DAVRANIŞSAL KAMU POLİTİKALARININ DÖRT MEVSİMİ

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 125 - 150, 30.06.2025

Sema Müge Özdemiray , Elsaeda Kodranjeci

Abstract

Bu çalışma, son yıllarda etkili kamu politikası tasarımına dair hükümetlerin gündeminde yer edinen ve akademik yazında ön plana çıkan davranışsal kamu politikalarının dününü, bugününü ve geleceğini sorgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. İlgili amaç doğrultusunda çalışmanın bakış açısını; Haenlein ve Kaplan’ın dört mevsim (ilkbahar, yaz, sonbahar ve kış) analojisi oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada; davranışsal kamu politikalarının ilkbahar mevsimi olarak alanın ortaya çıkışına neden olan gelişmeler irdelenmiş, yaz mevsimi olarak ise dürtmenin egemenliğinde gelişimi üzerinde durulmuştur. Dürtmenin popülaritesi beraberinde pek çok eleştiriyi de getirmiştir. Toplumsal sorunları çözmede bireysel sorumluluğa odaklandığı, bu nedenle sistem düzeyinde var olan sorunlara dair politika değişikliklerini engellediği, birey davranışında sürdürülebilir ve uzun vadeli etkisinin kısıtlılığı, seçim mimarisi temelinde karar ortamlarını şekillendirirken bu ortamın oluşmasına neden olan altyapının doğasına ve tasarımına odaklanmadığı gibi çok sayıda eleştiri dürtme üzerinden değerlendirilen davranışsal kamu politikaları alanının sonbahar mevsimini yaşaması olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Son olarak ise alanın gelecekte kış mevsimini yaşamaması için davranışsal kamu politikalarını besleyen içgörülerin hem birey hem de sistem düzeyinde potansiyel katkısının farkında olunarak stratejik bakış açısının benimsenmesi önerilmiştir.

Keywords

Dürtme , Davranışsal Kamu Politikaları , İnsan Odaklı (İ-çerçeve) Politika Müdahaleleri , Sistem Odaklı (S-çerçeve) Politika Müdahaleleri

THE FOUR SEASONS OF BEHAVIORAL PUBLIC POLICIES

Abstract

This study aims to question the past, present and future of behavioral public policies, which have been on the agenda of governments in recent years regarding effective public policy design and has come to the fore in the academic literature. In line with this purpose, the perspective of the study is based on Haenlein and Kaplan's analogy of the four seasons (spring, summer, fall and winter). The study examines the developments that led to the emergence of the field as the spring season of behavioral public policies and focuses on its development under the dominance of nudge as the summer season. The popularity of nudging has brought with it many criticisms. Numerous criticisms such as its focus on individual responsibility in solving social problems, thus preventing policy changes regarding system-level problems, its limited sustainable and long-term impact on individual behavior, and its lack of focus on the nature and design of the infrastructure that creates this environment while shaping decision environments on the basis of choice architecture have been evaluated as the autumn season of the field of behavioral public policies evaluated through nudge theory. Finally, in order to prevent the field from experiencing winter in the future, it is suggested to adopt a strategic perspective by being aware of the potential contribution of insights that feed behavioral public policies at both individual and system levels.

Keywords

Nudge , Behavioral Public Policy , I-frame Policy Interventions , S-frame Policy Interventions

