Research Article

Scale Of Organizational Unlearning: Study Of Validity Reliability

Volume: 15 Number: 22 February 29, 2020
EN TR

Scale Of Organizational Unlearning: Study Of Validity Reliability

Abstract

The aim of the research is the inclusion of validity and reliability studies by translating and adopting the scale of organizational unlearning into Turkish in order to test the structural validity of the scale which consists of totally 3 dimensions and 18 statements and developed by Cegarra & Sánchez (2008) The validity and reliability studies of the sample occured with the participation of 210 health employees working in Elazig private hospitals. According to the results of explanatory factor analysis, item number which was 18 in the original scale taken into consideration in three dimension faithfully was decreased to 15 According to the results of the conducted explanatory factor analyses, it was determined that the scale indicated adequate fitting. RMSEA = 0.062, NFI = 0.90, CFI =0.96, NNFI = 0.91, GFI = 0.92 ,AGFI = 0.89, χ2/sd =2,087. Alpha reliability coefficients of the scale were determined as 918, The consolidation of emergent understanding, 873, The examination of lens fitting, 885 for the framework for changing the individual habits. As a result, the Turkish version of this study, which has been validated and reliability analyzes of the organizational renunciation scale, has been obtained and it is thought to be gained in the national literature

Keywords

Organizational Unlearning,Reliability,Validity

References

  1. Akgun A.E., Lynn G.S. and Byrne J.C. (2006a). Antecedents and consequences of unlearning in new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 73-88.
  2. Akgün, A.E., Byrne, J.C., Lynn, G.S. and Keskin, H. (2007a), New product development in turbulent environments: impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3), 203-230.
  3. Alas, R. (2007), Reactions to organizational change from the institutional perspective: The case of Estonia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(3), 19–30.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  5. Casillas, J.C., Acedo, F.J. and Barbero, J.L. (2010), Learning, unlearning and internationalisation: evidence from the pre-export phase, International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 162-173.
  6. Cegarra-Navarro JG, Dewhurst FW (2006) Linking shared organizational context and relational capital through unlearning: an initial empirical investigation in SMEs. Learning Organization, 13, 49-62.
  7. Gustavsson, B. (1999). Three cases and some ideas on individual and organizational re- and unlearning. Presentation at the EIASM conference in Colchester
  8. Harvey, M. and Buckley, M.R. (2002), Assessing the ‘conventional wisdoms’ of management for the 21st century organization. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 368–78.
  9. Karabal, C. (2018), Değişime direnç, örgütsel hafıza ve vazgeçme arasındaki ilişkiler, Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü e-dergi, 1(2), 6-24.
  10. Martin de Holan, P., Phillips, N. and Lawrence, T.B. (2004). Managing organizational forgetting, MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 45–51.
APA
Gün, G. (2020). Scale Of Organizational Unlearning: Study Of Validity Reliability. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(22), 840-853. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.660915