Year 2020, Volume 9 , Issue 4, Pages 2459 - 2474 2020-10-13

Örgütlerde Çalışanların Stress, İş Yoğunluğu ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Karşısında Örgüte Olan Bağlılıklarının İncelenmesi
Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment

Zafer ADIGÜZEL [1] , İrem KUCUKOGLU [2]


Yoğun iş temposunda çalışanların yaşamakta oldukları iş stresi hem çalışanları psikolojik açıdan olumsuz yönde etkileyebilmekte hemde örgütlerin olumsuz çıktılar elde etmesine neden olabilmektedir. Çalışanların iş yoğunluğu yaşamaları stres altında olduklarını göstermemektedir. İş yoğunluğu ve stresin farklı kavramlar olduğunun bilincinde olmak gerekmektedir. İş yoğunluğu yaşayan çalışanlar işlerini memnuniyetle, isteyerek, severek yaptıklarında örgüte olumlu yönde yansıyabilmektedir. Ancak çalışanların stres altında iş yapmaları durumunda olumsuz etkiler söz konusu olabilmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı kapsamında, çalışanların yaşadıkları iş stresinin, iş yoğunluğunun, psikolojik güçlendirmenin, örgütsel bağlılığa etkileri incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın örneklem kitlesini hizmet sektöründe bulunan farklı firmalardaki 344 beyaz yakalı çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular IBM SPSS 25 ve AMOS programları kullanılarak faktör ve güvenirlilik analizleri yapıldıktan sonra regresyon analizleriyle hipotezler test edilmiş ve elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Aynı zamanda aracı değişken etkisinin analizin de Hayes process kullanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda örgütlerde çalışanlara psikolojik güçlendirme uygulandığında örgütsel bağlılıklarının olumlu yönde etkilendiği sonucuna varılmaktadır.
Work stress experienced by employees at intense work pressure can both adversely affect employees psychologically and cause organizations to get negative outcomes. That employees experience workload does not indicate that they are under stress. It is necessary to be aware that workload and stress are different concepts. Employees who are experiencing workload can be positively reflected to the organization when they do their job gladly, willingly and fondly. However, negative effects may occur if employees work under stress. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of work stress, workload, psychological empowerment on organizational commitment. The sample mass of the study consists of 344 white-collar employees in different companies in the service sector. After analyzing factor and reliability of the findings by using IBM SPSS 25 and AMOS programs, hypotheses were tested with regression analyzes and the results were evaluated. In addition, Hayes process was used to analyze the mediator variable effect. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that organizational commitment is positively affected when psychological empowerment is applied to employees.
  • Albrecht, S. L., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in health services, 24(3), 228-237.
  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  • Alpar, R. (2011). Çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 286-301.
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı. Sakarya yayıncılık.
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487-511.
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304-323.
  • Aroian, L. A. (1944/1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
  • Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 43(2), 207-242.
  • Aslan, S. H., Gürkan, S. B., Girginer, H. U., & Ünal, M. (1996). İşe bağlı gerginlik ölçeğinin bir hemşire örnekleminde geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi, 4(4), 276-283.
  • Baltaş, Z., Atakuman, Y., & Duman, Y. (1998). Standardization of the perceived stress scale: Perceived stress in Turkish middle managers. In Stress and Anxiety Research Society, 19th International Conference: İstanbul.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Bartram, T., & Casimir, G. (2007). The relationship between leadership and follower in-role performance and satisfaction with the leader: the mediating effects of empowerment and trust in the leader. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 4-19.
  • Beehr, T. A., & Bhagat, R. S. (1985). Human stress and cognition in organizations: An integrated perspective. Wiley-Interscience.
  • Beehr, T. A., & Newman, J. E. (1978). Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model, and literature review 1. Personnel psychology, 31(4), 665-699.
  • Bell, N. E., & Staw, B. M. 1989. People as sculptors versus sculpture: The roles of personality and personal control in organizations. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory: 232-251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological bulletin, 52(5), 396.
  • Brief, A. P., & Nord, W. R. 1990. Meanings of occupational work. Lexington: Lexington Booksc
  • Brockner, J., Grover, S. L., & Blonder, M. D. (1988). Predictors of survivors'job involvement following layoffs: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 436-442.
  • Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 81(4), 358.
  • Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 533-546.
  • Burchell, B., & Fagan, C. (2004). Gender and the Intensification of Work: Evidence from the "European Working Conditions Surveys". Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 627-642.
  • Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2008). Long Work Hours Culture: Causes, Consequences and Choices. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Campbell, J. P., & Pritchard, R. D. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63-130). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Caponetti, A. R. (2012). The correlates of work role stress with employee burnout, engagement.
  • Chen, J. C., Silverthorne, C., & Hung, J. Y. (2006). Organization communication, job stress, organizational commitment, and job performance of accounting professionals in Taiwan and America. Leadership & organization Development journal, 27(4), 242-249.
  • Chughtai, A. A., & Zafar, S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment among Pakistani university teachers.
  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 385-396.
  • Colquitt, L., & Wesson, O. B. (2009). Improving Performance and Commitmen in The Workplace. Florida: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  • Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–767.
  • Cooper, C. L. (1983). Identifying stressors at work: Recent research developments. Journal of psychosomatic research, 27(5), 369-376.
  • Cooper, C. L. (Ed.). (1983). Stress research: Issues for the eighties. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cooper, C. L., & Marshall, J. (1976). Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental ill health. Journal of occupational psychology, 49(1), 11-28.
  • Cordery, J., Sevastos, P., Mueller, W., & Parker, S. (1993). Correlates of employee attitudes toward functional flexibility. Human relations, 46(6), 705-723.
  • Darolia, C. R., Kumari, P., & Darolia, S. (2010). Perceived organizational support, work motivation, and organizational commitment as determinants of job performance. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 36(1), 69-78.
  • De Klerk, S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership empowerment behaviour, work engagement and turnover intention: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 5(3), 28-45.
  • Doğan, N., & Başokçu, T. O. (2010). İstatistik tutum ölçeği için uygulanan faktör analizi ve aşamalı kümeleme analizi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(2), 65-71.
  • Donovan, S. B., & Kleiner, B. H. (1994). Effective stress management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(6), 31-34.
  • Everly, G. S., & Girdano, D. A. (1980). The stress mess solution: The causes and cures of stress on the job. RJ Brady Co..
  • Eylon, D., & Bamberger, P. (2000). Empowerment cognitions and empowerment acts: Recognizing the importance of gender. Group and Organization Management, 25, 354–372.
  • Fornes, S. L., Rocco, T. S., & Wollard, K. K. (2008). Workplace commitment: A conceptual model developed from integrative review of the research. Human resource development review, 7(3), 339-357.
