Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Çalışma Yaklaşımlarının Akademik Başarıya Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, tıp öğrencilerinin çalışma yaklaşımları ve sosyodemografik özellikleri ile akademik performansları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve çalışma yaklaşımlarının klinik ve klinik öncesi dönemler arasında farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirlemektir.

Materyal ve Metot: Çalışma tanımlayıcı-kesitsel bir çalışmadır. Tıp öğrencilerinden “Revize İki Faktör Çalışma Süreci Anketi (R-SPQ2F)” anketini doldurmaları istendi.

Bulgular: Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 21,40±2,58 yıl olan 298 erkek ve 306 kız öğrenci alındı. Öğrencilerin %57,8'i (n=349) klinik öncesi tıp öğrencisi ve %42,2'si (n=255) klinik öğrencisiydi. Öğrencilerin ikamet ettikleri yer ile tıp fakültesini tercih nedenleri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (sırasıyla p=0,853, p=0,860). Klinik öncesi öğrencilerinin derin çalışma yaklaşımı puanları klinik öğrencilerine göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulundu (p<0,014). Klinik öncesi öğrencilerinin derin stratejik çalışma puanlarının klinik öğrencilerine göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu belirlendi (p<0,001).

Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımız, çalışma yaklaşımlarından biri olan derin öğrenme davranışının daha yüksek akademik başarı ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma sonuçları, tıp öğrencilerinin kullandıkları öğrenme yaklaşımlarının akademik başarı üzerindeki etkisini erken fark etmelerine yardımcı olabilir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tıp eğitimi
• tıp öğrencileri
• akademik başarı
• ders çalışma yaklaşımları

The Effect of Medical School Students' Study Approaches on Academic Achievement

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between medical students' study approaches and sociodemographic characteristics with their academic achievement and to determine whether their study approaches differ between clinical and preclinical periods.

Materials and Methods: The study is a descriptive-cross-sectional study. Medical students were asked to fill out the “Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F)” questionnaire.

Results: The study included 298 male and 306 female students with a mean age of 21.40±2.58 years. 57.8% (n=349) of the students were preclinical medical students and 42.2% (n=255) were clinical students. No significant difference was found between the place of residence of the students and the reason for choosing the medical faculty (p=0.853, p=0.860, respectively). Deep study approach scores of preclinical students were found to be significantly higher than clinical students (p<0.014). It was determined that the deep strategic study scores of the preclinical students were significantly higher than the clinical students (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Our study results show that deep learning behavior, which is one of the study approaches, is associated with higher academic achievement. The study results can help medical students to realize the effect of learning approaches they use on academic achievement early.

Keywords

• Medical education
• medical students
• study approaches
• academic achievement

References

1. Tengiz Fİ, Babaoğlu AB. Tıp fakültesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin kariyer tercihleri ve bu tercihleri etkileyen faktörler. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;27(1):67-78. doi:10.17343/sdutfd.560350
2. Bickerdike A, O'Deasmhunaigh C, O'Flynn S, O'Tuathaigh C. Learning strategies, study habits and social networking activity of undergraduate medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:230-236. doi:10.5116/ijme.576f.d074
3. Mirghani HM, Ezimokhai M, Shaban S, van Berkel HJM. Superficial and deep learning approaches among medical students in an interdisciplinary integrated curriculum. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014;27(1):10-14. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.134293
4. Shin HI, Jeon WT, Yang EB. Relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement in medical college and graduate medical school students. Korean J Med Educ. 2010;22(3):197-204. doi:10.3946/kjme.2010.22.3.197
5. Ward PJ. First year medical students' approaches to study and their outcomes in a gross anatomy course. Clin Anat. 2011;24(1):120-127. doi:10.1002/ca.21071
6. Ahmady S, Khajeali N, Sharifi F, Mirmoghtadaei ZS. Factors related to academic failure in preclinical medical education: A systematic review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019;7(2):74-85. doi:10.30476/JAMP.2019.44711
7. Kiran F, Javaid A. Students' perceptions of factors for academic failure in pre-clinical years of a medical school. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(5):803-808. doi:10.5455/JPMA.19548
8. Özcan KV, Bütün İ, Şahin Ş. Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin ders çalışma stratejileri ve öğrenme stillerinin akademik başarılarına etkisi. JOMEDIN. 2015;1(1):12-23.

9. Ogenler O, Selvi H. Variables affecting medical faculty students' achievement: A Mersin University sample. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(3):e14648. doi:10.5812/ircmj.14648
10. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Technol. 2001;71(Pt 1):133-149.
11. Yılmaz, MB, Orhan F. The Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the study process questionnaire. Education and Science. 2011;36:69-83.
12. Sandover S, Jonas-Dwyer D, Marr T. Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students' study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: A five year longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:5. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0284-7
13. Paudel KR, Nepal HP, Shrestha B, Panta R, Toth S. Distribution and academic significance of learning approaches among pre-clinical medical students at Trinity School of Medicine, St Vincent and the Grenadines. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:9. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.9 
14. Mansouri P, Soltani F, Rahemi S, Nasab MM, Ayatollahi AR, Nekooeian AA. Nursing and midwifery students' approaches to study and learning. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(3):351-358. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03814.x
15. Mattick K, Dennis I, Bligh J. Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: Vlidation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):535-543. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01836.x
16. Feeley AM, Biggerstaff DL. Exam Success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools: is learning style or learning approach more important? A critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry ("Traditional") and graduate-entry ("Nontraditional") medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):237-244. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1046734
17. Shaik SA, Almarzuqi A, Almogheer R, Alharbi O, Jalal A, Alorainy M. Assessing Saudi medical students learning approach using the revised two-factor study process questionnaire. Int J Med Educ. 2017;8:292-296. doi:10.5116/ijme.5974.7a06
18. Reid WA, Duvall E, Evans P. Can we influence medical students' approaches to learning? Med Teach. 2005;27(5):401-407. doi:10.1080/01421590500136410
19. Salih S, Fageehi M, Hakami S, et al. Academic difficulties among medical students at Jazan University: A case-control study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:723-729. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S307554
20. Gedefaw A, Tilahun B, Asefa A. Predictors of self-reported academic performance among undergraduate medical students of Hawassa University, Ethiopia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:305-315. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S78604
21. Alfayez SF Strand DA, Carline JD. Academic, social and cultural factors influencing medical school grade performance. Med Educ. 1990;24(3):230-238. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb00006.x
22. Zilundu PLM, Chibhabha F, Chengetanai S, Fu R, Zhou LH. Zimbabwean pre Clinical Medical Students Use of Deep and Strategic Study Approaches to Learn Anatomy at Two New Medical Schools. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):198-209. doi:10.1002/ase.2064
23. Lee J, Kim RJY, Choi H. Most surface learning in the third year: Dental student learning approaches and implications for curriculum and assessment. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(4):464-472. doi:10.1002/jdd.12043
24. Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN. Factors influencing the approaches to studying of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:22. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-22
25. Yang R. How to arouse students' desire to learn biochemistry. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020;48(6):572-578. doi:10.1002/bmb.21357
26. Pulito AR, Donnelly MB, Plymale M. Factors in faculty evaluation of medical students' performance. Med Educ. 2007;41(7):667-75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02787.x
27. Pulito AR, Donnelly MB, Plymale M, Mentzer RM Jr. What do faculty observe of medical students' clinical performance? Teach Learn Med. 2006;18(2):99-104. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_2
28. Donnon T, Violato C. Medical students' clinical reasoning skills as a function of basic science achievement and clinical competency measures: a structural equation model. Acad Med. 2006;81(10 Suppl):120-123. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000236543.88782.b6