THE ROLE OF U.S. LONG-TERM GOVERNMENT BOND YIELDS, BITCOIN AND GOLD PRICES IN EXPLAINING CHANGES IN TURKEY'S CPI

Abstract

Purpose- The main objective of this study is to investigate comparative short- and long-term impacts of U.S. long-term government bond yields, gold, and Bitcoin prices on the shift in Turkey's consumer price index (CPI) between January 2021 and March 2025. No prior studies were found for the comparative impact of the given variables. Digital assets such as Bitcoin became increasingly important for the global economy after the 2020 pandemic period. Many people bought digital assets to protect themselves from rising inflation. The inclusion of the Bitcoin variable and its effect on inflation in Turkey is another important objective of this research. Methodology- A two-regime Markov regime-switching model and cointegration analysis using FMOLS and DOLS techniques were employed to examine these relationships. Findings- The results indicate that U.S. long-term government bond yields significantly and positively influence Turkey's CPI under both regimes. Gold prices have a significant positive influence on changes in the CPI during regime 2 periods, but Bitcoin prices exhibit a significant negative relationship with Turkey’s CPI for the same regime. The FMOLS and DOLS analyses reveal that only U.S. long-term government bond yields have a significant, long-term positive influence on Turkey's CPI. Conclusion- According to this study, both in the short and long term, U.S. long-term government bond yields have a significant and steady positive influence on Turkey's CPI. During regime 2 periods, gold prices have a major positive influence on Turkey's CPI, whereas Bitcoin has a major negative effect on shifts in Turkey’s CPI. According to the findings, Bitcoin might be able to provide short-term inflation protection in Turkey, but only during specific economic regimes. Gold was found to have a positive significant influence on Turkey’s CPI for the short term. Moreover, it was found that gold and Bitcoin are not suitable for long-term safe haven asset classes for Turkey. Overall, the results show that U.S. long-term government bond yields had the most significant influence on Turkey's inflation dynamics over the analysis period. The findings highlight that Turkey’s inflation rate is highly sensitive to major international interest rate movements.

Keywords

• Bitcoin
• gold prices
• U.S. long-term government bond yields
• Turkey’s CPI
• Markov regime switching model

References

1. Abaidoo, R., and Agyapong, E. K. (2022). Commodity prices, inflation, and inflation uncertainty among emerging economies. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 40(3), 622–640.
2. Batten, J. A., Ciner, C., and Lucey, B. M. (2014). On the economic determinants of the gold–inflation relation. Resources Policy, 41, 101–108.
3. Baur, D. G., and McDermott, T. K. (2010). Is gold a safe haven? International evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1886-1898.
4. Conlon, T., Corbet, S., and McGee, R. (2020). Are cryptocurrencies a safe haven for equity markets? An international perspective from the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101248.
5. Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar–A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85-92.
6. Ergul, A., and Karakas, T. (2024). Analysis of the relationship of gold prices with inflation and Bitcoin in the post-tapering period. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(4), 797-805.
7. Khan, B., Rahman, S. U., and Hadi, F. (2024). How inflation responds to interest rate: Time series analysis for Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences Research & Policy, 2(3), 63–69.
8. Kia, A. (2010). Money, deficits, debts and inflation in emerging countries: Evidence from Turkey. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 136-151.

9. Lucey, B. M., Sharma, S. S., and Vigne, S. A. (2017). Gold and inflation (s)–A time-varying relationship. Economic Modelling, 67, 88-101.
10. Sarsici, E. (2025). The inflation-interest rate relationship in the Turkish economy: Evidence of cointegration and Granger causality. Journal of Bucak Business Administration Faculty, 8(1), 27–39.
11. Selmi, R., Mensi, W., Hammoudeh, S., and Bouoiyour, J. (2018). Is Bitcoin a hedge, a safe haven or a diversifier for oil price movements? A comparison with gold. Energy Economics, 74, 787–801.
12. Tkacz, G. (2007). Gold prices and inflation. Bank of Canada Working Paper (No. 2007 35).
13. Tufail, S., and Batool, S. (2013). An analysis of the relationship between inflation and gold prices: evidence from Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 18(2), 1-35.
14. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2025, April 27). FRED economic data. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org
15. Gold Market. (2025, April 27). Gold prices archive. Retrieved from https://www.altinpiyasa.com/arsiv
16. Investing.com (2025, April 27). Bitcoin data. Retrieved from https://www.investing.com/crypto/bitcoin/historical-data