Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Drought Stress and Management Strategies in Safflower

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 1166 - 1175, 16.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435
https://izlik.org/JA29XS55FY

Abstract

In this review, the physiological, biochemical and morphological responses of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to drought stress were investigated in the light of recent research. Drought is one of the main stress factors limiting agricultural production, especially in semi-arid regions, and adversely affects growth, yield, oil content and fatty acid composition of safflower plants. Drought-induced decreases were observed in parameters such as plant height, leaf area, biomass production, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic rate. The drought-induced decrease in safflower seed yield and oil content varied between genotypes. In the fatty acid composition, the linoleic acid ratio decreases while the oleic, palmitic and stearic acid ratios increase. These changes have been found to interact with genetic structure, developmental time and environmental conditions. The mechanisms by which safflower develops tolerance to drought stress include production of osmoprotectants, activation of antioxidant defence systems and changes in gene expression. Drought stress at the seedling stage and seed filling is one of the main factors limiting growth and survival of safflower. The review highlights the need to identify drought tolerant genotypes in safflower, optimise agronomic management strategies and use genomic approaches in breeding programmes

References

  • Aeini M., Abad HS., Yousefidad M., Heravan EM., Madani H. Effect of seed priming on morphological and biochemical characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under drought stress. Crop Research 2018; 53(1): 45–52.
  • Ahmad P., John R., Sarwat M., Umar S. Responses of proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes in two varieties of Pisum sativum L. under salt stress. International Journal of Plant Production 2008; 2(4): 353-366.
  • Amini H., Arzani A., Bahrami F. Seed yield and some physiological traits of safflower as affected by water deficit stress. International Journal of Plant Production 2013; 7(3): 597–614.
  • Aroca R. Plant responses to drought stress: From morphological to molecular features. Springer; 2012.
  • Ashraf M. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: Recent advances. Biotechnology Advances 2010; 28(1): 169–183.
  • Bahrami F., Arzani A., Karimi V. Evaluation of yield‐based drought tolerance indices for screening safflower genotypes. Agronomy Journal 2014; 106(4): 1219–1224.
  • Chaves MM., Pereira JS., Maroco J., Rodrigues ML., Ricardo CPP., Osrio ML, Carvalho I., Faria T., Pinheiro C. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany 2002; 89(7): 907-916.
  • Chavoushi M., Najafi F., Salimi A., Angaji SA. Improvement in drought stress tolerance of safflower during vegetative growth by exogenous application of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside. Industrial Crops and Products 2019; 134: 168–176.
  • Claeys H., Inzé D. The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiology 2013; 162(4): 1768–1779.
  • Cruz De., Carvalho MH. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production scavenging and signaling. Plant Signaling and Behavior 2008; 3: 156-165.
  • Dajue L., Mundel HH. Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 7. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute,1996, Rome, Italy.
  • Emongor V. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): The underutilized and neglected crop: A review. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2010; 9(6): 299–306.
  • Eslam BP. Evaluation of physiological indices for improving water deficit tolerance in spring safflower. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2011; 13(3): 327–338.
  • Farahani SM., Chaichi MR., Mazaheri D., Afshari RT. Barley grain mineral analysis as affected by different fertilizing systems and by drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2011; 13: 315–326.
  • Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2009; 29: 185–212.
  • Ghiyasi M., Rezaee Danesh Y., Amirnia R., Najafi S., Mulet JM., Porcel R. Foliar applications of ZnO and its nanoparticles increase safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) growth and yield under water stress. Agronomy 2023; 13(1) :192.
  • Hassani SMR., Pourdad SS., Naji AM., Fayaz F., Pirseyedi SM., Sheikhizadeh Anari S., Talebi R. Genome-wide association mapping in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for genetic dissection of drought tolerance using DArTseq markers. Scientific Reports 2024; 14(1): 31-49.
  • Hojati M., Modarres-Sanavy S., Karimi M., Ghanati F. Responses of growth and antioxidant systems in Carthamus tinctorius L. under water deficit stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 2011; 33(1): 105–112.
  • Hossain MA., Wani SH., Bhattacharjee S., Burrit DJ., Tran LP. Drought stress in plants. Volume 2: Molecular and genetic perspectives. 2016. Springer.
  • Hussain MI., Lyra DA., Farooq M., Nikoloudakis N., Khalid N. Salt and drought stresses in safflower: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2016; 36: 1–31.
  • Janmohammadi M. Evaluation of the impact of chemical and biological fertiliser application on agronomical traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences 2015; 69(6): 331–335.
  • Janmohammadi M., Sabaghnia N. Effects of foliar spray of nano-micronutrient and growth regulators on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) performance. Plant Nano Biology 2023; 5: 100045.
  • Javed S., Ashraf M., Mahmood S., Burkhari S., Meraj M., Perveen A. Comparative evaluation of biochemical changes in different safflower varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water deficit. Journal of Food Processing and Technology 2013; 4(10).
  • Joshan Y., Sani B., Jabbari H., Mozafari H., Moaveni P. Effect of drought stress on oil content and fatty acids composition of some safflower genotypes. Plant, Soil and Environment 2019; 65(11): 563–567.
  • Kazemeini SA., Mohamadi S., Pirasteh-Anosheh H. Growth and photosynthesis responses of safflower cultivars to water stress at two developmental stages. Biological Forum - An International Journal 2015; 7(2): 923–929.
  • Koç H. Determination of optimum sowing dates of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in dry conditions. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2019a; 28: 6453–6459.
  • Koç H. Relationships between survival in winter colds and some morphological and technological characteristics in safflower genotypes. Genetika 2019b; 51(2): 525–537.
  • Koç H. Effects of seedling stage drought on seed yield, oil rate and oil yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. KSU Agriculture and Nature Journal 2020; 23(6): 1626–1633.
  • Koç H. The effects of seasonal climate change on the safflower genotypes productivity under Central Anatolian conditions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 2025; 102(2): 295–304.
  • Lobell DB., Burke MB., Tebaldi C., Mastrandrea MD., Falcon WP., Naylor RL. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 2018; 319(5863): 607–610.
  • Lovelli S., Perniola M., Ferrara A., Di Tommaso T. Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agricultural Water Management 2007; 92(1): 73–80.
  • Mohammadi M., Ghassemi-Golezani K., Zehtab-Salmasi S., Nasrollahzade S. Assessment of some physiological traits in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under water stress. International Journal of Life Sciences 2016; 10(1): 58–64.
  • Mosupiemang M., Emongor VE., Malambane G. A review of drought tolerance in safflower. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 2022; 34(10): 140–149.
  • Nargeseh HE., Aghaalikhani M., Rad AS., Mokhtassi Bidgoli A., Sanavy SM. Comparison of 17 rapeseed cultivars under terminal water deficit conditions using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2020; 22(2): 489–503.
  • Öztürk Ö., Ada R., Akınerdem F. Bazı aspir çeşitlerinin sulu ve kuru koşullarda verim ve verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 2009; 23(50): 16-27.
  • Refay YA., Alderfasi AA., Selim MM., Awad K. Evaluation of variety, cropping pattern and plant density on growth and yield production of grain sorghum-cowpea under limited water supply condition growth, yield, and yield component characters of sorghum. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2013; 2(3): 24-29.
  • Seki M., Umezawa T., Urano K., Shinozaki K. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2007; 10: 296–302.
  • Soheili-Movahhed S., Khomari S., Sheikhzadeh P., Alizadeh B. Improvement in seed quantity and quality of spring safflower through foliar application of boron and zinc under end-season drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2019; 42(8): 942–953.
  • Uslu N., Tutluer I., Taner Y., Kunter B., Sagel Z., Peskircioglu H. Effects of temperature and drought stress during elongation and branching on development and yield of safflower. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter 2002; 17: 101–106.
  • Yeilaghi H., Arzani A., Ghaderian M., Fotovat R., Feizi M., Pourdad SS. Effect of salinity on seed oil content and fatty acid composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Food Chemistry 2012; 130(3): 618–625.

Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 1166 - 1175, 16.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435
https://izlik.org/JA29XS55FY

Abstract

Bu derleme çalışmasında, aspir (Carthamus tinctorius L.) bitkisinin, son yıllarda yapılan güncel araştırmalar ışığında kuraklık stresine karşı gösterdiği fizyolojik, biyokimyasal ve morfolojik tepkiler incelenmiştir. Kuraklık, özellikle yarı kurak bölgelerde tarımsal üretimi kısıtlayan temel stres faktörlerinden biri olup, aspir bitkisinde büyüme, verim, yağ içeriği ve yağ asidi bileşimini olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Bitki boyu, yaprak alanı, biokütle üretimi, klorofil içeriği, fotosentez oranı gibi parametrelerde kuraklık kaynaklı düşüşler gözlemlenmiştir. Kuraklık, aspir tohum verimi ve yağ içeriğinde azalma genotipe bağlı olarak değişkenlik göstermektedir. Yağ asidi bileşiminde ise linoleik asit oranı azalırken, oleik, palmitik ve stearik asit oranlarında artış meydana gelmektedir. Bu değişimlerin genetik yapı, gelişme dönemi ve çevresel koşullarla etkileşim içinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Aspirin kuraklık stresine karşı tolerans geliştirme mekanizmaları arasında osmoprotektanların üretimi, antioksidan savunma sistemlerinin devreye girmesi ve gen ekspresyonunda değişiklikler yer almaktadır. Fide devresi ve tohum doldurma dönemi kuraklık stresi, aspir büyümesini ve hayatta kalmayı sınırlayan ana faktörlerden biridir. Derlemede, aspirde kuraklığa toleranslı genotiplerin belirlenmesi, tarımsal yönetim stratejilerinin optimize edilmesi ve ıslah programlarında genomik yaklaşımların kullanılması gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

