Analysis of the impacts of average speed enforcement on driving speed of university members in Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4, 655 - 670, 25.08.2025

Arzu Ilgaz , Mehmet Saltan

Öz

In highly motorised countries around the world, average speed enforcement is a new and advanced technological approach that is growing in popularity. This paper investigates how a mobile average speed system affects speed on routes within the boundaries of a university campus. Firstly, the necessary system software and infrastructure were completed, and in the following 4-month period, before and after speed studies of the drivers were carried out. The first hidden (before) and the second announced (after) average speeds of drivers were measured on 11 different routes. The average speeds recorded in the before period were compared with the average speeds recorded in the after period. In this practice within the borders of the campus, only announcements and warnings were made to the drivers and no penalties were imposed. As a result, standard deviations decreased and average speeds decreased by 2.15 km/h (4.50 per cent), 1.81 km/h (5.10 per cent) and 4.50 km/h (8.35 per cent) on routes with 20, 30 and 50 km/h speed limits. 85% percentage speeds decreased by 4 km/h (6.50%), 3 km/h (6.70%), 3 km/h (4.70%). The rate of speed violations by drivers decreased from 69.38 per cent in the first period to 63.01 per cent in the second period. The proportion of vehicles obeying speed limits increased from 30.62 per cent in the first period to 36.99 per cent in the second period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Average speed enforcement , Average speed , Before/after period , Independent sample t test

Türkiye'de ortalama hız uygulamasının üniversite mensuplarının sürüş hızı üzerindeki etkilerinin analizi

Öz

Dünya çapında son derece yüksek seviyede motorize olmuş ülkelerde, ortalama hız uygulaması popülerliği artan, yeni ve gelişmiş bir teknolojik yaklaşımdır. Bu makale, bir üniversite kampüsü sınırları içindeki güzergahlarda, mobil ortalama hız sisteminin hızı nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. İlk olarak gerekli sistem yazılımı ve altyapısı tamamlanmış, daha sonraki 4 aylık süreçte, sürücülerin önce ve sonra hız etütleri yapılmıştır. Sürücülerin 1.'si gizli (önce), 2.'si ise ilan edilmiş (sonra) ortalama hız değerleri 11 farklı güzergâhta yapılmıştır. Önce döneminde kaydedilen ortalama hızlar, sonra döneminde kaydedilen ortalama hızlarla kıyaslanmıştır. Kampüs sınırları içerisindeki bu uygulamada, sürücülere yalnızca duyurular ve uyarılar yapılmış, herhangi bir ceza uygulanma yapılmamıştır. Sonuç olarak, standart sapmalar düşmüş, ortalama hızlar 20, 30 ve 50 km/s hız limitli güzergâhlarda 2.15 km/s (%4.50), 1.81 km/s (%5.10) ve 4.50 km/s (%8.35) azalmıştır. 85 yüzdeli hızlar ise 4 km/s (%6.50), 3 km/s (%6.70), 3 km/s (%4.70) azalmıştır. Sürücülerin hız ihlali oranı önce döneminde %69.38 iken, sonra döneminde %63,01’ e düşmüştür. Hız limitlerine uyan araçların oranı ise önce döneminde %30.62 iken sonra döneminde % 36.99’a yükselmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ortalama hız uygulaması , Ortalama hız , öncesi/sonrası periyodu , Bağımsız örneklem t testi

