Karşılıklı Taklit Eğitiminin Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Çocukların Taklit Edildiğinin Farkına Varma Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkililiği

Year 2019, , 29 - 51, 01.03.2019

Gökhan Töret , Emine Rüya Özmen

https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.366116

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Karşılıklı
Taklit Eğitimi (KTE) ile sunulan taklit eğitiminin otizm spektrum bozukluğu
(OSB) olan çocukların taklit edildiğinin farkına varma davranışları (TEFV) sıklık
düzeyleri üzerindeki etkililiğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın
deseni, tek denekli deneysel desenlerden uyarlanmış denekler arası çoklu
başlama düzeyi desenidir. Çalışmaya 26-42 ay aralığında bulunan OSB olan üç
denek katılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları, TEFV türleri açısından
bakıldığında, KTE oturumları arttıkça az gelişmiş TEFV davranışları sıklığında
kararsız veriler elde edilirken gelişmiş TEFV davranışlarından test etme
davranışları sıklık düzeylerinde ilerlemeler olmuştur. İzleme oturumlarında ise uygulama
evresinden 2 ve 4 hafta sonra az gelişmiş ve gelişmiş TEFV sıklık düzeylerinde
bazı deneklerde düşüşler olduğu, bazı deneklerde ise elde edilen kazanımların
kalıcılığının korunduğu gözlenmiştir. Elde
edilen bulgular, erken çocukluk döneminde OSB olan çocuklarda OSB olan çocuklarda TEFV davranışları sergileme
özellikleri ve KTE teknikleri açısından alan
yazın çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır. 

Keywords

Otizm spektrum bozukluğu, Karşılıklı Taklit Eğitimi

Effectiveness of Reciprocal Imitation Training on the Imitation Recognition Abilities of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract

References

• Baykan. S., Temel. Z. F., Ersoy. O., Avcı. N., & Turla. A. (2002). Gazi Erken Çocukluk Değerlendirme Aracı’nın (GEÇDA) geliştirme süreci. Erken Çocukluk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Sempozyumu. Ankara: Kök. Berger, N. I., & Ingersoll, B. (2013). An exploration of imitation recognition in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 6(5), 411–416. Berger, N. I., & Ingersoll, B. (2015). An evaluation of imitation recognition abilities in typically developing children and young children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 8(4), 442-453. Blackhurst, A. E., Schuster, W. J., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1994). The Single subject research advisor (Computer Software). Lexington, KY Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling. Dawson, G., & Adams, A. (1984). Imitation and social responsiveness in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12(2), 209–226. Dawson, G., & Galpert, L. (1990). Mothers’ use of imitative play for facilitating social responsiveness and toy play in young autistic children. Development and Psychopathology, 2(2), 151-162. Diken, I. H., Ardıç, A., Diken, Ö., & Gilliam, E. J. (2012). Exploring the validity and reliability of Turkish version of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-2: Turkish standardization study. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(166), 318-328. Eckerman, C. O. (1993). Imitation and toddlers’ achievement of coordinated action with others. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 116–138). London: Routledge. Escalona, A., Field, T., Nadel, J., & Lundy, B. (2002). Brief report: Imitation effects on children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 32(2), 141–144. Field, T. M. (1977). Effects of early separation, interactive deficits, and experimental manipulations on infant-mother face-to-face interaction. Child Development, 48(3), 763–771. Field, T., Field, T., Sanders, C., & Nadel, J. (2001). Children with autism display more social behaviors after repeated imitation sessions. Autism, 5(3), 317-323. Gazdag, G., & Warren, S. F. (2000). Effects of adult contin¬gent imitation on development of young children's vo¬cal imitation. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(1), 24-35. Heimann, M., Laberg, K.E., & Nordoen, B. (2006).Imitative interaction increases social interest and elicited imitation in non-verbal children with autism. Infant and Child Development 15(3), 297–309. Hwang, B., & Hughes, C. (2000). Increasing early socialcommunicative skills of preverbal preschool children with autism through social interactive training. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25(1), 18-28. Ingersoll, B. (2008). The social role of imitation in autism: Implications for the treatment of imitation deficits. Infants & Young Children, 21(2), 107-119. Ingersoll, B. (2010). Brief report: Pilot randomized controlled trial of reciprocal imitation training for teaching elicited and spontaneous imitation to children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(3), 1154-1160. Ingersoll, B. (2012). Brief report: Effect of a focused imitation intervention on social functioning in children with autism. Journal and of Autism Developmental Disorders, 42(3), 1768–1773. Ingersoll, B., & Gergans, S. (2007). The effect of a parent-implemented naturalistic imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(1), 163-175. Ingersoll, B., & Lalonde, K. (2010). The impact of nonverbal imitation training on language use in children with autism: A comparison of object and gesture imitation training. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 53(2), 1040-1051. Ingersoll, B., Lewis, E., & Kroman, E. (2007) Teaching the imitation and spontaneous use of descriptive gestures in young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral intervention. Journal and of Autism Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1446-1456. McCathren, R. B. (2000). Teacher-implemented prelinguistic communication intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(1), 21-29. Meltzoff, A. N. (1990). Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 139–164). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago. Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 26–43. Meltzoff, A.N. (2011). Social cognition and the origins of imitation, empathy, and theory of mind. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 49–75). West Sussex: Blackwell. Meltzoff, A. N., & Gopnik, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager- Flusberg, & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 335–366). New York, NY: Oxford University. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1999). Persons and representation: Why infant imitation is important for theories of human development. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.),Imitation in infancy. Cambridge studies in cognitive perceptual development (pp. 9–35). New York, NY: Cambridge University. Nadel, J. (1986). Imitation et communication entre jeunes enfants. Paris: PUF. (2000). Very young infants detection of imitation. Paper presented at the ICIS 2000, Brighton. Nadel, J. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: Functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases (pp. 46–62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University. Nadel, J. (2004). Do children with autism understand imitation as intentional interaction. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 4(2), 165–177. Nadel, J. (2006). Does imitation matter to children with autism? In S. J. Rogers & J. H. G. Williams (Eds.), Imitation and the social mind: Autism and typical development. New York, NY: The Guilford. Nadel, J. (2014). How imitation boosts development: In infancy and autism spectrum disorder. Oxford: Oxford University. Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., & Reserbat- Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science, 2(2), 164–173. Nadel, J., Croue, S., Kervella, C., Mattlinger, M., Canet, P., & Hudelot, C. (2000). Do children with autism have expectations about the social behavior of unfamiliar people. Autism, 4(2), 133-145. Nadel, J., Field, T., & Potier, C. (2000). Imitation recognition as a communicative skill in low-functioning children with autism. Paper presented at the ICIS 2000, Brighton. Nadel, J., Gu´erini, C., Pez´e, A., & Rivet, C. (1999). The evolving nature of imitation as a transitory means of communication. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 209–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University. Nadel, J., Revel, A., Andry, P., & Gaussier, P. (2004). Toward communication: First imitations in infants, low-functioning children with autism and robots. Interaction Studies, 5(30), 45–74. Rogers, S. (1999). An examination of the imitation deficit in autism. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (s. 254–279). UK: Cambridge University. Stephens, C. E. (2008). Spontaneous imitation by children with autism during a repetitive musical play routine. Autism, 12(6), 645-671. Tiegerman, E., & Primavera, L. H. (1984). Imitating the autistic child: Facilitating communicative gaze behavior. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 14(1), 27–38 Yoder, P. J., & Warren, S. F. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the extent to which prelinguistic intervention facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(5), 1207-1219.