References

  • Aeini M., Abad HS., Yousefidad M., Heravan EM., Madani H. Effect of seed priming on morphological and biochemical characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under drought stress. Crop Research 2018; 53(1): 45–52.
  • Ahmad P., John R., Sarwat M., Umar S. Responses of proline, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzymes in two varieties of Pisum sativum L. under salt stress. International Journal of Plant Production 2008; 2(4): 353-366.
  • Amini H., Arzani A., Bahrami F. Seed yield and some physiological traits of safflower as affected by water deficit stress. International Journal of Plant Production 2013; 7(3): 597–614.
  • Aroca R. Plant responses to drought stress: From morphological to molecular features. Springer; 2012.
  • Ashraf M. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: Recent advances. Biotechnology Advances 2010; 28(1): 169–183.
  • Bahrami F., Arzani A., Karimi V. Evaluation of yield‐based drought tolerance indices for screening safflower genotypes. Agronomy Journal 2014; 106(4): 1219–1224.
  • Chaves MM., Pereira JS., Maroco J., Rodrigues ML., Ricardo CPP., Osrio ML, Carvalho I., Faria T., Pinheiro C. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Annals of Botany 2002; 89(7): 907-916.
  • Chavoushi M., Najafi F., Salimi A., Angaji SA. Improvement in drought stress tolerance of safflower during vegetative growth by exogenous application of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside. Industrial Crops and Products 2019; 134: 168–176.
  • Claeys H., Inzé D. The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiology 2013; 162(4): 1768–1779.
  • Cruz De., Carvalho MH. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production scavenging and signaling. Plant Signaling and Behavior 2008; 3: 156-165.
  • Dajue L., Mundel HH. Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 7. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute,1996, Rome, Italy.
  • Emongor V. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): The underutilized and neglected crop: A review. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2010; 9(6): 299–306.
  • Eslam BP. Evaluation of physiological indices for improving water deficit tolerance in spring safflower. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2011; 13(3): 327–338.
  • Farahani SM., Chaichi MR., Mazaheri D., Afshari RT. Barley grain mineral analysis as affected by different fertilizing systems and by drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2011; 13: 315–326.
  • Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2009; 29: 185–212.
  • Ghiyasi M., Rezaee Danesh Y., Amirnia R., Najafi S., Mulet JM., Porcel R. Foliar applications of ZnO and its nanoparticles increase safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) growth and yield under water stress. Agronomy 2023; 13(1) :192.
  • Hassani SMR., Pourdad SS., Naji AM., Fayaz F., Pirseyedi SM., Sheikhizadeh Anari S., Talebi R. Genome-wide association mapping in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for genetic dissection of drought tolerance using DArTseq markers. Scientific Reports 2024; 14(1): 31-49.
  • Hojati M., Modarres-Sanavy S., Karimi M., Ghanati F. Responses of growth and antioxidant systems in Carthamus tinctorius L. under water deficit stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 2011; 33(1): 105–112.
  • Hossain MA., Wani SH., Bhattacharjee S., Burrit DJ., Tran LP. Drought stress in plants. Volume 2: Molecular and genetic perspectives. 2016. Springer.
  • Hussain MI., Lyra DA., Farooq M., Nikoloudakis N., Khalid N. Salt and drought stresses in safflower: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2016; 36: 1–31.
  • Janmohammadi M. Evaluation of the impact of chemical and biological fertiliser application on agronomical traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences 2015; 69(6): 331–335.
  • Janmohammadi M., Sabaghnia N. Effects of foliar spray of nano-micronutrient and growth regulators on safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) performance. Plant Nano Biology 2023; 5: 100045.
  • Javed S., Ashraf M., Mahmood S., Burkhari S., Meraj M., Perveen A. Comparative evaluation of biochemical changes in different safflower varieties (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under water deficit. Journal of Food Processing and Technology 2013; 4(10).
  • Joshan Y., Sani B., Jabbari H., Mozafari H., Moaveni P. Effect of drought stress on oil content and fatty acids composition of some safflower genotypes. Plant, Soil and Environment 2019; 65(11): 563–567.
  • Kazemeini SA., Mohamadi S., Pirasteh-Anosheh H. Growth and photosynthesis responses of safflower cultivars to water stress at two developmental stages. Biological Forum - An International Journal 2015; 7(2): 923–929.
  • Koç H. Determination of optimum sowing dates of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in dry conditions. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2019a; 28: 6453–6459.
  • Koç H. Relationships between survival in winter colds and some morphological and technological characteristics in safflower genotypes. Genetika 2019b; 51(2): 525–537.
  • Koç H. Effects of seedling stage drought on seed yield, oil rate and oil yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. KSU Agriculture and Nature Journal 2020; 23(6): 1626–1633.
  • Koç H. The effects of seasonal climate change on the safflower genotypes productivity under Central Anatolian conditions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 2025; 102(2): 295–304.
  • Lobell DB., Burke MB., Tebaldi C., Mastrandrea MD., Falcon WP., Naylor RL. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 2018; 319(5863): 607–610.
  • Lovelli S., Perniola M., Ferrara A., Di Tommaso T. Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agricultural Water Management 2007; 92(1): 73–80.
  • Mohammadi M., Ghassemi-Golezani K., Zehtab-Salmasi S., Nasrollahzade S. Assessment of some physiological traits in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under water stress. International Journal of Life Sciences 2016; 10(1): 58–64.
  • Mosupiemang M., Emongor VE., Malambane G. A review of drought tolerance in safflower. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 2022; 34(10): 140–149.
  • Nargeseh HE., Aghaalikhani M., Rad AS., Mokhtassi Bidgoli A., Sanavy SM. Comparison of 17 rapeseed cultivars under terminal water deficit conditions using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2020; 22(2): 489–503.
  • Öztürk Ö., Ada R., Akınerdem F. Bazı aspir çeşitlerinin sulu ve kuru koşullarda verim ve verim unsurlarının belirlenmesi. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 2009; 23(50): 16-27.
  • Refay YA., Alderfasi AA., Selim MM., Awad K. Evaluation of variety, cropping pattern and plant density on growth and yield production of grain sorghum-cowpea under limited water supply condition growth, yield, and yield component characters of sorghum. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2013; 2(3): 24-29.
  • Seki M., Umezawa T., Urano K., Shinozaki K. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2007; 10: 296–302.
  • Soheili-Movahhed S., Khomari S., Sheikhzadeh P., Alizadeh B. Improvement in seed quantity and quality of spring safflower through foliar application of boron and zinc under end-season drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2019; 42(8): 942–953.
  • Uslu N., Tutluer I., Taner Y., Kunter B., Sagel Z., Peskircioglu H. Effects of temperature and drought stress during elongation and branching on development and yield of safflower. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter 2002; 17: 101–106.
  • Yeilaghi H., Arzani A., Ghaderian M., Fotovat R., Feizi M., Pourdad SS. Effect of salinity on seed oil content and fatty acid composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Food Chemistry 2012; 130(3): 618–625.
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Field Crops and Pasture Production (Other)
Journal Section Review
Authors

