Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi

Year 2016, , 61 - 79, 30.12.2016

Sedat Alataş Osman Peker

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.281805
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, kurumsal kalite ile gelir arasındaki ilişki, 1996-2012 dönemi temel alınarak, 122 ülke için Panel EKK yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Ampirik analizlerden elde edilen üç önemli sonuç bu-lunmaktadır. Birinci olarak, kurumsal kalite ile gelir arasında pozi-tif ve istatistiki olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır. İkinci olarak, kurumsal kalitenin gelir üzerindeki etkisi ülke gruplarına göre farklılaşmaktadır. En yüksek olduğu ülkeler, Avrupa ile Sahra Altı ülkeleri iken; en düşük olduğu ülkeler, Doğu ve Güney Doğu Asya ülkeleri ile Kuzey ve Latin Amerika ülkeleridir. Üçüncüsü ise, ku-rumsal kalitenin gelire etkisi, ekonomik kalkınmaya yeni başlaya-cak/başlamış olan ülkelerde ve ekonomik kalkınmasını büyük öl-çüde tamamlamış ülkelerde daha yüksektir. Bu nedenle, özellikle azgelişmiş ülkelerin, kurumsal kalitelerini iyileştirmeye yönelik ge-rekli hukuksal düzenlemeleri yaparak, rüşvet ve yolsuzluğu azalt-malı, mülkiyet haklarını güvence altına alan, işgücü ve iş özgürlü-ğüne önem veren iyi kurumları oluşturmaları gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Gelir Kurumsal Kalite Panel Veri

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon ve Robinson Johnson (2004). “Institutions As the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 10481, s. 1-92.
  • Acemoglu, Daron ve Simon Johnson (2003). “Unblinding Institutions”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 9934, s. 1-39.
  • Acemoglu, Daron (2003). “Root Causes A Historical Approach to Assessing the Role of Institutions in Economic Development”, Finance&Development, s. 27-30.
  • Alesina, Alberto ve Roberto Perotti (1993). “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 4486, s. 1-33.
  • Aron, Jannie (2000). “Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 15, No: 1, s. 99-135.
  • Baltagi, Badi (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3. Edition), John Wiley Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
  • Bloch, Harry ve Sam Hak Kan Tang (2004). “Deep Determinants of Economic Growth: Institutions, Geography and Openness to Trade”, Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 4, No: 3, s. 245-255.
  • Breusch, Trevor S. ve Adrian R. Pagan (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, No: 47, s. 239-253.
  • Dampare, George A. ve Jennifer Piesse (2002). “Financial Development, Political Institutions and Economic Growth in the ECOWAS Sub-Region: An Empirical Analysis”, The Management Centre, King’ s College London, University of London.
  • Dawson, John D. (1998). “Institutions, Investment, and Growth: New Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. XXXVI, s. 603-619.
  • Dearmon, Jacob ve Kevin Grıer (2009). “Trust and Development”, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, No: 71, s. 210-220.
  • Deaton, Angus (1993). Data and Econometric Tools for Development Analysis, Woodrow Wilson School Development Studies, s. 1785-1874.
  • Dünya Bankası (2013). World Bank Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
  • GÖKALP, Faysal M. ve Ercan BALDEMİR (2006). “Kurumsal Yapı ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 212-226.
  • Green, Willam. H. (2004). Econometric Analysis (5. Edition), Prentice Hall:, New Jersey.
