Research Article

Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries

Volume: 30 Number: 2 August 21, 2025
EN TR

Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries

Abstract

The G20 countries comprise nations that account for a significant share of global economic and agricultural production. In this context, gender inequality in the agricultural sector, particularly the imbalance in the distribution of male and female labor, emerges as a critical issue. To develop effective policies aimed at reducing gender disparity, it is essential to accurately identify the parameters influencing this gap in the sector. This study examines the parameters contributing to the gender division in agricultural labor within G20 countries and analyzes the data using three distinct dynamic panel regression models for 1992-2022 period. In the first model, the agricultural trade deficit is included as an independent variable in addition to other variables that may affect the gender labor division. In the second model, agricultural import data replaces the trade deficit, while the third model incorporates agricultural export variables. The results obtained through the Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond dynamic panel regression model reveal that an increase in agricultural production exacerbates gender disparity. Additionally, higher rates of basic education negatively affect the ratio of female to male labor. This increase, occurring either through a rise in male labor or a decline in female labor, indicates a disadvantageous situation for women. Similarly, higher rates of employer status, self-employment, and fertility negatively impact women’s participation in the workforce. These findings demonstrate that policies aimed at reducing gender disparity in the agricultural sector of G20 countries should consider the effects of agricultural production, basic education rates, fertility rates, and self-employment ratios.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta, M., Wessel, M., Bommel, S., Ampaire, E., Jassogne, L., & Feindt, P. (2020). The power of narratives: Explaining inaction on gender mainstreaming in Uganda’s climate change policy. Development Policy Review, 38 (5), 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12458
  2. Adiandari, A. (2023). Gender in financial literacy: An analysis of economic empowerment. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 5 (1), 280-288. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v5i1.118
  3. Ahmad, N. (2024). Gender disparities in universal primary education: An analysis of women’s education and policy implications in Pakistan (1947-2017). European Journal of Education, 59 (2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12638
  4. Ahmed, F., Dar, A., Farooq, U., & Sharma, R. (2022). Do socio-economic factors in the BRICS explain gender gap in financial inclusion? The Indian Economic Journal, 71 (2), 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221137843
  5. Ampaire, E., Acosta, M., Huyer, S., Kigonya, R., Muchunguzi, P., Muna, R., & Jassogne, L. (2019). Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: Insights from East Africa. Climatic Change, 158 (1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019- 02447-0
  6. Andele, S., Kiganda, E., & Obange, N. (2024). Gender gap in agricultural productivity: A case study of smallholder farmers in busia county Kenya. International Journal of Economics, 9 (2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijecon.2516
  7. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  8. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Agricultural Economics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 9, 2025

Publication Date

August 21, 2025

Submission Date

January 22, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 22, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 30 Number: 2

APA
Kaya, T. (2025). Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1625013
AMA
1.Kaya T. Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025;30(2):334-346. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1625013
Chicago
Kaya, Tugce. 2025. “Gender Inequality in the Agricultural Sector: The Case of G20 Countries”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30 (2): 334-46. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1625013.
EndNote
Kaya T (August 1, 2025) Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30 2 334–346.
IEEE
[1]T. Kaya, “Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries”, MKU. J. Agric. Sci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 334–346, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.37908/mkutbd.1625013.
ISNAD
Kaya, Tugce. “Gender Inequality in the Agricultural Sector: The Case of G20 Countries”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30/2 (August 1, 2025): 334-346. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1625013.
JAMA
1.Kaya T. Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025;30:334–346.
MLA
Kaya, Tugce. “Gender Inequality in the Agricultural Sector: The Case of G20 Countries”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 30, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 334-46, doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1625013.
Vancouver
1.Tugce Kaya. Gender inequality in the agricultural sector: The case of G20 countries. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025 Aug. 1;30(2):334-46. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1625013