Şebboy (Matthiola incana) yetiştiriciliğinde farklı tuz uygulamalarının morfolojik özellikler üzerine etkisi

Öz

Artan tuzluluk, tarımsal üretimde olduğu gibi süs bitkisi yetiştiriciliğinde de verim ve kaliteyi olumsuz etkilemektedir. Bu nedenle tuz stresinin bitki gelişimi üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi, sürdürülebilir üretim stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi ve tuza dayanıklı çeşitlerin belirlenmesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Bu kapsamda yürütülen çalışmada, sera koşullarında farklı tuz konsantrasyonlarının (0, 25, 50, 75 ve 100 mM NaCl) şebboy (Matthiola incana “Canetto White”) bitkisinin büyüme, kalite ve morfolojik özellikleri üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, artan tuzluluk seviyelerinin bitki boyu, çiçek kalitesi, kök gelişimi ve biyokütle üretimi başta olmak üzere birçok parametreyi istatistiksel açıdan önemli ölçüde azalttığını göstermiştir. Özellikle 75 ve 100 mM NaCl uygulamalarında bitkinin morfolojik özelliklerinde belirgin düzeyde azalmalar tespit edilmiştir. En iyi gelişim kontrol grubunda gözlenmiş, tuz seviyesi artışına bağlı olarak büyüme performansı ve morfolojik özelliklerde belirgin azalmalar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu bulgular, şebboy bitkisinin yüksek tuzluluk koşullarına karşı hassas olduğunu ve tuz stresinin fotosentez ile su alımını sınırlayarak bitki büyümesini olumsuz etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Süs bitkileri
• tuz stresi
• kalite
• büyüme

The effects of different salt applications on the morphological characteristics of stock (Matthiola incana) cultivation

Abstract

Increasing salinity adversely affects yield and quality not only in agricultural production but also in ornamental plant cultivation. Therefore, investigating the effects of salt stress on plant development is crucial for developing sustainable production strategies and identifying salt-tolerant cultivars. Within this context, the a study was conducted under greenhouse conditions to evaluate the effects of different salt concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mM NaCl) on the growth, quality, and morphological characteristics of stock flower (Matthiola incana ‘Canetto White’). The results indicated that increasing salinity levels significantly reduced several parameters, including plant height, flower quality, root development, and biomass production. Notably, pronounced declines were observed at 75 and 100 mM NaCl treatments. The best growth performance was recorded in the control group, with marked decreases in growth and morphological traits corresponding to increasing salt concentrations. These findings demonstrate that stock flower is sensitive to high salinity conditions, and salt stress adversely affects plant growth by limiting photosynthesis and water uptake.

Keywords

• Ornamental plant
• salt stress
• quality
• growth

References

1. Akat, Ö. (2008). Farklı tuzluluk düzeyleri ve yıkama oranlarının gerbera bitkisinde gelişim, verim, kalite ve su tüketimi üzerine etkileri. Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 231.
2. Alasvandyari, F., & Mahdavi, B. (2017). Effect of glycinebetaine on growth and antioxidant enzymes of safflower under salinity stress condition. Agriculture & Forestry/Poljoprivreda i šumarstv, 63 (3), 85-95.
3. Allakhverdiev, S.I., Sakamoto, A., Nishiyama, Y., Inaba, M., & Murata, N. (2000). Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiology, 123 (3), 1047-1056.
4. Aydinsakir, K., Tepe, A., & Buyuktas, D. (2010). Effects of saline irrigation water applications on quality characteristics of freesia grown in greenhouse. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 41-46.
5. Aymen, E.M., Zhani, K., Meriem, B.F., & Hannachi, C. (2012). Seed priming for better growth and yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under saline condition. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 8 (3), 135-143.
6. Baas, R., Nijssen, H.M.C., van den Berg, T.J., & Warmenhoven, M.G. (1995). Yield and quality of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) and gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii L.) in a closed nutrient system as affected by sodium chloride. Scientia Horticulturae, 61 (3-4), 273-284.
7. Bahadorkhah, F., & Kazemeini, S.A. (2014). Effect of salinity and sowing method on yield, yield component and oil content of two cultivars of spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12 (2), 264-272.
8. Bassil, E.S., & Kaffka, S.R. (2002). Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to saline soils and irrigation: I. Consumptive water use. Agricultural Water Management, 54 (1), 67-80.

