YAPI ELEMANLARININ YENİDEN KULLANIMI VE ENVANTER KISITLI YAPISAL OPTİMİZASYON

Year 2023, , 988 - 1012, 22.12.2023

Soner Sezer , Hakan Özbaşaran , Murat Hiçyılmaz

https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1280445

Abstract

İnşaat sektörü çevresel etkiler ve atık oluşumu bakımından en büyük paydaşlardan birisidir. Karar verici kuruluşların çevresel etkileri azaltmak amacıyla baskılarını günden güne arttırdığı bilinmektedir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, bir döngüsel ekonomi stratejisi olan yeniden kullanımın yapısal sistemlere uygulanması değerli bir çözüm olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu literatür incelemesinde, son yıllarda yapı elemanlarının yeniden kullanımına olan ilginin artması ile gündeme gelen envanter kısıtlı yapısal optimizasyon (EKYO) alanındaki çalışmaların incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. EKYO yönteminden yapısal elemanların yeniden kullanımı ile elde edilen kazanımı maksimize etmesi beklenmektedir. EKYO yönteminin daha geniş bir perspektifte tartışılabilmesi için öncelikle yapısal elemanlarının yeniden kullanımı, inşaat sektörünün çevresel etkileri ve döngüsel ekonomi modeli, yapı elemanlarının yeniden kullanımının önündeki engeller ve sunulan çözümler, literatürde sunulan uygulama incelemeleri ve vaka çalışmaları özetlenmiştir. Ardından bu incelemenin ana konusu olan envanter kısıtlı yapısal optimizasyona dair literatürdeki çalışmaların geniş incelemeleri sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Yeniden kullanım, Yapısal optimizasyon, Stok, Envanter, Döngüsel ekonomi

REUSE OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND INVENTORY CONSTRAINED STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the biggest stakeholders in terms of environmental impacts and waste production. It is known that the pressure on the decision-making organizations to reduce environmental impacts is increasing day by day. For this purpose, the application of reuse, which is a circular economy strategy, to structural systems has emerged as a valuable solution. In this literature review, it is aimed to analyze the studies in the field of inventory constrained structural optimization (ICSO) which has come to the fore with the increasing interest in the reuse of structural elements in recent years. It is expected that the ICSO method will maximize the gain obtained by the reuse of structural elements. Primarily in order to discuss the ICSO method in a wider perspective, the reuse of structural elements, the environmental impacts of the construction sector and the circular economy model, the barriers and solutions to the reuse of structural elements, and the application reviews and case studies presented in the literature are summarized. Then extensive reviews of studies in the literature on inventory constrained structural optimization, which is the main subject of this review, are presented.

