A Comparison of Learning Style Preferences in E-Learning Environment: A Study of Health Science University Students in Turkey

Year 2020, Volume 7, Issue 1, 127 - 150, 29.06.2020

Emin IBILI

Abstract

In this study, it was investigated whether the e-learning styles of health science students differ according to gender, education type, department, class, working status, daily internet usage time and degree of graduation. In this context, data were obtained from a total of 1989 postgraduate and undergraduate students studying in 17 different departments. In the study, it was found that female students had higher audio-visual and independent learning preferences, and male students had higher verbal and social learning levels. In addition, it was determined that the working status influenced the intuitive learning style and the grade level influenced the logical learning style. In the results of bilateral correlations between learning styles; the highest relationship was found between active learning style and social learning style, while the lowest relationship was found between independent learning style and social and active learning style. In addition, this research has revealed that e-learning styles differ according to the departments where students study, and daily internet usage time is inversely proportional to verbal, logical and independent learning styles, and directly proportional to active learning style. The results of this research showed that different variables are effective on e-learning styles for health science students, therefore, personalized teaching environments are important in content design, instructional design, and determination of teaching methods and strategies.

Keywords

Learning styles, e-learning, health science, university students

References

• Akgün, Ö., Küçük, Ş., Çukurbaşı, B., & Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2014). Sözel veya görsel baskın öğrenme stilini belirleme ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 277-297.
• Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Allyn & Bacon.
• Altintas, S. & Goren, İ. (2018). The Effects of Pre-Service Teachers' Cognitive Styles on Learning Approaches. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(4), 285-293.
• Brown, T., Zoghi, M., Williams, B., Jaberzadeh, S., Roller, L., Palermo, C., ... & Hewitt, L. (2009). Are learning style preferences of health science students predictive of their attitudes towards e-learning? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4).
• Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 125-134.
• Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International journal of technology in teaching and learning, 1(1), 25-44.
• Dağhan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198-211.
• Dascalu, M. I., Bodea, C. N., Moldoveanu, A., Mohora, A., Lytras, M., & de Pablos, P. O. (2015). A recommender agent based on learning styles for better virtual collaborative learning experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 243-253.
• Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Comparing student learning styles in an online distance learning class and an equivalent on-campus class. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135.
• Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts?. The journal of the learning sciences, 14(2), 243-279.
• Emamepur, S. Shams, H. (2007). Learning and cognitive styles. Tehran, Samt press.
• Graf, S., Liu, T. C., Chen, N. S., & Yang, S. J. (2009). Learning styles and cognitive traits–Their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1280-1289.
• Grundman, J. A., Wigton, R. S., & Nickol, D. (2000, April). Controlled trial of a web based virtual reality program in teaching physical diagnosis skills to medical students. In Journal Of General Internal Medıcıne (Vol. 15, pp. 33-33). 350 Maın St, Malden, Ma 02148 Usa: Blackwell Scıence Inc.
• Gülbahar, Y., & Alper, A. (2011). Learning Preferences and Learning Styles of Online Adult Learners. In Antonio Méndez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (1st ed, pp 270-278). Formatex Research Center.
• Gülbahar, Y., & Alper, A. (2014). Development of e-learning styles scale for electronic environments. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(171).
• Hakkari, F., Kantar, M., Bayram, F., İbili, E., & Doğan, M. (2009). Ders notlarının senaryolaştırılması ve uygulaması. XI. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı (11-13 Şubat 2009), Şanlıurfa: Harran Üniversitesi.
• Hauer, P., Straub, C., & Wolf, S. (2005). Learning styles of allied health students using Kolb's LSI-IIa. Journal of Allied Health, 34(3), 177-182.
• Ibili, E. (2020). Examination of Health Science University Students' Level of Readiness for E-learning. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (InPress),
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter?. Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.
• Ibili, E., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). The Relationship between Self-Esteem and Social Network Loneliness: A Study of Trainee School Counsellors. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 39-56.
• Jahanbakhsh, R. (2012). Learning Styles and Academic Achievement: A case study of Iranian high school girl's students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 1030-1034.
• Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Routledge.
• Kamal, A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019). Individual learning preferences based on personality traits in an E-learning scenario. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 407-435.
• Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., Park, B., Kim, J. H., & Choi, H. G. (2017). The associations between internet use time and school performance among Korean adolescents differ according to the purpose of internet use. PLoS One, 12(4).
• Knoll, A. R., Otani, H., Skeel, R. L., & Van Horn, K. R. (2017). Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 544-563.
• Kulac, E., Sezık, M., Ascı, H., & Gurpınar, E. (2015). Tıp Fakültesinde Öğrenme Stilleri ve Akademik Başarı/Learning Styles and Academic Achievement in a Medical School Setting. Age (years), 20(1.2), 18-24.
• Kurnaz, F. B., & Ergün, E. (2019). E-öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenme stilleri ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 12(2), 532-549.
• Murayama, K., Goetz, T., Malmberg, L. E., Pekrun, R., Tanaka, A., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Within-person analysis in educational psychology: Importance and illustrations. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education–Current Trends: The Role of Competence Beliefs in Teaching and Learning, 71-87.
• Nirmalya, S., Kaushik, T., & Rituparna, D. (2015). Students’ opinion towards audio-visual aids used in lecture classes. Hindu, 92, 93-9.
• Özbaş, S. (2013). The investigation of the learning styles of university students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 3(1), 53-58.
• Pewewardy, C. (2002). Learning styles of American Indian/Alaska Native students: A review of the literature and implications for practice. Journal of American Indian Education, 22-56.
• Romanov, K., & Nevgi, A. (2007). Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning?. Medical teacher, 29(5), 490-494.
• Strayhorn, T. L. (2008). How college students' engagement affects personal and social learning outcomes. Journal of College and Character, 10(2).
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon. Needham Heights, MA.
• Tumkaya, S. (2012). The Investigation of the Epistemological Beliefs of University Students According to Gender, Grade, Fields of Study, Academic Success and Their Learning Styles. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 88-95.
• West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies.
• Willems, Julie. "Using learning styles data to inform e-learning design: A study comparing undergraduates, postgraduates and e-educators." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27.6 (2011).
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of educational research, 47(1), 1-64.
• Yemane, Y. et al. (2017), “Assessment of Gender Difference on Learning Styles Preferences among Regular Undergraduate Students of Mekelle University Collage of Health Science”, Journal of Stem Cell Biology and Transplantation.
• Zhang, H., & Lambert, V. (2008). Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China. Nursing & health sciences, 10(3), 175-181.