Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hemşirelerin Çocukluk Çağı Aşı Karşıtlığı ile Toplumda Aşı Karşıtlığının Önlenmesindeki Rol ve Sorumluluklarına İlişkin Görüşleri

Year 2023, , 180 - 187, 27.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1162000

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma çocukluk çağı aşı karşıtlığı ile aşı karşıtlığının önlenmesindeki rol ve sorumluluklarına ilişkin hemşirelerin görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı.
Yöntem: Kesitsel tipteki çalışma Mayıs-Ağustos 2020 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmanın örneklemini bir üniversite hastanesinde çalışan 199 hemşire oluşturdu. Gerekli izinlerin alınmasının ardından veriler araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan tanıtıcı bilgi formu ve çocukluk çağı aşı karşıtlığı ile toplumda aşı karşıtlığını önlemeye ilişkin rol ve sorumlulukları belirlemeye yönelik bir anket formu ile toplandı. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde tanımlayıcı istatistiksel analizler kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Bu çalışmada, hemşirelerin %80.9’u çocukluk çağı aşılarını gerekli bulurken; %19.1’inin aşılamaya ilişkin tereddüt bildirdiği belirlendi. Hemşirelerin toplumda aşı karşıtlığına ilişkin algıladıkları nedenler arasında, %58.3 ile aşıların yan etkileri olduğu düşüncesinin, %42.7 ile aşılara olan güvensizliğin ilk sıralarda yer aldığı saptandı. Hemşirelerin aşı karşıtlığının önlenmesi ve toplumsal farkındalığın arttırılmasındaki rol ve sorumluluklarını; eğitim, danışmanlık ve rol model olmak yolu ile ebeveynleri bilinçlendirmek, sosyal medya, kongre, sempozyum ve kamu spotları yolu ile farkındalığı artırmak, kanıta dayalı çalışmalar yapmak ve bilimsel yayınları takip etmek olarak bildirdikleri bulundu.
Sonuç: Çocukluk çağı aşı karşıtlığının önlenmesine yönelik politikalar geliştirilmesi, hemşirelerin hizmetiçi eğitimler ve bilimsel etkinliklerle konu ile ilgili farkındalıklarının arttırılması ve aşı karşıtlığının önlenmesinde etkin rol almaları önerilir.

