Örgütleri Örgütleyen Örgütler: Meta-örgüt Yazını Üzerine Bir Derleme

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 376 - 402, 19.12.2022

Deniz Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1182694

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bireyleri ortak bir amaç etrafında örgütleyen ve sayıları giderek artan örgütlerle birlikte; bu örgütler de aynı zamanda üyelerinin diğer biçimsel örgütler olduğu örgütler şeklinde tanımlanan meta-örgütler şeklinde örgütlenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgüt çalışmaları alanında 2005-2022 yılları arasında meta-örgütlenme yazınının nasıl evirildiğini ortaya koymaktır. Meta-örgütler ve meta-örgütlenme yazınındaki üretim dinamiklerinin incelendiği 59 çalışmadan yola çıkarak, ortaya konulan bilimsel bilgi birikiminde öne çıkan kriterler tanımlanmakta, amaç ve işlevler, meta-örgütlerin oluşumu ve dinamikleri ile çevre ilişkileri esas alınarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bulgularımız, mevcut yazının farklı ekollerin varlığı nedeniyle parçalı bir görünüm gösterdiğini vurgularken; meta-örgütlerin birbirinden farklılaşması, değişim ve dinamikleri, eylem ve sonuçları üzerine çalışmaların büyük zorluklar (grand challenges) bağlamında, örgüt kuramları yazını ile bütünleştirilerek önemli bir araştırma potansiyeli taşıdığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Meta-örgütler, meta-örgütlenme, derleme

Organizations Organizing Organizations: A Review of Meta-organizations

Öz

As the number of organizations that organize individuals around common goals increases, these organizations are also organized into meta-organizations, defined as organizations whose members are other formal organizations. This study aims to reveal how the meta-organization literature has evolved from 2005 to 2022. By analyzing 59 studies on the production dynamics of meta-organizations in the relevant literature, we evaluate the classifying criteria in the scientific knowledge and discuss extant research regarding meta-organizations’ purpose and functions, formation and dynamics and relations with the environment. Our findings hint the fragmented nature of the literature due to different schools of thought. We also draw attention to variations between meta-organizations, change and dynamics, and the actions and outcomes through integration with organization theories in the context of grand challenges that possess significant research potential.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Meta-organizations, meta-organizing, review