  • Frankenhaeuser, M. (1986). A psychobiological framework for research on human stress and coping. In Dynamics of stress (pp. 101-116). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • French, J. R., & Caplan, R. D. (1972). Organizational stress and individual strain. The failure of success, 30, 66. Gardner, D. G., Dunham, R. B., Cummings, L. L., & Pierce, J. L. (1989). Focus of attention at work: Construct definition and empirical validation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 61-77.
  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review, 17(2), 183-211.
  • Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708-713.
  • Green, F., & McIntosh, S. (2001). The intensification of work in Europe. Labour Economics, 8(2), 291-308.
  • Guest, D. E. (1987). Human resource management and industrial relations. Journal of management Studies, 24(5), 503-521.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, (s 271).
  • Güriş, S., & Astar, M. (2014). Bilimsel araştırmalarda SPSS ile istatistik.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Imran, A., & Ahmed, M. (2012). Impact of human resource practices on organizational commitment: A study among service sector employees in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(2), 81-90.
  • Iverson, R. D. (1996). Employee acceptance of organizational change: the role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 122-149.
  • Iverson, R. D., & Roy, P. (1994). A causal model of behavioral commitment: Evidence from a study of Australian blue-collar employees. Journal of management, 20(1), 15-41.
  • Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal en gagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (Vol. 5). Ankara, Turkey: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kanfer, R. (1991). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnett & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. 15. Baskı, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağitim.
  • Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management journal, 42(1), 58-74.
  • Klerk, D. S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership empowerment behavior, work engagement and turnover intention: the role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 3, 28-45.
  • Koberg, C. S., Boss, R. W., Senjem, J. C., & Goodman, E. A. (1999). Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry. Group & organization management, 24(1), 71-91.
  • Lawler, E. E., Ill, & Hall, D. T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 305-312.
  • Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
  • Mackey, J. D., Perrewé, P. L., & McAllister, C. P. (2017). Do I fit in? Perceptions of organizational fit as a resource in the workplace stress process. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 455-486.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
  • Marsh, R. M., & Mannari, H. (1977). Organizational commitment and turnover: A prediction study. Administrative science quarterly, 57-75
  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of applied psychology, 93(3), 498.
  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 171.
  • Matteson, M. T., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1987). Controlling work stress: Effective human resource and management strategies. Jossey-Bass.
  • Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied psychology, 50(1), 153-180.
  • Merelman, D., & Wandycz, K. (1997). Stressed. Forbes, 159(11), 20-21.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human resource management review, 11(3), 299-326.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization. Human resource management review, 20(4), 283-294.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of vocational behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (2013). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
  • Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations New York: Academic Press. Parsons, T. (1968). The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York).
  • Obeidat, B. Y., & Abdallah, A. B. (2014). The relationships among human resource management practices, organizational commitment, and knowledge management processes: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3), 9.
  • Oran, A. (2016). Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Örgüt Kültürünün, Çalışanların Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Tatmin Düzeyleri Açısından İncelenmesi. Aksaray Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aksaray.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: Unleashing the power of the workforce. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Pool, S., & Pool, B. (2007). A management development model: Measuring organizational commitment and its impact on job satisfaction among executives in a learning organization. Journal of Management Development, 26(4), 353-369.
  • Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational behavior and human performance, 15(1), 87-98.
  • Powell, D. M., & Meyer, J. P. (2004). Side-bet theory and the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 65(1), 157-177.
  • Quick, J. C., & Quick, J. D. (1984). Organizational stress and preventive management. McGraw-Hill College.
  • Rabinowitz, S., & Hall, D. T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 265-288.
  • Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743-1770.
  • Revicki, D. A., May, H. J., & Whitley, T. W. (1991). Reliability and validity of the Work-Related Strain Inventory among health professionals. Behavioral medicine, 17(3), 111-120.
  • Schuler, R. S. (1980). Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations. Organizational behavior and human performance, 25(2), 184-215.
  • Selye, H. (1976). 1976 The Stress of Life (Rev. Ed.).
  • Shaw, J. B., & Weekley, J. A. (1985). The effects of objective work-load variations of psychological strain and post-work-load performance. Journal of Management, 11(1), 87-98.
  • Siachou, E., & Gkorezis, P. (2014). Do empowered employees absorb knowledge? An empirical investigation of the effects of psychological empowerment dimensions on absorptive capacity. Management Research Review, 37(2), 130-151.
  • Smith, C. S., & Brannick, M. T. (1990). A role and expectancy model of participative decision-making: A replication and theoretical extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 77, 91-104.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of management journal, 39(2), 483-504.
  • Sullivan, S. E., & Bhagat, R. S. (1992). Organizational stress, job satisfaction and job performance: where do we go from here?. Journal of management, 18(2), 353-374.
  • Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E., & Topoyan, M. (2013). Yapisal Güçlendirme ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeklerinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizleri. Journal of Yasar University, 8(31), 5371-5391.
  • Tatlıdil, H. (1996). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analiz, Ankara: Cem Web Ofset Ltd.
  • Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681.
  • Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve spss ile veri analizi, Detay Yayıncılık, 4. Baskı, Ankara, 31.
  • Van Sell, M., Brief, A. P., & Schuler, R. S. (1981). Managing Job Stress.
  • Xie, J. L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high?. Academy of management journal, 38(5), 1288-1309.
  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1968). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Punishment: Issues and experiments, 27-41.
  • Yerlikaya, E. E., & İnanç, B. (2007). Algılanan Stres Ölçeği’nin Türkçe çevirisinin psikometrik özellikleri. IX. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi Özet Kitabı.
  • Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western setting. Personnel review, 29(5), 567-592.
  • Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment: A mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non-western country. Journal of managerial Psychology, 15(1), 6-24.
Primary Language en
Subjects Social
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0001-8743-356X
Author: Zafer ADIGÜZEL (Primary Author)
Institution: ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-0159-3621
Author: İrem KUCUKOGLU
Institution: ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Dates

