Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054

Abstract

References

  • Buder F., Feldmann C., Hamm, U. (2012). Why Regular Buyers of Organic Food Still Buy Many Conventional Products: Product-specific Purchase Barriers for Organic Food Consumers. British Food Journal, 116(3): 390-404. (ISSN:0007-070X).
  • Eti İçli G., Anıl N.K., Kılıç B. (2016). Tüketicilerin Organik Gıda Satın Alma Tercihlerini Etkileyen Faktörler. Review of Kırklareli University, 5(2): 93-108. (ISSN:2146-3417).
  • Hughner R.S., Mcdonagh P., Prothero A., Shultz II C. S., Stanton J. (2007). Who are Organic Food Consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 6: 1-17 (Published online in Wiley InterScience. DOI:10.1002/cb.210)
  • Demiryürek K., Stopes C., Güzel A. (2008). Organic Agriculture: The Case of Turkey. Agriculture. 37(4): 261-267. (Published online in Sage Journals https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008787167754)
  • Tregear A., Dent J.B., McGregor M.J. (1994). The Demand for Organically Grown Produce. British Food Journal. 96(4): 21-25. (ISSN:0007-070X).
  • Magnusson M.K., Arvola A., Hursti U.K. K., Åberg L., Sjödén P.O. (2003) Choice of Organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behavior. Appetite. 40: 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3
  • Torjusen H., Lieblein G., Wandel M., Francis C. A.. (2001) Food System Orientation and Quality Perception Among Consumers and Producers of Organic Food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Quality and Preference. 12: 207-2016. PII: S0950-3293(00)00047-1
  • Schifferstein H. N.J., Oude Ophuis P.A.M. (1998). Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Quality and Preference. 9(3): 119-133. PII: S0950-3293(97) 00044-X
  • Roddy G., Cowan C.A., Hutchinson G. (1996) Consumer Attitudes and Behaviour to organic Foods in Ireland. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 9(2): 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v09n02_03
  • Squires L., Juric B., Cornwell T. B. (2001). Level of market development and intensity of organic food consumption: cross-cultural study of Danish and New Zealand consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 18(5): 392-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110398754
  • Wilkins J.L., Hillers V.N. (1994). Influences of pesticide residue and environmental concerns on organic food preference among food cooperative members and non-members in Washington State. Journal of Nutrition Education. 26(1): 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80831-4
  • Zanoli R., Naspetti S. (2002). Consumer Motivations in the Purchase of Organic Food: A means-end approach. British Food Journal. 104 (8): 643-653. DOI 10.1108/00070700210125930
  • Albersmeier F., Schulze H., Spiller A. (2009). Evaluation and reliability of the organic certification system: perceptions by farmers in Latin America. Sustainable Development. 17(5): 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.4126
  • Michaelidou N., Hassan L.M. (2007). The Role of Health Consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 32(2): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x
  • Fotopoulos C., Krystallis A. (2002). Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: a countrywide survey. British Food Journal. 104(9): 730-765. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210443110
  • Chryssochoidis G. et al. (2012). Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: a consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Appetite. 59(3). 806-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.014
  • Thompson G.D., Kidwell J. (1998). Explaining the Choice of Organic Produce: Cosmetic Defects, Prices and Consumer Preferences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(2): 277-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244500.
  • Paul J., Rana J. (2012). Consumer Behavior and Purchase Intention for Organic Food. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 29(6): 412-422. DOI 10.1108/07363761211259223.
  • Canavari M., Bazzani G.M., Spadoni R., Regazzi D. (2002). Food safety and organic fruit demand in Italy: A survey. British Food Journal. 104(3/4/5): 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425688
  • Hill H., Lynchehaun F. (2002). Organic Milk: Attitudes and consumption patterns. British Food Journal. 104(7): 526-542. DOI: 10.1108/00070700210434570.

TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of this
research is to perceive and determine the reasons for buying and deterrents for
not buying organic products; and to see if modifications in deterrents can
increase purchase of organic products making it a value added for the economy.

Methodology- As the main aim of the
research is to determine Turkish consumers’ perception on organic food and figure
out whether the modifications on the deterrents can convince the consumers to
buy and/or buy more often organic products. As organic food agriculture can be
a powerful element of the economy, the feedbacks of non-organic product users
were deemed to be a good indicator on the path leading to increased demand and
increased production of organic products. A survey composed of 41 questions is
sent and this study summarizes the outputs of 556 responses.

Findings- The outputs highlight the distrust in certification process as the
main deterrent for not buying organic food. The pricing unreliability is also
another crucial factor that prevents consumers to consume more.







Conclusion- The outputs conclude as a proper modification to
be performed on organic product availability, price and reliability on
certification can increase organic product purchase and make it an economic
resource.