References

• Acar, M. (2024). Free markets and economic performance: Turkish experience, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2): 386-401.
• Alemanno, A., & Spina, A. (2014). Nudging legally: On the checks and balances of behavioral regulation. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(2), 429-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou033
• Altun, T. (2018). Hanelerde enerji verimliliği: Davranışsal müdahaleler ve kamu politikaları için anahtar ilkeler. Turkish Studies İktisat Finans ve Siyaset, 13(22), 91-106.
• Anderson, R. (1988). Health behaviour research and health promotion. Oxford University Press.
• Andreas, M., & Jabakhanji, S. B. (2023). The ı-frame vs. s-frame: How neoliberalism has led behavioral sciences astray. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247703
• Antonelli, A. M., & Yin, Y. (2016). What we know about retirement savings: Why strategic behavioral “nudges” make sense. Georgetown Center for Retirement Initiatives. https://cri.georgetown.edu/what-we-know-about-retirement-savings-why-strategic-behavioral-nudges-make-sense/ Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2025.
• Arya, J., & Hindolia, A. (2024). Nudging towards excellence: Harnessing behavioral insights for organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 39(1), 25-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-01-2024-0019
• Ball, S., & Head, B. W. (2021). Behavioural insights teams in practice: Nudge missions and methods on trial. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15840777045205
• Banerjee, S., & John, P. (2021). Nudge plus: Incorporating reflection into behavioral public policy. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.6
• Banerjee, S., & John, P. (2022). Nudge and nudging in public policy (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4314881). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4314881
• Banerjee, S., & John, P. (2025). Behavioural public policy: Past, present, and future (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5124029). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5124029
• Belardinelli, P. (2024). Mapping behavioral public policy: Citizens’ preferences and trust. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58531-9
• Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501
• Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2013). Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science, 339(6124), 1152-1153. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231320
• Bhargava, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy 102: Beyond Nudging. American Economic Review, 105(5), 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151049
• Bovens, L. (2009). The Ethics of Nudge. İçinde T. Grüne-Yanoff & S. O. Hansson (Ed.), Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology (ss. 207-219). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_10
• Briere, M. (2025). Overcoming barriers to retirement savings: Behavioural factors and existing schemes. Amundi Asset Management SAS. https://research-center.amundi.com/article/overcoming-barriers-retirement-savings-behavioural-factors-and-existing-schemes Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2025.
• Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), 1211-1254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312889
• Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023a). The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002023
• Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023b). Where next for behavioral public policy? [Response to commentaries]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23002091
• Cherry, T. L., & Kallbekken, S. (2023). Use behavioral research to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of system-level policy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000985
• Connolly, D. J., Loewenstein, G., & Chater, N. (2024). An s-frame agenda for behavioral public policy research. Behavioural Public Policy, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.58
• Cornforth, A. (2009). Behaviour change: Insights for environmental policy making from social psychology and behavioural economics. Policy Quarterly, 5(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v5i4.4307
• DellaVigna, S., & Linos, E. (2022). RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica, 90(1), 81-116. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA18709
• Diaz Del Valle, E., Jang, C., & Wendel, S. (2024). Behavioral systems: Combining behavioral science and systems analysis (No. No.8; Busara Groundwork (Genre Research Agenda). Busara. https://busara.global/our-works/behavioral-systems/
• Doğru, C. E. (2018). (PDF) Etik davranmak mı? Biri bizi dürtsün! (Behaving ethically? Someone nudge us!). Türkiye Etik ve İtibar Derneği. https://www.teid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Etik-Davranmak-Mi-TEID.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 30.01.2022.
• Dold, M. (2023). Escaping paternalism: Rationality, behavioral economics and public policy Mario J. Rizzo and Glen Whitman. Cambridge University Press, 2020, xii+496 pages. Book Review Essay, Behavioural Public Policy, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.1
• Edelman, S. (2023). Real systemic solutions to humanity’s problems require a radical reshaping of the global political system. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001061
• Erdem, O. (2020). After the crash: Understanding the social, economic and technological consequences of the 2008 crisis. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43343-7
• Esmark, A. (2023). Is there a behavioral revolution in policy design? A new agenda and inventory of the behavioral toolbox. Policy and Society, 42(4), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad028
• European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Dupoux, M., Gaudeul, A., Baggio, M., Bruns, H., Ciriolo, E., Krawczyk, M., Kuehnhanss, C., & Nohlen, H. (2025). Unlocking the full potential of behavioural insights for policy (No. JRC138028). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/7367599
• Fabian, M., & Dold, M. (2025). Agentic preferences: A foundation for nudging when preferences are endogenous. Behavioural Public Policy, 9(1), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.17
• Faria, L. (2024). Behavioral economics and decision-making: The impact of psychological insights on economic choices. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 25(5S), 1-3.
• Filip, B. (2020). The neo-liberal concept of freedom: Economic and negative freedom. İçinde B. Filip (Ed.), The rise of neo-liberalism and the decline of freedom (ss. 29-55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61623-6_3
• Fisher, J. D., Bell, P. A., & Baum, A. (1984). Environmental psychology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• French, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012). Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: A systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implementation Science, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38
• Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2023). Behavioral winter: Disillusionment with applied behavioral science and a path to spring forward. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000912
• Galizzi, M. M. (2017). Behavioral aspects of policy formulation: Experiments, behavioral insights and nudges, İçinde M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Ed.). Handbook of policy formulation Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Graf, R. (2019). Nudging before the nudge? Behavioural traffic safety regulation and the rise of behavioural economics. İçinde Handbook of behavioural change and public policy (ss. 23-37). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781785367847/9781785367847.00007.xml
• Griffiths, C., Radley, D., Gately, P., South, J., Sanders, G., Morris, M., Clare, K., Martin, A., Heppenstall, A., McCann, M., Rodgers, J., Nobles, J., Coggins, A., Cooper, N., Cooke, C., Gilthorpe, M., & Ells, L. (2023). A complex systems approach to obesity: A transdisciplinary framework for action. Perspectives in Public Health, 143(6), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139231180761
• Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
• Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2023). Optimizing behavior change through integration of individual- and system-level intervention approaches. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001012
• Hallsworth, M. (2023a). A manifesto for applying behavioural science. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3
• Hallsworth, M. (2023b). Behavioral public policy in practice: Misconceptions and opportunities. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000924
• Hallsworth, M., & Kirkman, E. (2020). Behavioral insights. MIT Press.
• Hansen, P. G. (2019). Chapter 5: The concepts of nudge and nudging in behavioural public policy. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781785367847/9781785367847.00010.xml
• Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. The University of Chicago Press.
• Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trials. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2131581
• Heilmann, C. (2014). Success conditions for nudges: A methodological critique of libertarian paternalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-013-0076-z
• Hertwig, R. (2023). The real cause of our complicity: The preoccupation with human weakness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000936
• Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496
• Hirsch, C. (2024). Public policy-making: Understanding its process and importance. PublicAdministrationPolicy.Org. https://publicadministrationpolicy.org/articles/public-policy-making/ Erişim Tarihi: 11.03.2025.
• House of Lords (2011). Science and technology committee: Behaviour change (No. 2nd Report of Session 2010–12). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldsctech/179/17902.htm
• Jackson, M. (2023). The social sciences are increasingly ill-equipped to design system-level reforms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001152
• John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stoker, G., & Wales, C. (2019). Nudge, nudge, think, think: Experimenting with ways to change citizen behaviour, (Second). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526153487
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
• Kosters, M., & Van der Heijden, J. (2015). From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating nudge theory. Evaluation, 21(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015590218
• Kuehnhanss, C. R. (2019). The challenges of behavioural insights for effective policy design. Policy and Society, 38(1), 14-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511188
• Kuyer, P., & Gordijn, B. (2023). Nudge in perspective: A systematic literature review on the ethical issues with nudging. Rationality and Society, 35(2), 191-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631231155005
• Lamberton, C. (2023). On skinner’s pendulum: A framework for assessing s-frame hope. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001048
• Lebaron, F. (2019). Chapter 3: Economic expertise and public policy. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781785367847/9781785367847.00008.xml
• Leeuwen, M. V., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2015). “Nudge” as an innovative policy instrument: A public administration perspective. Social Innovation Research Conference (SIRC).
• Lemken, D. (2024). Options to design more ethical and still successful default nudges: A review and recommendations. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(2), 349-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.33
• Loewenstein, G., & Chater, N. (2017). Putting nudges in perspective. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 26-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7
• Low, D. (2012). Behavioural economics and policy design: Examples from singapore. World Scientific.
• Maier, M., Bartoš, F., Raihani, N., Shanks, D. R., Stanley, T. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Harris, A. J. L. (2024). Exploring open science practices in behavioural public policy research. Royal Society Open Science, 11(2), 231486. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231486
• Maier, M., Bartoš, F., Stanley, T. D., Shanks, D. R., Harris, A. J. L., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(31), e2200300119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200300119
• Marten, M., & Dender, K. van. (2019). The use of revenues from carbon pricing. OECD Publishing, No.43(OECD taxation Working Paper). https://doi.org/10.1787/3cb265e4-en.
• Meaney, A. (2017). Hard shoulder: Using behavioural nudges to reduce congestion. Oxera. https://www.oxera.com/insights/agenda/articles/traffic-behavioural-nudges-reduce-congestion/ Erişim Tarihi: 18.03.2025.
• Meder, B., Fleischhut, N., & Osman, M. (2018). Beyond the confines of choice architecture: A critical analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 68, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.08.004
• Medium. (2022). Who invented the ‘carbon footprint’? The shocking origins. Greener Together. https://medium.com/greener-together/who-invented-the-carbon-footprint-the-shocking-origins-13d940d05f59 Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2025.
• Mertens, S., Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2022). The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(1), e2107346118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107346118
• Michaelsen, P. (2024). Transparency and nudging: An overview and methodological critique of empirical investigations. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(4), 807-817. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.7
• Mihaila, V. (2021). Behavioral-Based Interventions for Improving Public Policies, Hershey PA: IGI Global.
• Miłaszewicz, D. (2020). Designing public policy according to achievements of behavioural economics. İçinde K. Nermend & M. Łatuszyńska (Ed.), Experimental and quantitative methods in contemporary economics (ss. 47-57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_4
• Mills, S., & Whittle, R. (2025). How ‘nudge’ happened: The political economy of nudging in the Uk. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 49(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beae038
