Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

İdil Eren Kurt; Turan Akbaş

doi:10.26466/opus.547217

EN TR

Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı Bodenmann (2008) tarafından geliştirilen Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasıdır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda yapılan bu araştırma, Adana ilinde özel kuruluş ve devlet kurumlarında çalışan 720 evli ve çocuk sahibi bireyden toplanan veriler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uyarlama kapsamında önce çeviri çalışmaları tamamlanmış olup, ardından envanterin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenilirliği incelenmiştir. Envanterin yapı geçerliğini belirlemek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış, sonuçlar (bireyin kendi baş etmesine dair algı için X²/sd=3.76, RMSEA=.06, CFI=.94, GFI=.95, SRMR=.04; eşin baş etmesine dair algı için X²/sd=4.50, RMSEA=.06, CFI=.95, GFI=.94, SRMR=.04; ortak baş etmeye dair algı için X²/sd=4, RMSEA=.01, CFI=1, GFI=.99, SRMR=.01) üç boyutun da kabul edilebilir uyum düzeyine sahip olduklarını göstermiştir. Envanterin güvenilirliğini belirlemek için yapılan iç tutarlılık analizinde Cronbach alpha değerleri alt boyutlar bazında .63 ile .87 arasında, yarı test değerleri ise .63 ile .85 arasında değişmektedir. Yapılan geçerlik güvenirlik analizi sonuçları envanterin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stresle çift olarak baş etme,stresle baş etme,geçerlik,güvenirlik

References

Aydoğan, D. ve Özbay, Y. (2015). Çiftlerde ilişkisel yılmazlık ve ilişkisel profesyonel yardım arama: İkili (dyadic) analiz. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(44), 109-121.
Barbarin, O. A., Hughes, D., ve Chesler, M. A. (1985). Stress, coping, and marital functioning among parents of children with cancer. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(2), 473-480.
Bayram, N. (2013). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş AMOS uygulamaları (2. baskı). İstanbul: Ezgi Kitabevi.
Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping-a systematic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137-140.
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In (T.Revenson, K. Kayser and G.Bodenmann Ed.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (p.33-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadic coping and the significance of this concept for prevention and therapy. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitpsychologie, 16(3), 108-111.
Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T. ve Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14(4), 551-569.
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T. N., Gmelch, S. ve Ledermann, T. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 408-424.
Breitenstein, C. J., Milek, A., Nussbeck, F. W., Davila, J., ve Bodenmann, G. (2017). Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction in late adolescent couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 770–790.
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic concept, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.

