Şırnak ili Silopi ilçesinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan yer fıstığının mineral beslenme durumunun toprak ve yaprak analizleri ile incelenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma Silopi’de yaygın olarak yetiştirilen yer fıstığının (Arachis hypogaea L.) mevcut beslenme durumunu toprak ve yaprak analizleriyle belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Yer fıstığı yetiştirilen alanlardan alınan toprakların kimyasal özellikleri ile birlikte hem toprak hem de yaprak örneklerinde bazı makro ve mikro besin elementi konsantrasyonları belirlenmiştir. Bulgulara göre; topraklar hafif alkalin reaksiyonlu olup orta kireçli sınıfına girerken, büyük bir kısmında tuz probleminin olmadığı ve organik maddenin düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Topraklar ortalama 14.3 mg kg-1 yarayışlı fosfor (P), 401.3 mg kg-1 değişebilir potasyum (K), 9039.3 mg kg-1 kalsiyum (Ca), 1017.3 mg kg-1 magnezyum (Mg), 8.78 mg kg-1 alınabilir demir (Fe), 1.43 mg kg-1 çinko (Zn), 14.9 mg kg-1 mangan (Mn), 1.49 mg kg-1 bakır (Cu) içerirken yapraklar ortalama %3.6 azot (N), %0.17 P, %1.57 K, %1.42 Ca, %0.66 Mg, 152.4 mg kg-1 Fe, 42.5 mg kg-1 Zn, 104.6 mg kg-1 Mn ve 17.4 mg kg-1 Cu içerdiği belirlenmiştir. Toprakların tamamında değişebilir K, Ca, Mg ve alınabilir Fe, Mn, Cu konsantrasyonları, büyük bir kısmında ise P ve Zn konsantrasyonu yeterlidir. Yaprak örneklerinin tamamında P ve Zn, bir kısmında ise K ve Ca yeterlilik düzeyinin altındadır. Sonuç olarak, Silopi'de yer fıstığının beslenme durumunun yaprak analizi yoluyla değerlendirilmesine dayanan gübreleme programlarının uygulaması önerilebilir.

Keywords

• Silopi
• Bitki Besleme
• Gübreleme
• Besin Elementi
• Yer Fıstığı

Ethical Statement

Bu makalede insan veya hayvan deneklerle herhangi bir çalışma bulunmaması nedeniyle etik onaya gerek duyulmamaktadır.

Investigation of the mineral nutrition status of peanut cultivated in Silopi District of Şırnak Province through soil and leaf analyses

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the current nutritional status of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) widely cultivated in the Silopi through soil and leaf analyses. The chemical properties and some macro and micronutrient concentrations were determined in both soil and leaf samples taken from peanut growing areas. According to the findings, the soils were slightly alkaline and classified as moderately calcareous, with no significant salt problem and low organic matter content. The soils contained an average of 14.3 mg kg-1 available phosphorus (P), 401.3 mg kg-1 extractable potassium (K), 9039.3 mg kg-1 calcium (Ca), 1017.3 mg kg-1 magnesium (Mg), 8.78 mg kg-1 available iron (Fe), 1.43 mg kg-1 zinc (Zn), 14.9 mg kg-1 manganese (Mn), and 1.49 mg kg-1 copper (Cu). In contrast, the leaves contained an average of 3.6% nitrogen (N), 0.17% P, 1.57% K, 1.42% Ca, 0.66% Mg, 152.4 mg kg-1 Fe, 42.5 mg kg-1 Zn, 104.6 mg kg-1 Mn, and 17.4 mg kg-1 Cu. The concentrations of extractable K, Ca, Mg, and available Fe, Mn, Cu were sufficient in all soils, and in most cases, P and Zn concentrations were also adequate. However, P and Zn levels were below sufficiency in all leaf samples, and in some cases, K and Ca levels were also insufficient. Consequently, it is recommended to organize and implement fertilization programs based on leaf analysis to evaluate the nutritional status of peanuts in the Silopi.

