The Investigation of the Susceptibility of Candida Species to Fluconazole, Voriconazole, and Amphotericin B by Disc Diffusion and the Microdilution Method

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 4, 444 - 449, 13.07.2020

Hafize Sav Ayşe Barış Deniz Turan Fatma Özakkaş Rabiye Altınbaş , Sümeyye Şen Nuri Kiraz Kiraz

https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.513011

Cited By: 1

Öz

In
this study, we aimed to investigate the antifungal susceptibility profile of
Candida isolates obtained in our hospital with two methods. A total of 200
Candida isolates were obtained from samples of patients in various departments
of our hospital. Identification of each strain was performed using conventional
(germ tube formation, microscopic morphology in corn meal-Tween 80 agar), and
commercial kit API 20C (Biomerieux, France). MIC values of fluconazole (FLU),
voriconazole (VORI), and amphotericin B (AMB) were evaluated according to
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and disk diffusion
(DD) method. Totally isolated 200 Candida species were identified as 100 C.
albicans, 25 C. glabrata, 7 C. krusei, 43 C. parapsilosis, and 25 C.
tropicalis. All isolates were susceptible to VORI. High resistance rate (22,5%)
was detected for AMB antifungal by reference microdilution method. Between two
methods, the best categorical ratio was calculated as VORI (99%), FLU (84.9%),
and AMB (72,5%) respectively. Voriconazole exhibited better activity in vitro
than fluconazole, even in isolates fluconazole resistant and disk diffusion
method can be considered as alternative antifungal sensitivity method for VORI.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Broth microdilution, Antifungal susceptibility, Antifungal

Candida türlerinin flukonazol, vorikonazol, amfoterisin B'ye karşı duyarlılıklarının disk difüzyon ve mikrodilüsyon yöntemiyle araştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışmada
hastanemizde izole edilen Candida türlerinin iki farklı yöntemle antifungal
duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Hastanemizde çeşitli
departmanlardan gelen klinik örneklerden toplam 200 Candida türü izole edildi.
Bu türler geleneksel yöntem (germ tüp oluşturma, corn-meal tween 80  besiyerinde 
mikroskobik görünüm) ve ticari kit API 20C (Biomerieux, France) ile
tanımlandı. Bu türlerin flukonazol (FLU), vorikonazol (VORI), amfoterisin B
(AMB) antifungal minimum inhibisyon konsantrasyonu (MIK) değerleri Clinical and
Laboratory Standards Institute sıvı mikrodilüsyon ve disk-difüzyon (DD)
yöntemine göre değerlendirildi. İzole edilen 200 Candida türü; 100 C. albicans,
25 C. glabrata, 7 C. krusei, 43 C. parapsilosis ve 25 C. tropicalis olarak
tanımlandı. Bütün Candida izolatları VORI ‘ye karşı duyarlı bulundu. Yüksek
direnç (%22,5) oranı referans mikrodilüsyon yöntemi ile AMB antifungaline karşı
tespit edilidi. İki yöntem arasında en iyi kategorik oran sırası ile VORI (%99),
FLU (%84,9) ve AMB (%72,5) olarak hesaplandı.Vorikonazol, flukonazole dirençli
izolatlarda bile in vitro olarak flukonazolden daha iyi aktivite göstermiştir.
Ek olarak disk difüzyon yöntemi VORI için alternatif antifungal duyarlılık
yöntemi olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Antifungal duyarlılık, Antifungal, Sıvı Mikrodilüsyon

Kaynakça

• [1] Quindós G .Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2014;31:42-8
• [2] Eschenauer GA, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ. Is Fluconazole or an Echinocandin the Agent of Choice for Candidemia. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49:1068-74.
• [3] Furlaneto MC, Rota JF, Quesada RM,et al. Species distribution and in vitro fluconazole susceptibility of clinical Candida isolates in a Brazilian tertiary-care hospital over a 3-year period. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011 ;44:595-9.
• [4] Perea S, Patterson TF. Antifungal resistance in pathogenic fungi. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 35:1073-80.
• [5] Malani AN, Kerr LE, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: How to Use This Antifungal Agent and What to Expect. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:786-95.
• [6] Hamill RJ. Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs. 2013 ;73:919-34
• [7]Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2008. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeast; Approved Standard-Third Edition. CLSI document M27-A3.
• [8] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for antifungal disc diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts. In Approved Guideline. (M44-A2), 2nd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2009
• [9] Kiraz N, Dag I, Oz Y, Yamac M, Kiremitci A, Kasifoglu N.Correlation between broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole against Candida glabrata. J Microbiol Methods.2010;82:136-40.
• [10] Arendrup M, Lundgren B, Jensen I.M, Hansen BS, Frimodt-Møller N.Comparison of Etest and a tablet diffusion test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.2001; 47:521–526.
• [11] Diekema DJ, Meser S.A, Hollis R.J, Boyken LB, Tendolkar S, Kroeger J,et al.Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole, J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1322-4.
• [12] Azevedo AC, Bizerra FC, da Matta DA, de Almeida LP, Rosas R, Colombo AL. In vitro susceptibility of a large collection of Candida Strains against fluconazole and voriconazole by using the CLSI disk diffusion assay. Mycopathologia. 2011;171:411-6.
• [13] Quindós G, Sánchez-Vargas LO, Villar-Vidal M, Eraso E, Alkorta M, Hernández-Almaraz JL.Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata and Candida krusei: a 14-year study in a Spanish tertiary medical centre. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 ;31:266-71.
• [14] Noake T, Kuriyama T, White PL, et al.Antifungal susceptibility of Candida species using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute disk diffusionand broth microdilution methods. J Chemother. 2007;19:283-7.
• [15] Arikan S. Current status of antifungal susceptibility testing methods. Med Mycol. 2007; 45:569-87.
• [16] Wang H, Xiao M, Chen SC, et al. In vitro susceptibilities of yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by the 2010 National China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) study. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:3952-9.
• [17] Fukuoka T, Johnston D A, Winslow C A, de Groot MJ, Burt C, Hitchcock CA.et al.Genetic basis for differential activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against Candida krusei. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003. 47:1213–1219.
• [18] Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Meis JF, Gould IM,  et al.Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2005: an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candidaspecies and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J. Clin. Microbiol.45:1735–1745.
• [19] Pfaller MA , Boyken LB, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, et al.Validation of 24-Hour Fluconazole MIC Readings versus the CLSI 48-Hour Broth Microdilution Reference Method: Results from a Global Candida Antifungal Surveillance Program J Clin Microbiol. 2008 ;46:3585-90.
• [20] Barry AL, Phaller MA, Rennie RP, Fuchs PC, Brown SD. Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 ;46:1781-4.
• [21] Espinel-Ingroff A, Canton E, Gibbs D, Wang A. Correlation of Neo-Sensitabs Tablet Diffusion Assay Results on Three Different Agar Media with CLSI Broth Microdilution M27-A2 and Disk Diffusion M44-A Results for Testing Susceptibilities of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, and Voriconazole J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:858-64.