An Analysis of Architectural Technology Education in Turkey
Abstract
Architectural education is a generous field for
researches; however, the studies about Architecture Technology education are
very limited. Especially when the architecture schools in Turkey are
considered, it is safe to say that the number of different approaches about the
Architectural Technology education is parallel with the increasing number of
different architectural education programs in universities. To clarify this
tangled picture, this study intends to make a research regarding different
approaches about Architectural Technology education in Turkey and to put
forward the current types and trends. In order to demonstrate different
approaches in Architectural Technology education, thirty architecture schools
have been chosen and analyzed to reflect the main picture. The selection has
been carried out according to the OSYM ’s list of undergraduate programs. The
research material has been obtained from the schools’ education programs
declared in their web sites as “Academic Package” and the analysis has been
made by the quantitative factors. As a result of these analysis process, it is
possible to evaluate and compare the sub-fields of the Architectural Technology
education (Building Materials, Building Construction, Building Physics,
Structures etc.) according to the ECTS values, number of the courses, weekly
course hours, and semesters.
Keywords
References
- Boge, Patricia., and Sullivan, Jim (2004). “Curricular Weaving”, 92nd ACSA Annual Meeting, School of Architecture and Community Design, University of South Florida, 2004, pp. 496-500.
- D’Souza, Newton. “Design intelligences: A case for multiple intelligences in architectural design”, International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 1(2), 2007, pp. 15-34.
- Emmitt, Stephen, Architectural Technology, Blackwell Science Ltd., 2002
- Ghonim, Mohammed, and Nehad Eweda. "Investigating elective courses in architectural education." Frontiers of architectural research 7.2 (2018): 235-256.
- Oakley, Deborah and Ryan E. Smith. “Building Technology Educators' Symposium.” Bridging the Gap: Reviving Pedagogic Discourse in Architectural Technology Education, 2007, pp. 583–590.
- Ozmehmet, Ecehan, and Ebru Alakavuk. "Integration process of theoretical courses with design studios in undergraduate education: Case studies of architecture and interior design studios." SHS Web of Conferences. Vol. 26. EDP Sciences, 2016.
- Pultar, Mustafa. "Building Education: From Fragmentation to Integration." Engineering Education in the Third Millennium: Referate des 28. Internationalen Symposiums" Ingenieur Pedagogik. Vol. 99. 1999.
- URL-1: http://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,12735/2016-osys-yuksekogretim-programlarinin-merkezi-yerlestirmedeki-en-kucuk-ve-en-buyuk-puanlari-kitabi.html (Erişim tarihi: 12.09.2018, saat: 11.10)
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Architecture
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 30, 2019
Submission Date
December 3, 2018
Acceptance Date
June 26, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 4 Number: 1
Cited By
Mimarlık eğitiminde maket: örnek bir yapı bilgisi dersi uygulaması
Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.47615/issej.748821A Construction Design Experience in Emergency Distance Education: Detail Patterns
Kent Akademisi
https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1013698Mimarlıkta Yapı Dersleri Müfredatı Dijital Dönüşüm Modeli
Kocaeli Üniversitesi Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.26835/my.1181516