Keywords

• Silopi
• Plant nutrition
• Fertilization
• Nutrient elements
• Peanut

References

1. Akanji, M.A., Ahmad, M., Al-Wabel, M.I., & Al-Farraj, A.S. (2022). Soil phosphorus fractionation and bio-availability in a calcareous soil as affected by conocarpus waste biochar and ıts acidified derivative. Agriculture, 12 (12), 2157.
2. Aka Sağlıker, H., & Elmasoğlu, C. (2020). Osmaniye yer fıstığı ve topraklarının bazı ekolojik özelliklerinin ilçeler arasında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Anadolu Çevre ve Hayvancılık Bilimleri Dergisi, 5 (4), 460-465.
3. Allison, L.E., & Moodie, C.D. (1965). Carbonate. Norman A.G. (Ed).A. G. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties.
4. Anter, F., Hilal, M.H., & El-Damaty, A.H. (1973). A chemical and biological approach towards the definition of calcareous soils: II. Plant growth, P 32 and Fe uptake as affected by percentage of calcium carbonate fraction. Plant and Soil, 39, 479-486.
5. Arya, S.S., Salve, A.R., & Chauhan, S. (2016). Peanuts as functional food: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53, 31-41.
6. Aşık, F.F. (2023). Determination of macro and microelements in stem and leaf parts after harvest of some peanut varieties. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 46 (18), 4454-4461.
7. Aşık, F.F., & Aşık, B.B. (2023). Macro and micro element composition of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29 (1), 38-46.
8. Balota, M. (2014). Peanut (Arachis hypogaea, L.) nutrition. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Nutrition. 5. accessed 2019 Sept 10.