9. Bernstein, L., Francois, L. E., & Clark, R. A. (1972). Salt tolerance of ornamental shrubs and ground covers1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 97(4), 550-556.
10. Bizhani, S., Jowkar, A., & Abdolmaleki, M. (2013). Growth and antioxidant response of Zinnia elegans under salt stress conditions. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1285-1292 ref. 26.
11. Borde, M., Dudhane, M., & Jite, P. K. (2010). AM fungi influences the photosynthetic activity, growth and antioxidant enzymes in Allium sativum L. under salinity condition. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(4), 64-71.
12. Cassaniti, C., Li Rosi, A., & Romano, D. (2008, April). Salt tolerance of ornamental shrubs mainly used in the Mediterranean landscape. In International Symposium on Strategies Towards Sustainability of Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climate 807 (675-680).
13. Çelikel, F., & Reid, M. (2002). Postharvest handling of stock (Matthiola incana). HortScience, 37(1).
14. Çığ, A., Gülser, F., Başdoğan, G., & Gülser, E. (2014). Effects of mycorrhiza on growth of Narcissus tazetta (L.) under salt stress. In The International Congress on Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Societies/Cities (GREINSUS) (08-10).
15. Çulha, Ş., & Çakırlar, H. (2011). Tuzluluğun bitkiler üzerine etkileri ve tuz tolerans mekanizmaları. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(2), 11-34.
16. Echi, R. M., Asli, D. E., Vajedi, S. J., & Kashani, Z. F. (2013). The effect of seed pretreatment by salicylhydroxamic acid on germination indices of safflower under salinity stress. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB),181-189.
17. Ekmekçi, E., Apan, M., & Kara, T. (2005). Tuzluluğun bitki gelişimine etkisi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(3), 118-125.
18. El Shaer, H. M. (2010). Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants as potential forage for ruminants in the Near East region. Small Ruminant Research, 91(1), 3-12.
19. Forkmann, G., Heller, W., & Grisebach, H. (1980). Anthocyanin biosynthesis in flowers of Matthiola incana flavanone 3-and flavonoid 3′-hydroxylases. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 35(9-10), 691-695.
20. Grieve, C. M., Poss, J. A., Shouse, P. J., & Carter, C. T. (2008). Modeling growth of Matthiola incana in response to saline wastewaters differing in nitrogen level. HortScience, 43(6), 1787-1793.
21. Hale, M. G., & Orcutt, D. M. (1987). The physiology of plants under stress. John Wiley and Sons, 206 pp.
22. Harrathi, J., Hosni, K., Karray-Bouraoui, N., Attia, H., Marzouk, B., Magné, C., & Lachaâl, M. (2012). Effect of salt stress on growth, fatty acids and essential oils in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 34, 129-137.
23. Heuer, B., Ravina, I., & Davidov, S. (2005). Seed yield, oil content, and fatty acid composition of stock (Matthiola incana) under saline irrigation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56(1), 45-47.
24. Hewitt, E. J. (1966). Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. 2nd Edition England, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England.
25. Hısamatsu, T., & Koshıoka, M. (2001). Regulation of flowering in stock [Matthiola incana (L.) R. Br.] by manipulation of gibberellin biosynthesis. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 35(4), 263-269.
26. Hisamatsu, T., Koshioka, M., Kubota, S., Nishijima, T., Yamane, H., King, R. W., & Mander, L. N. (1998). Isolation and identification of GA112 (12β-hydroxy-GA12) in Matthiola incana. Phytochemistry, 47(1), 3-6.
27. Hoagland, D. R., & Arnon, D. I. (1938). The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station, Circular-347.