Kaynakça

• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429-449.
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83-104.
• Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Kerwer, D. (2016). The paradox of organizing states: A meta-organization perspective on international organizations. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 7(1), 5-24.
• Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyon organizations. European Management Journal, 34(2), 93-101.
• Amis, J. M., Mair, J., & Munir, K. A. (2020). The organizational reproduction of inequality. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 195-230.
• Barnett, M. L. (2018). Beyond the membership decision: How do trade associations manage firm involvement?. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(1), 10-12.
• Battisti, S., Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2022). Creating new tech entrepreneurs with digital platforms: Meta-organizations for shared value in data-driven retail ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 1-12.
• Bazzanella, F., Bichler, B. F., & Schnitzer, M. (2022). Collaboration and meta-organisation in event tourism–Effects of the Olympic Agenda 2020 on planning the 2026 Winter Olympics. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 100939.
• Berkowitz, H., & Dumez, H. (2015). La dynamique des dispositifs d’action collective entre firmes: Le cas des méta-organisations dans le secteur pétrolier. L'Année sociologique, 65(2), 333-356.
• Berkowitz, H., & Dumez, H. (2016). The concept of meta‐organization: Issues for management studies. European Management Review, 13(2), 149-156.
• Berkowitz, H., Bucheli, M., & Dumez, H. (2017). Collectively designing CSR through meta-organizations: A case study of the oil and gas industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 753-769.
• Berkowitz, H. (2018). Meta-organizing firms' capabilities for sustainable innovation: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 420-430.
• Berkowitz, H., & Bor, S. (2018). Why meta-organizations matter: A response to Lawton et al. and Spillman. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 204-211.
• Berkowitz, H., & Souchaud, A. (2019). (Self-) regulation of sharing economy platforms through partial meta-organizing. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 961-976.
• Berkowitz, H., Crowder, L. B., & Brooks, C. M. (2020). Organizational perspectives on sustainable ocean governance: A multi-stakeholder, meta-organization model of collective action. Marine Policy, 118, 1-10.
• Berkowitz, H., & Bor, S. (2022). Meta-organisation as partial organisation: An integrated framework of organisationality and decisionality. In Lupova-Henry & Dotti (Eds.), Clusters and sustainable regional development. A meta-organisational approach. Routledge, forthcoming.
• Berkowitz, H. and Grothe-Hammer, M. (2022). From a clash of social orders to a loss of decidability in meta-organizations tackling grand challenges: The case of Japan leaving the International Whaling Commission. In A.A. Gümüşay, E. Marti, H. Trittin-Ulbrich, C. Wickert (Eds.), Organizing for societal grand challenges (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 79) (pp. 115-138). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Bonfils, I. S. (2011). Disability meta-organizations and policy-making under new forms of governance. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13(1), 37-51.
• Bosch‐Sijtsema, P., & Bosch, J. (2015). User involvement throughout the innovation process in high‐tech industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 793-807.
• Brès, L., Raufflet, E., & Boghossian, J. (2018). Pluralism in organizations: Learning from unconventional forms of organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 364-386.
• Čada, K., Numerato, D., & Hoření, K. (2021). Those who pay the piper calls the tune: Meta-organisation and capacities of the third sector in migration policies. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-11.
• Calabrese, M., La Sala, A., Fuller, R. P., & Laudando, A. (2021). Digital platform ecosystems for sustainable innovation: Toward a new meta-organizational model?. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 119-133.
• Carmagnac, L., & Carbone, V. (2019). Making supply networks more sustainable ‘together’: The role of meta-organisations. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 20(1), 56-67.
• Castro, A., Phillips, N., & Ansari, S. (2020). Corporate corruption: A review and an agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 935-968.
• Chaudhury, A. S., Ventresca, M. J., Thornton, T. F., Helfgott, A., Sova, C., Baral, P., ... & Ligthart, J. (2016). Emerging meta-organisations and adaptation to global climate change: Evidence from implementing adaptation in Nepal, Pakistan and Ghana. Global Environmental Change, 38, 243-257.
• Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. Journal of Management, 48(1), 147-184.
• Corazza, L., Cisi, M., & Dumay, J. (2021). Formal networks: The influence of social learning in meta-organisations from commons protection to commons governance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(3), 303-318.
• Cropper, S., & Bor, S. (2018). (Un)bounding the meta-organization: Co-evolution and compositional dynamics of a health partnership. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 42-60.
• de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Flechas, X. A., Facin, A. L. F., & Borini, F. M. (2021). Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120950.
• Du, W., Pan, S. L., Zhou, N., & Ouyang, T. (2018). From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‐organization in Zhongguancun, China. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1158-1175.
• Ertug, G., Brennecke, J., Kovács, B., & Zou, T. (2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 38-69.
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2018). Voices in conflict? The crisis communication of meta-organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 90-120.
• Furåker, B. (2020). European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 26(3), 345-358.
• Garaudel, P. (2020). Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(1), 1-16.
• Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
• Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman, M. (2012). Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 571-586.
