-19 Expert Advice Service (SPACE), DAI Global UK Ltd, United Kingdom.
• Çelik, A. (2013). Avrupa Birliği sosyal politikası ve Türkiye (3. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
• D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., ... & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
• de Vries, A., Werner, G., Wijlhuizen, E., Toom, V., Bovens, M., & Hulscher, S. (2024). Justice in climate policy: Distributing climate costs fairly (p. 164). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- XXXX-X (doğru DOI girilirse buraya yazılabilir)
• de Vries, G. (2020). Public communication as a tool to implement environmental policies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 244–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12063
• de Vries, M. S. (1999). Developments in Europe: The idea of policy generations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65(4), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085239906500405
• de Vries, M. S. (2005). Generations of interactive policy-making in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305059593
• de Vries, S. (2010). Nearby nature and human health: Looking at mechanisms and their implications in designing health-promoting environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), 1037–1056.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031037
• de Vries, S. A., & Neergaard, U. (2025). Recalibration of EU internal market law paradigms in light of the EU Green Deal. SSRN.https://ssrn.com/abstract=5176659
• de Vries, S., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Environmental justice in urban green space provision: The case of The Netherlands. Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(15), 5889-5907. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v12n15p5889
• de Vries, S., Baliatsas, C., Verheij, R., & Dückers, M. (2025). Domestic gardens and morbidity: Associations between private green space and diagnosed health conditions in the Netherlands. Environment International, 199, 109450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109450
• de Vries, S., et al. (2012). Is green space in the living environment associated with people's feelings of social safety? Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(2-4), 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.08.001
• de Vries, S., Van Dillen, S. M., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 26–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
• de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
• de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments — Healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731.https://doi.org/10.1068/a35111
• Dobson, A. (1990). Green political thought: An introduction. Routledge.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Erasmus University Rotterdam. (2024). Sustainability and SDG research agenda. https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/vision/sustainability
• European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
• Felli, R., & Castree, N. (2012). Neoliberalising nature? The logics of the green economy. Environmental Politics, 21(2), 217–234.https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.664017
• Ferris, J. (1993). Ecological versus social rationality: Can there be green social policies? In The politics of nature (1st ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge.
• Fetting, C. (2020). The European Green Deal. ESDN Report, December, 2(9), 53. https://www.esdn.eu/fileadmin/ESDN_Reports/2020/ESDN_Report_2_2020.pdf
• Fitzpatrick, T. (2011). Understanding the environment and social policy. Policy Press.
• Fitzpatrick, T. (2023). Social policy in a climate emergency context: Towards an ecosocial research agenda. Journal of Social Policy, 52(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000721
• Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2005). Understanding the environment and social policy (1st ed.). Policy Press. (Understanding Welfare: Social Issues, Policy and Practice Series)
• Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2011). Understanding the environment and social policy. Policy Press.
• Fitzpatrick, T., & Cahill, M. (Eds.). (2002). Environment and welfare: Towards a green social policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Friel, S. (2010). Climate change, food insecurity and chronic diseases: Sustainable and healthy policy opportunities for Australia. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 21(6), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB10013
• Frumkin, H. (2002). Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Reports, 117(3), 201–217.https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/117.3.201
• Frumkin, H. (2005). Guest editorial: Health, equity, and the built environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(5), A290–A291. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.113-a290
• Frumkin, H. (2018). Healthy communities, green communities. In T. Beatley (Ed.), Green community (pp. 118–125). Routledge.
• Frumkin, H. (2022a). Hope, health, and the climate crisis. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 5, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100115
• Frumkin, H. (Ed.). (2010). Environmental health: From global to local (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Frumkin, H., Bratman, G. N., Breslow, S. J., Cochran, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Tandon, P. S., Varanasi, U., Wolf, K. L., & Wood, S. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 075001.https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663
• Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities (1st ed.). Island Press.
• Frumkin, H., Fried, L., & Moody, R. (2012). Aging, climate change, and legacy thinking. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300617
• Frumkin, H., Haines, A., & Rao, M. (2025). The US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement: Could it trump progress on climate change and health? BMJ, 388. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2025- 388
• Frumkin, H., Shane, B., & Schottland, T. (2024). Box 17-2 How many trees can the world support? In Climate change and public health (p. 371).