Application Date : December 10, 2019
Acceptance Date : August 24, 2020
Publication Date : October 13, 2020

Bibtex @research article { mjss657634, journal = {MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi}, issn = {1694-7215}, address = {Chyngyz Aytmatov Campus, 720038, Djal, Bishkek, KYRGYZSTAN}, publisher = {Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University}, year = {2020}, volume = {9}, pages = {2459 - 2474}, doi = {10.33206/mjss.657634}, title = {Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment}, key = {cite}, author = {Adıgüzel, Zafer and Kucukoglu, İrem} }
APA Adıgüzel, Z , Kucukoglu, İ . (2020). Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment . MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi , 9 (4) , 2459-2474 . DOI: 10.33206/mjss.657634
MLA Adıgüzel, Z , Kucukoglu, İ . "Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment" . MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 9 (2020 ): 2459-2474 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mjss/issue/57186/657634>
Chicago Adıgüzel, Z , Kucukoglu, İ . "Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment". MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 9 (2020 ): 2459-2474
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment AU - Zafer Adıgüzel , İrem Kucukoglu Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.33206/mjss.657634 DO - 10.33206/mjss.657634 T2 - MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 2459 EP - 2474 VL - 9 IS - 4 SN - 1694-7215- M3 - doi: 10.33206/mjss.657634 UR - https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.657634 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment %A Zafer Adıgüzel , İrem Kucukoglu %T Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment %D 2020 %J MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi %P 1694-7215- %V 9 %N 4 %R doi: 10.33206/mjss.657634 %U 10.33206/mjss.657634
ISNAD Adıgüzel, Zafer , Kucukoglu, İrem . "Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment". MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 9 / 4 (October 2020): 2459-2474 . https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.657634
AMA Adıgüzel Z , Kucukoglu İ . Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment. MJSS. 2020; 9(4): 2459-2474.
Vancouver Adıgüzel Z , Kucukoglu İ . Examining the Commitment to the Organization of the Employees Who Work in a Organization against Stress, Workload and Psychological Empowerment. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2020; 9(4): 2459-2474.