Supporting Institution

YOK

Project Number

YOK

Thanks

YOK

References

  • 1. Rodrigues CMC, Plotkin SA. Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1526.
  • 2. Gür E. Vaccine hesitancy - vaccine refusal. Turk Pediatri Ars 2019;54(1):1-2.
  • 3. Jones M, James J. Role of the nurse in addressing vaccine hesitancy and misinformation on social media. Nurs Stand. 2021;Dec 1;36(12):62-66.
  • 4. World Health Organisation. [Internet] Ten threats to global health in 2019. 21 March 2019. Available from:https://www.who.int/vietnam/news/feature-stories/detail/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
  • 5. WHO/UNICEF. [Internet]. National immunization coverage estimates, 2021 revision. UNICEF July 2022. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/immunization/.
  • 6. Yiğit T, et al. Anti-vaccination and it’s intellectual appearance. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research 2020;7(53):1244-1261.
  • 7. Zarobkiewicz MK, et al. Vaccination among Polish university students. Knowledge, beliefs and anti-vaccination attitudes. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017;13(11):2654-2658.
  • 8. Saada A, et al. Parents' choices and rationales for alternative vaccination schedules: A qualitative study. Clinical Pediatrics 2015;54(3):236–243.
  • 9. Smith TC. Vaccine rejection and hesitancy: A review and call to action. Open Forum İnfectious Diseases 2017;4(3):ofx146.
  • 10. Signorelli C, et al. Childhood vaccine coverage in Italy after the new law on mandatory immunization. Ann Ig. 2018; Jul-Aug;30(4 Supple 1):1-10.
  • 11. McKee C, Bohannon K. Exploring the reasons behind parental refusal of vaccines. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2016;21(2):104-109.
  • 12. Peterson RM, et al. Improving immunization coverage in a rural school district in Pierce County, Washington. The Journal of School Nursing 2012;28:352-7.
  • 13. Hoekstra S, Margolis L. The importance of the nursing role in parental vaccine decision-making. Clinical Pediatrics 2016;55(5):401-3.
  • 14. Gowda C, Dempsey AF. The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines Immunotherapeutics 2013;9(8):1755-62.
  • 15. Avcı E. Çocukluk dönemi aşılarına ilişkin karşılaştırmalı bir analiz: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Türkiye. Özgürlük Araştırmaları Derneği 2017;9: 5–35.
  • 16. Herzog R, et al. Are healthcare workers' intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;Feb 19;13:154.
  • 17. Hasar M, Özer ZY, Bozdemir N. Reasons for vaccine rejection and opinions on vaccines. Cukurova Med J 2021;46(1):166-176.
  • 18. Green J, et al. 'Blurred boundaries': When nurses and midwives give anti-vaccination advice on Facebook. Nurs Ethics 2022; May;29(3):552-68
  • 19. Sapçı E, Güngörmüş Z. Çığ gibi büyüyen evrensel sorun: Aşı karşıtlığı-aşı reddi ve hemşirelerin sorumlukları. J Educ Res Nurs 2021;18(3):352–355.
  • 20. Elizondo-Alzola U, et al. Vaccine hesitancy among paediatric nurses: Prevalence and associated factors. PLoS One 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251735.
  • 21. Tekinel B. Which is hazardous? Vaccination or anti-vaccination. Aegean J Med Sci 2020;2:80-82.
  • 22. Karabulut SD, Zengin HY. Parents’ and healthcare professionals’ views and attitudes towards anti-vaccination. Gulhane Med J 2021;63:260-66.
  • 23. Bryden GM, et al. Anti-vaccination and pro-CAM attitudes both reflect magical beliefs about health. Vaccine 2018 Feb 21;36(9):1227-1234.
  • 24. Yakşi N. Assessing the views and behaviours of family healthcare workers towards vaccine rejection. Turk J Public Health 2020; 18(3):143-154.
  • 25. Topçu S, et al. Evaluation of childhood vaccine refusal and hesitancy intentions in Turkey. Indian J Pediatr 2019;86(1):38-43.
  • 26. Ghinai I, et al. Listening to the rumours: what the northern Nigeria polio vaccine boycott can tell us ten years on. Glob Public Health 2013;8(10):1138- 50.
  • 27. McDuffie DC. Sacred immunity: religion, vaccines, and the protection of public health in America. Journal of Public Health (Germany). Journal of Public Health 2021; 29(5):1-7.
  • 28. Buttenheim AM, et al. Conditional admission, religious exemption type, and nonmedical vaccine exemptions in California before and after a state policy change. Vaccine 2018;Jun 18;36(26):3789-3793.
  • 29. Saitoh A, et al. Pilot study of evaluating attitudes toward childhood immunization among healthcare workers in Japan. Vaccines 2022; 10(7):1055.
  • 30. Çıtak G, Duran Aksoy Ö. An important obstacle in vaccination: Vaccination rejection. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2020; 7(2): 15-20.
  • 31. Ertaş H, Kıraç R, Ünal SN. A qualitative study on the evaluation of the attitudes of the families against vaccination by nurses. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences 2020;15(3):1149-1163.