9. Barton, C.J. (1948). Photometric analysis of phosphate rock. Analytical Chemistry, 20 (11), 1068-1073.
10. Bear, F.E., & Toth, S.J. (1948). Influence of calcium on availability of other cations. Soil Science, 65, 69-74.
11. Bilir, B., Irmak, S., & Doğan, M. (2023). Şırnak ili Silopi İlçesi tarım topraklarının bazı özellikleri ve besin elementi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28 (3), 1174-1186.
12. Bolonhezi, D., Santos, R.C. & Godoy, I.J. (2005). Manejo cultural do amendoim. In: Santos. R.C. (Ed.). O agronegocio do amendoim no Brasil. Campina Grande: Embrapa Algodao CNPA, 2 (6), 451-475.
13. Boydak, E., Şimşek, M., Demirkıran, A.R. (2020). The effects of different ırrigation levels and nitrogen rates on peanut yield and quality in Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 24 (2), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763481.
14. Brear, E.M., Day, D.A. & Smith, P.M.C. (2013). Iron: An essential micronutrient for the legume–rhizobium symbiosis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 1-15.
15. Bremner, J.M. (1996). Nitrogen total. In D.L. Sparks (Eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series Number 5, SSSA., Madison,WI, 1085–1112.
16. Cox. F.R., & Barnes. J.S. (2002). Peanut, corn, and cotton critical levels for phosphorus and potassium on Goldsboro soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33 (7-8), 1173-1186.
17. Crusciol, C.A.C., Portugal, J.R., Bossolani, J.W., Moretti, L.G., Fernandes, A.M., Garcia, J.L.N., Pilon, C., & Cantarella, H. (2021). Dynamics of macronutrient uptake and removal by modern cultivars. Plants, 10 (10), 2167.
18. Çağlar, K.Ö. (1949). Toprak bilgisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Yayınları.
19. Dellavalle, N.B. (1992). Determination of specific conductance in supertanat 1:2 Soil:Water Solution. In Handbook on Reference Methods for Soil Analysis.
20. Deliboran, A., Savran, M.K., Dursun, Ö., Eralp, O., Pekcan, T., Turan, H., Aydogdu, E., Cılgın, I., Olmez, H., & Nacar, A.S. (2020). Determination of nutritional status of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees grown in Izmir and Mugla Province in terms of boron and the other microelements with soil and leaf analyzes. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 392-405.
21. Dwivedi, R.S. (1986). Mineral nutrition and scope of breeding groundnut for nutrient deficiency resistance. Ibid. pp.68-75.
22. Dwivedi, R.S. (1988). Mineral nutrition of groundnut. Metropolitan Book Co. New Delhi, India 135pp.
23. Jones, J.B., Wolf, B. & Mills, H.A. (1991). Plant analysis handbook. Micro-Macro Publishing Inc. Georgia, U.S.A., 213 pp.
24. Evliya, H. (1960). Kültür bitkilerinin beslenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
25. Fageria, N.K. (1976). Critical P, K, Ca and Mg contents in the tops of rice and peanut plants. Plant and Soil, 45, 421-431.
26. FAO. (1990). Micronutrient, Assesment at the Country Level: An International Study. FAO Soil Bulletin by Mikko Silanpaa. Rome.
27. Francis, B., Aravindakumar, C.T., Brewer, P.B., & Simon, S. (2023). Plant nutrient stress adaptation: A prospect for fertilizer limited agriculture. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 105431.
28. Follet, R.H. (1969). Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu in Colorado Soils. PhD. Dissertation. Colo. State Univ., USA.
29. Foster, H.L. (1980). The influence of soil fertility on crop performance in Uganda. 2. Groundnuts. Tropical Agriculture, 57 (1), 29-42.
30. Gayar, A.E. (2021). A study on: Nutrients in sustainable cropping systems. Advances in Agriculture, Horticulture and Entomology, 3, Case Report AAHE-144. https://doi.org/10.37722/AAHAE.202111
31. Gökçeoğlu, K., & Çimrin, K.M. (2022). Hatay Altınözü ilçesi zeytin (Olea europaea L.) ağaçlarının yaprak ve toprak örnekleri ile beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6 (4), 680-697.
32. Havlin, J.L., Beaton, J.D., Tisdale, S.L., & Nelson, W.L. (2014) Soil Fertility and Fertilizers; An Introduction to Nutrient Management. 6th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
33. İşler, N., Çalışkan, M.E., & Boydak, E. (1997). Virginia tipi bazı yerfıstığı (Arachis hypogaea L.) çeşitlerinin şanlıurfa bölgesi ana ürün koşullarındaki verimi ile bitkisel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Türkiye II. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 22-25.
34. Johnson, R., Vishwakarma, K., Hossen, M.S., Kumar, V., Shackira, A.M., Puthur, J.T., Abdi, G., Sarraf, M., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2022). Potassium in plants: Growth regulation, signaling, and environmental stress tolerance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 172, 56-69.
35. Jones, J.B. Jr., Wolf, B., & Mills, H.A. (1991). Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, 892 s.