• Hardy, C., Maguire, S., Power, M., & Tsoukas, H. (2020). Organizing risk: Organization and management theory for the risk society. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 1032-1066.
• Heine, K., & Kerk, M. (2017). Conflict resolution in meta-organizations: The peculiar role of arbitration. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 1-20.
• Hyman, R., & Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (2020). (How) can international trade union organisations be democratic?. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 26(3), 253-272.
• Kaplan, R. (2021). Inter-firm convening and organisational power: How American multinationals mobilised the Venezuelan business community to adopt CSR practices, 1961–1967. Business History, 1-32.
• Karhunen, P., Kankaanranta, A., Louhiala‐Salminen, L., & Piekkari, R. (2018). Let’s talk about language: A review of language‐sensitive research in international management. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 980-1013.
• Karlberg, E., & Jacobsson, K. (2015). A meta-organizational perspective on the Europeanization of civil society: The case of the Swedish Women’s Lobby. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1438-1459.
• König, A., Schulte, M., & Enders, A. (2012). Inertia in response to non-paradigmatic change: The case of meta-organizations. Research Policy, 41(8), 1325-1343.
• Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405-424.
• Lapoutte, A. (2021). Résilience d'une méta‐organisation: Le cas d'un commun de l'alimentation. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 92(1), 79-100.
• Laurent, A., Garaudel, P., Schmidt, G., & Eynaud, P. (2020). Civil society meta-organizations and legitimating processes: The case of the addiction field in France. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(1), 19-38.
• Laviolette, E. M., Arcand, S., Cloutier, L. M., & Renard, L. (2022). Same but different: Meta-organization and collective identity dynamics. M@n@gement, 25(2), 45-59.
• Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2019). Constructing organizational life: How social-symbolic work shapes selves, organizations, and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Malcourant, E., Vas, A., & Zintz, T. (2015). World Anti-Doping Agency: A meta-organizational perspective. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 5(5), 451-471.
• Matinheikki, J., Pesonen, T., Artto, K., & Peltokorpi, A. (2017). New value creation in business networks: The role of collective action in constructing system-level goals. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 122-133.
• Megali, T. (2022). Digital platforms as members of meta-organizations: A case study of the online advertising market. M@n@gement, 25(2), 10-26.
• Monteiro, P., & Adler, P. S. (2022). Bureaucracy for the 21st century: Clarifying and expanding our view of bureaucratic organization. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 427-475.
• Peixoto, I., & Temmes, A. (2019). Market organizing in the European Union's biofuels market: Organizing for favouring, acceptability, and future preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 1-9.
• Radnejad, A. B., Vredenburg, H., & Woiceshyn, J. (2017). Meta-organizing for open innovation under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry. Technovation, 66, 14-27.
• Reveley, J., & Ville, S. (2010). Enhancing industry association theory: a comparative business history contribution. Journal of Management Studies, 47(5), 837-858.
• Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2014). Sustainable co–evolution of environmental regulation and oligopolies: moving towards a managerial theory of meta–organisational approaches. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 270-289.
• Roundy, P. T., & Bayer, M. A. (2019). To bridge or buffer? A resource dependence theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 550-575.
• Roundy, P. T. (2021). Leadership in startup communities: how incubator leaders develop a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Management Development, 40(3), 190-208.
• Roux, B., & Lecocq, X. (2022). A necessary evil: The role of the secretariat in effective meta-organizations. Lessons from the multilevel study of a business cooperative. M@n@gement, 25(2), 60-76.
• Saniossian, J., Lecocq, X., & Beaucourt, C. (2022). Meta-organizations in the making. A multiple case study of multi-stakeholder meta-organizations for social innovation. M@n@gement, 25(2), 27-44.
• Solansky, S. T., Beck, T. E., & Travis, D. (2014). A complexity perspective of a meta-organization team: The role of destabilizing and stabilizing tensions. Human Relations, 67(8), 1007-1033.
• Spillman, L. (2018). Meta-organization matters. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(1), 16-20.
• Strezhneva, M. V. (2020). On the norms and habits of the European Union as a meta-organisation. Croatian International Relations Review, 26(87), 6-31.
• Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2011). Entrepreneurship in emerging markets. Management International Review, 51(1), 23-39.
• Vale, J., Branco, M. C., & Ribeiro, J. (2016). Individual intellectual capital versus collective intellectual capital in a meta-organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 279-297.
• Vale, J., Ribeiro, J. A., & Branco, M. C. (2017). Intellectual capital management and power mobilisation in a seaport. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1183-1201.
• Valente, M., & Oliver, C. (2018). Meta-organization formation and sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Organization Science, 29(4), 678-701.
• Warwick-Giles, L., McDermott, I., Checkland, K., & Moran, V. (2020). Moving towards strategic commissioning: Impact on clinical commissioning groups as membership organizations. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 25(1), 22-29.
• Winand, M., Belot, M., Merten, S., & Kolyperas, D. (2019). International sport federations’ social media communication: A content analysis of FIFA’s Twitter account. International Journal of Sport Communication, 12(2), 209-233.
• Zapp, M., Jungblut, J., & Ramirez, F. O. (2021). Legitimacy, stratification, and internationalization in global higher education: The case of the International Association of Universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 27(1), 1-15.
• Zyzak, B., & Jacobsen, D. I. (2020). External managerial networking in meta-organizations. Evidence from regional councils in Norway. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1347-1367.