Kaynakça

• [1] T.C. Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü. “Traffic Accidents Summary”. https://www.kgm.gov.tr/SiteCollectionDocuments/KGMdocuments/Trafik/TrafikKazalariOzeti2022.pdf. (17.07.2023).
• [2] Taylor MC, Lynam DA, Baruya A. “The Effects of Drivers’ Speed on the Frequency of Road Accidents”. Transport Research Laboratory, Berkshire, England, Trl Report, 421, 2000.
• [3] Elvik R, Christensen, P. “Amundsen a. speed and road accidents: an evaluation of the power model”. Nordic Road and Transport Research, 17(1), 9-11, 2005.
• [4] Karagoz Z. Development of an Intelligent Speed Bump System in Highway Traffic. MSc Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2009.
• [5] Cavdar A, Mehmet U, Kiliçaslan İ. “Checking of the high speed faults caused to traffic accident and controling by active safety systems”. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 23(1), 187-198, 2008.
• [6] Korthof EW. Effects of Section Control on Traffic Safety at Dutch Motorways. MSc Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2014.
• [7] Cascetta E, Punzo V, Montanino M. “Empirical evidence of speed management effects on traffic flow at freeway bottleneck”. TRB 2011 Annual Meeting, Washington, USA, 23-27 January 2011.
• [8] Fleiter J, Lewis I, Watson B. “Promoting a more positive traffic safety culture in Australia: lessons learnt and future directions”. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, 25(1), 27-35, 2014.
• [9] Montella A, Imbriani L, Marzano V, Mauriello F. “Effects on speed and safety of point-to-point speed enforcement systems: evaluation on the urban motorway a56 Tangenziale di Napoli”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75(1), 164-178, 2014.
• [10] Goldenbeld C, Van Schagen I. “The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents: an evaluation study on rural roads in the dutch province Friesland”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(6), 1135-1144, 2005.
• [11] Sahin O. The Feasibility of Automatic Video-Radar Systems on Speed Control. PhD Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey, 2004.
• [12] Geçin M. Çömlekçi S. Ülgen ME. “Taşınabilir trafik denetleme sistemi”. 5. Karayolu Trafik Güvenliği Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, Ankara, Türkiye, 21-23 Mayıs 2014.
• [13] Ilıcalı M. Öngel A. Kızıltaş MÇ. Ergin E. “Trafik güvenliği ve akıllı ulaşım sistemleri (A.U.S.) uygulamaları, ülkemizde ve dünyada gelişim süreci”. 5. Karayolu Trafik Güvenliği Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, Ankara, Türkiye, 21-23 Mayıs 2014.
• [14] Bates L, Allen S, Watson B. “The influence of the elements of procedural justice and speed camera enforcement on young novice driver self-reported speeding”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92(1), 34-42, 2016.
• [15] Acar N. “The impact of excessive speed on traffic accidents”. Police Journals of the Period, 2(21), 10-11, 2009.
• [16] Speed Check Service. “Temporary Roadworks Speed Enforcement-M6”. http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/pdf/M6%20TASCAR%20case%20study.pdf (17.07.2023). Speed Check Services. “SPECS Safety Cameras-M4 10-12 Technology Upgrade”. http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/images/M4_Case_Study.pdf (17.07.2023).
• [17] Speed Check Services. “SPECS: Results”. http://www.speedcheck.co.uk/specs.htm (17.07.2023).
• [18] Gil MJM, Malenstein J. “Innovative Technology for Monitoring Traffic, Vehicles and Drivers”. 6th Framework Programme, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, Technical Report, 019744, 2007.
• [19] Simcic G. “Section Control: Towards a More Efficient and Better Accepted Enforcement of Speed Limits?” http://archive.etsc.eu/documents/ Speed%20Fact%20 Sheet%205.pdf (17.07.2023)
• [20] Council A T. “National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020”. https://www.roadsafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-11/nrss_2011_2020.pdf (17.07.2023)
• [21] Cameron M, Diamantopoulou K, Clark B, Langford J. “Identifying Traffic Enforcement Practices and Opportunities in Western Australia”, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Commissioned Report, 154, 2011.
• [22] Lynch M. “Forward Design Study: Introduction of Point to Point Speed Cameras in the ACT”. https://aecom.com/en-au/ (17.07.2023).
• [23] Lynch M, White M, Napier R. “Investigation Into The Use Of Point-To-Point Speed Cameras”. AECOM, Canbella, Australia, NZ Transport Agency Research Report, 465 2011.
• [24] Soole D, Fleiter J, Watson B. “Point-to-Point Speed Enforcement”. Austroads, New South Wales, Australia, Research Report, 1649, 2012.
• [25] Soole DW, Fleiter JJ, Watson BC. “Point-to-point speed enforcement: recommendations for better practice”. Australasian Road Safety Research Policing and Education Conference, Queensland, Australia, 28-30 August, 2013.
• [26] Høye A. “Speed cameras, section control, and kangaroo jumps - a meta-analysis”. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 73(1), 200-208, 2014.
• [27] Montella A, Punzo V, Chiaradonna S, Mauriello F, Montanino M. “Point-to-point speed enforcement systems: speed limits design criteria and analysis of drivers’ compliance”. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 53(1), 1-18, 2015.
• [28] Akpa EEN, Booysen MJ, Sinclair M. “A comparative evaluation of the impact of average speed enforcement (ASE) on passenger and minibus taxi vehicle drivers on the R61 in South Africa”. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 58(4), 2-10, 2016.
• [29] Pau M, Angius S. “Do speed bumps really decrease traffic speed? An Italian experience”. Accident Analysis& Prevention, 33(5), 585-597, 2001.
• [30] Elvik R. “Analytic choices in road safety evaluation: exploring second-best approaches”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45(1), 173-179, 2011.
• [31] Koy T, Benz S. “Automatic time-over-distance speed checks impacts on driving behaviour and traffic safety”. The 6th ITS World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Stockholm, Sweden, 21-25 September 2009.
• [32] Kallberg VP, Zaidel D, Vaa T, Malenstein J, Siren A, Gaitanidou E. “Police Enforcement Policy and Programmes on European Roads”, Brussels, Belgium 17, 2008.
• [33] Ragnøy A. “Automatic Section Speed Control in Tunnels”. https://www.vegvesen.no/en/ (11.12.2021)
• [34] De Pauw E, Daniels S, Brijs T, Hermans E, Wets G. “Automated section speed control on motorways: an evaluation of the effect on driving speed”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 73(1), 313-322, 2014.
• [35] Stefan C. “Automatic Speed Enforcement on the A13 Motorway (NL): Rosebud WP4-Case B Report”. https://www.kfv.at/ (17.06.2020)
• [36] Collins G. “Traffic flow improvements with average speed enforcement”. Proceedings of Smart Moving Conference 2007, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 29 November 2007.
• [37] Roberts CA, Brown-Esplain J. “Technical Evaluation of Photo Speed Enforcement for Freeways”. Arizona Department of Transportation, Arizona, United States Arizona Report 596, 2005. Speed Check Service. “Temporary Roadworks Speed Enforcement-M1”. http://www.speedcheck.co.uk. (17.07.2023).
• [38] Young KL, Regan MA. “Intelligent Transport Systems to Support Police Enforcement of Road Safety Laws”. ATSB Research and Analysis, Canberra, Australia, Report, 2007-02, 2007.
• [39] Cameron M. “Development of Strategies for Best Practice in Speed Enforcement in Western Australia”. Monash University Accident Research Centre, Canberra, Australia, Supplementary Report, 270, 2008.
• [40] Soole DW, Watson, BC, Fleiter JJ. “Effects of average speed enforcement on speed compliance and crashes: a review of the literature”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 54(1), 46-56, 2013.
• [41] Ilgaz A, Saltan M. “Case study on speed behavior determination via average speed enforcement at the Akdeniz University campus area”. International Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, 9(3), 22-35, 2017.
• [42] Kapsch. “Section Speed Enforcement: for Road Safety”. https://www.kapsch.net/ktc/downloads/ broch ures/Kapsch-KTC-DS-Section_Speed_Enforcement-EN-WEB?lang=en-US. (17.07.2023).
• [43] Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. “Speed Management”. http://www.itfoecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/06speed. (17.07.2023).
• [44] Gains A, Nordstrom M, Heydecker BG, Shrewsbury J. “The National Safety Camera Programme: Four-Year Evaluation Report”. PA Consulting Group, London, United Kingdom, 01137253, 2005.
• [45] Schwab N. “For a better safety and traffic flow optimisation during peak periods: Speed control experimentation on the A7 motorway”. ASECAP Annual Meeting, San Francisco California, United States, 6-10 November 2006.
• [46] Charlesworth K. “The effect of average speed enforcement on driver behaviour”. Road Transport Information and Control - RTIC 2008 and ITS United Kingdom Members' Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom, 20-22 May 2008.
• [47] Speed Check Service. “M1 6a-10 Motorway Widening Scheme” http://www.speedcheck.co.uk (11.12.2020).
• [48] Thornton T. “Reductions in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions with specs average speed enforcement”. Road Transport Information and Control Conference and the ITS United Kingdom Members' Conference (RTIC 2010)-Better Transport Through Technology, London, United Kingdom, 25-27 May 2010.
• [49] Cascetta E, Punzo V. “Impact on vehicle speeds and pollutant emissions of an automated section speed enforcement system on the naples urban motorway”. TRB 2011 Annual Meeting, Washington, USA, 23-27 January 2011.
• [50] Champness PG, Sheehan MC, Folkman LM. “Time and distance halo effects of an overtly deployed mobile speed camera”. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 14-16 November 2005.
• [51] Malenstein J. “Automated video speed enforcement and trajectory control combined with fully automated processing”. The 5th World Congress On Intellıgent Transport Systems, Seoul, Korea, 12-16 October 1998.
• [52] Cameron M, Delaney A, Diamantopoulou K, Lough B. “Scientific Basis for the Strategic Directions of the Safety Camera Program in Victoria”. Monash University Accident Research Centre Reports, Victoria, Australia, 202, 2003.
• [53] Orozova-Bekkevold I, Martinez M, Akkermans L. “Needs and Objectives of the EC Regarding TLE Data in the Light of Data Availability and the Technical Aspects of Data Collection and Exchange”. http://www.vtt.fi/files/sites/pepper/pepper_w12_wp2.pdf. (17.07.2023).
• [54] Kloeden CN, McLean J, Glonek GFV. “Reanalysis of travelling speed and the risk of crash involvement in Adelaide South Australia”. Australian Transport Safety, Bureau, Australia, Road Safety Research Report, CR 207, 2002.
• [55] Highways Agency Atkins Consultants. “A14 Huntingdon to Cambridge Safety Cameras”. LNMS Evaluation Report Highway Agency, London, United Kingdom, Joint Local Impact Report, V.4.1., 2009.
• [56] Collins G. “A14 Route Enforcement Scheme: A Case Study in Effective Average Speed Control”. http://www.speedcheck.co.uk (15.05.2018).
• [57] Collins G, McConnell D. “Speed harmonisation with average speed enforcement”. Traffic Engineering & Contro. 49(1), 6-9, 2008.
• [58] Stoelhorst H. “Reduced speed limits for local air quality and traffic efficiency”. The 7th European Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-6 June 2008.
• [59] Garcia-Castro A, Monzon A. “Using floating car data to analyse the effects of its measures and eco-driving”. Sensors, 14(11), 21358-21374, 2014.
• [60] Grunnan T, Vaa T, Ulleberg P, Malenstein J, Zaidel D, Kauvo K. “Implications of İnnovative Technology for the Key Areas in Traffic Safety: Speed, Drink Driving and Restraint Systems”. https://trimis.ec.europa.eu/project/police-enforcement-policy-and-programmes-european-roads (15.02.2023).
• [61] Montella A, Punzo V, Montanino M. “Analysis of drivers’ compliance to speed limits enforced with an automated section speed enforcement system”. Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, USA, January 22-27 2012.
• [62] Walker E, Murdoch C, Bryant P, Barnes B, Johnson B. “Quantitative study of attitudes, motivations and beliefs related speeding and speed enforcement”. The Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, 28-30 August 2009.
• [63] Ilgaz A, Saltan M. “An evaluation of section control: analyses of speed behavior of drivers at a university campus”. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 7(4), 461-474, 2017.
• [64] Ilgaz A, Saltan M. “Point-to-point speed enforcement: a case study on drivers’ speed behavior in Turkey”. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 8(2), 184-197, 2018.
• [65] Wiggins A. “ANPR technology and applications in its”. The 22nd ARRB Conference, Canberra, Australia, 29 October-10 November 2006.
• [66] Neuman TR, Slack KL, Hardy KK, Bond VL, Potts I, Alberson B, Lerner N. “Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan: A Guide for Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes”. Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, NCHRP Report, 500, 2009.
• [67] Townsend E, Achterberg F. “Enforcement Monitor (No. 4)”. https://etsc.eu/ (28.11.2018).
• [68] Crawford E. “Beyond 2010 - A Holistic Approach to Road Safety in Great Britain”. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=548fb7698633728d6067ac2ecfe479f6da378b70 (12.12.2019).
• [69] Fleiter J, Watson B. “The speed paradox: the misalignment between driver attitudes and speeding behaviour”. Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 14-16 November 2005.
• [70] Hatfield J, Job R.F.S. “Beliefs and Attitudes About Speeding and its Countermeasures”. Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Canberra, Australia, Report B, B2001/0342, 2006.
• [71] Nilsson G. Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety. Bulletin 221. PhD Thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 2004.
• [72] Vadeby A, Forsman A. “Speed distribution and traffic safety measures”. Transport Research Arena (TRA), Paris, France, 14-17 April 2014.
• [73] Stevens P. “Scheme 255: M5 Junctions 29-30, Exeter Speed Management”. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/highways-agency (21.12.2022).
• [74] Aarts L, Van Schagen I. “Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: a review”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 215-224, 2006.
• [75] Elvik R. “Optimal speed limits: limits of optimality models”. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1818(1), 32-38, 2002.
• [76] Wegman F, Goldenbeld C. “Speed Management: Enforcement and New Technologies”. http://www.swov.nl/rapport/R-2006-05.pdf. (17.07.2023)
• [77] Ilgaz A, Saltan M. “Case study of low speed limit regions inspected by average speed enforcement: opinions on speed limit enforcement of commuter drivers in Turkey”. Scientia Iranica, 28(3), 1109-1131, 2021.