• Ganda, F., & Ngwakwe, C. C. (2014). The role of social policy in transition towards a green economy: The case of South Africa. Environmental Economics, 5(3), 32.
• Gibson, A. G., & Hazelkorn, E. (2025). Reframing, reacting, or responding? The climate emergency and higher education in Ireland. In J. Kekäle & R. Pinheiro (Eds.), Higher education policy for tackling climate change (pp. 57–76). Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78479-8_3
• Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 31–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306- 4573(98)00028-4
• Goldstein, B. (2006). Environmental health: From global to local. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(11). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9111
• Haghani, M., Ghaderi, H., & Hensher, D. (2024). Hidden effects and externalities of electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 194, 114335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114335
• Hânlein, A. (2008). Gerhard Kessler'in hayatı ve Türkiye’de sosyal politikanın gelişmesindeki katkıları. In Journal of Social Policy Conferences (No. 54, ss. 203–213). İstanbul Üniversitesi.
• Hartig, T. (2007). Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In C. W. Thompson & P. Travlou (Eds.), Open space: People space (pp. 215–234). Taylor & Francis.
• Hartig, T. (2008). Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1614–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4
• Hartig, T. (2021). Restoration in nature: Beyond the conventional narrative. In Nature and psychology: Biological, cognitive, developmental, and social pathways to well-being (pp. 89–151).
• Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
• Hirvilammi, T., Häikiö, L., Johansson, H., Koch, M., & Perkiö, J. (2023). Social policy in a climate emergency context: Towards an ecosocial research agenda – Erratum. Journal of Social Policy, 52(2), 1.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000053
• Huang, H., Long, R., Chen, H., Sun, K., Sun, Q., & Li, Q. (2023). Examining public attitudes and perceptions of waste sorting in China through an urban heterogeneity lens: A social media analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 199, 107233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107233
• Hutajulu, H., Tahir, U., Utami, E. Y., Harsono, I., & Yuniarti, T. (2024). Green growth strategy and environmental policy integration in sustainable economic development: A review of bibliometric analysis. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(03), 474–482.
• Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2018). Green inside activism for sustainable development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170072
• International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/green- jobs/publications/WCMS_432859/lang--en/index.htm
• Journal of Cleaner Production. ( Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/78GR
• Journal of Environmental Management. Retrieved April 26, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/vzcBT
• Just the Transition Center. (2020). Just transition: A report for the OECD.https://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/Just-Transition-Center-Report.pdf
• Kakkar, R., & Sachdeva, G. (2025). Bibliometric exploration of workplace happiness: Identifying patterns, research themes and opening up the research agenda. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 1–35.
• Khurshid, A., Khan, K., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). 2030 agenda of sustainable transport: Can current progress lead towards carbon neutrality? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 122, 103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103869
• Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
• King, R., & Tingas, E. A. (2021). Potential for carbon-neutral advanced biofuels in UK road transport. Journal of Energy Engineering, 147(4), 04021025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943- 7897.0000799
• Koray, M. (2007). Sosyal politikanın anlamı ve işlevini tartışmak. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2007(4), 15.
• Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
• Liu, J., Long, R., Chen, H., Qin, L., Huang, H., Li, Q., & Ye, X. (2025). Assessing the effectiveness of green consumption policy in China: Evidence from social media data. Journal of Environmental Management, 376, 124500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.124500
• Lozano, R. (2022). Sustainable development and sustainability. In Toward sustainable organisations: Strategies for sustainability (pp. 17–41). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99676-5_2
• MacFarlane, A., Russell-Rose, T., & Shokraneh, F. (2022). Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 15, 200091.
