Bir Tüketici Davranışı Olarak Bireysel Bağış: Gönüllü Hizmet Sağlayanlar Üzerinde Bir Odak Grup Çalışması

Abstract

Bireysel bağışlar tüketim ilişkilerine benzer şekilde taraflar arası değişim ilişkisi oluşturmaktadır. Bireyler yardım kurumlarına para, eşya, zaman veya bireysel yeteneklerini bağışlayabilmektedirler. Bu çalışmada yardım kurumları aracılığıyla gönüllü hizmet sağlayanların bağış süreci üzerinde durulmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri iki farklı sivil toplum kuruluşunda gönüllü hizmet sağlayanlardan odak grup görüşmeleri vasıtasıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre gönüllü hizmet sağlamanın anlamı, bağış motivasyonları ve bağış biçimi temaları altında on iki farklı kategori elde edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlar gönüllü hizmet sağlayanların bağış sürecinin açıklanmasında bazı boyutların ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır.

Keywords

• Bireysel Bağış, Gönüllü Hizmet Sağlama, Yardım Kurumları, Bağış Süreci.

Individual Donation as a Consumer Behavior: A Focus Group Study in the Context of Volunteering

Abstract

Individual donation motivations constitute exchange relationships between parties in a similar way to the consumption relationship. Individuals can give money, goods, time, and individual skills to charities. This study focused on the volunteer’s donation process through charities. Data collected from two different nongovernmental organization volunteers through focus groups. According to research results twelve categories obtained under the meaning of volunteering, donation motivations, and types of donation themes. These results enabled to emerge some dimensions of volunteer’s donations process.

Keywords

• Individual Donation, Volunteering, Charities, Donation Process.

References

1. Bagozzi, R. P. (1975), “Marketing as Exchange”, Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32– 39.
2. Belk, R. W. (1979), “Gift Giving Behavior”, Ed. Jagdish Sheth, Research in Marketing, Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 95-126.
3. Clary, E. G., M. Snyder, R. D. Ridge, J. Copeland, A. A. Stukas, J. Haugen ve P. Miene (1998), “Understanding and Assessing the Motivations of Volunteers: A Functional Approach”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516- 1530.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2013), Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma ve Araştırma Deseni, Çev. Ed. M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir, Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
5. Çarkoğlu, A. (2006). “Türkiye’de Bireysel Bağışlar ve Vakıf Uygulamalarında Eğilimler”, Der. Davut Aydın, Murat Çizakça ve Fatoş Gökşen, Türkiye’de Hayırseverlik: Vatandaşlar, Vakıflar ve Sosyal Adalet, İstanbul: TÜSEV Yayınları, 81- 159.
6. Dawson, S. (1988), “Four Motivations for Charitable Giving: Implications for Marketing Strategy to Attract Monetary Donations for Medical Research”, Journal of Health Care Marketing, 8(2), 31-47.
7. Drollinger, T. (2010), “A Theoretical Examination of Giving and Volunteering Utilizing Research Exchange Theory”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(1), 55-66.
8. Gibbs, G. (2008). Analyzing Qualitative Data, London: Sage.

9. Glaser, B. G. ve A. L. Strauss, (1967/2012). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, 7. Baskı, New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction. Grace, D. ve D. Griffin (2006), “Exploring Conspicuousness in the Context of Donation Behaviour”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(2), 147-154.
10. Guy, B. S. ve W. E. Patton (1989), “The Marketing of Altruistic Causes: Understanding Why People Help”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(1), 19-30.
11. Hibbert, S. ve S. Horne (1996), “Giving to Charity: Questioning the Donor Decision Process”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(2), 4-13.
12. Independent Sector (2001), Giving and Volunteering in the United States, Washington, DC.
13. Kotler, P. ve S. J. Levy (1969), “Broadening the Concept of Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.
14. Kottasz, R. (2004), “Differences in the Donor Behavior Characteristics of Young Affluent Males and Females: Empirical Evidence from Britain”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(2), 181-203.
15. Lee, Y. ve C. Chang (2007), “Who Gives What to Charity? Characteristics Affecting Donation Behavior”, Social Behavior and Personality, 35(9), 1173-1180.
16. Mathur, A. (1996), “Older Adults Motivations for Gift Giving to Charitable Organizations: An Exchange Theory Perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 107-123.
17. Pearce, P. L. ve P. R. Amato (1980), “A Taxonomy of Helping: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis”, Social Psychological Quarterly, 43(4), 363–371.
18. Peloza, J. ve D. N. Hassay (2007), “A Typology of Charity Support Behaviors: Toward a Holistic View of Helping”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 17(1/2), 135-151.
19. Rankin, B, M. Ergin ve F. Gökşen (2014), “A Cultural Map of Turkey”, Cultural Sociology, 8(2), 159-179.
20. Sargeant, A. (1999), “Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour”, Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 215-238.
21. Sargeant, A. ve J. Shang (2010), Fundraising Principles and Practice, San Fransisco: Jossey Bass, Sargeant, A., J. B. Ford ve D. C. West (2006), “Perceptual Determinants of Nonprofit Giving Behavior”, Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 155-165.
22. Saunders, S. G. (2013). “The Diversification of Charities: From Religion- Oriented to for Profit-Oriented Fundraising”, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(2), 141-148.
23. Schlegelmilch, B. ve C. Tynan (1989), “The Scope for Market Segmentation Within the Charity Market: An Empirical Analysis”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2), 127-134.
24. Singer, A. (2008), Charity in Islamic Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Slater, D. ve F. Tonkiss (2001), Market Society: Markets and Modern Social Theory, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
26. Spiggle, S. (1994), “Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research”, Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491-503.
27. Strauss, A. L. (1990), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Taniguchi, H. (2011), “The Determinants of Formal and Informal Volunteering: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 920-939.
29. Webb, D. J., C. L. Green ve T. G. Brashear, (2000), “Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299-309.
30. Wilson, J. (2000), “Volunteering”, Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215-240.
31. Wilson, J. ve M. Musick (1997), “Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work”, American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.
32. Winterich, K. P., V. Mittal ve K. Aquino (2013), “When Does Recognition Increase Charitable Behavior? Toward a Moral Identity-Based Model”, Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 121-134.
33. Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4. Baskı, U.S.A.: Sage.