Çevresel (Periferik) Realizm Yaklaşımı: “Diğer Devletler”in Dış Politika Davranışına Dair

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Uluslararası İlişkiler teorilerinden Realizmin bir alt kolu olarak yorumlanabilecek Çevresel Realizm, mahiyeti, arka planı ve üzerine getirilebilecek eleştirilerle bir arada değerlendirilmektedir. Çevresel Realizm, Arjantinli siyaset bilimci ve dış politika danışmanı Carlos Escude’nin 1990’lı yıllarda Arjantin dış politikasını analiz etmek üzere geliştirdiği bir teorik çerçevedir. İlk olarak, yaklaşımın genel Uluslararası İlişkiler teorileri ve özel olarak Realist teoride gördüğü eksiklikler ele alınmıştır. Bu çerçevede Çevresel Realizm, Uluslararası İlişkiler literatüründe büyük güçlerin gölgesinde kalmış çevre (periferi), küçük, zayıf veya “diğer devletler”in dış politikadaki tekil ve ittifak içi davranışlarını inceleyen görüşler ışığında yorumlanmıştır. Yazarın literatürdeki eksiklikler üzerine bina ettiği, devlet temelli değil yurttaş temelli ve anarşik bir sistemin içerisinde özdeş değil hiyerarşik bir sistemin içerisinde farklı karakterdeki aktörler olarak temellendirdiği devlet-toplum kompleksi bakış açısı sunulmuştur. İkinci olarak, Çevresel Realizm yaklaşımı ile analiz edilen farklı dış politika analiz örnekleri incelenmiştir. Son olarak, bu yaklaşımın Realist teoriler içerisinde ne ifade ettiği ve yaklaşım üzerine hangi eleştirilerin getirilerek geliştirilebileceği tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

• Çevresel Realizm
• Carlos Escude
• uluslararası güvenlik
• dış politika
• uluslararası ilişkiler kuramları

Carlos Escude's Peripheral Realism Approach: On Foreign Policy Behavior of the “Other States”

Abstract

Peripheral Realism is a theoretical framework developed by Argentine political scientist and foreign policy advisor Carlos Escude to analyze Argentinian foreign policy in the 1990s. It problematizes the mainstream IR literature's focus on the great powers and the secondary role given to states on the periphery of international politics, or more precisely, the failure to develop a perspective specific to peripheral states. In this sense, an attempt is made to define particular foreign policy behaviors for "other states" interpreted "according to them" in the shadow of the great powers in order to overcome a weakness in theories of international relations. This paper discusses the place of Peripheral Realism in different theoretical accounts of “other states”, the value of the arguments developed by the approach in the case of Argentina, and the case studies of other authors focusing on the foreign policy behavior of peripheral states other than Argentina. Thus, the attempt of Peripheral Realism to overcome this weakness was evaluated. First, peripheral, small, weak or “other states” are examined in terms of their individual and alliance behavior in foreign policy. The state-society complex perspective, which the author builds on the shortcomings in the literature, is presented, which is based on citizen rather than state-based and on actors of different characters in a hierarchical system rather than identical actors in an anarchic system. Secondly, different examples of foreign policy analyses analyzed with the Peripheral Realism approach are examined. Finally, it is discussed what this approach means within Realist theories and what criticisms can be brought and developed on this approach.

Keywords

• Peripheral Realism
• Carlos Escude
• international security
• foreign policy
• international relations theory

References

1. Alvarez Maganini, V., & Rubbi, L. N. (2019). The Wrong Partner: Peripheral Realism and Argentina’s Defense Foreign Policy towards China and the United States between 2005 and 2015. Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales, 8(8), 161-184.
2. Aydın, M. (2004). Uluslararası İlişkilerin “Gerçekçi” Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 1(1), 33-60.
3. Ayoob, M. (1983). Security in the Third World: The worm about to turn? International Affairs, 60(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2618929
4. Ayoob, M. (1995). The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853778
5. Ayoob, M. (1998). Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory Meets the Third World. İçinde S. G. Neuman (Ed.), International Relations Theory and the Third World (ss. 31-54). MacMillan.
6. Cardozo, A., & Niño, C. (2023). Irán y Venezuela: Del realismo periférico a la diplomacia resiliente (1999-2023). Relaciones Internacionales, 96(1), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.96-1.6
7. Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
8. Dannreuther, R. (2007). War and insecurity: Legacies of Northern and Southern state formation. Review of International Studies, 33(2), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007528