  • Hadri, Kaddour ve Eiji KUROZUMİ (2012). “A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Serial Correlation and a Common Factor”, Economics Letter, No: 115, s. 31-34.
  • Hall, Robert E. ve Charles I. Jones (1998). “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 6564, s. 1-49.
  • Knack, Stephen ve Philip Keefer (1995). “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Indicators”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No: 23118, s.1-30.
  • Levin, Andrew, Lin, Chien-Fu ve Chia-Shang J. Chu (2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, No: 108, s. 1-24.
  • Mauro, Paolo (1995). “Corruption and Growth”, The Ouarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No: 3, s. 681-712.
  • Meier, Gerald M. ve Joseph E. Stıglıtz (2000). Frontiers of Development Economics The Future in Perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Miras Vakfı Veri Bankası (http://www.heritage.org/index/explore 07.12.2014)
  • Mitchener, Kris J. ve Mari Ohnuki (2008). “Institutions, Competition, and Capital Market Integration in Japan”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 14090, s. 1-37.
  • Nafziger, Wayne E. (2006). Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • North, Douglas C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • North, Douglass C. ve Robert P. Thomas (1970). “An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World”, The Economic History Review, Vol. 23, No: 1, s. 1-17.
  • North, Douglass C. ve John J. Wallıs (1994). “Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History A Transaction Cost Approach”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 150, No: 4, s. 609-624.
  • Özcan, Burcu ve Fatma Zeren (2013). “Sosyal Güvenlik ve Ekonomik Kalkınma: Avrupa Ülkeleri Üzerine Mekansal Ekonometri Analizi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 7-36.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M., Ulah, Aman ve Takashi Yamagata (2008). “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence”, Econometrics Journal, No: 11, s. 105-127.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. (2004). “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No: 435, s. 1-39.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. (2006). “Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure”, Econometrica, Vol. 74, No: 4, s. 967-1012.
  • Rodrik, Dani, Subramanıan, Arvind ve Francesco Trebbi (2002). “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development”, National Bureau Of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 9305, s. 1-44.
  • Scully, Gerald W. (1988). “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 96, No: 3, s. 652-662.
  • Shafik, Nemat (1994). “Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 46, s. 757-773.
  • Spindler, Zane A. (1991). “Liberty and Development: A Further Empirical Perspective”, Kluver Academic Publishers, No: 69, s. 197-210.
  • Vijayaraghavan, Maya ve William A. Ward (2001). “Institutions and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from a Cross-National Analysis”, Clemson University, Working Paper No: 001302, s. 1-25.
  • Yapraklı, Sevda (2008). “Kurumsal Yapının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Üst Orta Gelir Düzeyindeki Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 301-317.
  • Yoo, Dongwoo ve Richard H. Steckel (2010). “Property Rights and Financial Development: The Legacy of Japanese Colonial Institutions”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 16551, s. 1-33.