Nurses' Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society

Year 2023, , 180 - 187, 27.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1162000

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to determine the opinions of nurses on childhood anti-vaccination and their roles and responsibilities in the prevention of anti-vaccination in society.
Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted between May 2020 and August 2020. The sample of the study consisted of 199 nurses working in a university hospital. After obtaining the necessary permission the data were collected with an introductory information form and a questionnaire on views on childhood anti-vaccination, roles, and responsibilities regarding prevention of anti-vaccination in society, prepared by the researchers. Descriptive statistical analyzes were used in the assessment of the data.
Results: In this study, 80.9% of the nurses found childhood vaccination necessary; 19.1% reported hesitations about vaccination. The reasons perceived by the nurses regarding anti-vaccination, in society included that 58.3% of the individuals thought that the vaccine had side effects and was unsafety of vaccines followed by a rate of 42.7%. The opinions were determined about roles and responsibilities of nurses in preventing anti-vaccination attitudes and in raising awareness, in society; to inform parents by training, counseling, and being a role model, raising awareness through social media, congresses, symposiums and public service ads, conducting evidence-based studies and following scientific publications.
Conclusion: It is recommended to develop policies for the prevention of childhood anti-vaccination, to increase awareness of nurses about the issue through in-service trainings and scientific activities, and to take an active role in preventing anti-vaccination.

Project Number

YOK

References

  • 1. Rodrigues CMC, Plotkin SA. Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1526.
  • 2. Gür E. Vaccine hesitancy - vaccine refusal. Turk Pediatri Ars 2019;54(1):1-2.
  • 3. Jones M, James J. Role of the nurse in addressing vaccine hesitancy and misinformation on social media. Nurs Stand. 2021;Dec 1;36(12):62-66.
  • 4. World Health Organisation. [Internet] Ten threats to global health in 2019. 21 March 2019. Available from:https://www.who.int/vietnam/news/feature-stories/detail/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
  • 5. WHO/UNICEF. [Internet]. National immunization coverage estimates, 2021 revision. UNICEF July 2022. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/immunization/.
  • 6. Yiğit T, et al. Anti-vaccination and it’s intellectual appearance. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research 2020;7(53):1244-1261.
  • 7. Zarobkiewicz MK, et al. Vaccination among Polish university students. Knowledge, beliefs and anti-vaccination attitudes. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017;13(11):2654-2658.
  • 8. Saada A, et al. Parents' choices and rationales for alternative vaccination schedules: A qualitative study. Clinical Pediatrics 2015;54(3):236–243.
  • 9. Smith TC. Vaccine rejection and hesitancy: A review and call to action. Open Forum İnfectious Diseases 2017;4(3):ofx146.
  • 10. Signorelli C, et al. Childhood vaccine coverage in Italy after the new law on mandatory immunization. Ann Ig. 2018; Jul-Aug;30(4 Supple 1):1-10.
  • 11. McKee C, Bohannon K. Exploring the reasons behind parental refusal of vaccines. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2016;21(2):104-109.
  • 12. Peterson RM, et al. Improving immunization coverage in a rural school district in Pierce County, Washington. The Journal of School Nursing 2012;28:352-7.
  • 13. Hoekstra S, Margolis L. The importance of the nursing role in parental vaccine decision-making. Clinical Pediatrics 2016;55(5):401-3.
  • 14. Gowda C, Dempsey AF. The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines Immunotherapeutics 2013;9(8):1755-62.
  • 15. Avcı E. Çocukluk dönemi aşılarına ilişkin karşılaştırmalı bir analiz: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Türkiye. Özgürlük Araştırmaları Derneği 2017;9: 5–35.
  • 16. Herzog R, et al. Are healthcare workers' intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;Feb 19;13:154.
  • 17. Hasar M, Özer ZY, Bozdemir N. Reasons for vaccine rejection and opinions on vaccines. Cukurova Med J 2021;46(1):166-176.
  • 18. Green J, et al. 'Blurred boundaries': When nurses and midwives give anti-vaccination advice on Facebook. Nurs Ethics 2022; May;29(3):552-68
  • 19. Sapçı E, Güngörmüş Z. Çığ gibi büyüyen evrensel sorun: Aşı karşıtlığı-aşı reddi ve hemşirelerin sorumlukları. J Educ Res Nurs 2021;18(3):352–355.
  • 20. Elizondo-Alzola U, et al. Vaccine hesitancy among paediatric nurses: Prevalence and associated factors. PLoS One 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251735.
  • 21. Tekinel B. Which is hazardous? Vaccination or anti-vaccination. Aegean J Med Sci 2020;2:80-82.
  • 22. Karabulut SD, Zengin HY. Parents’ and healthcare professionals’ views and attitudes towards anti-vaccination. Gulhane Med J 2021;63:260-66.
  • 23. Bryden GM, et al. Anti-vaccination and pro-CAM attitudes both reflect magical beliefs about health. Vaccine 2018 Feb 21;36(9):1227-1234.
  • 24. Yakşi N. Assessing the views and behaviours of family healthcare workers towards vaccine rejection. Turk J Public Health 2020; 18(3):143-154.
  • 25. Topçu S, et al. Evaluation of childhood vaccine refusal and hesitancy intentions in Turkey. Indian J Pediatr 2019;86(1):38-43.
  • 26. Ghinai I, et al. Listening to the rumours: what the northern Nigeria polio vaccine boycott can tell us ten years on. Glob Public Health 2013;8(10):1138- 50.
  • 27. McDuffie DC. Sacred immunity: religion, vaccines, and the protection of public health in America. Journal of Public Health (Germany). Journal of Public Health 2021; 29(5):1-7.
  • 28. Buttenheim AM, et al. Conditional admission, religious exemption type, and nonmedical vaccine exemptions in California before and after a state policy change. Vaccine 2018;Jun 18;36(26):3789-3793.
  • 29. Saitoh A, et al. Pilot study of evaluating attitudes toward childhood immunization among healthcare workers in Japan. Vaccines 2022; 10(7):1055.
  • 30. Çıtak G, Duran Aksoy Ö. An important obstacle in vaccination: Vaccination rejection. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2020; 7(2): 15-20.
  • 31. Ertaş H, Kıraç R, Ünal SN. A qualitative study on the evaluation of the attitudes of the families against vaccination by nurses. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences 2020;15(3):1149-1163.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşe Şener Taplak 0000-0002-4229-038X

Sevinç Polat 0000-0001-7718-9428

Project Number YOK
Publication Date January 27, 2023
Submission Date August 14, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Şener Taplak, A., & Polat, S. (2023). Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi Ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 13(1), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1162000
AMA Şener Taplak A, Polat S. Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi. January 2023;13(1):180-187. doi:10.31020/mutftd.1162000
Chicago Şener Taplak, Ayşe, and Sevinç Polat. “Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society”. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi Ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi 13, no. 1 (January 2023): 180-87. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1162000.
EndNote Şener Taplak A, Polat S (January 1, 2023) Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi 13 1 180–187.
IEEE A. Şener Taplak and S. Polat, “Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society”, Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 180–187, 2023, doi: 10.31020/mutftd.1162000.
ISNAD Şener Taplak, Ayşe - Polat, Sevinç. “Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society”. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi 13/1 (January 2023), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1162000.
JAMA Şener Taplak A, Polat S. Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi. 2023;13:180–187.
MLA Şener Taplak, Ayşe and Sevinç Polat. “Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society”. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi Ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, pp. 180-7, doi:10.31020/mutftd.1162000.
Vancouver Şener Taplak A, Polat S. Nurses’ Opinions about Childhood Anti-Vaccination, Roles and Responsibilities in Preventing Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in Society. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi. 2023;13(1):180-7.
Creative Commons Lisansı
                                                                            Bu Dergi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nin süreli bilimsel yayınıdır. Kaynak gösterilmeden kullanılamaz.  Makalelerin sorumlulukları yazarlara aittir 

Kapak 

Ayşegül Tuğuz

İlter Uzel’inDioskorides ve Öğrencisi adlı eserinden 

Adres

Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Tıp Tarihi ve Etik  Anabilim Dalı Çiftlikköy Kampüsü

Yenişehir/ Mersin