Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı

Memduh Alper Demir; Mustafa Bilik

doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.309214

TR EN

Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin dış ticaret potansiyeli stokastik sınır çekim modeli uygulanarak incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, dış ticaretteki büyümeyi kısıtlayıcı faktörleri tespit edilmektedir. Çalışma Türkiye’nin 31 dış ticaret ortağının 2003-2014 yılları arası panel verileri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, dış ticareti etkileyen; kişi başına gelir, gayri safi yurt içi hasıla, nüfus yoğunluğu, uzaklık, ticari serbestlik, ortak gümrük gibi temel değişkenler modellenmiştir. Dış ticaret açısından Türkiye’nin ortalama etkinliğinin %60 olduğu ve ülke bazlı olarak %11 ile %96 arasında çıkan etkinlik sonuçlarına varılmıştır. Etkinliği ortalamanın altında kalan ülkelerdeki nedenler tartışılmış ve çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Çekim Modeli,Stokastik Sınır Analizi,Etkinlik,Dış Ticaret,Türkiye

References

Ahsan, M. R., & Chu, S. N. (2014). “The Potential and Constraints of the Exports of Environmental Goods (EGs): the case of Bangladesh” (No. 2014-05). The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation And estimation Of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Anderson, J. E. (1979). A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3712.867-a
Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192. http://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
Armington, P. S. (1969). “A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production”. Staff Papers, 16(1), 159-178.
Armstrong, S. P., Drysdale, P., & Kalirajan, K. P. (2008). Asian Trade Structures and Trade Potential: An Initial Analysis of South and East Asian Trade. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3–4. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1767686
Armstrong, S. P., & Drysdale, P. (2009). The influence of economics and politics on the structure of world trade and investment flows. East Asia Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, (61).
Armstrong, S. P. (2015). “East and South Asia: Managing Difficult Bilateral Relations and Regional Integration Globally”. Asian Economic Journal, 29(4), 303-324.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1988). Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data. Journal of econometrics, 38(3), 387-399.
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1-2), 153–169. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158774

Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1993). A stochastic frontier production function incorporating a model for technical inefficiency effects. Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481. http://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153. http://doi.org/10.2307/1928061
Bhattacharya, S. K., & Das, G. G. (2014). Can South-South Trade Agreements Reduce Development Deficits?: An Exploration of SAARC during 1995-2008. Journal of South Asian Development, 9(3), 253–285. http://doi.org/10.1177/0973174114549129
Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1990). Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2), 185–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90054-W
Danquah, M., Barimah, A., & Ohemeng, W. (2010). Regional Integration , Trade and National Efficiency in ECOWAS Countries.The West African Economic Review,2(1),65-87.
Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2007). Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: Methodology and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? NBER Working Paper No. W5377, (January), 7–32. http://doi.org/10.3386/w5377
Debreu, G. (1951). The Coefficient of Resource Utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292. http://doi.org/10.2307/1906814
Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.
Drysdale, P., & Armstrong, S. P. (2014). “Japan's Foreign Economic Policy Strategies and Economic Performance”.
Effendi,Y. (2014) “Asean Free Trade Agreement Implementation for Indonesian Trading Performance: A Gravity Model Approach”, Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, Ministry of Trade, 8(1).
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), pp. 253–290. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00022-4
Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, S. S. (2008). Efficiency and Productivity. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change, 1–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183528.003.0001
Greene, W. (2013). Export Potential for US Advanced Technology Goods to India Using a Gravity Model Approach. US International Trade Commission, Working Paper, (2013-03B), 1-43.http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183528.003.0001
Jondrow, J., Knox Lovell, C. A., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2-3), 233–238. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5
Kang, H., & Fratianni, M. U. (2006). International trade efficiency, the gravity equation, and the stochastic frontier. Available at SSRN 952848.
Kalirajan, K. P., & Shand, R. T. (1999). Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency Measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(2), 149–172. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00080
Kalirajan, K. (2008), "Gravity model specification and estimation: revisited", Applied Economics Letters 15(13): 1037–1039.
Kalirajan, K., & Singh, K. (2008). A Comparative Analysis of China’s and India’s Recent Export Performances *. Asian Economic Papers, 7(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/asep.2008.7.1.1
Kalirajan, K., & Liu, Y. (2016). "Renewable energy trade within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) countries: an exploratory analysis" (No. 2016-05). The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
Khan, I. U., & Kalirajan, K. (2011). "The impact of trade costs on exports: An empirical modeling". Economic Modelling, 28(3), 1341-1347
Kodde, D. A., & Palm, F. C. (1986). Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1243-1248.
Koh, W. C. (2013). Brunei Darussalam ’ s Trade Potential and ASEAN Economic Integration : A Gravity Model Approach, 1(December), 67–89.
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities. In Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (pp. 225–87). Retrieved from http://www.cer.ethz.ch/resec/people/tsteger/Ramsey_Model.pdf
Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). Production frontiers, panel data, and time-varying technical inefficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2), 201–211. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90055-X
Lee, Y. H., & Schmidt, P. (1993). A production frontier model with flexible temporal variation in technical efficiency. The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications, 237-255.
Lewis, F., Butler, A., & Gilbert, L. (2011). A unified approach to model selection using the likelihood ratio test. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(2), 155–162. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00063.x
Mastromarco, C. (2008). Stochastic frontier models. Department of Economics and Mathematics-Statistics, University of Salento.
Meeusen, W., & Broeck., J. van Den. (1977). Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. http://doi.org/10.1080/00420986820080431
Miankhel, A. K., Kalirajan, K., & Thangavelu, S. M. (2014). Australia's export potential: an exploratory analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 19(2), 230-246.
Miankhel, A. K. (2015). "Comparative Advantage, Institutions and'Behind the Border'Obstacles. Institutions and'Behind the Border'Obstacles" (December 10, 2015).
Nasir, S. & Kalirajan, K. (2016). Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Modern Services Export Performances of Asian Economies. Asian Development Review.
Nguyen, V.S. and Kalirajan, K. (2016) "Export of environmental goods: India’s potential and constraints", Environment and Development Economics, 21(2), 158–179. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X15000224
Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics, 9(1), 43–64. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3
Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93–100.
Ravishankar, G., & Stack, M. M. (2014). The Gravity Model and Trade Efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Eastern European Countries’ Potential Trade. World Economy, 37(5), 690–704. http://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12144
Roperto, J. D., & Edgardo, C. (2014). Philippine Export Efficiency and Potential: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. World Journal of Economic and Finance, 1(2), 006–015.
Salim, R. A., Kabir, M. M., & Mawali, N. A. (2011). Does more trade potential remain in Arab States of the Gulf?. Journal of Economic Integration, 217-243. Sanyal, P., Brady, P. V., & Vugrin, E. D. (2013). The Impact of Trade Costs on Rare Earth Exports: A Stochastic Frontier Estimation Approach. Sandia National Laboratories.
Sayavong, V. (2015). Export Growth , Export Potential and Export Resistance: A Case Study of Laos. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 32(3), 340–357. http://doi.org/10.1355/ae32-3c
Schmidt, P., & Sickles, R. C. (1984). Production frontiers and panel data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. http://doi.org/10.2307/1391278
Sumani, I.I. (2015) “Determinants of Ghana’s Trade Flows in Economic Community of West African States: Application of the Gravity Model”, A Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology.
Tamini, L. Chebbi, H. E., & Abbassi, A. (2016). Trade performance and potential of North African countries : An application of a stochastic frontier gravity model
Tinbergen, J. (1963). Shaping the world economy. The International Executive,5(1), 27-30.
Viorica, E.-D. (2015). Econometric Analysis of Foreign Trade Efficiency of E.U. Members Using Gravity Equations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20(15), 670–678. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00122-7
Waheed, A., & Abbas, S. (2015). "Potential Export Markets for Bahrain: A Panel Data Analysis". International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 6(3), 165.
Zarzoso, I. M. (2003). Gravity model: An application to trade between regional blocs. Atlantic Economic Journal, 31(2), 174–187. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319869
Zhang, N., Zhou, P., & Choi, Y. (2013). Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis. Energy Policy, 56, 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.033