• Mandelli, M. (2022). Understanding eco-social policies: A proposed definition and typology. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 28(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221125083
• Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., ... & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
• McElwee, S. (2019, June 20). It's younger and cooler than a carbon tax. The Atlantic.https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/06/green-new-deal-may-be-more-popular-carbon- tax/592201/
• Meadowcroft, J. (2005). Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344419
• Midgley, J. (1996). Social work and economic development: Introduction. International Social Work, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872896039001
• Miller, C., Iles, A., & Jones, C. F. (2013). The social dimensions of energy transitions. Science as Culture, 22(2), 135–148.https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786989
• Mohy‐ud‐Din, K., Shahbaz, M., & Du, A. M. (2025). Corporate social responsibility and climate change mitigation: Discovering the interaction role of green audit and sustainability committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1198–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2636
• Moriarty, P., Honnery, D., & Bebbington, J. (2020). Sustainability and social policy: Toward a green welfare state. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 717–728.
• Muhmad, S. N., Cheema, S., Mohamad Ariff, A., Nik Him, N. F., & Muhmad, S. N. (2024). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of green finance and renewable energy development. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 7342–7355. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2767
• Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008
• Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Chen, H., & Anguelovski, I. (2017). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities 'just green enough'. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(10), 471–478.https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1588
• Ortakaya, Ü. İ., Koca, D., & Akbaş, E. (2023). Yeşil sosyal politika: Sosyal adaletin ve ekolojik sürdürülebilirliğin bütünleşmesi. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 34(2), 45– 67.https://doi.org/xx.xxx/xxxxx(DOI eksik, tamamlanmalı)
• Özden, O. (2022). The climate crisis and the global green new deal: The political economy of saving the planet. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergi, 11(1), 82– 89.https://doi.org/10.47934/tife.11.01.06
• Paavola, J. (2017). Health impacts of climate change and health and social inequalities in the UK. Environmental Health, 16(Suppl 1), 113.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0328-z
• Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114–122.
• Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020013
• Plehwe, D., Moreno, J. A., & Neujeffski, M. (2025). Challenging energy transition and green jobs: Climate policy obstruction across borders. Critical Policy Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2025.2030975
• Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.319
• Rana, I. A., Khaled, S., Jamshed, A., & Nawaz, A. (2022). Social protection in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: A bibliometric and thematic review. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2022.2083872
• Rani, S., & Devi, E. B. (2024). Impact of collective knowledge on individual research competence: Exploring the mediating influence of knowledge management processes. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2023-0401
• Scopus Analiz Sonuçları, https://www.kisa.link/fHwkG, E.T. 23.05.2025.
• Scheepers, M., Palacios, S. G., Jegu, E., Nogueira, L. P., Rutten, L., van Stralen, J., ... & Van Der Zwaan, B. (2022). Towards a climate-neutral energy system in the Netherlands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112097
• Science of The Total Environment. Retrieved April 26, 2025, from https://l24.im/0GIfJc,
• Smardon, R. (2024). [Review of the book The green city and social injustice: 21 tales from North America and Europe, by I. Anguelovski & J. J. T. Connolly (Eds.)]. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14, 618–619.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00926-0
• Smitha Rao, & Teixeira, S. (2020). The Green New Deal: Social work’s role in environmental justice policy. Social Work, 65(2), 197–200.
• Singh, A. K., Zhang, Y., & Anu. (2023). Understanding the evolution of environment, social and governance research: Novel implications from bibliometric and network analysis. Evaluation Review, 47(2), 350–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X221121244
• Talas, C. (2001). Toplumsal politika (5. Baskı). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Terán-Yépez, E., Jiménez-Castillo, D., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2021). International opportunity recognition: A comprehensive bibliometric review. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 19(1), 18–52.
• The Journal of Cleaner Production. (n.d.). Retrieved April 27, 2025, fromhttps://l24.im/78GR
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
• Vaquero García, A., Bastida, M., Vazquez Taín, M. Á., & Others. (2024). The broad spectrum of sustainability and the social economy: Perspectives from bibliometric data. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02222-2
• Wang, J., & Kim, H. S. (2023). Visualizing the landscape of home IoT research: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer. Sensors, 23(6), 3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063086
• Wise, F., Gillich, A., & Palmer, P. (2025). Retrofit information challenges and potential solutions: Perspectives of households, retrofit professionals and local policy makers in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 119, 103866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103866
• Zhao, X., Nan, D., Chen, C., Zhang, S., Che, S. P., & Kim, J. H. (2023). Bibliometric study on environmental, social, and governance research using CiteSpace. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 1087493.https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1087493