Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER

Yıl 2010, Sayı: 13, 164 - 175, 30.08.2010

Öz

Yazı Hannes Lacher ve Ellen Meiksins Wood arasında ulus- devletlerin kökeni hakkında ikibinli yılların başlarında yapılan bir tartışmaya katkı sunmak amacıyla yazılmıştır. Bu tartışmada Lacher ulus-devlet biçiminin kapitalizme içkin bir nedenselliği yoktur derken, Wood kapitalizmin neden yayıldığı her yerde ulus- devlet formunu da taşıdığının araştırılması gerektiğini söyler. Bu makalede devlet kuramının uzamsallaştırılması ve bu tartışmaya bir katkı olarak ‘seçici geçirgenlik’ kavramı önerilmektedir. Ulus- devletler emek ve sermaye hareketlerini düzenlerlerken her zaman sermayeye daha fazla hareketlilik sağlayacak düzenlemeler getirmişlerdir. Devlet tartışmalarında kapitalizmin uzamsal örgütlenmesinin daha fazla tartışılması gerekmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Aygül, Cenk, “Bölgeler Üzerine Tezler,” Memleket SiyasetYönetim, Sayı 11, 2009, s. 68-87.
  • Albo Greg ve Jane Jenson, “A Contested Concept: The Relative Autonomy of the State,” The New Canadian Political Economy, (Ed. Wallace Clement ve Glen Williams), McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston, 1989.
  • Brenner, Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  • Faist, Thomas, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
  • Hay, Colin, “Marxism and the State,” Marxism and Social Science, (Ed. Andrew Gamble, David Marsh ve Tony Tant), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1999, s. 152-74.
  • Held, David ve Anthony McGrew, Küresel Dönüşümler, Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara, 2008.
  • Hirst, Paul ve Grahame Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • Jessop, Bob, The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
  • Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Polity Press, Londra, 1990.
  • Koffman, Eleonore, “Contemporary European Migrations, Civic Stratification and Citizenship,” Political Geography, 21:8, 2002, s.1035- 54.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s.146-64.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “International Transformation and the New Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a New Political Geography of Capitalism,” Review of International Political Economy, 12:1, 2005, s. 26-52.
  • Larrain, Jorge, Marxism and Ideology, MacMillan, Londra, 1983. Massey, Doreen, Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, Second edition, Routledge, New York, 1995.
  • Panitch, Leo, “The Impoverishment of State Theory,” State Theory Reconsidered: Paradigm Lost, (Ed. Stanley Aronowitz ve Peter Bratsis), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2002, s. 89-104.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Politische Macht und Gesellschaftliche Klassen, Athenaum Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1968.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, NLB, Londra, 1974.
  • Salter, Mark B., Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations,
  • Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 2003.
  • Teschke, Benno, “Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism,” European Journal of International Relations, 8:1, 2002, s. 5-48.
  • Torpey, John, “States and the Regulation of Migration in the Twentieth – Century North Atlantic World,” The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, (Ed. Peter Andreas ve Timothy Snyder), Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2000, s. 31-54.
  • Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • Van, Houtum H. ve M. van der Velde. eds, Borders, Regions and People, Pion, Londra, 2002.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins, “Global Capital, National Scales,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s. 17-39.
Yıl 2010, Sayı: 13, 164 - 175, 30.08.2010

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aygül, Cenk, “Bölgeler Üzerine Tezler,” Memleket SiyasetYönetim, Sayı 11, 2009, s. 68-87.
  • Albo Greg ve Jane Jenson, “A Contested Concept: The Relative Autonomy of the State,” The New Canadian Political Economy, (Ed. Wallace Clement ve Glen Williams), McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston, 1989.
  • Brenner, Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  • Faist, Thomas, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
  • Hay, Colin, “Marxism and the State,” Marxism and Social Science, (Ed. Andrew Gamble, David Marsh ve Tony Tant), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1999, s. 152-74.
  • Held, David ve Anthony McGrew, Küresel Dönüşümler, Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara, 2008.
  • Hirst, Paul ve Grahame Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • Jessop, Bob, The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
  • Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Polity Press, Londra, 1990.
  • Koffman, Eleonore, “Contemporary European Migrations, Civic Stratification and Citizenship,” Political Geography, 21:8, 2002, s.1035- 54.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s.146-64.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “International Transformation and the New Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a New Political Geography of Capitalism,” Review of International Political Economy, 12:1, 2005, s. 26-52.
  • Larrain, Jorge, Marxism and Ideology, MacMillan, Londra, 1983. Massey, Doreen, Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, Second edition, Routledge, New York, 1995.
  • Panitch, Leo, “The Impoverishment of State Theory,” State Theory Reconsidered: Paradigm Lost, (Ed. Stanley Aronowitz ve Peter Bratsis), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2002, s. 89-104.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Politische Macht und Gesellschaftliche Klassen, Athenaum Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1968.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, NLB, Londra, 1974.
  • Salter, Mark B., Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations,
  • Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 2003.
  • Teschke, Benno, “Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism,” European Journal of International Relations, 8:1, 2002, s. 5-48.
  • Torpey, John, “States and the Regulation of Migration in the Twentieth – Century North Atlantic World,” The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, (Ed. Peter Andreas ve Timothy Snyder), Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2000, s. 31-54.
  • Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • Van, Houtum H. ve M. van der Velde. eds, Borders, Regions and People, Pion, Londra, 2002.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins, “Global Capital, National Scales,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s. 17-39.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Kamu Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Cenk Aygül Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Sayı: 13

Kaynak Göster

APA Aygül, C. (2010). ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 5(13), 164-175.
AMA Aygül C. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. Ağustos 2010;5(13):164-175.
Chicago Aygül, Cenk. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ Ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5, sy. 13 (Ağustos 2010): 164-75.
EndNote Aygül C (01 Ağustos 2010) ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5 13 164–175.
IEEE C. Aygül, “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”, Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, c. 5, sy. 13, ss. 164–175, 2010.
ISNAD Aygül, Cenk. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ Ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5/13 (Ağustos 2010), 164-175.
JAMA Aygül C. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 2010;5:164–175.
MLA Aygül, Cenk. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ Ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, c. 5, sy. 13, 2010, ss. 164-75.
Vancouver Aygül C. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 2010;5(13):164-75.