Ebelik Öğrencilerine Tam Donanımlı Doğum Simülasyonu Kullanılarak Verilen Doğum Eğitiminin Memnuniyete Etkisi

Year 2024, , 503 - 513, 30.08.2024

Reyhan Aydın Doğan , Sebahat Hüseyinoğlu

https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1267497

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ebelik öğrencilerine tam donanımlı doğum simülasyonu ile verilen doğum eğitimin etkinliğini belirlemektir.
Yöntem: Çalışma karma yöntem kullanılarak iki aşamada uygulanmıştır. Birinci aşamada, yüksek kaliteli bir model kullanılarak kantitatif ve standart hastalarla simülasyon programı uygulandı. İkinci aşamada nitel ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yöntemleri ile bir analiz oturumu gerçekleştirilerek simülasyon etkililiği değerlendirilmiştir. SWOT (Güçlü Yönler, Zayıf Yönler, Fırsatlar ve Tehditler) analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini ebelik lisans programı üçüncü sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada örneklem seçimi yapılmamış, evrenin tamamına (n=112) ulaşılması planlanmış ve 97 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada kişisel bilgi formu, Öğrenci Memnuniyeti, Öğrenmede Özgüven Ölçeği, Simülasyon Tasarım Ölçeği ve Eğitim Uygulamaları Anketi uygulanmıştır. Veriler, tanımlayıcı istatistikler, doğrusal regresyon ve Pearson korelasyonu kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Öğrenci Memnuniyeti ve Özgüven Ölçeği toplam puanı 4.60, Simülasyon Tasarımı Ölçeği 4.66 ve Eğitim Uygulamaları Ölçeği 4.70’tir. n doğrusal regresyon analizinde aktif öğrenme alt boyutu anlamlı bulunmuştur (p=0,03). Her iki ölçekte de alınan puanlar yükseldikçe öğrencinin öğrenme başarısının da yükselmektedir.
Sonuç: Bulgularımız öğrencilerin özgüvenlerinin ve öğrenme doyumlarının yüksek olduğunu gösterdi. Öğrenciler simülasyona dayalı eğitimden memnun kaldılar ve eğitimlerine katkı sağladığını deneyimlediler. Simülasyonlar onlara güvenli bir öğrenme ortamında hata yapma ve hatalardan öğrenme fırsatı verdi. Doğum öğretiminde simülasyon, iyi bir öğretim yöntemi olarak kullanılabilir.

Keywords

doğum simülasyonu, ebelik, öğrenci memnuniyeti

The Effect of Birth Education Given to Midwifery Students Using Fully Equipped Birth Simulation on Satisfaction

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of birth education given to midwifery students by fully equipped birth simulation.
Methods: The study was implemented in two stages using mixed method. In the first stage, a simulation program was implemented with quantitative and standard patients using a high-quality model. In the second stage, simulation effectiveness was evaluated by conducting an analysis session using qualitative and semi-structured interview methods. SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis was conducted. The population of the research consisted of third-year students of the midwifery undergraduate program. No sample selection was made in the research; it was planned to reach the entire population (n=112), was conducted with 97 students. Personal information form, Student Satisfaction, Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale and Educational Applications Survey were applied. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, Pearson correlation.
Results: The total score of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence Scale is 4.60, the Simulation Design Scale is 4.66, and the Educational Practices Scale is 4.70. In the linear regression analysis, the active learning sub-dimension was found to be significant (p=0.03). As the scores on both scales increase, the student's learning success also increases.
Conclusion: Findings showed that students' self-confidence and learning satisfaction were high. Students were satisfied with the simulation-based education and experienced that it contributed to their education. Simulations gave them the opportunity to make mistakes and learn from mistakes in a safe learning environment. Simulation in birth teaching can be used as a good teaching method.

Keywords

birth simulation, midwifery, student satisfaction

Thanks

Thank you for your contribution to midwifery students that agreed to participate in our study.

