SÜT SIĞIRLARINDA MASTİTİS İLE SÜTÜN ELEKTRİKSEL İLETKENLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Year 2008, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 131 - 136, 30.06.2008

Savaş Atasever Hüseyin Erdem

Abstract

Mastitis, bugün tüm dünyada süt sektörünün karşı karşıya bulunduğu en önemli sorunlardan biridir. Sütün elektriksel iletkenliği (Eİ); yüksek güvenilirliğe sahip olması ve mastitisle arasında orta-yüksek ilişki bulunması nedeniyle bu hastalığın belirlenmesinde özel bir önem taşımaktadır. Bu makalede mastitisin etki mekanizması hakkında özlü bilgiler verilerek, Eİ ve mastitis arasındaki ilişkiler üzerinde durulmuştur.

Keywords

Mastitis, Elektriksel iletkenlik, Süt sığırı

SÜT SIĞIRLARINDA MASTİTİS İLE SÜTÜN ELEKTRİKSEL İLETKENLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

Abstract

Mastitis, bugün tüm dünyada süt sektörünün karşı karşıya bulunduğu en önemli sorunlardan biridir. Sütün elektriksel iletkenliği (Eİ); yüksek güvenilirliğe sahip olması ve mastitisle arasında orta-yüksek ilişki bulunması nedeniyle bu hastalığın belirlenmesinde özel bir önem taşımaktadır. Bu makalede mastitisin etki mekanizması hakkında özlü bilgiler verilerek, Eİ ve mastitis arasındaki ilişkiler üzerinde durulmuştur

Keywords

Mastitis, Elektriksel iletkenlik, Süt sığırı

References

• Anonim, 2005. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Bölgesel İstatistikler. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_=141 [Ulş. Tar.: 09.10.2007]
• Balık, M. Z., 1998. Köy Koşullarında İnek Mastitislerinin Yıl İçinde Dağılımları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Ens., Ankara, 35 s.
• Bansal, B. K., Hamann, J., Grabowskit, N. T. and Singh, K. B., 2005. Variation in the composition of selected milk fraction samples from healty and mastitic quarters, and its significance for mastitis diagnosis. J. Dairy Res. 72 (2): 144-152.
• Barth, K. and Worstorff, H., 2003. Monitoring of quarter health status by periodic milk conductivity measurement: a useful management tool in dairy herds. 5 th International Dairy Housing Proceedings of the 29-31 January 2003 Conference. FortWorth, Texas, USA.
• Bodoh, G. W., Pearson, R. E., Schultze, W. D. and Miller, R. H., 1981. Variation in Wisconsin Mastitis Test Scores of bucket milk samples and relationship to bacterial infections. J. Dairy Sci. 64 (1): 123-129.
• Bradley, A. J., 2002. Bovine mastitis: An evolging disease. The Veterinary Journal. 164: 116-128.
• Bradley, A. J. and Green, M. J., 2001. Aetiology of clinical mastitis in six Somerset dairy herds. Vet. Rec. 148 (22): 683- 686.
• Bramley, A. J., 1991. Mastitis: Physiology or pathology? Flemmish Veterinary Journal. 62 (1): 3-11. mastitis control handbook. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Circular: 1136.
• Bruckmaier, R.M., Weiss, D., Wiedemann, M., Schmitz, S. and Wendl, G., 2004. Changes of physicochemical indicators during mastitis and the effects of milk ejection on their sensivity. J. Dairy Res. 71(3): 316-321.
• Carlén, E., Strandberg, E. and Roth, A., 2004. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production in the first three lactations of Swedish Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Sci. 87: 3062-3070.
• Cavero, D., Tölle, K. H., Buxadé, C., Krieter, J., 2006. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livestock Sci. 105: 207-213.
• Chamings, R.J., Murray, G. and Booth, J.M., 1984. Use of conductivity meter for the detection of subclinical mastitis. Vet. Rec. 114 (10): 243-5.
• Fernando, R.S., Spahr, S.L. and Jaster, E.H., 1985. Comparison of electrical conductivity of milk with other indirect methods for detection of subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 68 (2): 449-456.
• Fernando, R.S., Rindsig, R.B. and Spahr, S.L., 1982. Electrical conductivity of milk for detection of mastitis. J.Dairy Sci. 65: 659-664.
• Ferrero, F. J., Grillo, G., Pérez, M. A., Antón, J. C. and Campo, J. C., 2002. Design of a low cost mastitis detector in cows by measuring electrical conductivity of milk. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. 21-23 May 2002. Anchorage, AK.,USA.
• Filev, F. and Kabaivanov, S., 1980. Indirect methods of determining the amount of cellular elements in bulk cow’s milk. Vet. Med. Nauki.17 (9-10):19-24.
• Gebre-Egziabher, A., Wood, H. C., Robar, J. D. and Blankenagel, G., 1979. Evaluation of automatic mastitis detection equipment. J. Dairy Sci. 62 (7): 1108-1114.
• Günaydın, G., 2007. Türkiye Süt Sığırcılığı Sektörünün Ekonomik ve Politik Analizi. Türkiye Süt Sığırcılığı Kurultayı (25-26 Ekim 2007). E.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Zootekni Bölümü, Bornova-İzmir.
• Hillerton, J.E. and Walton, A.W., 1991. Identification of subclinical mastitis with a hand- held electrical conductivy meter. Vet. Rec. 128(22): 513-515.
• Hillerton, J. E. and Berry, E. A., 2005. Treating mastitis in the cow-a tradition or an archaism. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 98: 1250- 1255.
• Ingvartsen, K.L., Dewhurst, R. J. and Friggens, N. C., 2003. On the relationship between lactational performance and health: is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83: 277- 308.
• Kesenkaş, H., 1999. İzmir İli ve Çevresinde Seçilen Pilot İşletmelerde Mastitisin Belirlenmesi ve Süt Kalitesine Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, 93 s.
• Kobayashi, Y., 1978. Simplified resazurin rennet test for diagnosis of mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 61(5): 592-595.
• Lansbergen, L. M. T. E., Nielen, M., Lam, T. J. G. M., Pengov, A., Schukken, Y. H., 1994. Evaluation of a prototype on-line electrical conductivity system for detection of subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 77: 1132- 1140.
• Mansell, P. D. and Seguya, A., 2003. The use of a hand-held conductivy meter for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows during late lactation. New Zeland Vet. J. 51(1): 21-25.
• Miller, R.H., Clay, J.S. and Norman, H.D., 2001. Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 2543- 2548.
• Nielen, M., Deluyker, H., Schukken, Y.H. and Brand, A., 1992. Electrical conductivity of milk: measurement, modifiers, and meta analysis of mastitis detection performance. J. Dairy Sci. 75: 606-614.
• Nielen, M., Schukken, Y.H., Van De Broek, J., Brand, A., Deluyker, H. A. and Maatje, K., 1993. Relations between on-line electrical conductivity and daily milk production on a low somatic cell count farm. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 2589-2596.