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Economics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Memduh Alper Demir
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ
Türkiye

Mustafa Bilik
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ
Türkiye

Publication Date

February 9, 2018

Submission Date

April 26, 2017

Acceptance Date

January 21, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 11 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.309214

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA95PH43BU

APA

Demir, M. A., & Bilik, M. (2018). Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.309214

AMA

1.Demir MA, Bilik M. Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;11(1):29-48. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.309214

Chicago

Demir, Memduh Alper, and Mustafa Bilik. 2018. “Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11 (1): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.309214.

EndNote

Demir MA, Bilik M (February 1, 2018) Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11 1 29–48.

IEEE

[1]M. A. Demir and M. Bilik, “Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–48, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.309214.

ISNAD

Demir, Memduh Alper - Bilik, Mustafa. “Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (February 1, 2018): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.309214.

JAMA

1.Demir MA, Bilik M. Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;11:29–48.

MLA

Demir, Memduh Alper, and Mustafa Bilik. “Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 1, Feb. 2018, pp. 29-48, doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.309214.

Vancouver

1.Memduh Alper Demir, Mustafa Bilik. Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018 Feb. 1;11(1):29-48. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.309214

Cited By

https://doi.org/

Ömer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi (OHUIIBF) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Pseudonymity License 4.0 international license.

Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı

Türkiye’nin Ticaret Etkinliği: Stokastik Sınır Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Keywords

Turkey’s Trade Effıcıency: A Stochastıc Frontıer Gravıty Model Approach

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

EKONOMİK ENTEGRASYONLARA KATILIMIN TÜRKİYE'NİN DIŞ TİCARETİNE ETKİLERİ:PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Measuring Effectiveness Of Turkish Natural Gas Distribution Companies By Stochastic Frontier Analysis

TİCARİ ÇEKİM MODELİNDE ÇOKLU DİRENÇ FAKTÖRÜ VE TÜRKİYE’NİN DIŞ TİCARET EĞİLİMİNİN DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Determinants of dried fruit products sector export: A gravity model for Türkiye

Analyzing Common Market Options in the Scope of OIC

Türk Devletleri Teşkilatının Türkiye İhracatına Etkisinin Çekim Modeli ile Analizi