36. Kasap, Y., Demirkıran, A.R., & Şerbetçi, A. (1999). The Effect of differents level of phosphorus fertilizer on yield, quality and agricultural characteristics of some groundnut varieties under the ecological conditions of Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23 (10), 777-784. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/vol23/iss10/1
37. Kaur, H., Kaur, H., Kaur, H., & Srivastava, S. (2023). The beneficial roles of trace and ultratrace elements in plants. Plant Growth Regulation, 100 (2), 219-236.
38. Keskin, M., Karanlik, S., Keskin, S.G., & Soysal, Y. (2013). Utilization of color parameters to estimate moisture content and nutrient levels of peanut leaves. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37 (5), 604-612.
39. Kirkby, E.A. (2023). Introduction, definition, and classification of nutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Plants (pp. 3-9). Academic Press.
40. Kopittke, P.M., & Menzies, N.W. (2007). A review of the use of the basic cation saturation ratio and the “ideal” soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71 (2), 259-265.
41. Kösen, İ. (2019). Silopi şehrinin fonksiyonel özellikleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karabük Üniversitesi, Coğrafya Anabilim Dalı, 161 s, Karabük.
42. Lambers, H. (2022). Phosphorus acquisition and utilization in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 73, 17-42.
43. Leytem, A.B., & Mikkelsen, R.L. (2005). The nature of phosphorus in calcareous soils. Better Crops, 89 (2), 11-13.
44. Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell W.A. (1978). Development of A DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding, 42, 421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
45. Lourduraj, A.C. (1999). Nutrient management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivation-A review. Agricultural Reviews, 20 (1), 14-20.
46. Maas, E.V., & Hoffman, G.J. (1977). Crop salt tolerance: Current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 103, 115-134.
47. Malavolta, E., & Vitti, G.C., Oliveira, S.A. (1997). Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: Princípios e aplicações. 2. ed. Piracicaba. SP: POTAFOS. 319 p.
48. Mandal, K.G., Ghosh, P.K., Wanjari, R.H., Hati, K.M., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., & Misra, A.K. (2002). Practical implication of nutrient x Nutrient interaction to boost oilseeds productivity in India. Fertiliser News, 47 (7), 13-18.
49. Marschner, H. (1995). Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd. Edition. Academic Press. Inc. London, G.B. p. 446.
50. Marschner, H. (Ed.). (2011). Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press.
51. McLean, E.O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Agronomy Monograph Number 9, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 199-224.
52. Munis, M.M., & Sakin, E. (2013). Cizre ilçesi topraklarının verimlilik durumlarının belirlenmesi. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 2 (2), 38-43.
53. Mossa, A.W., Gashu, D., Broadley, M.R., Dunham, S.J., McGrath, S.P., Bailey, E.H., & Young, S.D. 2021. The effect of soil properties on zinc lability and solubility in soils of Ethiopia–an isotopic dilution study. Soil, 7 (1), 255-268.
54. Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Sparks, d.l. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods, Madison.
55. Neto, J.F., Costa, C.H.M., & Castro, G.S.A. (2012). Ecophysiology of peanut. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, 11, 1-13.
56. Olsen, S.R., & Sommers, E.L. (1982). Phosporus Soluble in Sodium Bicarbonate, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties.
57. Oya, R., & Çimrin, K.M. (2022). Mersin ili Tarsus ilçesi portakal bahçelerinin yaprak ve toprak örnekleri ile beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 28 (2), 398-412.
58. Özsayar, M.M., & Çimrin, K.M. (2022). Hatay ili Hassa ilçesi zeytin ağaçlarının yaprak ve toprak örnekleri ile beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6 (1), 42-57.
59. Özyazıcı, M.A., Dengiz, O., & İmamoğlu, A. (2014). Siirt ili bazı arazi ve toprak özelliklerinin coğrafi bilgi sistem analizleriyle değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (2), 128-137.
60. Parlak, M., Everest, T., & Tunçay, T. (2021). Pırasa ve yer fıstığı yetiştirilen toprakların verimlilik durumları ile ağır metal içerikleri: İzmir-Torbalı ve Çanakkale-Bayramiç ilçeleri örnek çalışmaları. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 36, 200-211
61. Plank, C.O. (1989). Plant Analysis Handbook for Georgia. Cooperative Extension Service. University of Georgia College of Agriculture.
62. Richard, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agriculture Handbook, Washington.
63. Rodrigues Filho, F.S.O., Godoy, I.J., & Fetosa, C.T. (1986). Accumulation of dry matter and nutrients by peanut plants CV Tatui-76. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 10, 61-66.