Year 2016, , 61 - 79, 30.12.2016

Sedat Alataş Osman Peker

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.281805
Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon ve Robinson Johnson (2004). “Institutions As the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 10481, s. 1-92.
  • Acemoglu, Daron ve Simon Johnson (2003). “Unblinding Institutions”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 9934, s. 1-39.
  • Acemoglu, Daron (2003). “Root Causes A Historical Approach to Assessing the Role of Institutions in Economic Development”, Finance&Development, s. 27-30.
  • Alesina, Alberto ve Roberto Perotti (1993). “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 4486, s. 1-33.
  • Aron, Jannie (2000). “Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 15, No: 1, s. 99-135.
  • Baltagi, Badi (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3. Edition), John Wiley Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
  • Bloch, Harry ve Sam Hak Kan Tang (2004). “Deep Determinants of Economic Growth: Institutions, Geography and Openness to Trade”, Progress in Development Studies, Vol. 4, No: 3, s. 245-255.
  • Breusch, Trevor S. ve Adrian R. Pagan (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, No: 47, s. 239-253.
  • Dampare, George A. ve Jennifer Piesse (2002). “Financial Development, Political Institutions and Economic Growth in the ECOWAS Sub-Region: An Empirical Analysis”, The Management Centre, King’ s College London, University of London.
  • Dawson, John D. (1998). “Institutions, Investment, and Growth: New Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence”, Economic Inquiry, Vol. XXXVI, s. 603-619.
  • Dearmon, Jacob ve Kevin Grıer (2009). “Trust and Development”, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, No: 71, s. 210-220.
  • Deaton, Angus (1993). Data and Econometric Tools for Development Analysis, Woodrow Wilson School Development Studies, s. 1785-1874.
  • Dünya Bankası (2013). World Bank Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
  • GÖKALP, Faysal M. ve Ercan BALDEMİR (2006). “Kurumsal Yapı ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 212-226.
  • Green, Willam. H. (2004). Econometric Analysis (5. Edition), Prentice Hall:, New Jersey.
  • Hadri, Kaddour ve Eiji KUROZUMİ (2012). “A Simple Panel Stationarity Test in the Presence of Serial Correlation and a Common Factor”, Economics Letter, No: 115, s. 31-34.
  • Hall, Robert E. ve Charles I. Jones (1998). “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 6564, s. 1-49.
  • Knack, Stephen ve Philip Keefer (1995). “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Indicators”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No: 23118, s.1-30.
  • Levin, Andrew, Lin, Chien-Fu ve Chia-Shang J. Chu (2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, No: 108, s. 1-24.
  • Mauro, Paolo (1995). “Corruption and Growth”, The Ouarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No: 3, s. 681-712.
  • Meier, Gerald M. ve Joseph E. Stıglıtz (2000). Frontiers of Development Economics The Future in Perspective, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Miras Vakfı Veri Bankası (http://www.heritage.org/index/explore 07.12.2014)
  • Mitchener, Kris J. ve Mari Ohnuki (2008). “Institutions, Competition, and Capital Market Integration in Japan”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 14090, s. 1-37.
  • Nafziger, Wayne E. (2006). Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • North, Douglas C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • North, Douglass C. ve Robert P. Thomas (1970). “An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World”, The Economic History Review, Vol. 23, No: 1, s. 1-17.
  • North, Douglass C. ve John J. Wallıs (1994). “Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History A Transaction Cost Approach”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 150, No: 4, s. 609-624.
  • Özcan, Burcu ve Fatma Zeren (2013). “Sosyal Güvenlik ve Ekonomik Kalkınma: Avrupa Ülkeleri Üzerine Mekansal Ekonometri Analizi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 7-36.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M., Ulah, Aman ve Takashi Yamagata (2008). “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence”, Econometrics Journal, No: 11, s. 105-127.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. (2004). “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No: 435, s. 1-39.
  • Pesaran, Hashem M. (2006). “Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure”, Econometrica, Vol. 74, No: 4, s. 967-1012.
  • Rodrik, Dani, Subramanıan, Arvind ve Francesco Trebbi (2002). “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development”, National Bureau Of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 9305, s. 1-44.
  • Scully, Gerald W. (1988). “The Institutional Framework and Economic Development”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 96, No: 3, s. 652-662.
  • Shafik, Nemat (1994). “Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 46, s. 757-773.
  • Spindler, Zane A. (1991). “Liberty and Development: A Further Empirical Perspective”, Kluver Academic Publishers, No: 69, s. 197-210.
  • Vijayaraghavan, Maya ve William A. Ward (2001). “Institutions and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from a Cross-National Analysis”, Clemson University, Working Paper No: 001302, s. 1-25.
  • Yapraklı, Sevda (2008). “Kurumsal Yapının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Üst Orta Gelir Düzeyindeki Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt 8, Sayı 1, s. 301-317.
  • Yoo, Dongwoo ve Richard H. Steckel (2010). “Property Rights and Financial Development: The Legacy of Japanese Colonial Institutions”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No: 16551, s. 1-33.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sedat Alataş

Osman Peker

Publication Date December 30, 2016
Submission Date December 27, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Alataş, S., & Peker, O. (2016). Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.281805
AMA Alataş S, Peker O. Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. December 2016;17(2):61-79. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.281805
Chicago Alataş, Sedat, and Osman Peker. “Kurumsal Kalite Ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 17, no. 2 (December 2016): 61-79. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.281805.
EndNote Alataş S, Peker O (December 1, 2016) Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 17 2 61–79.
IEEE S. Alataş and O. Peker, “Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 61–79, 2016, doi: 10.17494/ogusbd.281805.
ISNAD Alataş, Sedat - Peker, Osman. “Kurumsal Kalite Ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 17/2 (December 2016), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.281805.
JAMA Alataş S, Peker O. Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016;17:61–79.
MLA Alataş, Sedat and Osman Peker. “Kurumsal Kalite Ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 2, 2016, pp. 61-79, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.281805.
Vancouver Alataş S, Peker O. Kurumsal Kalite ve Gelir: Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2016;17(2):61-79.

Cited By

REKLAM HARCAMALARININ FİRMA KARLILIK PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ
Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.873184