Research Article

Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods

Volume: 30 Number: 2 August 21, 2025
EN TR

Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods

Abstract

In this study, nectarines were dried using four methods: microwave, hot air, microwave-hot air combination, and freeze drying. The effects of these methods were evaluated based on drying time, moisture diffusion, modeling, color, rehydration, energy use, and surface temperature. Two different microwave power values (200 and 300 W) and a single temperature value (50 °C) were used for product drying. The relation of the length of drying time of nectarine samples according to the methods was found as Freeze-dry>hot air>microwave>microwave-hot air. While the lowest effective moisture diffusion coefficient was obtained in freeze dry method, the highest effective moisture diffusion coefficient was found in 300 W-50 °C application. Midilli et al. model could be chosen to represent the thin-layer drying of nectarine slices for all cases. The greatest total color change (∆E) was observed in samples dried at 300 W-50 °C, whereas the minimal color change was recorded in the freeze-dried samples. Both rehydration capacity values (3.152±0.053) and energy consumption (4.152±0.215) values of freeze dried samples were found to be higher than the other methods. The highest product surface temperatures were found in products dried by microwave method. The study indicates that microwave–hot air drying offers shorter drying time with acceptable quality, while freeze drying, though less energy-efficient, provides superior quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahamed, S., Saha, C.K., Sarkar, S., & Alam, M.M. (2023). Effect of paddy drying methods on the performance of rice mills in Bangladesh. Drying Technology, 41 (1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2022.2083633
  2. Alaei, B., & Chayjan, R.A. (2025). Microwave-hot air for rapid dehydration of nectarine chips: optimization of quality and energy efficiency. Food and Humanity, 100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100626
  3. Altay, K., Hayaloglu, A.A., & Dirim, S.N. (2019). Determination of the drying kinetics and energy efficiency of purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) leaves using different drying methods. Heat and Mass Transfer, 55, 2173-2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02570-9
  4. Amiri Chayjan, R., & Shadidi, B. (2014). Modeling high‐moisture Faba bean drying in fixed and semi‐fluidized bed conditions. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 38 (1), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2012.00766.x
  5. AOAC (1980). Moisture in dried fruits. In: Horowitz, W. (Ed.), Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 13th ed. Washington, DC (22.013 (7)).
  6. Argyropoulos, D., Heindl, A., & Müller, J. (2011). Assessment of convection, hot-air combined with microwave-vacuum and freeze-drying methods for mushrooms with regard to product quality. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 46 (2), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02500.x
  7. Belghith, A., Azzouz, S., & ElCafsi, A. (2016). Desorption isotherms and mathematical modeling of thin layer drying kinetics of tomato. Heat and Mass Transfer, 52, 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1560-0
  8. Bhatta, S., Stevanovic Janezic, T., & Ratti, C. (2020). Freeze-drying of plant-based foods. Foods, 9 (1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010087

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Biosystem

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 9, 2025

Publication Date

August 21, 2025

Submission Date

May 8, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 30 Number: 2

APA
Polat, A. (2025). Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(2), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1695251
AMA
1.Polat A. Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025;30(2):611-628. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1695251
Chicago
Polat, Ahmet. 2025. “Drying Behavior and Quality Assessment of Nectarine Slices Dried by Different Drying Methods”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30 (2): 611-28. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1695251.
EndNote
Polat A (August 1, 2025) Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30 2 611–628.
IEEE
[1]A. Polat, “Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods”, MKU. J. Agric. Sci., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 611–628, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.37908/mkutbd.1695251.
ISNAD
Polat, Ahmet. “Drying Behavior and Quality Assessment of Nectarine Slices Dried by Different Drying Methods”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30/2 (August 1, 2025): 611-628. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1695251.
JAMA
1.Polat A. Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025;30:611–628.
MLA
Polat, Ahmet. “Drying Behavior and Quality Assessment of Nectarine Slices Dried by Different Drying Methods”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 30, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 611-28, doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1695251.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Polat. Drying behavior and quality assessment of nectarine slices dried by different drying methods. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2025 Aug. 1;30(2):611-28. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1695251