Coyne, J. C. and Racioppo, M. W. (2000). Never the Twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American psychologist, 55(6), 655.
Coyne, J. C. ve Smith, D. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404.
Çağ, P. ve Yıldırım, İ. (2013). Evlilik doyumunu yordayan ilişkisel ve kişisel değişkenler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(39), 13-23.
Çelik, E. H. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). LISREL 9.1 İle Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi, Temel kavramlar- uygulamalar-programlama (2. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Evans, S. E., Steel, A. L., Watkins, L. E. ve DiLillo, D. (2014). Childhood exposure to family violence and adult trauma symptoms: The importance of social support from a spouse. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(5), 527.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J. ve DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of personality and social psychology, 50(3), 571.
Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 26(2), 136-153.
Hilpert, P., Bodenmann, G., Nussbeck, F. W. ve Bradbury, T. N. (2013). Predicting relationship satisfaction in distressed and non-distressed couples based on a stratified sample: a matter of conflict, positivity, or support?. Family Science, 4(1), 110-120.
Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Kabasakal, Z., ve Soylu, Y. (2016). Evli bireylerin evlilik doyumunun cinsiyet ve eş desteğine göre incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), 208-214.
Karademas, E. C. ve Roussi, P. (2017). Financial strain, dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, and psychological distress: A dyadic mediation study in Greek couples. Stress and Health, 33(5), 508-517.
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Edition). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kurdek, L. A. (2005). Gender and marital satisfaction early in marriage: A growth curve approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 68–74.
Kurt, İ. E., (2018). Stresle çift olarak baş etme envanterinin psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. H. Akça, M. Erarslan, M. F. Sansar (Ed.), II. Uluslararası multidisipliner çalışmaları kongresi bildiri özet kitapçığı içinde (s. 141-142), Ankara: Gece Kitaplığı.
Landis, M., Bodenmann, G., Bradbury, T. N., Brandstätter, V., Peter-Wight, M., Backes, S. ve Nussbeck, F. W. (2014). Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych, 27, 139-149.
Landis, M., Peter-Wight, M., Martin, M. ve Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping and marital satisfaction of older spouses in long-term marriage. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(1), 39-47.
Lawrence, E., Bunde, M., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A. ve Adams, E. E. (2008). Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 445-463.
Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Gagliardi, S., Charvoz, L., Verardi, S., Rossier, J. , Iafrate, R. (2010). Psychometrics of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology.
Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M. ve Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59(2), 195-206.
Levesque, C., Lafontaine, M. F., Caron, A., ve Fitzpatrick, J. (2014). Validation of the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(3), 215-225.
O’Brien, T. B. ve DeLongis, A. (1997). Coping with chronic stres: An interpersonal perspective. (B. H. Gottlieb Ed.), Coping with Chronic Stress (pp. 161–190), New York: Plenum Press.
Özmen, S. K. ve Özmen, A. (2012). Anne baba stres ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 41(196), 20-35.
Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Jimenez-Arista, L. E., Walsh, K. J., ve Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic coping in the US: Psychometric properties and validity for use of the English version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Current Psychology, 35(4), 570-582.
Revenson, T. A. (1994). Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 122-130.
Rusu, P. P., Hilpert, P., Beach, S. R., Turliuc, M. N. ve Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(6), 843-849.
Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Ullman, J.B. (2007). Structural equation modeling. In Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). In Using multivariate statistics (p. 653-771). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Xu, F., Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Li, Q. ve Bodenmann, G. (2016). Validation of the Dyadic Coping Inventory with Chinese couples: Factorial structure, measurement ınvariance, and construct validity. Psychological assessment 28(8), 127-140.
Zeidner, M., Kloda, I. ve Matthews, G. (2013). Does dyadic coping mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and marital quality?. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 795-805.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İdil Eren Kurt ^*
0000-0001-8243-0685
Türkiye

Turan Akbaş
0000-0002-3372-8327

Publication Date

September 30, 2019

Submission Date

March 31, 2019

Acceptance Date

August 29, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 13 Number: 19

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.547217

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA47UZ74YJ

APA

Kurt, İ. E., & Akbaş, T. (2019). Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 13(19), 636-655. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.547217

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction of Turkish Emerging Adults: The Role of Dyadic Coping

International Journal of Systemic Therapy

https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2023.2229712

The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping Strategies and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Pregnant Persons at Risk of Miscarriage

Psychiatric Annals

https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230828-02

The relationship between postpartum mothers’ dyadic coping and adjustment and psychological well-being

Current Psychology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05844-6

Being One and Staying Two as a Couple: Turkish Married Couples’ Sense of We-Ness, Psychological Distress, and Common Dyadic Coping

Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy

https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2024.2406812

Dyadic coping strategies of Turkish couples and dyadic adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2489372

Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Adaptation of Dyadic Coping Inventory Into Tur-kish

Abstract

Keywords

Stresle Çift Olarak Baş Etme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Understanding relational resilience of married adults in quarantine days

The Mediating Role of Dyadic Coping on the Effects of Covid-19 and Relationship Satisfaction among Turkish Couples

Psychometric properties of the dyadic coping inventory: Systematic review

COVID-19 Stress in Married Individuals in Terms of Dyadic Copingand Problem-Solving in Marriage

COVID-19 Stress in Married Individuals in Terms of Dyadic Copingand Problem-Solving in Marriage

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction of Turkish Emerging Adults: The Role of Dyadic Coping

The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping Strategies and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Pregnant Persons at Risk of Miscarriage

The relationship between postpartum mothers’ dyadic coping and adjustment and psychological well-being

Being One and Staying Two as a Couple: Turkish Married Couples’ Sense of We-Ness, Psychological Distress, and Common Dyadic Coping

Dyadic coping strategies of Turkish couples and dyadic adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic