Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Makroekonomik Göstergelerin Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirmesi Hindistan ve Nijerya Arasındaki Büyüme Performansı

Year 2022, Volume: 37 Issue: 3, 603 - 616, 31.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1084922

Abstract

Hindistan ve Nijerya, İngiliz imparatorluğu tarafından sömürgeleştirildi, belirli bir zaman aralığında bağımsızlıklarını kazandılar ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler arasında en büyük büyüyen ekonomiler arasında yer alıyorlar. Ortak refah ülkeleri arasında sırasıyla en kalabalık 1. ve 3. sırada yer alan her iki ülke önemli miktarda yetersiz beslenen, yoksul ve gıda güvencesi olmayan insan nüfusuna sahiptir. Bu çalışmada, 1990-2020 arasındaki zaman serisi verilerini kullanarak iki ülke arasındaki makroekonomik büyüme performansını karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Dönem boyunca hızlanma, yavaşlama veya durgunluk eğilimini doğrulamak için verilere bileşik büyüme oranı modeli yerleştirildi. Çalışmanın sonuçları, Hindistan için sabit fiyatlarla ABD doları cinsinden ortalama GSYİH ve GSMH değerlerinin Nijerya'dan neredeyse 7 kat daha yüksek olduğunu, Nijerya'nın kişi başına düşen GSYİH'sinin ise referans döneminde Hindistan'dan daha yüksek olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. GSYİH ve kişi başına GSYİH büyüme oranları ile ilgili olarak, Hindistan, Nijerya'dan daha düşük ancak daha istikrarlı bir büyüme kaydetti. Ayrıca, her iki ülke hizmet sektöründen en yüksek GSYİH katkısını kaydetmiştir (Hindistan'da yüzde 46 ve Nijerya'da yüzde 35). Ancak büyüme oranı, tarım sektöründeki en yüksek istikrarsızlığın aksine Hindistan hizmet sektöründe belirli bir istikrar göstermiştir. Nijerya'da ise, tarım sektörü, durgun ve istikrarsız olsa da GSYİH büyümesine en yüksek büyüme katkısını sağlarken, hizmet sektörünün GSYİH büyümesine katkısı diğer değişkenler arasında en düşük olmuştur. Araştırmada, Hindistan ve Nijerya'da fırsatlar ve yoksulluğun azaltılması, kredi desteği ve yayım hizmetlerinin uygun şekilde finanse edilmesi yoluyla tarıma ayrılan bütçe payını artırmanın, tarımın daha yüksek (yaklaşık yüzde 50'lik) GSYİH katkısına geri dönmesine yardımcı olması ve gelir yaratma, istihdam konularında diğer ekonomik sektörlerle güçlü bir şekilde rekabet etmesi tavsiye edilmektedir.

References

  • Chambers, U. 2016. A comparative analysis of economic development in Nigeria and Singapore. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(3)
  • Femi, A. 2021. Nigeria lost N91bn in April as India cuts oil imports. https://punchng.com/nigeria-lost-n91bn-in-april-as-india-cuts-oil-imports/
  • FAO, 2018. Measuring Food Insecurity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/y5898e/y5898e06.htm
  • HCI, 2022. High Comission of India, Abuja, Nigeria. https://hciabuja.gov.in/index.php
  • IFAD, 2012. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rural Poverty Report: The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty. Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
  • Investopedia, 2016. Developed Economy Definition. Retrieved on 30 June 2016, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/developed-economy.asp
  • Isah, M.A., 2016. Agricultural Development and Food Security in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Economic Analysis. Unpublished PhD. Thesis submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka.
  • Maboja, W. 2015. A closer look at Nigeria`s GDP rebasing. CNBCAfrica.com. http://www.cnbcafrica.com/news/western-africa/2014/04/11/a-closer-look-a-nigerias-gdp-rebasing/
  • OECD, 2008. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Statistics Working Paper.
  • Sadiq, M.S., Singh, I.P. and Ahmad, M.M. 2020. Domestic consumption pattern of cereal commodities in Nigeria.Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 35(1):120-126.doi: 10.28955/alinterizbd.700658
  • SRWE, 2019. Statistical Review of World Energy. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
  • The Hindus, 2015. Retrieved from http://m.thehindu.com/business/budget/india-has-second-fastest-growing-services-sector/article6193500.ece
  • Todaro, M. and Smith S., 2012. Economic Development. Pearson Education, Inc., United States of America, ISBN 13: 978-0-13-801388,
  • Umezurike, C.A.C. 2016. Nigerian agricultural policies: a review. In: A. I. Ikeme (Ed.), The Challenges of Agriculture in National Development. Enugu: Optimal Computer Solutions Ltd.

Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria

Year 2022, Volume: 37 Issue: 3, 603 - 616, 31.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1084922

Abstract

India and Nigeria were colonized by the British empire, got their independence within a given time range, and are among the largest growing economies among developing nations; they were ranked 1st and 3rd most populous among the common wealth countries respectively and both the countries houses significant population of malnourished, poor and food insecure people. The paper comparatively assessed the macroeconomic growth performance between the two countries using time series data that spanned from 1990-2020. Compound growth rate model was fitted to the data to confirm the trend of acceleration, deceleration or stagnation during the period. The results of the study revealed that mean values of GDP and GNI in US dollars at constant prices for India were higher than that of Nigeria by almost 7 times, while Nigeria`s per capita GDP was higher than that of India under the reference period. With respect to the GDP and per capita GDP growth rates, India recorded lower growth but more stable than Nigeria. Further, both the countries recorded highest GDP contributions from Service sector (46 per cent in India and 35 per cent in Nigeria). But the growth rate shows stability in Indian Service sector in contrast to the highest instability in agricultural sector. In Nigeria, on the other hand, agricultural sector got the highest growth contribution to GDP growth-though stagnant and instable, while service sector’s growth contribution to GDP growth was the lowest among other variables. It is recommended that increase budget share to agriculture through proper funding of research, credit support and extension service would help to repositioned agriculture back to its higher (of about 50 per cent) GDP contribution and compete vigorously with other economic sectors in income generation, employment opportunities and poverty reduction in both India and Nigeria.

References

  • Chambers, U. 2016. A comparative analysis of economic development in Nigeria and Singapore. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(3)
  • Femi, A. 2021. Nigeria lost N91bn in April as India cuts oil imports. https://punchng.com/nigeria-lost-n91bn-in-april-as-india-cuts-oil-imports/
  • FAO, 2018. Measuring Food Insecurity. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/y5898e/y5898e06.htm
  • HCI, 2022. High Comission of India, Abuja, Nigeria. https://hciabuja.gov.in/index.php
  • IFAD, 2012. International Fund for Agricultural Development. Rural Poverty Report: The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty. Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
  • Investopedia, 2016. Developed Economy Definition. Retrieved on 30 June 2016, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/developed-economy.asp
  • Isah, M.A., 2016. Agricultural Development and Food Security in India and Nigeria: A Comparative Economic Analysis. Unpublished PhD. Thesis submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka.
  • Maboja, W. 2015. A closer look at Nigeria`s GDP rebasing. CNBCAfrica.com. http://www.cnbcafrica.com/news/western-africa/2014/04/11/a-closer-look-a-nigerias-gdp-rebasing/
  • OECD, 2008. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Statistics Working Paper.
  • Sadiq, M.S., Singh, I.P. and Ahmad, M.M. 2020. Domestic consumption pattern of cereal commodities in Nigeria.Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 35(1):120-126.doi: 10.28955/alinterizbd.700658
  • SRWE, 2019. Statistical Review of World Energy. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
  • The Hindus, 2015. Retrieved from http://m.thehindu.com/business/budget/india-has-second-fastest-growing-services-sector/article6193500.ece
  • Todaro, M. and Smith S., 2012. Economic Development. Pearson Education, Inc., United States of America, ISBN 13: 978-0-13-801388,
  • Umezurike, C.A.C. 2016. Nigerian agricultural policies: a review. In: A. I. Ikeme (Ed.), The Challenges of Agriculture in National Development. Enugu: Optimal Computer Solutions Ltd.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
Authors

Isah Musa Ahmad This is me 0000-0001-5878-6139

Sanusi Sadıq 0000-0003-4336-5723

Mohammed Goni This is me 0000-0003-4224-2430

Early Pub Date October 27, 2022
Publication Date October 31, 2022
Acceptance Date June 10, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 37 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ahmad, I. M., Sadıq, S., & Goni, M. (2022). Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 37(3), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1084922
AMA Ahmad IM, Sadıq S, Goni M. Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria. ANAJAS. October 2022;37(3):603-616. doi:10.7161/omuanajas.1084922
Chicago Ahmad, Isah Musa, Sanusi Sadıq, and Mohammed Goni. “Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 37, no. 3 (October 2022): 603-16. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1084922.
EndNote Ahmad IM, Sadıq S, Goni M (October 1, 2022) Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 37 3 603–616.
IEEE I. M. Ahmad, S. Sadıq, and M. Goni, “Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria”, ANAJAS, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 603–616, 2022, doi: 10.7161/omuanajas.1084922.
ISNAD Ahmad, Isah Musa et al. “Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 37/3 (October 2022), 603-616. https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.1084922.
JAMA Ahmad IM, Sadıq S, Goni M. Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria. ANAJAS. 2022;37:603–616.
MLA Ahmad, Isah Musa et al. “Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria”. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 37, no. 3, 2022, pp. 603-16, doi:10.7161/omuanajas.1084922.
Vancouver Ahmad IM, Sadıq S, Goni M. Comparative Assessment of Macroeconomic Indicators Growth Performance Between India and Nigeria. ANAJAS. 2022;37(3):603-16.
Online ISSN: 1308-8769