9. Dispo, A. M. F. (2021). Changing the Rules of the Game: The Philippines and the Politics of Climate Change in the post-Paris Era [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, De la Salle University]. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5910/
10. Dulkadir, D. (2020). Dünya Güç Hiyerarşisinde Dönüşüm ve Çin in Hegemonik Yükselişi. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 2(2), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.51124/jneusbf.2020.2
11. Elman, M. F. (1995). The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in its Own Backyard. British Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 171-217.
12. Escudé, C. (1995). El realismo de los estados débiles: La política exterior del primer gobierno Menem frente a la teoría de las relaciones internacionales (1a ed). Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
13. Escudé, C. (1997). Foreign policy theory in Menem’s Argentina. Univ. Press of Florida.
14. Escudé, C. (1998). An Introduction to Peripheral Realism and its Implications for the Interstate System: Argentina and the Condor II Missile Project. Içinde S. G. Neuman (Ed.), International relations theory and the Third World (ss. 55-75). Macmillan.
15. Escudé, C. (2010). State personhood, reality or fiction?: The divergent views of C. Escudé (1994) and A. Wendt (2004) (1. ed). Univ. del CEMA.
16. Escudé, C. (2015). Realism in the Periphery. İçinde J. I. Domínguez & A. Covarrubias Velasco (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Latin America in the world (ss. 45-57). Routledge.
17. Escudé, C. (2016). Who Commands, Who Obeys, and Who Rebels. İçinde D. R. Mares & A. M. Kacowicz (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Latin American security (ss. 56-66). Routledge.
18. Kahraman, S. (2021). Baskı Gruplarının Politika Transerlerinde Etkililiği. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 3(2), 218-237.
19. Kaya, M. A. (2022). Egemenlik Kavramı ve Siyasi Düşünürler. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi, 5(1), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.51120/NEUHFD.2022.44
20. Keohane, R. O. (1969). Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291-310.
21. Krasner, S. D. (1985). Structural conflict: The Third World against global liberalism. University of California Press.
22. Krause, K. (1996). Insecurity and State Formation in the Global Military Order: The Middle Eastern Case. European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 319-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003002
23. Labs, E. J. (1992). Do Weak States Bandwagon? Security Studies, 1(3), 383-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419209347476
24. Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (Ed.). (2009). Neoclassical Realism, the state, and foreign policy (1. publ). Cambridge University Press.
25. Mijares, V. M. (2017). Soft Balancing the Titans: Venezuelan Foreign‐Policy Strategy Toward the United States, China, and Russia. Latin American Policy, 8(2), 201-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12128
26. Morgenthau, H. J. (1970). Uluslararası Politika. Türk Siyasi İlimler Derneği Yayınları.
27. Niemann, M. (1998). Peripheral States and Realism. Mershon International Studies Review, 42(1), 180-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/254463
28. Pereira Stallaert, C. (2018). The strategic alliance between Chávez and Ahmadinejad, and its impact on international institutions, from a peripheral-realist perspective. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 17(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.17.2.179_1
29. Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
30. Sahni, V. (2001). Peripheric Realism versus Complex Interdependence: Analyzing Argentine and Mexican Foreign Policies since 1988. International Studies, 38(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881701038001002
31. Schenoni, L., & Escudé, C. (2016). Peripheral Realism Revisited. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600102
32. Singer, M. R. (1972). Weak states in a world of powers: The dynamics of international relationships. Free Press.
33. Skjær, A. I. (2016). Protecting Democracy? The Role of OAS and UNASUR When Facing Democratic Crises in Latin America [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
34. Tickner, A. B. (2003). Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 4(4), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.404001
35. Ünüvar, A. (2022). 20.Yüzyılda Sınır Olgusu ve Sınır Anlaşmazlıkları. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi, 4(1), 54-67.
36. Walt, S. M. (2007). The origins of alliances (1. publ. paperb. 1990, [Nachdr.]). Cornell Univ. Press.
37. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics (1st ed). McGraw-Hill.
38. Wendt, A. (2004). The state as person in international theory. Review of International Studies, 30(2), 289-316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504006084
39. Wohlforth, W. C. (1994). Realism and the End of the Cold War. International Security, 19(3), 91-129.