References

• Ayhan H, Çınar Fİ, Şahin SY, Demirtaş A, Özkan Y, Bakçek Ö, ve ark. (2019). Cerrahi ve iç hastalıkları hemşireliği eğitimi kapsamında yürütülen simülasyon uygulamalarına yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sağlik Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, 1(2), 66-75.
• Blanié A, Amorim MA, Benhamou D. (2020). Comparative value of a simulation by gaming and a traditional teaching method to improve clinical reasoning skills necessary to detect patient deterioration: A randomized study in nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1939-6
• Changuiti O, Ouassim A, Marfak A, Saad E, Hilali A, Youlyouz-Marfak I. (2022). Simulation pedagogical program design for midwifery education using logic model. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 18(6), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2022.02.011
• Cooper S, Cant R, Porter J, Bogossian F, McKenna L, Brady S, et al. (2012). Simulation-based learning in midwifery education: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 25(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.03.004
• Dayal AK, Fisher N, Magrane D, Goffman D, Bernstein PS, Katz NT. (2009). Simulation training improves medical students’ learning experiences when performing real vaginal deliveries. Simulation in Healthcare, 4(3), 155. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH. 0b013e3181b3e4ab
• Gebreheat G, Whitehorn LJ, Paterson RE. (2022). Effectiveness of digital simulation on student nurses’ knowledge and confidence:an integrative literature review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 765–775. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S36 6495
• Gelbart NR. (1999). The king’s midwife: A history and mystery of Madame du Coudray. Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. of California Press E-Books Collection. p. 4-10. Data of access: 31.12.2022 https://publishing.cdlib. org/cpressebooks/view?docId=ft1g5004dk&chunk.id=d0e33&toc.depth=1&toc.id=d0e33&brand=ucpress
• George D, Mallery P. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10th edition, United States, Pearson Education Company. p. 100-112.
• Guerrero JG, Ali SAA, Attallah DM. (2022). The acquired critical thinking skills, satisfaction, and self confidence of nursing students and staff nurses through high-fidelity simulation experience. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 64, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.11.008
• Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Strømme H, Jamtvedt G. (2017). Simulation-based training for nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 54, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.004
• International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). (2021). ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (revised 2021). Date of access: 31.12.2022. https://internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2021/09/global-standards-for-midwifery-education_2021_en.pdf.
• Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
• Karaçay P, Kaya H. (2017). Simülasyonla eğitimde kullanılan Öğrenci Memnuniyet ve Öğrenmede Kendine Güven Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 25(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.17672/fnhd.53359
• Karadag M, Çalışkan N, Iseri O. (2015). Simüle hasta kullanımına ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Çağdaş Tıp Dergisi, 5(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.16899/ctd. 83205
• Kumar A, Khot N, Bansal U, Singh JV, Malhotra A. (2021). Lessons learnt from an obstetric and neonatal emergency simulation program in India. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 27(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jnn.2020.07.004
• Levett-Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, et al. (2011). The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. Nurse Education Today, 31(7), 705–710. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.nedt.2011.01.004
• Murray Davis B, Soltani H, Wilkins H. (2009). Using a childbirth simulator in midwifery education. British Journal of Midwifery, 17(4), 234–237. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.4.41673
• Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt, CR. (2020). Elements in scenario‐based simulation associated with nursing students’ self‐confidence and satisfaction: A cross‐sectional study. Nursing Open, 7(1), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.375
• Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, Ramos J, Costa, P. (2019). Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e11529. https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
• Powers K. (2020). Bringing simulation to the classroom using an unfolding video patient scenario: A quasi-experimental study to examine student satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceptions of simulation design. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104324
• Roberts E, Kaak V, Rolley J. (2019). Simulation to replace clinical hours in nursing: a meta-narrative review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 37, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.07.003
• Roh YS, Jang KI, Issenberg SB. (2021). Nursing students’ perceptions of simulation design features and learning outcomes: The mediating effect of psychological safety. Collegian, 28(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.06.007
• Ruyak SL, Migliaccio L, Levi A, Patel S. (2018). Role development in midwifery education: A place for simulation. Midwifery, 59, 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.021
• Ryan G, Callaghan S, Rafferty A, Murphy J, Higgins M, Barry T, et al. (2022). Virtual reality in midwifery education: A mixed methods study to assess learning and understanding. Nurse Education Today, 119, 105573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105573
• Stoodley C, McKellar L, Steen M, Fleet J. (2020). Simulation in midwifery education: A descriptive explorative study exploring students’ knowledge, confidence and skills in the care of the preterm neonate. Nurse Education in Practice, 42, 102635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102635
• Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan, S, et al. (2017). The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire. Contemporary Nurse, 53(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319
• Yoo JH, Kim YJ. (2018). Factors Influencing Nursing Students’ Flow Experience during Simulation-Based Learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 24, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.09.001