Keywords

Reuse, Structural optimization, Stock, Inventory, Circular economy

References

• Academia. Erişim adresi: www.academia.edu. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Addis, B. (2006). Building with reclaimed components and materials: A design handbook for reuse and recycling. London, UK: Routledge.
• Akbarieh, A., Jayasinghe, L. B., Waldmann, D. & Teferle, F. N. (2020). BIM-based end-of-lifecycle decision making and digital deconstruction: Literature review. Sustainability, 12(7), 2670. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072670
• Akinade, O.O., Oyedele, L.O., Ajayi, S.O., Bilal, M., Alaka, H.A., Owolabi, H.A., Bello, S.A., Jaiyeoba, B.E. & Kadiri, K.O. (2017). Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. Waste Management, 60, 3–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.017
• Allwood, J.M. & Cullen, J.M. (2012). Sustainable materials: with both eyes open. Cambridge, UK: UIT Cambridge.
• Balbas, L. T. (1965). La mezquita de Córdoba y las ruinas de Madinat Al-Zahra. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Plus-Ultra.
• Brütting J., Senatore G., Fivet, C. (2018a). Advanced Computing Strategies for Engineering: Optimization formulations for the design of low embodied energy structures made from reused elements., Eds: Smith, I., Domer, B., Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Brütting, J., De Wolf, C. & Fivet, C. (2019a). The reuse of load-bearing components. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225, 012025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012025
• Brütting, J., Desruelle, J., Senatore, G. & Fivet, C. (2019b). Design of truss structures through reuse. Structures, 18,128-137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.006
• Brütting, J., Desruelle, J., Senatore, G., & Fivet, C. (2018b, July). Optimum truss design with reused stock elements. In Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, 1-8, Boston, USA.
• Brütting, J., Senatore, G. & Fivet, C. (2019c). Form follows availability–Designing structures through reuse. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 60(4), 257-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2019.202.033
• Brütting, J., Senatore, G., Schevenels, M. & Fivet, C., (2020). Optimum design of frame structures from a stock of reclaimed elements. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6(57). doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00057
• Bukauskas, A. (2020). Inventory-constrained structural design (PhD Thesis). University of Bath, Bath, UK.
• Bukauskas, A., Shepherd, P., Walker, P., Sharma, B., & Bregulla, J. (2017, September). Form-Fitting strategies for diversity-tolerant design. In Proceedings of IASS annual symposia, 1-10, Hamburg, Germany.
• Bukauskas, A., Shepherd, P., Walker, P., Sharma, B., & Bregulla, J. (2018, July). Inventory-constrained structural design: new objectives and optimization techniques. In Proceedings of IASS annual symposia, 1-8, Boston, USA.
• Condotta, M. & Zatta, E. (2021). Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128413
• Estrella Arcos, E. X., Muresan, A. M., Redealli, D., Brütting, J., Warmuth, J., & Fivet, C. (2023, June). A Reuse-Ready Timber Slab-and-Column System for Modular Building Structures. In World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2023). Timber for a livable future (pp. 3588-3593), Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.52202/069179-0467
• European Commission (2015). Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels, Belgium: Eur-Lex.
• European Commission (2017). Efficient use of mixed wastes – improving management of construction and demolition waste final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Eurostat (2022). Waste statistics online database. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics#Total_waste, Erişim tarihi: 30.01.2022
• Fujita, M. & Masuda, T. (2014). Application of various NDT methods for the evaluation of building steel structures for reuse. Materials, 7(10), 7130-7144. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7107130
• Fujitani, Y., & Fujii, D. (2000, May). Optimum structural design of steel plane frame under the limited stocks of members. In Proceedings of the RILEM/CIB/ISO international symposium, integrated life-cycle design of materials and structures, 198-202, Helsinki, Finland.
• Google Scholar. Erişim adresi: https://scholar.google.com. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Gorgolewski, M. (2008). Designing with reused building components: some challenges. Build. Res. Inf., 36, 175-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701559499
• Gorgolewski, M., Straka, V., Edmonds, J. & Sergio-Dzoutzidis, C. (2008). Designing buildings using reclaimed steel components. Journal of Green Building, 3(3), 97-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.3.3.97
• Hradil, P., Talja, A., Wahlström, M., Huuhka, S., Lahdensivu, J. & Pikkuvirta, J. (2014). Re-use of structural elements environmentally efficient recovery of building components. Espoo, Finland: VTT Technology 200.
• Iacovidou, E. & Purnell, P. (2016). Mining the physical infrastructure: opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural component reuse. Sci Total Environ, 557–558, 791–807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.098
• Kanters, J. (2018). Design for deconstruction in the design process: State of the art. Buildings, 8(11), 150. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110150