Hasan Koç 0000-0003-1728-070X

Submission Date May 13, 2025
Acceptance Date October 2, 2025
Publication Date March 16, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435
IZ https://izlik.org/JA29XS55FY
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Koç, H. (2026). Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 1166-1175. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435
AMA 1.Koç H. Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Techno. 2026;9(2):1166-1175. doi:10.47495/okufbed.1698435
Chicago Koç, Hasan. 2026. “Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi Ve Yönetim Stratejileri”. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 (2): 1166-75. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435.
EndNote Koç H (March 1, 2026) Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 2 1166–1175.
IEEE [1]H. Koç, “Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri”, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Techno, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1166–1175, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.47495/okufbed.1698435.
ISNAD Koç, Hasan. “Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi Ve Yönetim Stratejileri”. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9/2 (March 1, 2026): 1166-1175. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1698435.
JAMA 1.Koç H. Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Techno. 2026;9:1166–1175.
MLA Koç, Hasan. “Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi Ve Yönetim Stratejileri”. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, Mar. 2026, pp. 1166-75, doi:10.47495/okufbed.1698435.
Vancouver 1.Hasan Koç. Aspir Bitkisinde Kuraklık Stresi ve Yönetim Stratejileri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of The Institute of Science and Techno. 2026 Mar. 1;9(2):1166-75. doi:10.47495/okufbed.1698435

23487


196541947019414

19433194341943519436 1960219721 197842261021238 23877

*This journal is an international refereed journal 

*Our journal does not charge any article processing fees over publication process.

* This journal is online publishes 5 issues per year (January, March, June, September, December)

*This journal published in Turkish and English as open access. 

19450 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.