References

  • Buder F., Feldmann C., Hamm, U. (2012). Why Regular Buyers of Organic Food Still Buy Many Conventional Products: Product-specific Purchase Barriers for Organic Food Consumers. British Food Journal, 116(3): 390-404. (ISSN:0007-070X).
  • Eti İçli G., Anıl N.K., Kılıç B. (2016). Tüketicilerin Organik Gıda Satın Alma Tercihlerini Etkileyen Faktörler. Review of Kırklareli University, 5(2): 93-108. (ISSN:2146-3417).
  • Hughner R.S., Mcdonagh P., Prothero A., Shultz II C. S., Stanton J. (2007). Who are Organic Food Consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 6: 1-17 (Published online in Wiley InterScience. DOI:10.1002/cb.210)
  • Demiryürek K., Stopes C., Güzel A. (2008). Organic Agriculture: The Case of Turkey. Agriculture. 37(4): 261-267. (Published online in Sage Journals https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008787167754)
  • Tregear A., Dent J.B., McGregor M.J. (1994). The Demand for Organically Grown Produce. British Food Journal. 96(4): 21-25. (ISSN:0007-070X).
  • Magnusson M.K., Arvola A., Hursti U.K. K., Åberg L., Sjödén P.O. (2003) Choice of Organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behavior. Appetite. 40: 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3
  • Torjusen H., Lieblein G., Wandel M., Francis C. A.. (2001) Food System Orientation and Quality Perception Among Consumers and Producers of Organic Food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Quality and Preference. 12: 207-2016. PII: S0950-3293(00)00047-1
  • Schifferstein H. N.J., Oude Ophuis P.A.M. (1998). Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Quality and Preference. 9(3): 119-133. PII: S0950-3293(97) 00044-X
  • Roddy G., Cowan C.A., Hutchinson G. (1996) Consumer Attitudes and Behaviour to organic Foods in Ireland. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 9(2): 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v09n02_03
  • Squires L., Juric B., Cornwell T. B. (2001). Level of market development and intensity of organic food consumption: cross-cultural study of Danish and New Zealand consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 18(5): 392-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110398754
  • Wilkins J.L., Hillers V.N. (1994). Influences of pesticide residue and environmental concerns on organic food preference among food cooperative members and non-members in Washington State. Journal of Nutrition Education. 26(1): 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80831-4
  • Zanoli R., Naspetti S. (2002). Consumer Motivations in the Purchase of Organic Food: A means-end approach. British Food Journal. 104 (8): 643-653. DOI 10.1108/00070700210125930
  • Albersmeier F., Schulze H., Spiller A. (2009). Evaluation and reliability of the organic certification system: perceptions by farmers in Latin America. Sustainable Development. 17(5): 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.4126
  • Michaelidou N., Hassan L.M. (2007). The Role of Health Consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 32(2): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x
  • Fotopoulos C., Krystallis A. (2002). Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: a countrywide survey. British Food Journal. 104(9): 730-765. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210443110
  • Chryssochoidis G. et al. (2012). Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: a consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Appetite. 59(3). 806-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.014
  • Thompson G.D., Kidwell J. (1998). Explaining the Choice of Organic Produce: Cosmetic Defects, Prices and Consumer Preferences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(2): 277-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244500.
  • Paul J., Rana J. (2012). Consumer Behavior and Purchase Intention for Organic Food. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 29(6): 412-422. DOI 10.1108/07363761211259223.
  • Canavari M., Bazzani G.M., Spadoni R., Regazzi D. (2002). Food safety and organic fruit demand in Italy: A survey. British Food Journal. 104(3/4/5): 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425688
  • Hill H., Lynchehaun F. (2002). Organic Milk: Attitudes and consumption patterns. British Food Journal. 104(7): 526-542. DOI: 10.1108/00070700210434570.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Anda E. Yarman Ak This is me 0000-0002-1619-6066

Dilek Teker 0000-0002-3893-4015

Publication Date July 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yarman Ak, A. E., & Teker, D. (2019). TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE. PressAcademia Procedia, 9(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054
AMA Yarman Ak AE, Teker D. TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE. PAP. July 2019;9(1):1-5. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054
Chicago Yarman Ak, Anda E., and Dilek Teker. “TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE”. PressAcademia Procedia 9, no. 1 (July 2019): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054.
EndNote Yarman Ak AE, Teker D (July 1, 2019) TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE. PressAcademia Procedia 9 1 1–5.
IEEE A. E. Yarman Ak and D. Teker, “TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE”, PAP, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054.
ISNAD Yarman Ak, Anda E. - Teker, Dilek. “TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE”. PressAcademia Procedia 9/1 (July 2019), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054.
JAMA Yarman Ak AE, Teker D. TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE. PAP. 2019;9:1–5.
MLA Yarman Ak, Anda E. and Dilek Teker. “TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1-5, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1054.
Vancouver Yarman Ak AE, Teker D. TURKISH CONSUMERS’ PERCEPTION ON ORGANIC FOOD: AN ANALYSIS FOR TURKISH CASE. PAP. 2019;9(1):1-5.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.