• Kanyilmaz, A., Birhane, M., Fishwick, R., & del Castillo, C. (2023). Reuse of Steel in the Construction Industry: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Steel Structures, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00778-4
• Kim, S. & Kim, S.-A. (2021). Design optimization of noise barrier tunnels through component reuse: Minimization of costs and CO2 emissions using multi-objective genetic algorithm, J. Clean. Prod., 298, 126697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126697
• Ness, D. & Swift, J., Ranasinghe, D. C., Xing, K., Soebarto, V. (2015). Smart steel: new paradigms for the reuse of steel enabled by digital tracking and modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 292-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.055
• Pongiglione, M. & Calderini, C. (2014). Material savings through structural steel reuse: A case study in Genoa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86, 87-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.011
• Researchgate. Erişim adresi: www.researchgate.net. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Rios, F.C., Chong, W.K. & Grau, D. (2015). Design for disassembly and deconstruction—challenges and opportunities. Procedia Eng., 118, 1296–1304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485
• Ruan, C. (2020). Imperfections on the stability of reused steel structures (BS Thesis), Häme University of Applied Sciences, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
• Saka, M. P., Hasançebi, O. & Geem, Z. W. (2016). Metaheuristics in structural optimization and discussions on harmony search algorithm. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 28, 88–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2016.01.005
• Salama, W. (2017). Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: An explorative review. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(2), 617-635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.005
• Sandin Y., Carlsson A., Chúláin U.C. & Sandberg K. (2021). Design for deconstruction and reuse: case study Villa Anneberg. Borås, Sweden: RISE.
• ScienceDirect. Erişim adresi: www.sciencedirect.com. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Sohani, H., Hosseini Nourzad, S. H., & Saghatforoush, E. (2023). The optimized form of building made from the reused elements. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2285344
• Springer Link. Erişim adresi: link.springer.com. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Stahel, W.R. (2013). Policy for material efficiency- sustainable taxation as a departure from the throwaway society. Phil Trans R Soc A, 371, 20110567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/275/1/012022
• Taylor Francis. Erişim adresi: www.tandfonline.com. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Tingley, D. D., Cooper, S. & Cullen, J. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642-652. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006
• Tomczak, A., Haakonsen, S. M., & Łuczkowski, M. (2023). Matching algorithms to assist in designing with reclaimed building elements. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 3(3), 035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acf341
• Ünlütürk, Ş., Öztürk, P. H., Kardeş, S., Birdal, M., Saral, B., Aşıroğlu, B., Ergün, G. ve Yokuş, P. P. (2020). İşletmeler için döngüsel ekonomi rehberi. İstanbul: Hedefler İçin İş Dünyası Platformu – Dcube Döngüsel Ekonomi Kooperatifi.
• Van Gelderen, T. (2021). Truss topology optimization with reused steel elements: An optimization tool for designing steel trusses with a set of reclaimed elements (MSc Thesis), Delft University of Technology, Delf, Netherlands.
• Van Lookeren Campagne, F. (2022). Efficiently including reclaimed steel elements in a truss bridge design by performing a stock-constrained shape and topology optimization, (MSc Thesis), Delft University of Technology, Delf, Netherlands. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:85cbf0eb-0a2f-4be8-aecc-84616a5f8643
• Vares, S., Hradil, P., Pulakka, S., Ungureanu, V., & Sansom, M. (2018, October). Environmental-and life cycle cost impact of reused steel structures: A case study. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Life Cycle Civil Engineering IALCCE, 28-31, Ghent, Belgium.
• Vares, S., Hradil, P., Sansom, M. & Ungureanu, V. (2020). Economic potential and environmental impacts of reused steel structures, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(4), 750-761. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1662064
• Walsh, S. J., & Shotton, E. (2022). Design for deconstruction and reuse: An Irish suburban semi-detached dwelling. Technical Report, School of Architecture, Planning & Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, April 1, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10197/13111
• Warmuth, J., Brütting, J., & Fivet, C. (2021, August). Computational tool for stock-constrained design of structures. In Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2020/21 and the 7th International Conference on Spatial Structures, 1-9, Guilford, UK.
• Web of Science. Erişim adresi: www.webofscience.com. Erişim tarihi: 02.12.2023
• Yeung, J., Walbridge, S. & Haas, C. (2015). The role of geometric characterization in supporting structural steel reuse decisions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 104, 120-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.017
• Yeung, J., Walbridge, S., Haas, C. & Saari, R. (2007). Understanding the total life cycle cost implications of reusing structural steel. Environment Systems and Decisions, 37(1), 101-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9621-6