IMPORTANCE OF REASONABLENESS TESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ITS APPLICATIONS

Abstract

Objective- Analytical procedures have higher potential compared to test of details in terms of analysing the account relationships, detecting significant risk of misstatement, reducing audit fieldwork and testing management assertions. In order to get benefit of those procedures, auditors should access more entity specific resources and invest more time in planning the audit program. In this study, reasonableness tests that are generally used in substantive analytical procedures are analysed through industry examples and their role in reducing the audit risk is demonstrated.

Methodology- In this study, case study method is used as a research methodology. The reason of selecting this methodology is due to its relevance in accordance with the objective of the study as well as providing an opportunity to auditors that would like to implement reasonableness tests.  

Findings- This study reveals, through examples that can be used in practice, that the management claims can be tested more soundly through rationality tests when more time is given to the stages of understanding the enterprise and planning the audit.

Conclusion- Among the analytical review techniques, reasonableness test is highly effective technique for testing the relationship between non-financial information and financial information. In order to use the reasonableness tests more frequently in the evidence collection, understanding the enterprise, more senior and industry specific team construction and accessing the non-financial information by inquiring also the performance indicators used by the enterprise are important. Agreements for longer than a year between the auditor and the company will reinforce the auditor's accumulated knowledge on the enterprise that will increase number of reasonableness tests.

 

Keywords

• Reasonableness Test,analytical procedures,independent audit,analytical review,risk of misstatement

References

1. McKee T., Modern Analytical Auditing: Practical Guidance for Auditors and Accountants, Quorum Boks, New York, 1989, SS. 5
2. KGK, http://www.kgk.sakarya.edu.tr/FileUploads/Src/de3a13f5-3322-4362-a3b7- 88cfe3e2e3e0/B%C3%B6l%C3%BCm%203_2%20ekitap%20-%204.6.%20Analitik%20Prosed%C3%BCrler.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 24.05.2017
3. Kaval H., 2005, Muhasebe Denetimi, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara, ss. 146
4. Choo T.M., Chua M.K., Ong C.B., Tan T.H., ,1997, “Analytical Procedures for New and Matured Industries”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 12/3, 123-134.
5. Arens A.A., Elder R.J., Beasley M.S., 2012, Auditing and Assurance Services an Integrated Approach, Fourteenth Edition, Pearson,ss. 224.
6. AICPA, Statements on Auditing Standarts No:56 Analytical Procedures, New York, 1989.
7. IFAC, International Standarts on Auditing 520: Analytical Procedures, Handbook of International Auditing, Assurence and Ethics Pronouncements, New York, 2007.
8. Blocher E., Patterson G.F., “The Use of Analytical Procedures”, Journal of Accountancy, February (1996), 53-55.

9. Fraser I.A.M., Hatherly D.J., Lin K.Z., “An Empirical Investigation of The Use of Analytical Review By External Auditors”, British Accounting Review, 29, (1997), 35-47.
10. Ameen E.C., Strawser J.R., “Investigating The Use of Analytical Procedures: An Update and Extension”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.13, No.2, (1994), 69-76.
11. Dönmez A., Ersoy A., “Bağımsız Denetim Sürecinde Analitik İnceleme Prosedürleri: Türkiye’de SPK’dan Yetki Almış Denetim Firmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Bilig, 56, (2011), 131-132