YEŞİL TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALARININ PERFORMANS ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELİ İLE ANALİZİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 1 - 22, 30.06.2020

Bülent Yıldız

Öz

Bu çalışmada yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamalarının performans üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla 191 firmadan anket ile elde edilen veriler yapısal eşitlik modeli ile analiz edilmiştir. Modelde yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamalarından iç çevre yönetimi, yeşil satın alma, müşterilerle işbirliği ve eko tasarımın çevresel ve ekonomik performans üzerindeki etkisi analiz edilmiştir. Analiz neticesinde iç çevre yönetiminin çevresel performansı pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca eko tasarımın çevresel ve ekonomik performansı pozitif yönde anlamlı olarak etkilediği bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi, çevresel performans, yapısal eşitlik modeli

Kaynakça

• Abdallah A.B. ve Al-Ghwayeen W.S. (2019). Green supply chain management and business performance The mediating roles of environmental and operational performances. Business Process Management Journal, 20 (2) 290-334
• Abdel-Baset M., Chang V. ve Gamal A. (2019). Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: A novel neutrosophic approach. Computers in Industry, 108 (1) 210–220
• Ahmed W., Najmi A., Arif M. ve Younus M. (2019). Exploring firm performance by institutional pressures driven green supply chain management practices. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8 (5) 415-437
• Al-Ghwayeen W.S. ve Abdallah A.B. (2018). Green supply chain management and export performance The mediating role of environmental performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(7) 1233-1252
• Bansal, P. ve Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4) 717-736.
• Buzuku S. ve Kraslawski A. (2017). Use of Design Structure Matrix for Analysis of Critical Barriers in Implementing Eco-Design Initiatives in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 11 ( 1 ) 742 – 750
• Buzuku S. ve Kass T.,(2019) Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Eco-design Practices in Pulp and Paper Industry: a Case Study of Finland. Procedia Manufacturing, 33 (1) 717-724
• Carter, C.R. ve Rogers, D.S. (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5) 360-387.
• Chavoshlou A.S., Khamseh A.A. ve Naderi B. (2019). An optimization model of three-player payoff based on fuzzy game theory in green supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering 128 (1) 782–794
• Choudhary K. ve Sangwan K.S. (2019) Adoption of green practices throughout the supply chain: an empirical investigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6) 1650-1675
• Cicconi P. (2020). Eco-design and Eco-materials: An interactive and collaborative approach. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 23 (1) e00135
• Choudhary K. ve Sangwan K.S. (2019). Multiple case study analysis and development of an interpretive structural model for greening of supply chains in Indian ceramic enterprises. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6) 1279-1296
• Cousins P.D., Lawson B., Petersen K.J. ve Fugate B. (2019). Investigating green supply chain management practices and performance The moderating roles of supply chain ecocentricity and traceability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(5) 767-786. Çankaya S.Y. ve Sezen B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1) 98-121
• da Rosa F.S., Lunkes R.J. ve Brizzola M.M.B. (2019). Exploring the relationship between internal pressures, greenhouse gas management and performance of Brazilian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212 (1) 567-575
• Das C. ve Jharkharia S. (2019). Effects of low carbon supply chain practices on environmental sustainability An empirical study on Indian manufacturing firms. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(1) 2-25.
• de Oliveira U.R., Espindola L.S., da Silva I.R., da Silva I.N. ve Rocha H.M. (2018). A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187 (1) 537-561
• de Sousa Jabboura A.B.L., Vazquez-Brust D., Chiappetta Jabboura C.J. ve Latan H. (2017). Green supply chain practices and environmental performance in Brazil: Survey, case studies, and implications for B2B. Industrial Marketing Management, 66 (1) 13–28
• ECAP, (2011). First Assessment Of the Environmental Compliance Assistance Programme For SMEs (ECAP). Ref: ENV.C.1/ETU/2010/0032r. http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/archives/sme/pdf/First%20assessemnt%20of%20the%20ECAP% 20for%20SMEs.pdf.
• Fernando Y., Walters T., Ismail M.N., Seo Y.W. ve Kaimasu M. (2018). Managing project success using project risk and green supply chain management A survey of automotive industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2) 332-365
• Gardas B., Raut R., Jagtap A.H. ve Narkhede B. (2019). Exploring the key performance indicators of green supply chain management in agro-industry. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1) 260-283
• Green Jr K.W., Zelbst P.J., Meacham J. ve Bhadauria V.S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (3) 290–305
• Günday A.H. (2018). Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Uygulamalarının İşletme Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: Kimya Sektöründe Görgül Bir Analiz. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Konya
• Hsu C.C., Tan K.C., Mohamad Zailani S.H. ve Jayaraman V. (2013). Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(6) 656-688