28. Hussain, M. I., Lyra, D. A., Farooq, M., Nikoloudakis, N., & Khalid, N. (2016). Salt and drought stresses in safflower: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 1-31.
29. Jaén-Molina, R., Caujapé-Castells, J., Reyes-Betancort, J. A., Akhani, H., Fernández-Palacios, O., de Paz, J. P., ... & Marrero-Rodríguez, Á. (2009). The molecular phylogeny of Matthiola R. Br.(Brassicaceae) inferred from ITS sequences, with special emphasis on the Macaronesian endemics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 53(3), 972-981.
30. Jafari, S., & Garmdareh, S.E.H. (2019). Effects of salinity on morpho-physiological, and biochemical characteristics of stock plant (Matthiola incana L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 257, 108731.
31. Jaleel, C.A., Sankar, B., Murali, P.V., Gomathinayagam, M., Lakshmanan, G.M.A., & Panneerselvam, R. (2008). Water deficit stress effects on reactive oxygen metabolism in Catharanthus roseus; impacts on ajmalicine accumulation. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 62 (1), 105-111.
32. Jin, L., Li, X.B., Tian, D.Q., Fang, X.P., Yu, Y.M., Zhu, H.Q., ... & Li, M. (2016). Antioxidant properties and color parameters of herbal teas in China. Industrial Crops and Products, 87, 198-209.
33. Kandeel, A.M., El-Ramah, S.O., & Al-Qubati, A.A. (1999). Effect of sodium chloride in soil on the growth and uptake of some nutrient essential elements of snapdragon plant (Antirrhinum majus, L.). Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 261-271.
34. Kılınç, S.S. (2005). Katı Ortam Kültürü ile Yapılan İncir Fidanı Yetiştiriciliğinde Farklı Besin Eriyiği Formülasyonlarının Fidan Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Yüksek lisans tezi. In Turkish with English abstract.
35. Koksal, N., Alkan-Torun, A., Kulahlioglu, I., Ertargin, E., & Karalar, E. (2016). Ion uptake of marigold under saline growth conditions. SpringerPlus, 5, 1-12.
36. Kotuby-Amacher, J., Koenig, R., & Kitchen, B. (1997). Salınıty and Plant Tolerance, Utah State University, July 1997.
37. Kuşvuran, Ş. (2010). Kavunlarda kuraklık ve tuzluluğa toleransın fizyolojik mekanizmaları arasındaki bağlantılar. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Doktora tezi, Adana.
38. Levitt, J. (2015). Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, Second Edition, Volume II: Water, Radiation, Salt, and Other Stresses. 622.
39. Li, A.N., Li, S., Li, H.B., Xu, D.P., Xu, X.R., & Chen, F. (2014). Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of 51 edible and wild flowers. Journal of Functional Foods, 6, 319-330.
40. Marfá, O., Savé, R., Serrano, L., & Roselló, E. (1988). Carnation bag cultures on steep gradient soil. In International Symposium on Protected Cultivation of Ornamentals in Mild Winter Climates, 246 (37-44).
41. Parwaiz, A., & Satyawati, S. (2008). Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants – a review. Plant Soil Environ., 54 (3), 89-99.
42. Picchioni, G.A., & Graham, C.J. (2001). Salinity, growth, and ion uptake selectivity of container-grown Crataegus opaca. Scientia Horticulturae, 90 (1-2), 151-166.
43. Prabucki, A., Serek, M., & Andersen, A.S. (1999). Influence of salt stress on stock plant growth and cutting performance of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 74 (1), 132-134.
44. Quamme, H.A., & Stushnoff, C. (1983). Resistance to environmental stress. Methods in Fruit Breeding, 242-266.
45. Rasool, N., Afzal, S., Riaz, M., Rashid, U., Rizwan, K., Zubair, M., ... & Shahid, M. (2013). Evaluation of antioxidant activity, cytotoxic studies and GC-MS profiling of Matthiola incana (stock flower). Legume Research-An International Journal, 36 (1), 21-32.
46. Rogers, M.N., & Tjia, B.O. (1990). Gerbera production timber press growers handbook series vol 4. ISBN. Hong Kong.
47. Sadeghi, H., Khazaei, F., Yari, L., & Sheidaei, S. (2011). Effect of seed osmopriming on seed germination behavior and vigor of soybean (Glycine max L.). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6 (1), 39-43.
48. Salachna, P., Zawadzińska, A., & Podsiadło, C. (2016). Response of Ornithogalum saundersiae Bak. to salinity stress. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 15 (1), 123-134.
49. Sevgican, A. (2002). Örtüaltı Sebzeciliği [Vegetable Production in Greenhouse]. E. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 528, Bornova, İzmir, pages 476.
50. Shannon, M.C., & Grieve, C.M. (1998). Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78 (1-4), 5-38.
51. Sivritepe, N., & Eris, A. (1998). Effects of NaCl treatments on ion metabolism in some grapevine rootstocks. Bahçe, 23-33.
52. Sonneveld, C., & Straver, N. (1999). Nutrient solutions for vegetables and flowers grown in water or substrates. Glasshouse Crops Research Station, 393-403.
53. Steiner, A.A. (1984). The universal solution. ISOSC. In Proceedings of 6th International Congress on Soilles Culture. Lunteren, The Netherlands (633-649).
54. Tuncturk, M., Yasar, F., & Tuncturk, R. (2009). Effect of salinity stress on plant green weight and nutrient value of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) cultivars. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21 (2), 1481-1489.
55. Tunçtürk, M., Tunçtürk, R., Yildirim, B., & Çiftçi, V. (2011). Changes of micronutrients, dry weight and plant development in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars under salt stress. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (19), 3726-3730.
56. Türkan, I., & Demiral, T. (2009). Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67 (1), 2-9.
57. Valdez-Aguilar, L.A., Grieve, C.M., Poss, J., & Mellano, M.A. (2009). Hypersensitivity of Ranunculus asiaticus to salinity and alkaline pH in irrigation water in sand cultures. HortScience, 44 (1), 138-144.
58. Vı́llora, G., Moreno, D.A., Pulgar, G., & Romero, L. (2000). Yield improvement in zucchini under salt stress: determining micronutrient balance. Scientia Horticulturae, 86 (3), 175-183.
59. Wang, Y., Xu, Z., Bach, S.J., & McAllister, T.A. (2008). Effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on in vitro ruminal digestion of mixed forage or barley grain. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145 (1-4), 375-395.
60. Yaniv, Z., Elber, Y., Zur, M., & Schafferman, D. (1991). Differences in fatty acid composition of oils of wild Cruciferae seed. Phytochemistry, 30 (3), 841-843.
61. Yaniv, Z., Schafferman, D., Zur, M., & Shamir, I. (1997). Evaluation of Matthiola incana as a source of omega-3-linolenic acid. Industrial Crops and Products, 6 (3-4), 285-289.
62. Yasemin, S., Köksal, N., Özkaya, A., & Yener, M. (2017). Growth and physiological responses of ‘Chrysanthemum paludosum’under salinity stress. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 11 (32), 59-66.
63. Yılmaz, E., Tuna A.L., & Bürün, B. (2011). Bitkilerin Tuz Stresi Etkilerine Karşı Geliştirdikleri Tolerans Stratejileri. C.B.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1), 47-66.
64. Zapryanova, N., & Atanassova, B. (2009). Effects of salt stress on growth and flowering of ornamental annual species. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 23 (sup1), 177-179.
65. Zeng, Y., Deng, M., Lv, Z., & Peng, Y. (2014). Evaluation of antioxidant activities of extracts from 19 Chinese edible flowers. SpringerPlus, 3, 1-5.