• Norberg, E.,Hogeveen, H., Korsgaard, I.R., Friggens, N.C., Sloth, K.H.M.N. and Lİvendahl, P., 2004a. Electrical conductivity of milk: Ability to predict mastitis status. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 1099-1107.
• Norberg, E., Ødegard, J. and Madsen, P., 2004b. Comparison of variance components for test- day electrical conductivity of milk and test-day somatic cell score for first lactation cows in an experimental herd. Acta Agriculturae Scan. Section A- Animal Sci. 54 (4): 181-186.
• Norberg, E., 2005. Electrical conductivity of milk as a phenotypic and genetic indicator of bovine mastitis: A review. Livestock Production Sci. 96: 129-139.
• Norberg, E., Rogers, G. W., Odegard, J. B., Cooper, J. B. and Madsen, P., 2006. Short communication: genetic correlation between test-day electrical conductivity of milk and mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 89 (2): 779-781.
• Pösö, J. and Mäntysaari, E.A., 1996. Relationships between clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production for the first three lactations of Finnish Ayrshire. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 1284-1291.
• Pyörälä, S., 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet. Res. 34 (5): 565-578.
• Ruegg, P., 2001. Milk secretion and quality standarts. Dairy Updates. Milking and Milk Quality, No: 404. The Babcock Institute, University of Wisconsin.
• Rupp, R. and Boichard, D., 2000. Relationship of early first lactation somatic cell count with risk of subsequent first clinical mastitis. Livestock Production Sci. 62: 169-180.
• Santos, J. E., Cerri, R. L., Ballou, M. A., Higginbotham, G. E. and Kirk, J. H., 2004. Effect of timing of first clinical mastitis occurrence on lactational and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 80 (1-2): 31-45.
• Sargeant, J.M., Leslie, K.E., Shirley, J.E., Pulkrabek, B.J. and Lim, G.H., 2001. Sensivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J.Dairy Sci. 84(9): 2018-2024.
• Schrick, F.N., Hockett, M.E., Saxton, A.M., Lewis, M.J., Dowlen, H.H. and Oliver, S.P., 2001. Influence of subclinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 1407-1412.
• Schroeder, J.W., 1997. Mastitis control programs: Bovine mastitis and milking management. North Dakota State University Extension Service. AS–1129 (April 1997).
• Seegers, H., Fourichon, C. and Beaudeau, F., 2003. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet. Res. 34: 475- 491.
• Seguya, A.G. and Mansell, P.D., 2000. An evaluation of a hand-held electrical resistance meter for the diagnosis of bovine subclinical mastitis in late lactation under Australian conditions. Aust. Vet. J. 78 (9): 608-611.
• Sheldrake, R.F. and Hoare, R. J., 1981. The detection of mastitis in individual quarters using electrical conductivity or somatic cell concentration. New Zeland Vet. Journal. 29 (11): 211-213.
• Sheldrake, R.F., Hoare, R.J. and McGregor, G.D. 1983. Lactation stage, parity, and infection affecting somatic cells, electrical conductivity, and serum albumin in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 66(3): 542-547.
• Shim, E. H., Shanks, R. D. and Morin, D. E., 2004. Milk losses and treatment costs associated with two treatment protocols for clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 2702-2708.
• Singh, S. and Bansal, B. K., 2004. Variation in selected components of milk among different milk fractions and its relevance to diagnosis of mastitis in buffaloes. Buffalo Journal. 3: 213-2124.
• Skrzypek, R., Wójtowski, J. and Fahr, R. D., 2004. Factors affecting somatic cell count in cow bulk tank milk- A case study from Poland. J. Vet. Med. Series A 51: 127-131.
• Sloth, K. H. M. N., Friggens, N. C., Lİvendahl, P., Andersen, P. H., Jensen, J., Ingvartsen, K. L., 2003. Potential for improving description of bovine udder health status by combined analysis of milk parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 86: 1221-1232.
• Sugimoto, M., Fujikawa, A., Womack, J. E. and Sugimoto, Y., 2006. Evidence that bovine forebrain embriyonic zinc finger-like gene influences immune response associated with mastitis resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Online. 103 (17): 6454- 6459.
• Špauskas, V., Klimiene, I. and Matusevičius, A., 2006. A comparison of indirect methods for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. Vet. Arhiv. 76 (2): 101- 109.
• Tekeli, T., 2005. Mastitis. AB Sürecinde Kaliteli Süt Üretimi ve Somatik Hücre Sayısı. Güzeliş Matbaası, Konya. s: 19-35.
• Tsenkova, R., Atanassova,S., Kawano, S. and Toyoda, K., 2001. Somatic cell count determination in cow’s milk by near-infrared spectroscopy: a new diagnostic tool. J. Anim. Sci.79(10): 2550-2557.
• Tsioulpas, A., Lewis, M. J., Grandison, A. S., 2007. A study of the ph of individual milk samples. Int. Journal of Dairy Technology. 60 (2): 96-97.
• Van Dorp, T. E., Dekkers, J. C. M., Martin, S. W. and Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M., 1998. Genetic parameters of health disorders, and relationships with 305-day milk yield and conformation traits of registered Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Sci. 81: 2264-2270.
• Windig, J. J., Calus, M. P. L., De Jong, G. and Veerkamp, R. F., 2005. The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis. Livestock Production Sci. 96: 291- 299.