• Mojašević, A. (2020). Behavioural economics and public policies: Some introductory issues. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS - Law and Politics, 18(3), 131-145.
• Mozafar, M., Moini, A., & Sobhanifard, Y. (2023). A systematic review of behavioral public policy research: Origins, mechanisms and outcomes. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(4), 603-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2022-0168
• Mulrow, J., Machaj, K., Deanes, J., & Derrible, S. (2019). The state of carbon footprint calculators: An evaluation of calculator design and user interaction features. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.001
• Nair, A. S. (2019). Publication bias—Importance of studies with negative results! Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 63(6), 505-507. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_142_19
• Naru, F. (2024). Behavioral public policy bodies: New developments & lessons. Behavioral Science & Policy, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241285614
• National Academies of Sciences, E., Education, D. of B. and S. S. and, Board on Behavioral, C., Policy, C. on F. D. for A. B. E. to, Beatty, A., Moffitt, R., & Buttenheim, A. (2023). Foundational behavioral and economic ideas. Içinde Behavioral economics: Policy impact and future directions. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593520/
• Neuhaus, T., & Curley, L. J. (2022). The emergence of global behavioral public policy – developments of and within the nudge unit. World Complexity Science Academy Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.46473/WCSAJ27240606/20-09-2022-0006//full/html
• Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913-923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
• NSMC (2023). Change4life, https://www.thensmc.com/resources/showcase/change4life Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2025
• OECD. (2022). Good practice principles for ethical behavioural science in public policy (No. 20; OECD Public Governance Policy Papers). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e19a9be9-en
• Oliver, A. (2013). From nudging to budging: Using behavioural economics to inform public sector policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(4), 685-700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000299
• Osman, M. (2016). Nudge: How far have we come? Œconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy, 6-4, 557-570. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.2490
• Osman, M. (2023). What’s the future of nudge? BBC. https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/m001slsl Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2025.
• Öğüt, A., Ekinci, T. & Gökçe, Ş. (2023). Yeşil yönetim uygulamaları ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkinin bibliyometrik analizi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 258-277
• Özdemiray, S. M. & Karamanoğlu, H. (2024). Davranışsal politika küpünde dürtme ve diğer politika araçları: Kavramlar ve uygulamalar. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 57(1), 87-108
• Pasquale, F. (2015). Why “nudges” hardly help. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/nudges-effectiveness/418749/ Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2025.
• Pottenger, M., & Martin, A. (2014). Insights into behavioural public policy (No. 06/14; ISSUES PAPER SERIES). Melbourne School of Government.
• Reisch, L. A., & Zhao, M. (2017). Behavioural economics, consumer behaviour and consumer policy: State of the art. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2017.1
• Roberto, C. A. (2023). An inconvenient truth: Difficult problems rarely have easy solutions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000882
• Sanders, M., & Halpern, D. (2014). Nudge unit: Our quiet revolution is putting evidence at heart of government. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/small-business-blog/2014/feb/03/nudge-unit-quiet-revolution-evidence Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2025.
• Schmidt, A. T. (2019). Getting real on rationality—Behavioral science, nudging, and public policy. Ethics, 129(4), 511-543. https://doi.org/10.1086/702970
• Schmidt, R. (2022). A model for choice infrastructure: Looking beyond choice architecture in behavioral public policy. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(3), 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.44
• Schmidt, R., & Stenger, K. (2021). Behavioral brittleness: The case for strategic behavioral public policy. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(2), 212-237. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.16
• Sent, E.-M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36(4), 735-760. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
• Serim, H., & Küçükşenel, S. (2020). Davranişsal ikti̇sat ve dürtme: Sağlık poli̇ti̇kaları özeli̇nde bi̇r inceleme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.658117
• Sevgin, M. (2023). The behavioral economics implementation into public policymaking: The behavioral public policies [Doctoral Thesis]. University of Wroclaw.
• Shah, Z. (2024). Why every government needs a behavioural insights unit. LSE International Development - Social, Political and Economic Transformation in the Developing World. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/internationaldevelopment/2024/09/05/why-every-government-needs-a-behavioural-insights-unit/ Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2025.
• Solek, A. (2014). Behavioral economics approaches to public policy. Journal of Internatıonal Studıes, 7(2), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2014/7-2/3
• Solman, G. (2008). BP: Coloring public opinion? https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/bp-coloring-public-opinion-91662/ Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2025.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(4), 583-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1
• Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Green defaults can combat climate change. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 548-549. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01071-2
• Sunstein, C. R. (2023). Conspiracy theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001097
• Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1159-1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600573
• Şahin, Suna (2021). Neoliberal politikalar ve Türkiye’de özelleştirme uygulamaları. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 160-176.
• Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics (ss. xvi, 415). W W Norton & Co.
• Thaler, R. H. (2023). Nudging is being framed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23000973
• Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164-S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/380085
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
• Wachner, J., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2020). And how would that make you feel? How people expect nudges to influence their sense of autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607894