64. Roy, R.N., Finck, A., Blair, G.J., & Tandon, H.L.S. (2006). Plant nutrition for food security. A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin, 16 (368).
65. Sağlam, T.M. (2012). Toprak kimyası. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi.
66. Saltalı, K. (2015). Tarımda toprak kalitesi için gidya kullanımı. Türkiye doğal beslenme ve yaşam boyu sağlık zirvesi. Özet Kitap. 20-23 Mayıs, Bilecik, Turkey.
67. Sakin, E. (2010). Güneydoğu anadolu bölgesi topraklarının karbon stokları ve dengesi. Doktora Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 243 s, Şanlıurfa.
68. Samdur, M.Y., Singh, A.L., Mathur, R.K., Manivel, P., Chikani, B.M., Gor, H.K., & Khan, M.A. (2000). Field evaluation of chlorophyll meter for screening groundnut genotypes tolerant to iron-deficiency chlorosis. Current Science, 79 (2), 211-230.
69. Schmidt, J.P., & Cox, F.R. (1992). Evaluation of the magnesium soil test interpretation for peanuts. Peanut Science, 19 (2), 126-131.
70. Silva, E.D.B., Ferreira, E.A., Pereira, G.A.M., Silva, D.V., & Oliveira, A.J.M. (2017). Peanut plant nutrient absorption and growth. Revista Caatinga, 30, 653-661.
71. Singh, A.L. (1994). Micronutrient nutrition and crop productivity in groundnut. In Plant productivity under environment stress, Edited by K. Singh and S. S. Purohit, 67-72. Bikaner: Agrobotanical Publishers.
72. Singh, A.L. (1999). Mineral nutrition of groundnut. Advances in Plant Physiology, 2, 161-200.
73. Singh, D., McLaren, R.G. & Cameron, K.C. (2008). Effect of pH on zinc sorption–desorption by soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39 (19-20), 2971-2984.
74. Singh, A., Raina, S.N., Sharma, M., Chaudhary, M., Sharma, S., & Rajpal, V.R. (2021). Functional uses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seed storage proteins. Grain and Seed Proteins Functionality, 121-142.
75. Small, H.G., & Ohlrogge, A.J. (1973). Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing soybeans and peanuts, in Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Walsh, L.M. and Beaton, J.D. (eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 315-327.
76. Song, Y.L., Dong, Y.J., Tian, X.Y., Wang, W.W., & He, Z.L. (2017). Effects of nitric oxide and Fe supply on recovery of Fe deficiency induced chlorosis in peanut plants. Biologia Plantarum, 61, 155-168.
77. Sönmez, S., Orman, Ş., Çıtak, S., Oğuz, İ.K., Kalkan, H., Uras, D.S., Ok, H., Özsayın Çıtak S., Yılmaz E., Sönmez, N.K., &
78. Kaplan, M. (2014). Kumluca ve Finike yöreleri turunçgil bahçelerinin beslenme durumlarının belirlenmesi. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 27 (1), 51-59.
79. Suganya, A., Saravanan, A., & Manivannan, N. (2020). Role of zinc nutrition for increasing zinc availability, uptake, yield, and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) grains: An overview. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51 (15), 2001-2021.
80. Toomer. O.T. (2018). Nutritional chemistry of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58 (17), 3042-3053.
81. Ülgen, N., & Yurtsever, N. (1974). Türkiye gübreler ve gübreleme rehberi. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Teknik Yayınlar No:28. Ankara.
82. Vasudha, L., Kaur, A., & Vershit, M.C.H. (2023). Effect of chemical fertilizers and integrated nutrient management on groundnut: A review. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12 (2), 2602-2607.
83. Wright, G., Wieck, L., & O'Connor, D. (2017). Peanut production guide. Peanut Company of Australia, 1-32.
84. Wu, Y., Sun, Z., Qi, F., Tian, M., Wang, J., Zhao, R., Wang, X., Wu, X., Shi, X., Liu, H., Dong, W., Huang, B., Zheng, Z., &
85. Zhang, X. (2022). Comparative transcriptomics analysis of developing peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) pods reveals candidate genes affecting peanut seed size. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 958808.
86. Yamabi, S., & Imai, H. (2002). Growth conditions for wurtzite zinc oxide films in aqueous solutions. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 12 (12), 3773-3778.
87. Yılmaz, M., Şahin, C.B., Yıldız, D., Demir, G., Yıldız, R., & İşler, N. (2022). General situation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production in the world and in Turkey, major problems and solution suggestions. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 2 (1), 8-17.
88. Yılmaz, H.Ş., Bilir, B., Çaçan, E., Özdemir, S., Eren, İ.N.A.K., & Bingöl, F. (2023). Farklı pH’lardaki sulama sularının, cd ile kontamine olmuş toprakta yetiştirilen sorgum bitkisinin, bazı iz element (Zn, Mn, Co, Cr, Ni ve Pb) içeriklerine etkisi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 10 (4), 1025-1038.
89. Zuo, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., & Christie, P. (2004). A study on the improvement iron nutrition of peanut intercropping with maize on nitrogen fixation at early stages of growth of peanut on a calcareous soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 50 (7), 1071-1078.