• Islam M.S., Tseng M.L., Karia N. ve Lee C.H. (2018). Assessing green supply chain practices in Bangladesh using fuzzy importance and performance approach. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 131 (1) 134–145
• Jabbour C.J.C., Jugend D., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., Govindan K., Kannan D. ve Filho W.L. (2018). There is no carnival without samba: Revealing barriers hampering biodiversity-based R&D and eco-design in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management 206 (1) 236-245
• Jayant A. ve Azhar M. (2014). Analysis of the barriers for implementing green supply chain management (GSCM) Practices: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach. Procedia Engineering, 97 ( 1 ) 2157 – 2166
• Johnstone L. (2020). A systematic analysis of environmental management systems in SMEs: Possible research directions from a management accounting and control stance. Journal of Cleaner Production 244 (1) 118802
• Laari S., Töyli J., Solakivi T. ve Ojala L. (2016). Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (1) 1960-1970
• Laosirihongthong T., Adebanjo D. ve Tan K.C. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8)1088-1109
• Latan H., Chiappetta Jabbour C.J., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., Wamba S.F. ve Shahbaz M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180 (1) 297-306
• Lee V.H., Ooi K.B., Chong A.Y.L. ve Seow C. (2014). Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: An empirical analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 41 (1) 6983–6994
• Lin Y., Luo J., Cai S., Ma S. ve Rong K. (2016). Exploring The Service Quality in The E-Commerce Context: A Triadic View. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(3) 388-415.
• Maditati D.R., Munim Z.H., Schramm H.J. ve Kummer S. (2018). A review of green supply chain management: From bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework and future research directions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 139 (1) 150–162
• Marconi M. ve Favi C. (2020). Eco-design teaching initiative within a manufacturing company based on LCA analysis of company product portfolio. Journal of Cleaner Production 242 (1) 118424
• Min, H. ve Galle, W.P. (2001). Green purchasing practices of US firms, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(9) 1222-1238.
• Mishal A., Dubey R., Gupta O.K. ve Luo Z. (2017). Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 9(5) 682-706
• Mumtaz U., Ali Y. ve Petrillo A. (2018). A linear regression approach to evaluate the green supply chain management impact on industrial organizational performance. Science of the Total Environment, 624 (1) 162–169
• Namagembe S., Ryan S. ve Sridharan R. (2019). Green supply chain practice adoption and firm performance: manufacturing SMEs in Uganda. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1) 5-35
• Paul I.D., Bhole G.P. ve Chaudhari J.R. (2014). A review on Green Manufacturing: It’s important, Methodology and its Application. Procedia Materials Science, 6 (1) 1644 – 1649
• Petljak K., Zulauf K., Štulec I., Seuring S. ve Wagner R. (2018). Green supply chain management in food retailing: survey-based evidence in Croatia. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(1) 1–15.
• Sari K. (2017). A novel multi-criteria decision framework for evaluating green supply chain management practices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105 (1) 338–347.
• Scur G., de Mello A.M., Schreiner L. ve das Neves F.J. (2019). Eco-design requirements in heavyweight vehicle development – a case study of the impact of the Euro 5 emissions standard on the Brazilian industry. Innovation & Management Review, 16(4) 404-422
• Suki N.M. (2016). Green product purchase intention: impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal, 118(12) 2893-2910
• Trivedi R.H., Patel J.D. ve Acharya N. (2018). Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196 (1) 11-22
• Tumpa T.J., Ali S.M., Rahman M.H., Paul S.K., Chowdhury P. ve Rehman Khan S.A. (2019). Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236 (1) 117617
• Wang C.H. (2019). How organizational green culture influences green performance and competitive advantage The mediating role of green innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(4) 666-683
• Wang Z., Wang Q., Zhang S. ve Zhao X. (2018). Effects of customer and cost drivers on green supply chain management practices and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189 (1) 673-682
• Yang C.S. (2018). An analysis of institutional pressures, green supply chain management, and green performance in the container shipping context. Transportation Research Part D, 61 (1) 246–260
• Yen Y.X. ve Yen S.Y. (2012). Top-management's role in adopting green purchasing standards in high-tech industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 65 (1) 951–959
• Yook K.H., Choi J.H. ve Suresh N.C. (2018). Linking green purchasing capabilities to environmental and economic performance: The moderating role of firm size. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(4) 326-337
• Zeng D., Cao H., Jafar S., Tan Y. ve Su S. (2018). A Life Cycle Ecological Sensitivity Analysis Method for Eco-Design Decision Making of Machine Tool. Procedia CIRP, 69 (1) 698 – 703
• Zhu, Q. ve Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22 (3), 265–289.
• Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J. ve Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (11/12), 1041-1052.
• Zhu Q., Sarkis J. ve Lai K.H. (2019). Choosing the right approach to green your supply chains. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 1(1) 54-67